Bulletin N° 1013

"The Murder of Fred Hampton : Black History Speaks"



A documentary   by Incarcerated Nation Network Inc. Media

  Fred Hampton was born on August 30, 1948 in suburban Illinois. He was noticeably gifted in academics and athletics. He wanted to play for the New York Yankees when he was done with school but ended up studying pre-law at Triton Junior College. Hampton was inspired to study law to use it as a defense against police and their brutality. Around this time, he became active in the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), leading their Youth Council of the organization’s West Suburban Branch. He increased the Council’s membership to over 500 members. While he was organizing youth on behalf of the NAACP, the Black Panther Party was gaining national popularity. The Party's Ten-Point Program that integrated black self-determination and elements of Maoism inspired Hampton to join and move to downtown Chicago. Hampton’s leadership abilities were apparent there. He brokered a nonaggression pact between Chicago’s most powerful and dangerous street gangs. Hampton’s personal charisma combined with his organizing skills and gift of speech allowed him to be noticed and rise quickly within the Black Panthers. He soon became the leader of the Chicago chapter -- organizing rallies, working with the People’s Clinic, and the Free Breakfast Program. With the actions of the COINTELPRO operation decimating the Party’s leadership, Hampton became next in line to be appointed the Central Committee Chief of Staff of the Black Panther Party - also marking him as a person of interest to the FBI. The FBI convinced a informant, William O'Neal, to infiltrate the Party and get close to Hampton. O'Neal succeeded in joining the Party, acting as Fred Hampton’s bodyguard and Director of Chapter Security. At the instruction of J. Edgar Hoover, he worked to undermine the coalitions that Hampton had created amongst the neighborhood gangs and organizations - causing a major rift and creating a distrust of the Black Panthers. Officers were dispatched to raid his apartment. They stormed in and opened fire, killing Mark Clark, acting as his security guard. Then they opened fire on Hampton’s bedroom where he laid unconscious from the drug. Despite the intense round of fire, Hampton and his pregnant fiance were only wounded. Upon that discovery, an officer shot him twice in his head and killed him. The remaining seven Panthers that were present in the apartment were all arrested and indicted by a grand jury on charges of attempted murder, armed violence, and a variety of weapons charges. A short time later, there was a break-in at a FBI field office in Pennsylvania where the COINTELPRO documents were discovered. The cache of documents included a floorplan of Hampton’s apartment and an outline of the deal to conceal the FBI’s role in the assassination of Hampton. Records at the National Archives relating to Fred Hampton include the FBI and Department of Justice case files investigating his death, and US District Court files relating to the subsequent civil suit. On the evening of December 3, Hampton taught a political education course at a local church, which was attended by most members. Afterward, as was typical, several Panthers went to his Monroe Street apartment to spend the night, including Hampton and Deborah Johnson, Blair Anderson, James Grady, Ronald "Doc" Satchell, Harold Bell, Verlina Brewer, Louis Truelock, Brenda Harris, and Mark Clark. There they were met by O'Neal, who had prepared a late dinner, which the group ate around midnight. O'Neal had slipped the barbiturate sleep agent secobarbitol into a drink that Hampton consumed during the dinner, in order to sedate Hampton so he would not awaken during the subsequent raid. O'Neal left at this point, and, at about 1:30 a.m., December 4, Hampton fell asleep mid-sentence talking to his mother on the telephone.the coming raid would kill Hampton that nite The bed and room where Hampton was fatally shot during the raid, showing a large amount of blood on his side of the mattress and numerous bullet holes in the walls. At 4:00 a.m., the heavily armed police team arrived at the site, divided into two teams, eight for the front of the building and six for the rear. At 4:45 a.m., they stormed into the apartment. Mark Clark, sitting in the front room of the apartment with a shotgun in his lap, was on security duty. The police shot him in the chest, killing him instantly.An alternative account said that Clark answered the door and police immediately shot him. Either way, Clark's gun discharged once into the ceiling. This single round was fired when he suffered a reflexive death-convulsion after being shot. This was the only shot fired by the Panthers. organized by the office of Cook County State's Attorney Edward Hanrahan.


Subject: The art of detecting fact and fiction, and Ernest Hemingway’s ‘built-in bullshit detector.’



Grenoble, December 13, 2021


"But you’re not a conspiracy theorist, are you?" asked the cat to the canary. “After all, the proof is only in the pudding."

"But that is always too late," chirped the canary from her perch; then she flew away.

--From Alice in Dystopia, a novel yet to be written.


Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,


It is becoming more and more obvious that our lives have been captured in a world of absurdities. Predator Capitalism is equipped with an entire handbook of techniques on how to leave no fingerprints behind when capturing the prey. There are millions of men and women today who are well-versed in these lessons, and grew up facing the apparent choice: "to become a pig, or become a pork chop." [A recent cultural expression of the despair caused by this historic 21st-century social displacement to save corporate ruling-class privilege and power is found in the popular song, God Help Us All.]


The choice is a false choice, and the phony logic that promotes it is exposed by a richer understanding of the real context in which decisions are made (and who is excluded from the decision-making process). It is only within a contextual understanding that we can gain some degree of independence from the systemic tyranny that is imposed on all of us living within this dependent power pyramid called monopoly capitalism.


The study of history is one avenue that leads to this greater comprehension of who we are, and it can offer us a more critical view of current events.

We turn now to the second chapter of Barrington Moore, Jr.’s 1966 book on the social origins of dictatorship and democracy that is titled, “Evolution and Revolution in France” and which constitutes a 70-page monograph on “the origins, course, and consequences” of the French Revolution. Instead of composing a choreography for dramatic events, Moore takes us through the Byzantine experience of contradictions, paradoxes, and blatant deceptions that pervaded relationships between established social-class cunning and fledgling class consciousness which he traces back convincingly to their social origins. He concludes this detailed discussion with the following “recapitulation” in three paragraphs.

     The central message that I have been able to discern in the origins, course, and consequences of the Revolution is that the violent destruction of the ancient régime was a crucial step for France on the long road toward democracy. It is necessary to underscore the point that the step was crucial for France, where the obstacles democracy faced were different from those in England. French society did not and probably could not generate a parliament of landlords with bourgeois overtones, in the English manner. Previous tends in France had made the upper classes into an enemy of liberal democracy, not part of democracy’s entering wedge. Hence, if democracy were to triumph in France, certain institutions would have to be gotten out of the way. To assert that such was the connection implies no claim that French history was inevitably bound to culminate in liberal democracy or that the Revolution was in any sense inevitable. Instead there are grounds for holding that the whole process could have worked itself out very differently and that, for this very reason, the Revolution was all the more decisive;

     Under the conditions of royal absolutism the French landed upper classes adapted to the gradual intrusion of capitalism by putting greater pressure on the peasants, meanwhile leaving them in a situation approaching de facto ownership. Up until about the middle of the eighteenth century the modernization of French society took place through the crown. As part of this process there grew up a fusion between nobility and bourgeoisie quite different from that in England. This fusion took place through the monarchy rather than in opposition to it and resulted, to speak in what may be here a useful if inaccurate shorthand, in the ‘feudalization’ of a considerable section of the bourgeoisie, rather than the other way around. The eventual result was to limit very severely the crown’s freedom of action, its ability to decide what sectors in society were to bear what burdens. This limitation, accentuated by Louis XVI’s defects of character, I would suggest, was the main factor that brought on the Revolution, rather than any extraordinarily sever conflict of interests along class and group lines. Without the Revolution, this fusion of nobility and bourgeoisie might have continued and carried France forward into a form of conservative modernization from above, similar in its main outlines to what took place in Germany and Japan.

