Bulletin N° 1001
“Betrayal at Attica”
https://ww1.best-putlocker.pw/free-movie/betrayal-at-attica/qDXITJKf/vRnSDt9A-watch.html
The 2021 documentary film on "America's Paris Commune," by Elizabeth Fink, Esq. (1:23:50)
The Timeline of Events http://www.archives.nysed.gov/research/topic-attica-timeline
Subject: Reform and/or Revolution?
Grenoble, September 18, 2021
Dear Colleagues and Friends of
CEIMSA,
The horrors depicted in this documentary and the commentaries provided by Democracy Now! producer Amy Goodman on the recent 5Oth anniversary of this event are a reminder of the leitmotif of capitalist society (i.e. class struggle). The lives of both prisoners and prison guards were judged expendable by the ambitious billionaire Republican governor fifty years ago, in 1971. Marx’s famous book, Civil War in France (1871), stands as an analysis that reverberates still a century later when submerged class conflicts rose to the surface yet again, for all to see.
Barrington Moore, Jr.’s classic social history of the German working class, in Part Two of his book, Injustice, the Social Origins of Obedience and Revolt (1978), includes a chapter (number six) on “Social and cultural thends before 1914,” which begins, as we mentioned in our previous Bulletin, with the following observation :
After a relatively brief immersion in the
autobiographies and prewar sociological investigations of German working-class
life, an investigator will notice the existence of an intellectual elite among the working class with a somewhat patronizing stance
toward what it regards as the mass of the workers. In modern times this is
often the case with subordinate and oppressed groups, whose leaders are often
unsure whether the masses will be up to carrying the burden that historical
destiny has supposedly laid upon their shoulders. In Germany at this time [prior
to the First World War] the distinction was mainly between an articulate upper
stratum of workers and a much larger stratum of inarticulate or possibly deliberately
silent ones. Most though not all of the information that is available about the
inarticulate comes from the articulate. To learn what we can about the
mentality of the inarticulate it is necessary to have as clear a conception as
possible of the biases and predilections of the articulate. Otherwise the investigator
runs the risk, well known to anthropological and sociological field workers, of
swallowing the half-baked interpretations of professional ‘good’ informants . .
. . Nevertheless this group’s relations
with and attitudes toward the rest of the workers tell us a great deal
indirectly about the character of the industrial working class as a whole.
August Springer provides a good
introduction to this elite in his of his first contact with the socialists,
which took place when he was a young man working in a shoe factory in a small
Bavarian town. There he met a man with bitter features, deep-set eyes, who
seldom spoke, but then did so in a powerful manner. When other workers appeared
childish and their chatter without sense or reason, the socialist refused to
join in with them. To young Springer he appeared very manly, with sharp clear
judgment, obviously a model for future behavior, even though Springer never
became a socialist. Other workers feared the socialist because he would expose
their silliness with a sharp word or a pinted question, poking holes in the bubbles of their slogans or phrases.
At a later point Springer describes how intellectually alert workers always sought out each other’s company.
Sometimes they would find one another at a big meeting, at other times in a
doctor’s waiting room. Then other workers would look on either in wonder or with
ironical smiles as these members of the workers’ elite discussed Gerhard Haputmann, Emile Zola, Hein, Schiller, and many others.
Though it is safe to infer that ordinary workers frequently felt uncomfortable
and resentful in the presence of his elite, Springer points out that at least
the convinced Social Democrats in this elite tried to be very patient with
their more backward comrades. In its popular version Marxism provided both an explanation
of this backwardness and a manner for coping with it. As described by the sympathetic
but nonbelieving Springer, Marxism underpinned a
complete faith in the automatic creation of more and more recruits to their
party through the working of impersonal economic processes. Mechanization would
show the skilled worker that he was no longer irreplaceable. Crises would become
more sever and reveal ever more clearly the way capitalism destroyed human
beings. As soon as the worker grasped these processes in the very marrow of his
bones, he would struggle in order to preserve his own humanity one must be
patient with fellow workers who go after small advantages, who try to escape
where no escape was possible, where in fact there was no hole to crawl though
to get out of the position of wage worker.
With a hint of envy of the Social
Democrats, Springer confesses that at times he found it terribly hard to love
his fellow workers. His own picture of the world bore a strong imprint of Protestantism,
and he wondered if the failure to love came from some radical evil in his own
nature. Yet he was able to perceive quite clearly some of the historical and
social reasons for the stolidity and intellectual laziness of the mass of
German workers in the provincial towns where he himself worked: peasant and
petty-bourgeois backgrounds of a large portion of them, as well as the
conditions of factory life with its long hours and low wages. These left little
time or energy for concern with anything more than just getting by somehow.
If some of the convinced socialists were
able to be patient with their more backward fellow workers that was scarcely
the case with all members of the workers’ intellectual elite. Evidence on this
point comes from a quaint but precious source of information on working-class
attitudes, a mine of sociological data that has been the object of minimal
exploration so far: Aldolf Levenstein, Die Arbeiterfrage, published in 1912, Levenstein had been a foreman (Werkmeister)
and over many years maintained close connections with a number of Social
Democratic workmen. Apparently he conceived quite on his own the idea of making
what would now be known as an attitude survey using open-ended questions. He
asked workers whom he had known to distribute the questionnaires. Die Arbeiterfrage contains the results of 5,040
questionnaires from miners, textile workers, and metalworkers. The bulk of the
book consists of verbatim extracts and occasional passages of high-flown prose.
Here we have a sounding into German working-class mentalities that almost
permits us to hear some German workers speaking in their own words. It is the
articulate who dominate the talk; though there are occasional revealing and
tantalizing remarks from the others.
Levenstein divided his respondents into four types, of which only one deed concern us at
the moment. Unlike the other three types who wrote lengthy replies to many of
the questions, and sometimes long letters besides, those in the Massenschicht or mass type answered most questions
with a simple yes or no, or with an occasional derisive answer (such as the
reply to the question: “What would you get yourself if you had more money?” –“Four women”). At the end of his characterization of the
mass type Levenstien burst out in frustration to say
that these might better be called the type with dead souls, people who take an
apathetic stance toward all expressions of human life, who might as well be put
in a cage and fed. That is elitism with a vengeance, and none of his
working-class respondents go quite that far, though they approach it. Well over
three thousand of his respondents, 64 percent or nearly two-thirds of his
sample, he placed in this Massenschicht category.
By itself all that this proves is that a
large number of workers did not want to fill out a questionnaire, even when asked
by a fellow worker (who obviously had gotten ahead of them). Normal
working-class suspicion of inappropriate nosiness could account for the result.
But there are good reasons to think that there is more to the situation than
mere suspicion. Anyone who has had even minimal contact with uneducated persons
knows that many of them do have considerable difficulty putting their feelings
in words (though a minority may display a striking natural eloquence). Any
social scientist worth his salt knows at least some of the reasons: lack of opportunity
or even more a set of life conditions that is basically stultifying. Alfred
Weber, one of those in charge of the Verein für Sozialpolitik’s inquiries into working-class life, asserted in 1912 that the man tied to the
machine was the one who had lost the power to complain – in the presence of strangers
or on paper’, we must remember – is hardly a person who has lost the power to
feel, even though there is likely to be a considerable degree of resignation, a
certain damping down of feelings that would otherwise be too painful. This is
exactly what the pattern of responses in the Levenstein report suggests. Members of this mass type do answer simple questions about the
forms of pay (piecework versus hourly wages) fairly often; they are almost
silent when he tries to tap working-class hopes and aspirations. Hence we come
to the question of whether it is possible to use the information about the
feelings of articulate workers as evidence about those of the inarticulate. If
one makes allowance for lowered aspirations and probably a considerably lesser
degree of self-confidence and self-esteem, I believe that one can insofar as
their situations are generally similar. Since the inarticulate do have feelings,
it is a reasonable inference that the articulate ones in many cases express the
latent and perhaps not so latent sentiments of the rest. In the course of this
chapter I shall draw on such evidence for that purpose. But fitsy it will be wise to glance briefly at the elite’s own attitudes.