     But the Revolution did prevent all that. It was not a bourgeois revolution in the restricted sense of the seizure of political power by a bourgeoisie that already had won the commanding heights of economic power. There was a group of this variety within the ranks of the bourgeoisie, but the previous history of royal absolutism had prevented its growing strong enough to accomplish much on its own. Instead, parts of the bourgeoisie rose towards power on the backs of radical movements within the urban plebs, released by the collapse of order and the monarchy. These radical forces also prevented the Revolution from turning backward or halting at a point suitable to such sections of the bourgeoisie. Meanwhile the peasants, mainly the upper layer at this point, had taken advantage of the situation to force the dismounting of the seigniorial system, the main achievement of the Revolution. For a time rural and urban radicalism, which shared a contradictory mixture of small-property and backward-looking collectivist aims, could work together, as they did up to and through the most radical phases of the Revolution. But the need to get food to the poorer townspeople and the Revolutionary armies ran up against the interests of the more well-to-do peasants. Increasing resistance from the peasants deprived the Parisian san-culottes of food, thereby removed Robespierre’s popular support, and brought the radical revolution to a halt. The sans-culottes made the bourgeois Revolution, the peasants determined just how far it could go. The incompleteness of the Revolution on the other hand, an incompleteness quite largely traceable to the structure of French society in the late eighteenth century, meant that it would be a long time before a full-blown capitalist democracy could establish itself in French society.(pp.108-110)


The conclusions in Professor Moore’s “recapitulation” are supported with a detailed account of the quite complex political and cultural evolution in French social class relationships before and during the Revolution, an evolution which begs the question: Is the enemy of my enemy my friend? There are essentially seven issues which he addresses in this chapter on “evolution and revolution in France.”


1)    Contrasts with England and their Origins.

Among the decisive factors in the development of democracy in England were the independence of the landed gentry and nobility from the crown, their adoption of commercial agriculture partly in response to the growth of a trading and manufacturing class with its own strong economic base, and the disappearance of the peasant problem. French society entered the modern world by a very different path. Instead of thrusting its way through to a high degree of independence, the French nobility, or more specifically its leading sector, became a decorative appendage of the king. Though this trend was reversed in the latter part of the eighteenth century, the ultimate consequence was the destruction of the aristocracy. Instead of a landed upper class turning to commercial agriculture in the English manner, we find in France of the Bourbon monarchy mainly a nobility living from what it can extract through obligations resting upon the peasants. In the place of the destruction of peasant property we perceive its gradual consolidation both before and after the Revolution. Commerce and manufacturing in France lag behind that in England. All the main structural variables and historical trends in French society of the ancient régime differed sharply from those in England from the sixteenth through the eighteenth centuries. How and why there was any similarity at all in the final political outcome during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries constitutes, along with some of the important differences, the central puzzle that I shall try to unravel in this chapter. Since without the Revolution it is most improbable that there would have been any similarity at all, this great event will be the central concern of the discussion.

     In comparison with their counterpart in England during the eighteenth century, the French nobility lived very largely from dues collected in kind or in cash from their peasants. The origins of this difference reached sufficiently far back into the mists of early French history to make it unwise for an amateur to try peering very far into them, especially since the great French historian Marc Bloch threw up his hands rather than suggest an explanation. Suffice it to say that, by the late fourteenth century and during the fifteenth, many of the basic features had already begun to appear: a seigneur who devoted relatively little attention to the cultivation of his own demesne, which was rather small in size. The demesne seems to have shrunk as the overlord granted out sections of it in small parcels to the peasants in return for a portion of the crop. Where possible the seigneur preferred to let out his land en bloc and in many cases on terms showing that he hoped to regain it at some future date. But this was not always possible. The nobleman was often far away at war, while hands to work the land were hard to come by. The best solution, at least for many, appears to have been to throw the burden of cultivation as much as possible on those tenants who would manage large units or, more often, directly on the peasants. Somewhat earlier the French nobility had begun to acquire a more precise juridical status through rules strictly defined in law.

     These two traits of a more definite legal status, even if a far from crystal clear one, and dependence on peasant dues were to distinguish the French nobility form the English gentry for the remainder of its history. At quite an early date the peasant had managed to escape from personal servitude, mainly by capitalizing on the demand for labor in the countryside that increased as the growing towns presented the possibility of another way of making a living. By the time of the Revolution, peasants possessed close to de facto property rights.

     Underlying this continuity were also important elements of change. The system of large landholdings worked by serfs began, as we have seen, to undergo modification at least as early at the latter part of the fourteenth century. At the end of the Middle Ages and during the early modern period, perhaps especially during the sixteenth century when an increase in the supply of gold and silver seems to have driven up prices, there are indications of something approaching a crisis in seigniorial incomes. Large section of the old fighting nobility, the noblesse d’épée, lost out heavily. The disappearance of their economic underpinnings may have made it easier for the kings and their talented ministers to extend the royal authority, a process that culminated in the long reign of Louis XIV (1643-1715). Naturally the nobility did not accept their fate passively. Faced with catastrophe, many attempted to backwater, to cease being rentiers and to reconstitute the demesne. But by and large they lacked the economic basis, such as the wool trade, that made such a policy possible in England.

     Members of the bourgeoisie who had made money in the towns and begun to acquire land from the distressed nobles had somewhat greater success. The process began in the fifteenth century and continued on through the eighteenth. Through this influx of urban wealth there was some reconstitution of estates. In parts of France it brought about a situation that had some resemblances to England, as the new owners lived on and managed their estates with an eye to profit. But the resemblance is superficial. In seventeenth-century France, as well as later, the profit came not from selling produce on the market but still from collecting rents from peasants. As Bloch observed, the fortune to be gained from a big estate came from collecting a series of small dues, some of them in kind, from a series of small units. Though the task might be turned over to an intermediary, the best prospect of success came from careful, detailed, and rather pettifogging administration.

The situation was an ideal one for lawyers, and in more than one respect. The spreading tentacles of the royal bureaucracy needed lawyers in its struggle against the older nobility. And the rich bourgeois who acquired land moved into higher social circles either through being granted nobility or through purchase of a bureaucratic position (office or charge). Though the noblesse de robe was often troublesome to the king – only Louis XIV was able in time to treat them with deliberate contempt – they furnished one of the main instruments of absolutism in its struggle with localist tendencies and with the older fighting nobility. As there were often good pickings in the royal bureaucracy, especially in the eighteenth century as royal control slackened, its attractions may have served to diminish any tendency to operate an estate along English lines.