At least some members of this elite were what an outsider would call snobbish to the
point of outright contemptuousness.
. . .
Paul Göhre,
the Protestant pastor who worked on the shop floor of a Chemnitz machine tool factory
and has left us one of the first field studies of working-class life reports the
same situation. His account is more sympathetic to the mass of the workers and
shows some of the causes for their behavior. He described them as persons with
no political or social convictions of their own, who made on effort to earn the
right to such convictions, but still considered themselves to be Social Democrats.
Such persons seldom looked at a Social Democratic newspaper and rarely went to
an SPD meeting. But they swore by the program. Within this group he noticed two
general types. One, which he thought most deserving of pity, was too oppressed
and too full of care to concern themselves with SPD politics. The others were
too incapable, thoughtless, or lazy; here young persons between the ages of sixteen and twenty were the commonest. The reasons he saw
were the youngsters’ love of pleasure and the easy possibility for satisfying their
inclinations. They spent their time in dance halls or out walking with their
girls. Political concern was more likely to arise after marriage and the necessity
to face life in a serious fashion. From this evidence it is apparent that many
ordinary workers were in a situation where self-restraint was not much of a paying
proposition. Furthermore, circumstances
imposed enough frustrations for such people to be unwilling to add more on their
own. There were signs of this among the apprentices before 1848. There, as in other
times and places, the common reaction was to get what one could out of life in
short-run pleasures. Very likely the somewhat priggish hostility of the worker
elite to the masses ‘dallying back and forth between work and pleasure’ comes
from their own efforts to control exactly these impulses.
Such angry frustration is
not, however, the only reaction. One miner, regarded by Levenstein as unusually intelligent remarked that the party and trade-union movement had
taught him how to understand his situation, and thorough this understanding had
injected him with an honest hate of God’s world and the property-owning class. ‘And
the man who can hate honestly can also hope. Otherwise I would have talked my
way free of both movements out of contempt for my class comrades.’ Finally,
here and there one comes across a sensitive personality, perhaps with
frustrated artistic inclinations, who finds the gross and rough manners of his
fellow workers offensive and wounding.
Besides this distinction
between elite and mass there were many lines of cleavage among industrial workers.
Religious differences were quite marked in some areas, especially in the
Rhineland but also in parts of Bavaria. Often there was a line between workers
born in the town or city and migrants into the city, the latter usually crowding
into the less desirable tasks. Occupational differences we have already
discussed at some length. Even a very modern factory in prewar Germany was
likely to have a work force with numerous gradations of rank and status, each
symbolized by a special consume. Yet despite these distinctions there was a
series of calamities and misfortunes to which all wage earners were liable.
This common liability to misfortune becomes quite apparent on reading biographical
accounts. To be sure, not all workers were equally exposed. Perhaps a majority
never suffered the worst calamities. Nevertheless, the nature of these
calamities does more to distinguish industrial wage earners as a group than any
other single factor. To the extent that there is a justification for speaking of
an industrial working class distinct for other classes, this is the reason.
In comparison with the
situation around 1848, in the rapidly changing pre-1914 years there had been a
marked increase in ‘specialization of misery,’ roughly corresponding to the
increasing division of labor. Among the new industrial workers there are few
echoes of the complaints about the squeeze on the small producers that were still
a major theme in the journeymen’s laments of 1848. By 1914 the belief that it
was possible to do something about poverty and misfortune had seeped down much
more widely. The notion of doing something about it through cooperation across
class lines had by no means vanished. The patriotic and religious unions, as
well as much of the actual practice of the SPD and SPD-affiliated unions,
provide much evidence on that score. But there was a new intransigence against property-owners
and employers. The workers were going to have to do things for themselves and
to the rest of society. If there was an increased specialization in the causes
and remedies for misery, corresponding to an increased division of labor, the
human manifestations still did not seem very different. Fears for the loss of
earning power and its chain of consequences in hunger and the erosion of self-respect
were not, so far as I can see, very different in 1913 from what they had been
three and four generations earlier.
From the workers’ own point
of view there appear to have been two main forms of misery: calamities and more
or less ‘normal’ suffering. The main form of calamity was the loss by the
breadwinner of the capacity to earn a living. As the situation appeared to the
worker, the calamity was liable to occur for three reasons: accident; illness,
or more gradually from severe alcoholism. When any of these things happened,
other members of the household had to pitch in and supplement its earnings in
any way they could. Sickness and accidents appear in the main as events that
just happen. There is usually very little in the way of explanation. The events
are merely reported, along with the immediate causes.(pp.191-198)
.
. .
Losing
one’s job might be a severe blow, but did not turn into a disaster unless it turned
out to be impossible to get another job for a long period of time. Some of the saddest
and most moving parts of the workers’ biographies are accounts of the search for
work that met with perpetual failure. On this score there was evidently an important
difference between the unskilled and skilled or semiskilled workers. An unskilled
worker, especially in construction, one of the biggest areas of employment,
expected that any given job would probably be temporary. What mattered most about
this kind of work was how much it paid. That would determine whether one had a margin
to buy some cheap clothes and manage somehow while moving on to a new job. Skilled
and semiskilled workers, on the other hand, were tied to a particular kind of
work. They moved around from one factory to another, doing very much the same
kind of work in each factory. A contraction in their particular line of industry
might therefore be disastrous.(p.199)
. . .
Among ‘normal’ miseries, fear of what would happen in old age appears
as the overriding one. Workers in the large factories that formed the heart of
the capitalist system reached the peak of their earning power at about forty
years of age. After that, their earnings were liable to drop precipitously. By forty
they were too old to stand the pace, which required not so much brute strength
as the ability to pay attention under monotonous yet endlessly demanding conditions.
As Alfred Weber pointed out, the career line of the factory worker contrasted sharply
with that in other occupations. A factory owner or manager generally was just
beginning to reach the climax of his career at forty. At that age a bureaucrat was
entering the highest posts he would reach. Even an artisan could look forward
to many more years of productive work and social esteem. For the factory
worker, on the other hand, just at the point when his needs were likely to
reach their maximum and he faced some twenty more years of hard work, he was used
up and ready before long to be thrown on the scrap heap. From the day he stared
on the job the worker was aware of this, though many must have repressed it in
a happy-go-lucky fashion. ‘Getting ahead’ for the worker amounted to a brief
devouring intoxication of youth. At life’s high noon there came short rations,
to end perhaps in collapse.
Thought the contrasts were
sharpest for the moderately skilled factory workers, they were present for all,
and certainly no less intense in occupations with serious health hazards, such
as mining. Alfred Weber saw the workers’ career line as the main reason for a
deep pessimism and alienation from the existing social order. This pessimism
was certainly there and colors nearly all the workers statements in Levenstein’s interview materials. It was, however, a pessimism about their own personal fate that was partly offset
by a mixture of hopes about a better world in the future. These hopes could be
for a new social order or for their children’s advancement within the prevailing
system.
If there were deep fears about
the future, there were plenty of anxieties about the present. Biographical
accounts are full of reports of periods of hunger, inadequate shelter in the
form of whole families crowded into one room, sometimes without heat and other
penuries. There can be no doubt that these were painful and common experiences,
especially in the big cities. While these experiences were very hard to bear,
by themselves they do not appear as a source of resentment or moral outrage.
Until and unless some form of spiritual awakening occurred, such as through exposure
to socialist propaganda, these experiences evidently appeared to those who suffered
them as part of the natural order of things. Like bad weather they were to be
endured. If anything was to be done about them;, the
solution was to try for a better job. Especially the younger members of the family
were expected to make superhuman efforts to relieve the plight of the household
if they were at or near an age when they could earn something. Still even if
these experiences do not appear as a specific source of resentment, it seems
likely that they contributed to a general undercurrent of dissatisfaction with
the workers’ place in the social order, a theme to which we shall recur in
other contexts.(pp.200-201)
Let us hope that this can be
prevented and a new egalitarian social order - more just and more democratic - can be achieved.
Sincerely,
Francis McCollum Feeley
--
Professeur honoraire de l'Université Grenoble-Alpes
a.