     In any case the ‘return’ of the big estate was a relatively limited affair. They were not nearly as common in France as in England or Eastern Germany. Large sections of the country were in the hands of the peasants. Thus the system as a whole was one where large and small units coexisted. France did not undergo an extensive enclosure movement. By and large, the large proprietor was interested in preserving peasant tenures because they provided the basis of his own existence. Only in the latter part of the eighteenth century did the situation begin to change.

     The decline of the noblesse d’épée was part of the same process by which the king consolidated and extended his authority. In course of the sixteenth century and afterward, the king deprived the nobles of any of their judicial functions, raised soldiers and taxes on their lands, intervened generally in their affairs, and force them to submit to his Parliaments. By the time of Louis XIV, the nobility seemed reduced to a role of magnificent indolence at Versailles or else peaceful vegetation in the provinces. However, this impression is somewhat deceptive. To be sure the Sun King had rendered them largely harmless. But he had to pay certain costs that were only partly advantageous to the crown. He could get good positions for many in the church, which had enormous revenues, as the time much larger than those of the state. In return for the church’s assistance in taking care of a sector of the nobility, the king protected the church against heresy. One consequence was the revocation of the Edict of Nantes. A second form of the cost to the crown was war. Though Louis drove the nobility away from the center of government, he gave over to them the army as well as the church. Perpetual war was the perpetual topic of conversation among the nobility at court and helped to create an atmosphere of loyalty to the king.

     The system of compulsory conspicuous consumption at Versailles ruined many nobles. In the provinces too Colbert’s inquiry, conducted through the intendants, revealed widespread poverty. Hence it is tempting to make a connection between royal absolutism and a failure of commercial agriculture to take hold, both factors mutually reinforcing one another over a long period of time. Until quite recently the historians’ accounts of a brilliant and parasitic aristocracy in Paris and of the rural nobleman proudly molding away in the countryside amidst a generally stagnant agriculture pointed toward some such explanation of the background of the Revolution and the disappearance of the aristocracy through revolutionary violence.(pp.40-44)


2)    The Noble Response to Commercial Agriculture.

     For the latter part of the seventeenth century and the opening decade of the eighteenth, there is little reason to doubt the thesis that the impulse toward commercial agriculture was weak in comparison to that in England, not only among nobility but in France generally. As it was in England too, the key agricultural problem was to get grain to the classes that ate bread but did not grow wheat. The grain trade presented a picture of stagnation broken by some impulse toward production for the market in the neighborhood of the big cities. There the wealthier peasant rather than the landed aristocracy appear to have been the main beneficiaries. Market areas generally did not extend beyond the vicinity of a few big cities and certain export depots on the frontiers. Only Paris drew on a substantial hinterland. Most of the territory drew its supplies from nearby areas.


     The general conception of the grain problem was one of controlling a limited supply from a limited area. The pull of a few big cities was felt mainly in times of scarcity, and then as a disruptive factor. In the latter part of the seventeenth century and the early part of the eighteenth, merchants and their agents in some localities, mainly near Paris, adopted the practice of scouring the countryside to buy up any surplus they could find. This practice aroused much resentment as a disturbance for local sources of supply and grew up in opposition to both prevailing custom and legislation.(p.45)

. . .

    To consider only the grain trade runs the risk of giving a very misleading impression. Wine was a commercial product and a very important one. Indeed wine was to French agriculture, perhaps even to eighteenth-century French society as a whole, what wool was to English agriculture and society in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.

. . .

     The economic and political consequences of the wine trade and sheep raising are quite different. In what seems to have been a burst of Gallic enthusiasm, coupled with an American statistical mania, the distinguished French economic historian C.E. Labrousse has endeavored to demonstrate with mountainous statistics that a long depression in the wine trade was a decisive factor in accounting for the generally backward state of the French economy and the outbreak of the Revolution. The result is to me more overwhelming than convincing. The link with industrial backwardness in not demonstrated. His two massive studies, only a small part of the whole undertaking as originally planned, limit themselves almost entirely to agricultural matters.

. . .

     Wines that yielded a good commercial profit seem to have been produced in the same limited areas of France as now. The advantages of proximity to water transport must have given the port of Bordeaux a huge advantage during the eighteenth century. Wine provided the economic basis for a very prosperous and very commercially minded provincial nobility in and around Bordeaux during the eighteenth century. Grapes were transmuted into gold and gold into many attractive forms of culture, varying all the way from dancing girls to Montesquieu’s Esprit de lois. (This distinguished philosopher was at times what moderns would call a lobbyist for the wine industry.) By themselves, profits from wine stop there, as they seem to have done in Bordeaux. Viniculture cannot form the basis of a textile industry as can sheep raising. Nor can it provide for feeding the city populqtion as does wheat growing. In any case the impulse for change comes from the cities, not the countryside. What happens in the countryside becomes important mainly through the social changes that may or may not overspread what is still the overwhelming majority of the population during the early stages of industrial growth.

     Wine growing in France did not produce the kind of changes among the peasantry, such as massive enclosures, that were the consequence of commercial agriculture in England. Viniculture, particularly in the days before artificial fertilizers, was what economists call a labor-intensive variety of agriculture, requiring large amounts of fairly skilled peasant labor and relatively small amounts of capital either in the form of land or equipment. The English situation by and large was the other way around. Now French rural society in the eighteenth century was such as to be able to take care of the problems of labor-intensive agriculture quite satisfactorily – from the point of view of the aristocracy if not that of the peasantry. . . . the essential distinction is fairly simple: the French aristocrat kept the peasant on the land and used feudal levers to extract more produce. Then the nobleman sold the produce on the market. In the case of wine, his legal privileges were especially useful, since through them he could do a great deal to prevent peasants from bringing wine into Bordeaux where it could compete with that from a chateau. Lacking privilege of bringing wine into the city, as well as the resources to postpone sale until the most favorable moment, the smaller producers found it necessary to sell their wine to the noble landlord.


     In eighteenth-century Bordeaux, good-sized fortunes base on wine were to be found only among the noblesse de robe, the juridical nobility whose origins were mainly bourgeois, though, in many eighteenth-century robe families in France as a whole, the bourgeois origin might be a matter that belonged to the remote past. The old military nobility, the noblesse d’épée, was neither rich nor illustrious.(p.46-48)



3)    Class Relationships under Royal Absolutism.  

     For a long time the sale of offices made good political sense. Inasmuch as it gave the bourgeoisie access to the royal administration, it made allies among this class. Probably under French conditions it was an indispensable device in creating the king’s power and hence in pushing aside the older nobility and overcoming the vagaries of feudalism to create the conditions of a modern state. And from the king’s point of view it was both an important source of revenue and a cheap method of administration, though neither of these features was advantageous to French society as a whole.


     There were at the same time inherent disadvantages that became increasingly important with the passage of time. The sale of an office meant in effect that the position became a form of private property that passed from father to son. Hence the king tended to lose control over his subordinates. The famous Paulette of 1604 in the reign of Henri IV granted full property rights to the holders of offices in return for the payment of a tax and thereby sealed the transition from bureaucratic office to property. To counter this situation, the kings resorted characteristically to the creation of new officials, the intendants, to watch over the activities of others. Even these offices became in time indirectly subject to purchase.