9/11 Lies and the National Security State
https://theanalysis.news/9-11-lies-and-the-national-security-state-thomas-drake-pt-6-6/
with Paul Jay and Thomas Drake
(1:17:18)
+
Endless militarization has bled US society dry
https://therealnews.com/endless-militarization-has-bled-us-society-dry
by Marc Steiner
+
Afghanistan collapse reveals Beltway media’s loyalty to permanent war
state
https://thegrayzone.com/2021/08/30/afghanistan-beltway-medias-permanent-war-state/
by Gareth Porter
+
The Seekers of World Domination: ‘The Neocons’
https://www.globalresearch.ca/seekers-world-domination/5755566
by Karsten Riise
+
The Vocabulary of Neoliberal Diplomacy in Today’s New Cold War https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/09/13/the-vocabulary-of-neoliberal-diplomacy-in-todays-new-cold-war/
by Michael Hudson
+
COVID-19 is a Bioweapon?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JaWiTYVnYB1W/
(1:07:50)
Interview with Dr. Richard M. Fleming
(Sept. 12th, 2021)
https://www.flemingmethod.com/
"Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?" (A Special Interview with Dr. Richard M. Flemming) by Dr. Joseph Mercola
===========
b.
Day of the Planes: A 9/11 excerpt from ‘The Management of Savagery’
https://thegrayzone.com/2021/09/11/day-planes-9-11-management-savagery/
by Max Blumenthal
+
Video: 9/11 and the Global War on Terrorism
with Michel Chossudovsky
(18:15)
+
Global war on terror comes home
https://electronicintifada.net/content/global-war-terror-comes-home/33901
by Michael E. Deutsch
+
Post-9/11 militarization has cost $21 trillion
—here's where that money could have gone
with Jaisal Noor
(3:17)
+
The Doomsday Machine Still Exists
with Paul Jay
and Daniel Ellsberg
(5:15)
===========
c.
The Vaccine Offers No Protection
against the Virus:
COVID Will Prevail as Long as the Known Cures Are Against
Protocol
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-prevail-long-known-cures-are-against-protocol/5753356
by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
+
Digital Tyranny and the Rockefeller-Gates WHO "Vaxx-Certificate
Passport": Towards a World War III Scenario
https://www.globalresearch.ca/worldwide-resistance-against-vaccine-covid-fraud/5755538
by Peter Koenig
+
The COVID Lies Are Crumbling Yet Forced Lockdowns & Vaccines
Are Still Being Openly
Pushed
with Ryan Cristián
(audio, 2:53:41)
+
The
Cause of COVID Deaths No One Wants to Talk About
by Alliance for Natural
Health
Governments focused on the virus itself, fighting it with
drugs and vaccines or avoiding it with quarantines and isolation, but ignored
the toxic exposures that degrade immune systems, greatly increasing the risk of
serious complications and death from COVID.
+
+ mRNA Expert Speaks Out on the COVID Crisis Summary of 1h10min video interview with Aga Wilson and Dr. Robert Malone:
It’s since been revealed that the spike protein on its own is enough to cause inflammation and damage to the vascular system, even independent of a virus.7
Data Do Not Support Vaccination of Children
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) recently posted more than 50 video presentations from the pay-for-view Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination held online October 16 to 18, 2020, and made them available to everyone for free.
- Sources and References:
===========
d.
“Shockingly, CDC Now Lists Vaccinated Deaths as
Unvaccinated”
analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
(September 15, 2021)
Story at-a-glance
·
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a full 14 days have passed since
your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna,
or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen, despite the fact that over 80% of
deaths after the vaccines occur in this window. How convenient
·
Anyone who dies within the first 14 days post-injection is counted as
an unvaccinated death. Not only does this inaccurately inflate the unvaccinated
death toll, but it also hides the real dangers of the COVID shots, as the vast
majority of deaths from these shots occur within the first two weeks
·
The CDC also has two different sets of testing guidelines — one for
vaccinated patients and another for the unvaccinated. If you’re unvaccinated,
CDC guidance says to use a cycle threshold (CT) of 40, known to result in false
positives. If you’re vaccinated, they recommend using a CT of 28 or less, which
minimizes the risk of false positives
·
The CDC also hides vaccine failures and props up the “pandemic of the
unvaccinated” narrative by only counting breakthrough cases that result in
hospitalization or death
·
Hospitals are still also reporting non-COVID related illnesses as
COVID-19
While public health officials and
mainstream media claim the COVID-19 pandemic is now “a pandemic of the
unvaccinated,”1 we now know this claim is based on highly misleading
statistics.
In a July 16, 2021, White House
press briefing,2 U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claimed that “over 97% of people who are entering the hospital right now are
unvaccinated.” A few weeks later, in an August 5, 2021, statement, she
inadvertently revealed how that statistic actually came about.3
As it turns out, the CDC was looking
at hospitalization and mortality data from January through June 2021 — a
timeframe during which the vast majority of the U.S. population were still
unvaccinated.4
But that’s not the case at all now.
The CDC is also playing with statistics in other ways to create the false and
inaccurate impression that unvaccinated people make up the bulk of infections,
hospitalizations and deaths. For example, we now find out the agency is
counting anyone who died within the first 14 days post-injection as
unvaccinated.
Not only does this inaccurately
inflate the unvaccinated death toll, but it also hides the real dangers of the
COVID shots, as the vast majority of deaths from these shots occur within the
first two weeks.5 Now their deaths are
counted as unvaccinated deaths rather than being counted as deaths due to
vaccine injury or COVID-19 breakthrough infections!
How CDC Counts Breakthrough Cases
According to the CDC,6 you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a
full 14 days have passed since your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna, or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen. This
is how the CDC defines a vaccine breakthrough case:
“… a vaccine breakthrough infection is defined as the detection
of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen in a respiratory specimen collected from a person
≥14 days after they have completed all recommended doses of a U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized COVID-19 vaccine.”
In other words, if you’ve received
one dose of Pfizer or Moderna and develop symptomatic
COVID-19, get admitted to the hospital and/or die from COVID, you’re counted as
an unvaccinated case. If you’ve received two doses and get ill within 14 days,
you’re still counted as an unvaccinated case.
The problem with this is that over
80% of hospitalizations and deaths appear to be occurring among those who have
received the jabs, but this reality is hidden by the way cases are defined and
counted. A really clever and common strategy of the CDC during the pandemic has
been to change the definitions and goalposts so it supports their nefarious
narrative.
For example, the CDC has quietly
changed the definition of “vaccine,” apparently in an attempt to validate
calling the COVID mRNA gene therapies vaccines. In an August 26, 2021, archived
version7 of vaccine, the CDC defines it as a “product that
stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease,
protecting the person from that disease.”
But a few days later, a new
definition appeared on the CDC’s website,8 which now says a vaccine is a “preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s
immune response against diseases.” The differences in the definitions are
subtle but distinct: The first one defined a vaccine as something that will
“produce immunity.”
But, since the COVID-19 vaccines are
not designed to stop infection but, rather, to only lessen the degree of
infection, it becomes obvious that the new definition was created to cover the
COVID vaccines.
Different Testing Guidelines for Vaxxed and Unvaxxed
It’s not just the CDC’s definition
of a breakthrough case that skews the data. Even more egregious and illogical
is the fact that the CDC even has two different sets of testing guidelines —
one for vaccinated patients and another for the unvaccinated.
Since the beginning of the pandemic,
the CDC has recommended a PCR test cycle threshold (CT) of 40.9 This
flies in the face of scientific consensus, which has long been that a CT over
35 will produce 97% false positives,10 essentially rendering the test useless.11,12,13
In mid-May 2021, the CDC finally
lowered its recommended CT count, but only for patients who have received one
or more COVID shots.14 So, if you have
received a COVID injection, the CDC’s guidelines call for your PCR test to be
run at a CT of 28 or less. If you are unvaccinated, your PCR test is to be run
at a CT of 40, which grossly overestimates the true prevalence of infection.
The end result is that unvaccinated
individuals who get tested are FAR more prone to get false positives, while
those who have received the jab are more likely to get an accurate diagnosis of
infection.
Only Hospitalization and Death Count
if You’re COVID Jabbed
Even that’s not all. The CDC also
hides vaccine failures and props up the “pandemic of the unvaccinated”
narrative by only counting breakthrough cases that result in hospitalization or
death.
In other words, if you got your
second COVID shot more than 14 days ago and you develop symptoms, you do not
count as a breakthrough case unless you’re admitted to the hospital and/or die
from COVID-19 in the hospital, even if you test positive. So, to summarize,
COVID breakthrough cases count only if all of the following apply:
The patient received the second dose
of the Pfizer or Moderna shot at least 14 days ago (or
one dose in case of Johnson & Johnson’s single-dose injection)
The patient tests positive for
SARS-CoV-2 using a CT of 28 or less, which avoids false positives
The patient is admitted to the
hospital for COVID-19 and/or dies in the hospital
Vaccinated Probably Make Up Bulk of
Hospitalizations
If vaccinated and unvaccinated were
not treated with such varying standards, we’d probably find that the vaccinated
now make up the bulk of hospitalizations, making the COVID pandemic one of the
vaccinated. An August 30, 2021, exposé by The Epoch Times reveals what’s really
happening on the front lines:15
“After a
battery of testing, my friend was diagnosed with pancreatitis. But it was
easier for the hospital bureaucracy to register the admission as a COVID case …
The mainstream media is reporting that severe COVID cases are mainly among
unvaccinated people … Is that what’s really going on?
It’s
certainly not the case in Israel, the first country to fully vaccinate a
majority of its citizens against the virus. Now it has one of the highest daily
infection rates and the majority of people catching the virus (77 percent to 83
percent, depending on age) are already vaccinated, according to data collected
by the Israeli government …
After
admission, I spoke to the nurse on the COVID ward … The nurse told me that she
had gotten both vaccines but she was feeling worried: ‘Two thirds of my
patients are fully vaccinated,’ she said. How can there be such a disconnect between what the COVID ward nurse told me and
the mainstream media reports?”
The heart of the problem is that the
U.S. is not even trying to achieve an accurate count. As noted by The Epoch
Times, “the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have publicly
acknowledged that they do not have accurate data.”
So, when you hear that cases are
rising, and that most of them are unvaccinated, you need to ask: “Are these
people who have had one vaccine and gotten sick, two vaccines and gotten sick, or no vaccines at all? Without more details, it is
impossible to know what is really going on,” The Epoch Times says.16
All we do know, according to one
doctor who spoke with The Epoch Times, is “the vaccines are not as effective as
public health officials told us they would be. ‘This is a product that’s not
doing what it’s supposed to do. It’s supposed to stop transmission of this
virus and it’s not doing that.’”
Counting Non-COVID Illness as COVID
Cases
On top of all of that, hospitals are
still also reporting non-COVID related illnesses as COVID. As reported by The
Epoch Times:17
“Health
authorities around the world have been doing this since the beginning of the
COVID crisis. For example, a young man in Orange County, Florida who died in a
motorcycle crash last summer was originally considered a COVID death by state
health officials …
And a
middle-aged construction worker fell off a ladder in Croatia and was also
counted as a death from COVID … To muddy the waters further, even people who test negative for COVID are sometimes counted as COVID deaths.
Consider
the case of 26-year-old Matthew Irvin, a father of three from Yamhill County,
Oregon. As reported by KGW8 News, Irvin went to the ER with stomach pain,
nausea, and diarrhea on July 5, 2020. But instead of admitting him to the
hospital, the doctors sent him home.
Five days
later, on July 10, 2020, Irvin died. Though his COVID test came back negative
two days after his death and his family told reporters and public health
officials that no one Irvin had been around had any COVID symptoms, the medical
examiner allegedly told the family that an autopsy was not necessary, listing
his death as a coronavirus case. It took the Oregon
Health Authority two and a half months to correct the mistake.
In an
even more striking example of overcounting COVID
deaths, a nursing home in New Jersey that only has 90 beds was wrongly reported
as having 753 deaths from COVID. According to a spokesman, they had fewer than
twenty deaths. In other words, the number of deaths was over-reported by 3,700
percent.”
No Need to Fear the Delta Variant if
You’re Unvaccinated
In a June 29, 2021, interview,18 Fauci called the
Delta variant “a game-changer” for unvaccinated people, warning it will
devastate the unvaccinated population while vaccinated individuals are
protected against it. Alas, in the real world, the converse is turning out to
be true, as the Delta variant is running wild primarily among those who got the
COVID jab.
The Delta variant contains three different mutations,
all in the spike protein. This allows
this variant to
evade the immune responses in those who
have received
the COVID jabs, but not those who have
natural immunity,
which is much broader.
In a June 30, 2021, appearance on
Fox News (video above), epidemiologist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough
pointed out that “It is very clear from the U.K. Technical Briefing19 that was published June 18 that the vaccine provides no protection against the
Delta variant.”20
The reason for this is because the
Delta variant contains three different mutations, all in the spike protein. This
allows this variant to evade the immune responses in those who have received
the COVID jabs, but not those who have natural immunity, which is much broader.
Even so, the Delta variant is far
milder than previous variants, according to the U.K.’s June 18, 2021, Technical
Briefing.21 In it, they present data showing the Delta variant is
more contagious but far less deadly and easier to treat. As McCullough told Fox
News:
“Whether
you get the vaccine or not, patients will get some very mild symptoms like a
cold and they can be easily managed … Patients who have severe symptoms or at
high risk, we can use simple drug combinations at home and get them through the
illness. So, there’s no reason now to push vaccinations.”
Contrast that with the following
statement made by President Biden during a CNN town hall meeting in Cincinnati,
Ohio, in late July 2021:22
“We have
a pandemic for those who haven't gotten a vaccination. It's that basic, that
simple. If you're vaccinated, you're not going to be hospitalized, not going to
the ICU unit, and not going to die. You're not going to get COVID if you have
these vaccinations."
However, Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency doctor and visiting professor of
health policy and management at George Washington University's Milken School of
Public Health in Washington, D.C., contradicted the president, saying he had
led the American astray by telling them you don’t need a mask if you’re
vaccinated, or that you can’t get it or transmit it. As reported by CNN Health:23
“In
particular, Wen took issue with Biden's incorrect
claims that you cannot contract Covid-19 or the Delta variant if you are
vaccinated. ‘I was actually disappointed,’ Wen said. ‘I
actually thought he was answering questions as if it were a month ago. He's not
really meeting the realities of what's happening on the ground. I think he may
have led people astray.’"
CNN added that Wen had told their political commentator Anderson Cooper that “many unknown answers
remain related to Covid-19, and that it is still not known how well protected
vaccinated individuals are from mild illness … [or] if you're vaccinated, could
you still be contagious to other people.”
Vaccinated Patients Flood Hospitals Around the World
The U.K. data showing the Delta
variant is far milder than previous SARS-CoV-2 viruses deflates the claim that
avoiding severe illness is a sign that the shots are working. Since the Delta
variant typically doesn’t cause severe illness in the first place, it doesn’t
make sense to attribute milder illness to the shot.
But if Delta is the mildest coronavirus variant yet, why are so many “vaccinated”
people ending up in the hospital? While we still do not have clear
confirmation, this could be a sign that antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) is
at work. Alternatively, it could be that vaccine injuries are being misreported
as breakthrough cases.
Whatever the case may be, real-world data from areas with high COVID jab rates
show a disturbing trend. For example, August 1, 2021, the director of Israel’s
Public Health Services, Dr. Sharon Alroy-Preis,
announced half of all COVID-19 infections were among the fully vaccinated.24 Signs of more serious disease among fully vaccinated are also emerging, she
said, particularly in those over the age of 60.