     At first the status of nobility acquired by purchase of an office was limited to the person of the purchaser. Then it became hereditary. Under Louis XIV the rule disappeared that three generations in the same office were necessary to confer hereditary nobility. Since high offices tended to remain in the same family anyway, the change was mainly symbolic. The bourgeois drive toward property found considerable satisfaction through the royal bureaucracy, while any drive toward political independence was blunted by converting the bourgeois into an aristocrat. Later this aspect was to limit very severely the power of the monarchy to adapt itself and French society to ever more pressing problems.


     At the height of absolutism the contradictions and paradoxes of the system were already visible. Without resort to the sale of offices, ‘the manna that never fails?’ Louis XIV would probably have had to seek the consent of the nation through the Estates General to raise money. Hence the sale of offices was at the root of the king’s independence of the aristocracy, of any effective control by a parliament. It was the key prop of royal absolutism.


     At the same time the practice undermined the king’s independence. It is at the root of the paradox that the most powerful king in Europe against whom no domestic resistance was possible or even imaginable still appears to historians so badly obeyed that he had to regard disobedience as perfectly normal.


     If, in the earlier stages of the monarchy’s growth, the sale of offices had helped to rally the bourgeoisie to the monarch’s onslaught on feudalism, continued resort to this device increasingly revealed that it also imparted feudal characteristics to the bourgeoisie. In 1665 Colbert supported his proposal to a abolish the sale of offices with the argument that the amount of money tied up in the traffic of offices would thus be returned to real commerce which would be useful to the state. He suggested that this amount might be as much as the value of all the lands in the kingdom. No doubt Colbert’s claim was exaggerated. But his thesis is undoubtedly correct that the system diverted energy and resource from commerce and industry. Furthermore, by giving bourgeois commoners a title of nobility and then making it impossible to supervise their activities closely, the sale offices helped to build up a sense of corporate identity, immunity for outside influences, and esprit de corps. Holders of office sealed themselves off from royal influence and became stubborn defenders of local interest and vested privileges. (pp.58-60)



4)    The Aristocratic Offensive and the Collapse of Absolutism.  

Capitalism, as Jaurès, the great socialist historian of the Revolution perceived without drawing the necessary conclusions, permeated the ancient régime, twisting it in such a way as to antagonize important segments of the privileged classes as well as the peasants, turning them too against the monarchy. Partly for this reason the radical thrust behind the Revolution, based on the san-culottes and sections of the peasantry, was explicitly and strongly anticapitalist. The rich peasants, as we shall see, set the limits to which radical anticaptalism could go. Ultimately the forces behind a private property free of ancient fetters won important triumphs in the city and the countryside. To achieve this victory the capitalists frequently required the help of their bitterest enemies.(p.69)



5)    The Peasants’ Relationship to Radicalism during the Revolution.  

     Up to this point the discussion has tried to illuminate the sources of both rigidity and demands for change that gradually accumulated among the dominant classes. In analyzing the Revolution itself the facts compel a change of focus with concentration on the lower classes. French society broke apart from the top downward as the monarchy, for institutional and personal reasons, became increasingly unable to control the divisive forces discussed in the preceding sections. The collapse increased latent discontents among the lower classes and allowed them to come to the surface. There is evidence that these had been simmering for some time. Peasant uprisings in which the little people of the towns also took part strew the record of the seventeenth century. They occurred in different parts of France in 1639, 1662, 1664, 1670, 1674, and 1675. By itself, however, popular resentment could not make a revolution. Whether it increased just before the Revolution is not absolutely clear; very likely it did. Nevertheless, only when popular grievances could coalesce even briefly with those of more powerful groups would they help to bring the monarchy crashing down amid fire, blood, and smoke.


     The causes of earlier outbreaks, the nature of the peasants’ world, the problems of those who constituted the great bulk of the French population appear but dimly in studies of the great days of royal absolutism. As the Revolution approaches, more details appear until at least some of the main outlines of peasant society become reasonably distinct. In the absence of the kind of commercial revolution that took place in England or of the manorial reaction such as that which happened in Prussia and also in Russia for quite different reasons, many French peasants had become in effect small property owners. Though it is impossible to give precise numbers of these coqs de paroisse – their counterpart will be called kulaks at a later stage in Russia – they were certainly a substantial and very influential minority. The large majority of the peasants trailed off beneath them by imperceptible gradations, through those who had tiny lopins de terre, down to those who had none at all and lived as agricultural laborers. One gets the impression – but it is no more than an impression – that the number of the land-short and the landless had been slowly and steadily growing for at least two centuries. Lefebvre asserts that by 1789 the large majority of rural proprietors did not have enough land to live on and had to work for others or find some auxiliary trade. Again general figures are not to be had. But in many parts of the country families without any land at all may have run from twenty to as high as seventy percent of the peasant population.


     One may discern two major demands among the poorer peasants. First, and perhaps above all, they wanted a plot of land if they had none, a slightly larger plot if they had any at all. Secondly, they were anxious to preserve those specific customs of the village community that served their own interests. The poor peasants had no generalized attachment to the village community. When they caught a glimpse of the opportunity to get a plot of land out of dividing up the common lands of the village during the Revolution, they were loud in their cries to do so. It was mainly the rich peasants who prevented the breaking up of the commons, partly because the rich peasants were often the only ones to use the commons for pasture for the stock with which they worked their farms. On the other hand, certain collectivist practices were important to poor peasants. The most valuable was the right of vaine pâture. On cultivated territory this right was part of the ancient open-field system that prevailed through much of France in the absence of a powerful movement toward enclosures. The cultivated fields lay in strips, surrounding the cluster of dwellings that was the village. All this land had to go through each stage of the agricultural cycle at the same moment, a practice known in France as assolement forcé, in German-speaking lands as Flurzwang. After the harvest had been gathered in, the rights of the proprietor, as Bloch vividly remarks, went to sleep, and cattle wandered freely over unfenced fields. In meadows used for hay growing, which by this time might be the property of a seigneur, the village as a whole, or of a well-to-do peasant, a similar arrangement prevailed in many areas: after the hay had been gathered, the meadows would be thrown open for the cattle to graze and eat the second growth (regain). To the poor peasants the right of vaine pâture was important because they were liable to be prevented from making much use of communal lands. Even if they lacked horsed and ploughs, they were likely to possess a cow or sheep and a few goats that they used for meat or to raise a bit of cash. Gleaning rights, when hordes of poor peasants might swarm over the fields for a specified number of days under the anxious eyes of the owners of the fields, and rights to collect fuel and pasture animals in the woods, were also significant to them.