A few days later, August 5, 2021,
Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of
the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that
95% of severely ill COVID-19 patients are fully vaccinated, and that they make
up 85% to 90% of COVID-related hospitalizations overall.25
In Scotland, official data on
hospitalizations and deaths show 87% of those who have died from COVID-19 in
the third wave that began in early July were vaccinated.26
In Gibraltar, which has a 99% COVID
jab compliance rate, COVID cases have risen by 2,500% since June 1, 2021,27 and in Iceland, where over 82% have received the shots, 77% of new COVID cases
are among the fully vaccinated.28
Data from the U.K. show a similar
trend among those over the age of 50. In this age group, partially and fully
“vaccinated” people account for 68% of hospitalizations and 70% of COVID
deaths.29
A CDC investigation of an outbreak
in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, between July 6, 2021, through July 25,
2021, found 74% of those who received a diagnosis of COVID19, and 80% of
hospitalizations, were among the fully vaccinated.30,31 Most, but
not all, had the Delta variant.
The CDC also found that fully
vaccinated individuals who contract the infection have as high a viral load in
their nasal passages as unvaccinated individuals who get infected.32 The same was found in a British study, a preprint of which was posted
mid-August 2021.33,34 This means the vaccinated are just as
infectious as the unvaccinated.
Interestingly, a Lancet preprint
study35 that examined breakthrough infections in health care workers
in Vietnam who received the AstraZeneca COVID shot found the “viral loads of
breakthrough Delta variant infection cases were 251 times higher than those of
cases infected with old strains detected between March-April 2020.”
What’s more, they found no
correlation between vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody levels and viral
loads or the development of symptoms. According to the authors:
“Breakthrough
Delta variant infections are associated with high viral loads, prolonged PCR
positivity, and low levels of vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies,
explaining the transmission between the vaccinated people.”
Not All Vaccinated Are Confirmed
Vaccinated
As if all of that weren’t enough,
there’s yet one more confounder. Just because you got the COVID shot does not
mean you’ve been confirmed as having gotten the shot. You’re only confirmed
“vaccinated” if your COVID injection is added to your medical record, and this
sometimes doesn’t happen if you’re going to a temporary vaccination clinic, a
drive-through or pharmacy, for example. As reported by CNN:36
“If you
are among the countless people who didn't get the doses at a primary care
doctor's office, there may not be any record of the vaccination on file with
your doctor.”
To actually count as a “confirmed
vaccinated” individual, you must send your vaccination card to your primary
care physician’s office and have them add it to your electronic medical record.
If you got the shot at a pharmacy, you’ll need to verify that they forwarded
your proof of vaccination to your doctor. Primary care offices are then
responsible for sharing their patients’ immunization data with the state’s
immunization information system.
Patient-recorded proof of
vaccination is only accepted for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, not
COVID-19 injections.37 What this all means is that, say you got the
shot several weeks ago at a drive-through vaccination clinic and get admitted
to the hospital with COVID symptoms. Unless your COVID shot status has actually
been added into the medical system, you will not count as “vaccinated.”
This too can skew the statistics,
because we know the CDC ascertains vaccination status by matching SARS-CoV-2
case surveillance and CAIR2 data using person-level identifiers and algorithms.38
As noted by John Zurlo,
division director of infectious disease at Thomas Jefferson University, “the
lack of reliable vaccine records complicates efforts to precisely understand
vaccine effectiveness and determine how many local hospitalizations and deaths
are resulting from COVID-19 breakthrough infections.”39
We’re in the Largest Clinical Trial
in Medical History
In closing, it’s worth remembering
that the COVID injection campaign is part and parcel of a clinical trial. As
noted Dr. Lidiya Angelova in a recent Genuine Prospect article:40
“Many
people are unaware that they are participating in the largest clinical trial
test of our times. It is because World Health Organization, healthcare
authorities, politicians, celebrities, and journalists promote the experimental
medical treatments (wrongly called COVID-19 vaccines) as safe and efficient
while in fact these treatments are in early clinical research stage.
It means
that there is not enough data for such claims and that the people who participate
are test subject.”
As shown in a graph on Genuine
Prospect, under normal circumstances, clinical research follows a strict
protocol that begins with tests on cell cultures. After that comes tests on animals, then limited human testing in four phases. In Phase 1 of
human testing, up to 100 people are included and followed anywhere from one
week to several months.
Phase 2 typically includes several
hundred participants and lasts up to two years. In Phase 3, several hundred to
3,000 participants are tested upon for one to four years. Phase 4 typically
includes several thousand individuals who are followed for at least one year or
longer. After each phase, the data is examined to assess effectiveness and
adverse reactions.
The timelines for these stages and
phases were not followed for the COVID “vaccines.” Most Phase 3 trials
concluded by the end of 2020, and everyone who got the shots since their
rollout under emergency use authorization is part of a Phase 4 clinical trial,
whether they realize it or not.41 And since
the trials are not completed, you simply cannot make definitive claims about
safety, especially long-term safety. As noted by Angelova:42
“When I
worked at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) … I
went to the course Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research … The
first rule we learnt was ‘Clinical research must be ethical’ … All ethical
aspects of clinical research are dismissed with the COVID-19 vaccines.
People
should know that nobody can require such to participate in everyday activities
like using public transportation, shopping, going to school and even hospital.
People should know that they should not be punished for refusing to take the
experimental medical treatments.
COVID-19
vaccines mass use and COVID-19 measures are an infringe[ment]
of the Articles 2, 3, 5, 9, 11, 12, 13, 18, 20, 25, 27, 28 of The Universal
Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).”
Sources and
References
===========
e.
WHY THE INJECTION DOESN'T HURT OR
KILL EVERYONE ?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fDe6nv2Y4wP5/
(00:57)
with
‘ClinicalTrials.gov’ is a database of privately and publicly funded
clinical studies conducted around the world
by the U.S. National Library of Medicine
+
The
Corporatization of American Science
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv-lXFYhT24
with Chris Hedges
(25:53)
+
Massachusetts coronavirus breakthrough cases jump 4,415 last week,
more than 600 fully vaccinated people
a day
by Rick Sobey
+
Is There Graphene Oxide In The Covid Injections? The Last American
Vagabond Interviews
Whitney Webb
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jCNgaCiGLCrF/
with Ryan Christian and Whitney Webb
(2:00:08)
+
Video: Graphene Oxide: A Toxic Substance in the Vial of the COVID-
19 mRNA Vaccine?
with Ricardo Delgado and Prof Michel Chossudovsky
(24:45)
===========
f.
“Were the notorious ‘Dancing Israelis’
9/11 plotters, spies,
or just common scam artists?”
https://thegrayzone.com/2021/09/11/dancing-israelis-9-11-plotters-spies-scam-artists/
+
Witness in ex-Israel PM’s trial killed in plane crash
https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20210914-witness-in-ex-israel-pms-trial-killed-in-plane-crash/
+
Greece probes crash that killed witness in Netanyahu trial https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/9/14/greece-probes-crash-that-killed-witness-in-netanyahu-trial
+
Newly Released FBI Docs Shed Light
on Apparent Mossad Foreknowledge of 9/11 Attacks
+
Holocaust in Israel: Leaked Call
with Pfizer Scientist Admits
Israelis are Lab Rats for COVID
Shots
by Brian Shilhavy
(3:39)
Israeli TV
recently exposed a leaked Zoom call with Pfizer Vice President and Chief
Scientist, Dr. Philip Dormitzer, who stated that
because Pfizer had an exclusive agreement with the Israeli Minister of Health
to use only Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccines exclusively, Israel was the laboratory
of the world, and that by looking at the high percentage of Israel's population
that is now vaccinated, they can predict what will happen in the U.S. a couple
of months later.
An Israeli
doctor was also interviewed on Israeli TV recently stating that the vaccine is
not working, as 90% of the hospitalizations are among those fully vaccinated,
and many of them seriously.
===========
g.
Debates
https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/category/debates/
+
“It’s Happening Now But People Don’t See It –
Roger Waters on Challenging Authority”
with Roger Waters
(8:44)
+
9/6/21 Magnus Panvidya on the Upcoming
Day of Antiwar Protests - The Scott Horton Show
https://scotthorton.org/interviews/9-6-21-magnus-panvidya-on-the-upcoming-day-of-antiwar-protests/
with Scott
Horton and Magnus Panvidya
(audio, 35:15)
+
Living With Vietnam and Afghanistan: It’s Not What You Did Then, But What You Will Do Now
by Camillo Mac Bica
+
The Activation Tour
https://www.corbettreport.com/solutionswatch-activationtour/
with James Corbett
(20:39)
Derrick Broze and Miriam Gomez of The Conscious Resistance join us
today to talk about The Activation Tour, a whirlwind 28-city tour that they’re engaged in to
foster activism and spread a message of empowerment across the US.
+
From ‘political correctness’ to critical race theory:
How the right manufactures its boogeymen
with Jaisal Noor
(19:57)
+
Racist Stereotypes About Africa in the U.S. Media Have Long Driven
the Rape and Plunder of the Continent—But Where is the
Outcry?
by Jeremy Kuzmarov
+
The US is turning oil-rich Nigeria into a proxy for its Africa wars
https://thegrayzone.com/2021/09/13/us-oil-rich-nigeria-proxy-africa/
by TJ Coles
===========
h.
“Never Forget: 9/11 and the 20
Year War on Terror”
(3:27:40)
Creative
Commons Webinar
(September
11, 2021)
This webinar is
co-sponsored by: The Coalition for Civil Freedoms Historians for Peace and
Democracy United for Peace and Justice World BEYOND War Project Censored
Veterans For Peace CovertAction Magazine Military
Families Speak Out On Earth Peace National Network Opposing The Militarization
of Youth.
Join us today as we reflect on the lessons of 9/11 and the lessons of the 20 year Global War on Terror. We’ll hear testimonials from: John Kiriakou, Vijay Prashad, Sam Al-Arian, Medea Benjamin, Jodie Evans, Assal Rad, David Swanson, Kathy Kelly, Matthew Hoh, Danny Sjursen, Kevin Danaher, Ray McGovern, Mickey Huff, Chris Agee, Norman Solomon, Pat Alviso, Rick Jahnkow, Larry Wilkerson, and Moustafa Bayoumi In the name of freedom, and of vengeance, the United States invaded and occupied Afghanistan. We stayed for 20 years. With lies of ‘weapons of mass destruction' a majority of the country was convinced to invade and occupy Iraq, the worst foreign policy decision of the modern era. The Executive Branch was given sweeping authority to make war across borders and without limits. The conflict in the Middle East expanded under both Republican and Democratic Presidents, leading to US wars in Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia, and more. Trillions of dollars were spent. Millions of lives were lost. We created the greatest migration and refugee crisis since World War II. 9/11 was also used as an excuse to change the relationship of the US government to its citizens. In the name of safety the national security state was given expansive surveillance powers, threatening privacy and civil liberties. The Department of Homeland Security was created and with it ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Words like ‘enhanced interrogation,’ a euphemism for torture entered the American lexicon and the Bill of Rights was tossed aside. After the events of September 11th, 2001, “Never Forget” became a common expression in the United States. Unfortunately, it was not only used to remember and honor the dead. Like “remember the Maine” and “remember the Alamo,” “never forget” was also used as a rallying cry to war. 20 years after 9/11 we are still living in the age of the ‘War on Terror.’ We must never forget the lessons of 9/11 or the lessons of the Global War on Terror, lest we risk repeating the pain, death, and tragedy of the past 20 years. +
False
Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda
Part 1
https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-407-false-flags-the-secret-history-of-al-qaeda-part-1-video/
with James Corbett
(1:16:18)
+
Day of the Planes: A 9/11 excerpt from ‘The Management of Savagery’
https://thegrayzone.com/2021/09/11/day-planes-9-11-management-savagery/
by Max Blumenthal
+
9/11 and the Politics of Fear and
Self-Preservation
https://www.mintpressnews.com/9-11-and-the-politics-of-self-preservation-and-fear/278455/
by Whitney Webb
We will either be remembered as a country that took
freedom and liberty for all seriously or we will be remembered as a nation of
cowards who, driven by fear, were willing to deprive this group, then that
group, of their freedom — before losing that freedom entirely.
+
The Twenty Year Shadow of 9/11: U.S. Complicity in the Terror
Spectacle
and the Urgent Need to End It
by Aaron Good, Ben Howard and Peter Dale Scott
Part 1: How
the U.S. Used Radical Islam and 9/11 to Advance Imperialism and Override the
Constitution
This is Part
One of a three-part re-evaluation of 9/11 in light of startling new evidence
that may change many minds about the so-called “craziness” of those who have
refused to accept the “official” government story of this traumatic and
defining event, which has so tragically misdirected U.S. policy for the past 20
years.
+
The Twenty Year Shadow of 9/11 (Part 2): Why Did Key U.S. Officials
Protect the Alleged 9/11 Plotters?
by Aaron Good, Ben Howard and Peter Dale Scott
===========
i.
How the US Trained the Afghan Mujahideen To Produce War
Propaganda
by Dan Cohen
Behind The Headlines’ Dan Cohen explains a little
known effort to train Afghan Islamic fundamentalists in propaganda, and how
that effort created a blueprint for the White Helmets in Syria.
+
US Military a Killing Machine! & How The Taliban Went
From Ally to Enemy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlyVJF00Pxc
with John Pilger
+
How the CIA Waged War in Afghanistan
+
CIA Stories: Death Squads in Afghanistan
===========
j.
“America’s
Longest War” Is Not Over!
https://covertactionmagazine.com/2021/09/08/americas-longest-war-is-not-over/
by Brian Terrell
+
"Injections and Injunctions"
Part 2:
"Scientific, Technological
Elite"
https://www.bitchute.com/video/p1QALi41zqq4/
with Dr. Robert Malone
+
“This Interview Could Save Your Life”
Part One
A Conversation with Dr. McCullough
https://www.bitchute.com/video/JzZTrQU95CfS/
(41:14)
+
“This Interview Could Save Your
Life”
Part Two
The Dangers of the Injections
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BxME0RDJ61S9/
with Dr. James
McCullough
(1:14:25)
===========
k.
Breaking:
Canada Announces Plan To Merge With Communist China
Social
Credit Score
by Jamie White
+
Red State Rebellion! Majority Of US Governors Say NO!
To Biden Vax Mandate
with Ron Paul
(42:50)
+
Michael
Moore on the 20 Year Anniversary of 9/11 | MSNBC Politics Nation w/ Rev. Al Sharpton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8u2EAzuzpo
(8:59)
===========
l.
NEW Recordings BLOW UP Julian Assange Case
with Ryan Grim
+
“Organic Intellectuals”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0firAMSDmA
with RJ Eskow and Richard Wolff
+
The Age of Manufactured Ignorance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wf4rY963FY
with Chris Hedges and Henry A. Giroux
(25:39)
===========
m.
Is Fauci’s Botched Handling Of The AIDS Epidemic Being Repeated?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezKb_AFvU4g
with Kim Iversen
(14:06)
+
NEW Docs Provide Damning Evidence
Dr. Fauci, NIH FUNDED Wuhan Covid Research With TAXPAYER Dollars
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UlIz7tVG5o
with Kim Iversen
(11:23)
+
Stanford Faculty Smear Professor Who
Accurately Summarized Data On Masks
by Carl Heneghan and Martin Kulldorff
Open
scientific discourse is especially critical during a public health crisis such
as a pandemic. It is deeply troubling when scientists try to limit rather than
engage in scientific debate.
===========
n.
Biden’s Vaccine Mandate Is
Unconstitutional
by Children's
Health Defense Team
The
Defender’s Big Brother NewsWatch brings you the
latest headlines related to governments’ abuse of power, including attacks on
democracy, civil liberties and use of mass surveillance.
On September
9, President Joe Biden unveiled his COVID-19 Action Plan, “a six-pronged,
comprehensive national strategy” to combat the pandemic. The most controversial
provision, covering some 80 million Americans, mandates that all
employers with 100 or more employees must ensure that each worker is either
fully vaccinated or provides weekly negative COVID test
results.
Republican
governors were quick to condemn the mandate, with some vowing legal challenges
… the courts are likely to strike down Biden’s mandate as a clear violation of
the Constitution’s principles of federalism and separation of powers.
The Case Against Vaccine Passports . . . .