     The political consequence was a split within the peasantry and a very marked disintegration of the peasant community. Like those in many other parts of the world the poor peasants in France were the main victims as the forces of modernization pried apart the ancient village society that had governed the division of labor and had provided them a modest but recognized place within their small world for as long as anyone could remember. Though French villages, of which there were many different types, by and large suffered later and less and for different reasons than their English counterparts, still this society was under very visible attack as the eighteenth century drew toward its close. The situation of the rural poor drove many toward violent egalitarian theories. For them modernization meant mainly that the prosperous peasants were blocking them from dividing up the land (including that which became available (through confiscation during the Revolution) and starving them out by restrictions on gleaning and pasture rights as part of the drive toward modern forms of private property in land. At the height of the Revolution, radicalism in the cities and the countryside could join hands, a fact that helps to explain the depth and violence of the French Revolution in comparison with its English precursor. There was not just a single peasant revolution going on its own way, sometimes joining, sometimes opposing the revolution in the cities and the capital. There were a least two peasant revolutions, that of the peasant aristocracy and that of the larger and more diffuse majority, each following its own course and also from time to time fusing or opposing revolutionary waves in the cities.


     Turning now to the upper ranks of the peasantry, it seems at least moderately clear that their discontents came from their half-way position: they possessed the land without really owning it. As is well known, the legal and social position of the French peasantry, at any rate at its upper levels, was subject to fewer repressive restraints than in any other large country on the continent. Most of them were personally free. To the extent that we can glimpse their demands through the refractions of the cahiers, we can see that they wanted mainly to eliminate the arbitrary aspects of the feudal system that had been increasing in the last years of the old order. In sharp contrast with the bourgeoisie, they did not attack the social position and special privileges of the nobility. Instead, they often expressly acknowledged them, a fact which suggests that they could not understand any general connection between the privileges of the nobility and their own problems. Evidently in 1789 it would still take serious shocks to turn the peasqnts into an active revolutionary force. These shocks were not long in coming.(pp.70-74)

. . .

     It is fair … to hold that the peasantry was the arbiter of the Revolution ,though not its chief propelling force. And even if it was not the main propelling force, it was a very important one, largely responsible for what in retrospect seems the most important and lasting achievement of the Revolution, the dismantling of feudalism.(p.77)

. . .

     Thus both the rural and the urban radicals shared a common hostility at this point to the rich who were profiting from the Revolution and to the unfettered workings of the market. Further evidence that urban and rural radicalism were seeking compatible objectives comes from a significant detail reported by Mathiez about the uprising of May 31, 1793. Some months before, delegates from the fédérés of eighty-three départments had come to Paris. Though the Gironde leaders hoped to use this group in its struggle against the Paris Commune and the Montagne, the delegates fell under the influence of the enragés. That provincials whom the Gironde hoped to use were susceptible to such ideas indicates the general strength of anticapitalist radicalism at this juncture.

. . .

To sum up the meaning of the uprising and the events surrounding it, the bourgeois revolution had been pushed sharply to the left under radical pressure and forced to shed the moderates (dramatized in the arrest of thirty-one Girondist deputes on June 2), while the urban radicals and the peasants were still marching together even if in ragged formation.

     The popular upsurge helped to make possible the heroic and desperate period of the Revolution, the reign of terror and the so-called dictatorship of the Committee of public Safety, the creation of a new army, the driving of those allied against France back across the Rhine, the defeat of the counterrevolution in the Vendée. Actually, of course, the dictatorship of the Committee of Public Safety was a ramshackle and primitive affair by twentieth-century standards. The technical means of communication and transportation precluded centralized control of the economy. No nationwide measure to ration the consumption of the population was attempted. The failure to ration food was one of the main reasons why the urban sans-culottes failed in the end to stand by Robespierre. On the agrarian side, the key problems were to get grain to the armies first, secondly to Paris and the big cities, and finally to ensure its movement from areas where there was a surplus to areas in short supply. The last aspect was a continuation under new revolutionary conditions of a difficulty that had long plagued the old order.(pp.86-87)

. . .


     The obvious and decisive fact of the radical phase is this: the urban sans-culottes had been able to push the Jacobin leaders into policies that saved the Revolution but at the cost of turning the peasants against it. The radical phase might have gone further if the government in Paris had been able to count on the mass of the poor peasants against the wealthier ones. But the government’s limited capacity and willingness to enforce price controls helped to prevent this split for, materializing. Rising prices worked hardship on the small-plot owners who had little to sell and on agricultural workers who had to buy at least part of their food. Those suffered the most form the violation of the maximum. For a time their situation remained tolerable, according to Lefebvre’s detailed and thorough studies on the North, because the price of bread rose less rapidly than wages. By the end of 1793 these groups were in worse straits, Lefebvre holds, than the town dwellers. To the extent that these conditions prevailed elsewhere in the countryside, they alienated radical support from the Revolution and dried up the sources of rural radicalism.


     In measures they proposed in March 1994, just before the execution of the sans-culotte leaders, Robespierre and Saint-Just showed signs of being aware of the fact that they needed to prop up their government by concessions to the poor peasants. Whether or not the proposals they made at this time, known as the Ventôse decrees, were more than a political maneuver is a question still under discussion. What the episode does demonstrate is that Robespierre and Saint-Just knew very little about the peasants’ problems and that their proposals fell far short of meeting demands of the peasants expressed in petitions whose general content the revolutionary leaders must have known. Even if they had wanted to do more, Robespierre and Saint-Just had precious little room within which to maneuver.  . . . It would have been very difficult, perhaps impossible, to meet the expressed desires of the poorer peasants without putting a spike into the wheels of the bourgeois and capitalist revolution. As it was, even these mild proposals encounter strong opposition in the Convention and the Committee of Public Safety itself and hence came to nothing.


     Thus during the radical phase the needs and aspirations of the urban sans-culottes finally came into fierce and open conflict with all sections of the countryside. The main symptom was the deterioration of exchanges between the city and the countryside, especially the provisioning of the city….(pp.89-90)



6)    Peasants against the Revolution: The Vendée.  

In revolutions, as well as counterrevolutions and civil wars, there comes a crucial point when people suddenly realize that they have irrevocably broken with the world they have known and accepted all their lives. For different classes and individuals this momentary flash of a new and frightening truth will come at successive points in the collapse of the prevailing system. There are also unique moments and decisions – the storming of a palace, the beheading of a king, and in reverse the overthrow of a revolution dictator – after which there is no return. Huge sections of the population become part of a new social order.


     These features of the counterrevolution in Vendée shared with other violent social upheavals, even if often on the minute scale of the parish or the commune; What seems rather more unique is the simple transformation of the prevailing social organization in the countryside from being a legal and accepted order to being the basis of rebellion. I detect no sign in the literature of the breakdown of the older society into masses of wandering individuals, of revelatory corwds, and the corresponding forging of new revolutionary organizations and new forms of solidarity, processes that the communists in a later age were to learn by trial and error to turn to their purposes. Nevertheless in many of its features the counterrevolution of the Vendée foreshadows what was to happen as capitalism impinged on premodern peasant societies. An account of the actual fighting we may forgo, since what happened beforehand contains the main lessons for our purposes. Suffice it to say that the repression of the counterrevolution was the bloodiest domestic act in the French revolutionary drama. Let us turn instead to a general assessment of revolutionary terror, in which vengeance taken by peasants and upon peasants claimed a huge and tragic toll.(pp.100-101)



7)    Social Consequences of Revolutionary Terror.  