+
Injections & Injunctions
Part 1: “Paradox”
(A Conversation with Dr. Robert
Malone)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/VLjIX18XrrhO/
with Dr. Robert Malone
(51:30)
+
Injections and Injunctions
Part 2: “Scientific, Technological Elite”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/p1QALi41zqq4/
with Dr. Robert Malone
(49:46)
===========
o.
Unexpected and heartbreaking: Thousands flood ABC affiliate's
Facebook page with
vaccination horror stories
by WorldTribune.com
WXYZ in Detriot, an ABC affiliate, asked viewers to share stories
of loved ones who died of COVID after refusing or delaying to get the vaccine.
This request produced an unexpected truth bomb.By noon on Monday, the post had received over
39,000 angry and often heartbreaking responses. Virtually every string contains
a firsthand report by people whose family members are grieving the loss of
loved ones of all ages.FROM THE VACCINES.
+
‘Majority’
of those dying have had both jabs
https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-scottish-mail-on-sunday/20210829/282183654147043
by Gareth Rose SCOTTISH POLITICAL EDITOR
THE vast majority of Scots now dying from Covid are fully vaccinated, figures show.
Three quarters of those who died in the most recent week
for which data was available had received both doses.
But experts have warned the figures are not a reason to
avoid getting vaccinated, as without the jab the death toll would be far
higher.
Professor Linda Bauld, a
Scottish Government adviser and expert in public health at the University of
Edinburgh, said: ‘As more people are double vaccinated there will be a higher
proportion of the small
‘No reason for people not to take up vaccines’
overall number
of deaths among the double vaccinated. This is to be expected in countries with
high vaccination rates and should not cause alarm – it’s not a reason for
people not to take up vaccines.
‘If people didn’t take up vaccines the deaths would be
far higher.’
Public Health Scotland does not directly publish weekly
figures of vaccinated and unvaccinated deaths. But this paper has calculated in
the month up to August 12, 144 out of 236 deaths were of people with both doses,
compared with 80 unvaccinated, and 12 with just one dose. The most recent
weekly data, to August 12, showed 30 of 41 deaths were of people with both
doses, ten were unvaccinated, and one had been given one dose.
+
EXCLUSIVE – Covid-19 deaths are 58 times higher than this time last
year and 78% of those
dying had the Covid-19 vaccine
according to Public Health data
(audio, 4:48)
by Daily Exposé
Deaths associated
with Covid-19 across the UK are significantly higher than this time last year
despite 89% of adults allegedly being vaccinated against the disease, and despite the fact summer is supposed to help to keep the alleged virus at
bay due to seasonality.
The mainstream media, Public Health sources, and the
government are doing their best to convince you that it is the unvaccinated who make up the majority of those deaths. But to do this
they are including deaths from the height of the second wave of Covid-19 back
in January when barely anybody has been vaccinated.
A recent
article by the BBC claimed the
following –
Whereas the actual data
available from Public Health England shows
that 70% of Covid-19 deaths since February 2021 up to the 29th August 2021 were
among the vaccinated population.
+
BREAKING – 30,305 people died within 21 days of having a Covid-19
Vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021
according to ONS data
(audio, 6:31)
by Daily Exposé
Official Office for
National Statistics data has inadvertently revealed that 30,305 people have
died within twenty-one days of having a Covid-19 vaccine in England during the
first 6 months of 2021.
Dozens of freedom of information requests have
been made to Public Health England (PHE) over the past few months requesting to
know how many people have died within 28 days of having a Covid-19 vaccine, but
each and every time PHE have claimed they do “not hold the information
requested”.
===========
p.
“CNN
Story That Never Was”
by Dr. Robert Mercola
Story at-a-glance
·
CNN reporter Randi Kaye
contacted me to request an interview regarding my latest book, “The Truth About
COVID-19”
·
Although I responded to her
questions via email, CNN did not publish a story based on this interview
request
·
You can tell from the
leading questions that, had this “story” been published, it wouldn’t have been
true journalism but rather another hit piece manipulated to fit a preformed
agenda
·
In the interest of
transparency, I posted the email exchange so you can read my responses to CNN’s
accusatory questions firsthand
·
CNN and other media outlets
have the power to share lifesaving information that could turn the pandemic
around and save lives in the process — but they won’t; instead, the media are
ignoring the basics of healthy immune function and the importance of early
COVID-19 treatment to continue to push the narrative that the only solution is
to get an injection
CNN reporter Randi Kaye visited my
home unannounced, then tracked me down as I bicycled around my home town in
August 2021. Her purpose was to publish a hit piece further labeling me as a
"super-spreader of COVID-19 misinformation,"1 based primarily on the opinions of foreign agent Imran Ahmed, founding CEO Center for Countering Digital Hate
(CCDH),2 which is a recently spun up front
group funded by dark money.
After that
story aired, she again contacted me, this time via email, to request an
interview regarding my latest book, "The Truth About COVID-19: Exposing The Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New
Normal." Interview questions were provided via email, as were my
responses. To my knowledge, and for unknown reasons, CNN did not publish a
story based on this interview request.
However, in
the interest of transparency, below I'll post the email exchange so you can
read my response to her questions firsthand. You can tell from the leading
questions that, had this "story" been published, it wouldn't have
been true journalism but rather another hit piece manipulated to fit a
preformed agenda.
CNN
Interview Request for My Latest Book
August 26,
2021, Kaye emailed, "Here are the questions we would like answered about
Dr. Mercola's new book. We would welcome responses by
5pm tomorrow, please." The questions, which are clearly accusatory, are as
follows:
"You
say in your book that "A large amount of data strongly suggests the COVID
- 19 vaccine may be completely unnecessary, which
means the global population is being bamboozled into participating in a
dangerous and unprecedented experiment for no good reason whatsoever." Can
you please point us to that data that suggests the covid vaccines are unnecessary or dangerous?
You say
in your book that "vaccine trials are rigged." What proof do you have
of that? Which trials? How many? Who rigged them and for what purpose?
You say
in your book, "Common sense dictates that if the vaccines cannot prevent
or reduce infection and transmission, hospitalization, or death, then they
cannot possibly end the pandemic." And that
"There's no telling whether they will ultimately prevent hospitalizations
and deaths."
Can you
please provide us with the source and support for your statements since the CDC
says vaccines are nearly 100% effective at preventing severe disease and death
and greatly reduce infection.
How do
you explain statements from hospitals and government officials that nearly all
those who are getting sick and dying now are the unvaccinated?
Do you
feel responsible for the spread of misinformation by writing a book full of
conspiracy theories and false claims?
What were
you paid for this book deal by the publisher?
Are you
donating 100% of the earnings from your book?
If so, to which organization? Are you concerned this book will
cost people their lives?"
My Response
to CNN
Media
organizations contact Mercola.com regularly, sometimes to challenge us on the
researched, fact-checked articles we post for our readers. In CNN's case, the
information they were seeking was directly related to my book, which was the
No. 1 best seller in all categories for four straight days with thousands of
five-star ratings.
Much like
the information on Mercola.com, the information in my book is thoroughly
referenced, but Kaye, ironically, engaged in the dissemination of
misinformation herself by describing my book as being "full of conspiracy
theories and false claims." My response to her questions follows:
"Many
studies and other literature offer support for my position in answering several
of your questions, which are combined since they can be answered with the same
literature. Here are the important points that drive my book:
The
vaccines are just 39% effective and waning, and the CDC's Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices has now advised booster doses to the mRNA vaccines in immunocompromised persons. CDC's goal is to begin offering
booster doses to everyone else beginning this fall.3,4,5,6
Additionally,
breakthrough infections among fully vaccinated persons are becoming more and
more prevalent around the world. Evidence is beginning to mount that people with
breakthrough infections can spread the Delta variant more easily.7,8,9,10,11,12,13
Most
recently, researchers in Israel report that fully vaccinated persons are up to
13 times more likely to get infected than those who have had a natural COVID
infection.
As
explained by ScienceMag: The study "found in two
analyses that people who were vaccinated in January and February were, in June,
July and the first half of August, six to 13 times more likely to get
infected than unvaccinated people who were previously infected with the coronavirus.