The experience of the Terror and the French Revolution in general gave a strong impulse to that very influential current of Western political thought which recoils from political violence in any form. Today many educated people are still likely to think of the Terror as a daemonic outburst of mob violence indiscriminate in its choice of victims, later as the expression of blind hatred and extremism, indeed of a special utopian mentality that lies at the roots of twentieth-century totalitarianism. I shall try to show that the interpretation is a distorted caricature.


    Like any caricature, this conception contains some truthful elements without which the resulting image would bear no recognizable relation to reality. As the victims of the September massacres [the series of killings of inmates by revolutionary crowds in Paris at Bicêtre, a hospital for men and boys that also served as a prison for beggars and the homeless, and at Salpêtriére, a hospice for women and girls to which a prison was attached, that occurred from Sunday Sept 2 until Thursday Sept 6, 1992 in 1792,]  - mainly poor people who happen to be in jail when the mob burst in – popular resentments could erupt in sudden acts of indiscriminate vengeance. Nevertheless, a dispassionate analysis cannot just draw back in horror at this point; it is necessary to perceive the causes. They are clear enough in the aggravating circumstances of the moment and the history of degradation and oppression to which the mass of people at the very bottom of the social order were subject. To express outrage at the September massacres and forget the horrors behind them is to indulge in a partisan trick. In that sense there is no mystery here. In another there is. As we shall see most clearly later, when we come to consider India, sever suffering does not always and necessarily generate revolutionary outbursts, and certainly not a revolutionary situation. That problem must wait. For the moment we may take it that popular desperation and anger were comprehensible reactions to circumstances.


     For the Terror to become an effective instrument of policy, that is, for it to produce significant political results, the popular impulse had to be brought under some degree of rational and centralized control. This impulse came mainly from the sans-culottes. From the very beginning there was more than sheer resentment in the call for the guillotine. It was a protest against the workings of the market that were producing untold misery and a primitive way of forcing rich speculators to disgorge hoarded goods. Though the situation and requirements of the poor peasants paralleled that of the urban poor for a time, the peasants were not at all a significant force behind the organized Terror of 1793-1794. Peasant violence did play a decisive part in the French Revolution, especially as a force behind the dismantling of feudal practices, but mainly in the earlier’ phases.


      As matters turned out, the popular and bureaucratic impulses were partially fused and partially contradictory. Essentially what happened was that Robespierre and the Montagne took over a large part of the program of the sans-culottes, including the Terror on a massive scale, tried to use it for their own purposes, and in time turned the weapon back against popular forces. By and large the consequences were rational. Detailed researches show that the Terror was mainly used against counterrevolutionary forces and was most severe where the counterrevolution was strongest. Certainly there were exceptions and injustices. But the Terror was not in its major features a case of shedding blood for the insane pleasure of doing so.


     Within France counterrevolutionary forces had two distinct geographical bases, the Vendée, and the commercial and port cities of Lyon, Marseilles, Toulon, and Bordeaux. The contrast between these two foci of counterrevolution sheds a revealing light on the social character of the Revolution itself. The Vendée was the part of France where commercial and modern influences had penetrated least; the southern cities, the area where they had penetrated furthest. In the Vendée, as might be expected, the Terror claimed the largest number of victims. The situation in the south was almost exactly the opposite, especially in Lyon where the silk industry had proceeded to the point of crippling the artisans and producing an incipient modern proletariat.  Throughout much of southern France the wealthier commercial elements in the towns showed a strong inclination to join hands with the nobility and the clergy, who hoped to use the Gironde and the federalist movement as an entering wedge for the restoration of the monarchy. As the Revolution became more radical, a seesaw struggle developed in several of the cities. . . .  The executions in the Vendée and the port cities were, however, only a relatively small aspect of the red terror as a whole. Less than 17,000 victims died in executions carried out by the revolutionary authorities. How many died in prison and otherwise, and were also real victims of the Revolution we do not know. Greer estimates that 35,000 to 40,000 persons in all may have lost their lives as a direct result of revolutionary repression, a figure that Lefebvre regards as quite a reasonable guess, though it is little more than that. That this blood bath had its tragic and unjust aspects no serious thinker will deny. Yet in assessing it, one has to keep in mind the repressive aspects of the social order to which it was a response. The prevailing order of society always grinds out its tragic toll of unnecessary deaths year after year. It would be enlightening to calculate the death rate of the ancient regime for such factors as preventable starvation and injustice if that were at all possible. Offhand it seems very unlikely that this would be very much belox the proportion of .0016 which Greer’s figure of 40,000 yields when set against an estimated population of around twenty-four million, the lowest one that Greer cites. I think it would be vastly higher. The figures themselves are open to dispute. The conclusion to which they pointy is less so: to dwell on the horrors of revolutionary violence while forgetting that of ‘normal’ times is merely partisan hypocrisy.


     Still the reader who feels that there is something inhuman in this balancing of grim statistics is by no means altogether mistaken. Even if they were perfect they would not answer some of the most important and difficult questions. Was the terror and bloodshed of the Revolution necessary? What if anything did it accomplish? We may close with a few comments on these points.(pp.103-104)  . . .  


Barrington Moore described in the first chapter of this book how the English capitalists "broke the back" of the independent peasantry in the 16th century, during the historic Enclosures of the Commons, turning peasants into a "surplus population" to be absorbed into the labor market only gradually, as British capitalism expanded. In this second chapter he described how the French capitalists in the 17th century, rather than liquidating the peasant class, as the English had successfuly done, chose to intensify the agricultural exploitation of French peasants to suit the needs of the large landowners in the new capitalist market economy.


In chapter 3, Moore turns to examine the history of a third variant in the social origins of representative capitalist democracy, as it emerged in America and its social consequences.



The 25 + items below offer interpretations and analyses of events from the contemporary Anglophone world in crisis. As class struggle intensifies, even momentary victories are cause for celebration. Congratulations go to Professor Mark Crispin Miller for winning recognition for his completely legitimate self-defense in the academic freedom struggle against the NYU administration, which has belatedly acknowledged that he had violated no university rules during the teaching of his course on Propaganda Studies. We now await a formal apology from The Chronicle of Higher Education’s editorial board for publishing, on May 12, 2021, a libelous hit piece on Professor Miller, entitled "The Professor of Paranoia," written by Mark Dery. The next victory must be the liberation of Julien Assange, an historic struggle for freedom of the press . . . .


Meanwhile, we are warned once more of the overwhelming violence of ruling-class caprice: This Pivotal Moment, vaccine passports (16:57).





Francis McCollum Feeley


Professeur honoraire de l'Université Grenoble-Alpes
Ancien Directeur des Researches
Université de Paris-Nanterre
Director of The Center for the Advanced Study
of American Institutions and Social Movements
The University of California-San Diego






“Another Doctor Tries to Warn Us. Will You Hear Her?”