In one
analysis, comparing more than 32,000 people in the health system, the risk of
developing symptomatic COVID-19 was 27 times higher among the vaccinated, and
the risk of hospitalization eight times higher."14
The study
also said that, while vaccinated persons who also had natural infection did
appear to have additional protection against the Delta variant, the vaccinated
were still at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to
those without the vaccine, but who were previously infected.
Vaccinees who hadn't had a natural infection
also had a 5.96-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold
increased risk for symptomatic disease.
"This
study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger
protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by
the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose
vaccine-induced immunity," study authors said.15
A
majority of gravely ill patients in Israel are double vaccinated.16 A majority
of deaths over 50 in England are also double vaccinated.17 Also, mass vaccination of the
population with the highly mutating coronavirus will
only evolve perfectly vaccine-resistant strains of the virus."18
Injection
Trials Included COVID-19 Infections as Successes
The next
part of my response focused more specifically on the vaccine trials, which were
problematic from the start since they did not include prevention of infection
as an endpoint. Instead, all study endpoints required infection with
SARS-CoV-2, and "successes" included subjects with confirmed COVID-19
cases. The difference measured wasn't whether or not the vaccines prevented
COVID-19 but whether, and how, they modified symptoms among those infected.19
Also
problematic is the unblinding of the vaccine trials,
which means the placebo groups were removed. As medical investigative
journalist Jeanne Lenzer wrote in the BMJ, "The
data are now likely to be scanty and less reliable given that the trials are
effectively being unblinded."20 This is the next section of my response to Kaye:
"Regarding the vaccine trials: The vaccine trials were
designed specifically to succeed for profit. The public health authorities and
media like CNN are utilizing fear of the virus to induce psychological stress
that promotes obedience and servitude.21
Additionally,
proof that the trials are "rigged" can be shown by virtue of the fact
that they've done away with the control groups — who were getting a placebo but
who were then offered the vaccine, which virtually does away with the ability
to compare adverse reactions including deaths. Pfizer's own vaccine insert for Comirnaty admits that the control group hasn't existed
since December 2020:
Section
6.1 — "Upon issuance of the Emergency Use Authorization (December 11,
2020) for COMIRNATY, participants were unblinded to
offer placebo participants COMIRNATY. Participants were unblinded in a phased manner over a period of months to offer placebo participants
COMIRNATY."22
NPR has
noted that removing the placebo groups from vaccine trials will prevent
accurate data from long-term studies from being known.23
Additionally,
the CDC is being dishonest by utilizing data from the beginning of this year
when the vaccine campaign had just been initiated to conflate their claim. They
are using data that were scant early in the year because so few were
vaccinated, as opposed to using current information.24
Proceeding
with the FDA approval of Comirnaty this week was
unprecedented. No other vaccine has ever received approval this fast — and
without public comment being allowed through ACIP [the CDC's Advisory Committee
on Immunization Practices] or VRBPAC [the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological
Products Advisory Committee] before approval was issued.
The
approval is unconscionable because over 600,000 adverse reactions and 6,000
deaths [now over 14,500 deaths25] have been reported in the U.S. to
VAERS. A majority of these reports are filed by medical professionals.
This
shows that the safety of these vaccines is not proven. Besides, the experiments
are continuing through 2027 as the FDA APPROVAL requires Pfizer to submit study
results analyzing risk of myocarditis and pericarditis, and risk to long-term infant development in
pregnant women. Study results will be submitted to the FDA for review on Oct
31, 2025 and May 31, 2027 respectively."26
Lifesaving
Information That CNN Won't Share
CNN and
other media outlets have the power to share lifesaving information that could
turn the pandemic around and save lives in the process — but they won't.
Instead, the media are ignoring the basics of healthy immune function and the
importance of early COVID-19 treatment to continue to push the narrative that
the only solution is to get an injection.
The last
part of my response to Kaye includes empowering steps that virtually everyone
can take to support their health and reduce their risk of infectious disease.
This includes having supplies from the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care
Working Group (FLCCC) I-MASK+ protocol on hand in the event you do get
COVID-19.
FLCCC's
I-MASK+ protocol can be downloaded in full,27 giving you
step-by-step instructions on how to prevent and treat the early symptoms of
COVID-19. FLCCC also has protocols for at-home prevention and early treatment,
called I-MASS, which involves ivermectin, vitamin D3,
a multivitamin and a digital thermometer to watch your body temperature in the
prevention phase and ivermectin, melatonin, aspirin
and antiseptic mouthwash for early at-home treatment.
I also
recommend getting a nebulizer, and the moment you feel a sniffle or something
coming on, use nebulized hydrogen peroxide. Having a
pulse oximeter on hand is also wise, as it's a
noninvasive way to measure the oxygen levels in your blood, allowing you to
monitor your levels and help gauge whether a trip to the ER is truly in order.
As I told
Kaye, taking control of your health continues to be the "secret" that
I strive to share with the masses. The remainder of my response to CNN follows:
"I am
donating all proceeds to the National Vaccine Information Center. I encourage
every person to fully educate themselves to make individual decisions about
medical risk-taking by talking with their personal physician and comparing the
risks and benefits to make an informed decision that includes all the
information on how these vaccines are working (or not working) and what all the
possible side effects may be.
This
pandemic is a direct reflection of the health of our population: 95% of COVID
deaths have multiple comorbidities. Obesity, vitamin
D deficiency and metabolic dysfunction are at the core of this pandemic and can
be resolved by taking control of your health by following science-based dietary
and lifestyle recommendations.
Since
building up your health can't be done overnight, what you can do beginning
right now is avoid linoleic acid, check to ensure
your vitamin D levels are above 40ng/ml, exercise, get fresh air and proper sun
exposure, and restrict your eating window to a 6- to 8-hour time frame each
day.
If you do
get COVID-19, early treatment is crucial. Follow the Front Line Critical Care
Alliance iMASK+ or MATH+ treatment protocols."28
Sources and
References
==========
q.
The Covid-19 "Vaccine" and the Nuremberg Code.
Crimes against Humanity?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-covid-19-vaccine-and-the-nuremberg-code-crimes-against-humanity/5755776
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky
+
Parents Sacrifice Their Children on the Altar of Obedience:
Children in Need – The
Future in Danger
https://www.globalresearch.ca/parents-sacrifice-children-altar-obedience-children-need-future-danger/5755811
by Dr. Rudolf Hänsel
+
The "Killer Vaccine" Worldwide. 7.9 Billion
People
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-killer-vaccine-worldwide-7-9-billion-people/5749363
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky
+
"Majority Of Those Dying Had Both Jabs", GoFundMe Deletes
Vaccine Injured & Artificial Scarcity
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/majority-dying-had-both-jabs-gofundme-deletes-vaccine-injured-artificial-scarcity/
with Ryan Cristián
(2:57:33)
+
Why Vaccine
Passports Are Illegal in Canada
https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-why-vaccine-passports-illegal-canada/5755121
by Nicholas Wansbutter
===========
r.
From: ZCommunications [mailto:michael.albert@zmag.org]
===========
s.
Remembering Amiri Baraka and his poem:
"Somebody Blew Up America"
https://therealnews.com/remembering-amiri-baraka-and-his-poem-somebody-blew-up-america
with Eddie Conway
(21:30)
+
The
industrial working class is not dead
https://therealnews.com/the-industrial-working-class-is-not-dead
by Paul Prescod, Jen Pan and Maximillian Alvarez
(33:49)
+
Freedom Talks
https://www.freedomtravelalliance.com/freedomtalks
with Kevin Jenkins and Mark Crispin
Miller
(1:33:00)
September 14, 2021
Mark Crispin Miller is a Professor of Media, Culture and Communication at
New York University. He is the author of several books,
his recent article touches on many issues we are facing today.
At a time when truth has been silenced & trampled by big tech and
conglomerate news networks, Freedom Talks is set to provide a platform for our
Natural Freedom Audience to be a part of the discussion so we can broadcast the
true opinion of the masses.
|