Published December 6, 2021


"I am a natural doctor. I have about 1,600 patients, many are vaccinated, just to give you a little backstory about my credibility.

"What I've seen so far is all information from physicians, medical physicians, natural physicians and also immunization and virology doctors, things like that and then, also nurses.

"So, what I'm about to share with you is the first vaxxine, the second vaxxine and then the boosters and what it does to you.


Attorney Leigh Dundas Gives Updates on Current Legal Actions

Regarding Vaccine Mandates


with Leigh Dundas

(12 :51)


Video: “Yes, It’s a Killer Vaccine”


with Prof Michel Chossudovsky



CDC study: Veterans with two mRNA doses saw dip in antibody


response after four months


by Justine Coleman


‘We Should Anticipate Seeing this Immune Erosion More Widely’


by Global Research News


New Zealand: Pfizer Confidential Document Concedes that There Is a


Large Increase in Types of Adverse Event Reaction to Its Vaccine


by Guy Hatchard


Bombshell Document Dump on Pfizer Vaccine Data


by Global Research

(December 5, 2021)


Court-Ordered Pfizer Documents They Tried to Have Sealed for 55 Years


Show 1223 Deaths, 158,000 Adverse Events in 90 Days Post EUA Release


by Celia Farber

(December 6, 2021)


Beyond Belief: FDA Adds Another 20 Years to Timeline for Full


Release of Pfizer COVID Vaccine Data – Not Until 2096, Now!


by Ethan Huff

(December 9, 2021)


The End Of Our Species


by Yuval Noah Harari



Catherine Austin Fitts Interview - Global Financial Coup D’état


& Technocratic Slavery That Follows


with Catherine Austin Fitts






Sincere Devotion to the Vaccine. Encounters with a COVID Believer


by Michael Welch and Dr. Tara Moriarty


The Grand Psyop: Five Experiments and Syndromes to Account


for Mass COVID Trance Behavior


by Makia Freeman


The Segregation of the Jabbed and Unjabbed


Is the Next Stage of the Tyrannical ‘New Normal


by Kennedy Hall


The pandemic will end when the digital monetary system is in place


with Sara Haboubi and Melissa Ciummei



Melissa Ciummei, a financial investor from Northern Ireland, has serious concerns that injection passports will be used more like data passports to control participation in society. She believes the passport system was manufactured to bring about a financial reset, replacing our failing fiat currency system. Trillions of dollars are owed to banks and there's no way to pay it back. Because passports are crucial for the implementation of this new financial system, mandatory vaccination of all citizens, young and old, will be imperative for the plan to succeed. Tune in to this in-depth interview for an insight into the economics at play behind the c19 narrative. To prevent this new system from being introduced all people need do is not comply.


Probe Shows Big Pharma 'Manipulated' Patent System


and 'Raised Prices With Abandon'


by Jessica Corbett


COVID-19 A Pandemic Of Fear "Manufactured" By Authorities:


Yale Epidemiologist


by Isabel van Brugen


Big Food Says the ‘Transition’ to the New World Order Food System

Is Already Well Underway


by Celine Ryan Ciccio


 ‘And Just Like That, Inflation Is About To Disappear?’


by Tyler Durden





Webinar with Michael Hudson: a 4000-year perspective on economy, money and debt




More information about the webinar and links to transcript in English and Swedish are published below. You can also watch the video with English and (soon to come) Swedish subtitles. INFORMATION IN ENGLISH The history of money and debt can make us understand more of the economy, the power of the financial elite and how the world is governed today. This is the claim of economics professor Michael Hudson, who has also been an adviser to governments in the USA, Russia and China. Now he comes to Positiva Pengar to tell how history has been a struggle over who should benefit from the ownership, the money and the debts. The Bible talks about jubilee years that recurred at certain intervals when all debts were written off. This was to correct imbalances that arise in economies over time. When economics professor Hudson in 1994 published his research that biblical debt relief dates back two thousand years to the Babylonian and Sumerian traditions, it was very controversial. Today it is recognized by Assyriologists, but among most economic thinkers the idea is taboo. Why was debt write-off a matter of course several thousand years ago, but not today? Hudson's research shows that, as he writes, “Debts that can't be paid, won't be paid.” How then will it be resolved? Do you want to know more? Watch this webinar. You can read a transcription of the webinar here: https://positivapengar.se/michael-hud...


The New Global Order


with Chris Hedges and Professor Alfred McCoy



On the show, Chris Hedges discusses the decline of the American empire and the new global order with Professor Alfred McCoy, who holds the Harrington Chair in History at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Professor Alfred McCoy, the chair of the history department at The University of Wisconsin-Madison, looks at past empires and how they disintegrated in his book ‘To Govern the Globe.’ The familiar patterns of decline allow him to speculate about what lies ahead as the global dominance of the United States crumbles under the weight of disastrous military adventurism, the collapse of public institutions, a rapacious and greedy oligarchic elite and inept political and military leadership. The new world order, McCoy argues, will see China ascendant. “While Washington was spilling its blood and treasure into desert sands,” writes McCoy, “Beijing had been investing much of its accumulated trade surplus in the integration of the ‘world island’ of Africa, Asia, and Europe into an economic powerhouse.” The key to Chinese dominance, he argues, is its far-sighted strategic focus on control of the world’s energy and raw materials, increasingly in short supply, and its investment in a technologically advanced infrastructure. “Each transition to a new world order has occurred when a massively destructive cataclysm has coincided with major social change,” he notes, arguing that the climate crisis will be the trigger for a new configuration of world dominance. Professor Alfred McCoy’s new book is ‘To Govern the Globe: World Orders and Catastrophic Change.’


 “A Tale of Two Summits”


with James Corbett and James Evan Pilato






From: News from Underground [mailto:nobody@simplelists.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2021 1:48 AM
Subject: Daily digest for nfu@simplelists.com


1. "More lawyers than the public realize" are hard at work to halt the killing of of our children, and bring the murderers to justice: Anna de Buisseret, retired army officer and senior lawyer - Mark Crispin Miller (02 Dec 2021 23:47 EST)
2. What it was like to spend two weeks in Australia's COVID concentration camp - Mark Crispin Miller (02 Dec 2021 23:49 EST)
3. “Most” orphans tortured by Dr. Fauci, in the name of "science," were NOT HIV-positive, but perfectly healthy before he had them killed by force-feeding them highly toxic drugs - Mark Crispin Miller (02 Dec 2021 23:54 EST)
4. Hitler decrees that anybody who attacks him is attacking science - Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 12:29 EST)
5. If Germany locks down the "unvaccinated," can the USA/EU be far behind? - Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 12:39 EST)
6. Have the "vaccinated" been chipped after all? Check out all those tiny rectangles - Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 12:45 EST)
7. A microchip containing your "vaccine" passport can now be embedded in your hand (and some Swedes are dumb enough to have it done) - Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 12:49 EST)
8. This is it. Now you either say "Enough," or quit pretending that you're free, or even care to be (MUST-READ) - Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 13:08 EST)
9. The BBC revealed what Dr. Fauci did to all those orphans (then took it down—but here it is again) - Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 13:14 EST)


1. "More lawyers than the public realize" are hard at work to halt the killing of of our children, and bring the murderers to justice: Anna de Buisseret, retired army officer and senior lawyer by Mark Crispin Miller (02 Dec 2021 23:47 EST)
Reply to list


2. What it was like to spend two weeks in Australia's COVID concentration camp by Mark Crispin Miller (02 Dec 2021 23:49 EST)
Reply to list


3. “Most” orphans tortured by Dr. Fauci, in the name of "science," were NOT HIV-positive, but perfectly healthy before he had them killed by force-feeding them highly toxic drugs by Mark Crispin Miller (02 Dec 2021 23:54 EST)
Reply to list

Publius posted: " Contrary to the popular narrative that the poor, mostly Black and Hispanic orphans who died in experiments overseen by Anthony Fauci in the Nineties were HIV infected, and expected to die anyway, in his new book The Real Anthony Fauci, Robert F. Kenn"
Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on Coronavirus News

BOOM. RFK Jr: “Most” Orphans Used by Fauci in Deadly US Experiments Were Not HIV-Positive, But Healthy Before Forcibly Drugged
by Publius
Contrary to the popular narrative that the poor, mostly Black and Hispanic orphans who died in experiments overseen by Anthony Fauci in the Nineties were HIV infected, and expected to die anyway, in his new book The Real Anthony Fauci, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. asserts, citing many sources, that most of them were healthy to begin with.
Fauci at the time was helping GlaxoSmithKline and other companies develop an enormously profitable HIV vaccines, to the exclusion of other cheaper, effective treatments.
The revelations come as the nation's governors and medical authorities continue to follow Fauci in lock-step in every aspect of the pandemic known as COVID, now transitioning to Omicron, even though multitudes of scientists and other countries say up to 80% of COVID deaths could have been avoided but for a relentless campaign by Fauci to deny patients life-saving remedies such as Ivermectin. Denial of Ivermectin as a safe and effective remedy goes on to this day.
Nevertheless, the media and politicians, with the exception of lone Senator Rand Paul, decline to ask Fauci rude question or fawn on him outright, a possible mass killer of children.
Governor Charlie Baker of Massachusetts is the latest to announce the creation of Fauci's long-desired "vaccine passports," leading to a mandatory, life-long injection regime of "boosters" for every human dependent on civil society and public transport, not private jets.
Fauci and Fauci-ism continue uninterrupted.
If the assertions withstand scrutiny, it is clear that the nation is following a psychopath who has committed Crimes Against Humanity, according to the post WWII Nuremberg Code. Kennedy says the orphans were chosen for their lack of guardianship or a lack of advocacy on their behalf. Many were children of the incarcerated.
According toKennedy, most of the children were healthy and could have been expected to live normal, productive lives, with care and nurturing. Instead, they were force-fed the drugs, even surgically intubated through the stomach if they resisted too much. Many wound up in a mass grave at Gate of Heaven cemetery in Hawthorne, New York.
Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor who has devoted her life to stopping unethical and illegal medical experimentation on children, and whose organization conducted a major investigation into the episode, told RFK Jr.:
"Fauci just brushed all those dead babies under the rug. They were collateral damage in his career ambitions. They were throwing away children."
Below: Direct stomach infusion of baby in New York City’s ICC Orphanage (source)
Vera Sharav, Holocaust survivor
New York City’s ICC Orphanage Fauci Drug Trials Victim
journalist Celia Farber, who worked on a 2004 BBC documentary on the part of the vast program, involving as many as 14,000 children in seven states, told RFK Jr.:
 “I couldn’t believe my eyes. It was a very large pit with AstroTurf thrown over it, which you could actually lift up. Under it one could see dozens of plain wooden coffins, haphazardly stacked. There may have been 100 of them. I learned there was more than one child’s body in each.”
The BBC documentary was "Guinea Pig Kids." After a campaign by proponents of the GlaxoSmithKline drug approved by Fauci, AZT, the BBC issued a limited apology which affirmed:
"The programme explored legitimate concerns about a research project involving the testing of anti-HIV drugs on children..."
The apology centered on controversy around the role of the HIV virus actually being the cause of AIDS, and conceded that:
 "...the programme interviewed an expert witness who was, though the audience was not told, a leading advocate of the propositions that HIV is unconnected with AIDS, that anti-retroviral drugs do not work in the treatment of AIDS and that they are, in fact, responsible for deaths attributed to AIDS."
The apology was in no way a retraction of the documentary's major conclusions.
RFK Jr.'s heavily researched, 2,200-footnote book is now at the top of the Amazon charts. In a remarkable affront to Fauci, Tel Aviv University has awarded the $1 million Dan David Prize to Kennedy's book, after giving the award to Fauci earlier this year. Kennedy donates all such proceeds from his book to the Children's Defense Fund.
Kennedy presents reports and documentation which say that the children suffered horribly, even though "most" were healthy going into the trials.
Kennedy repeats the claim in a now viral interview given after the release of the book, below. (View at Bitchute)
The orphan episode is one of the most controversial in Fauci's career. But always, it has been presumed, in defenses of Fauci, that the children all had HIV, and so were acceptable candidates for dangerous, but possibly life-saving treatments. The broadside upends any medical rationale for subjecting the children, who died vomiting, blind, or from strokes, to the experimental substances.
In 2009 the city of New York commissioned a study which found no link between the experimental drugs and the childrens' deaths, some as young as three-day-old newborns. But that study, done by the Vera Institute, admits that the city:
"refused multiple requests...to review clinical trial research or medical records. This limited Vera’s review in several ways, including the ability to fully document the frequency and severity of toxicity (side effects), the individual outcomes of trial participation for the children..."
The Vera Institute is in no way affiliated or connected with Vera Sharav's Alliance for Human Research Protections (AHRP,) which reached the opposite conclusion, that the experimentation killed the children.
Kennedy writes on page 533, citing Vera Sharav's Alliance for Human Research Protections (AHRP) 2005 reports and hearing before the New York State Legislature Committee on Health and Committee on Children and Families:
"In testimony before Congress, NIAID and its local partner—New York City’s Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) —sought to justify the unethical research practices by claiming they were providing first-class, cutting-edge treatments to HIV- infected children who could otherwise not afford expensive medicines. However, AHRP's investigation revealed that many of the children NIAID subjected to Dr.
Fauci's experiments were perféctly healthy and may not even have been HIV-infected."
On page 534:
"Publicly, NIAID pretended it would permit pharmaceutical companies
to conduct their dangerous dose tolerance experiments only on children who had terminal AIDS and were therefore likely to die anyhow. However, AHRP found that NIAID was quietly allowing its Pharma partners to experiment not only on children with laboratory-confirmed HIV infection, but also those “presumed” to be infected. In other
words, NIAID required no proof that these children actually had HIV."
On page 533:
"AP writer John Solomon confirmed that despite contrary requirements in official NIAID protocols, NIAID was knowingly allowing its Pharma partners to violate NIAID’s written study protocols by conducting these experiments on children with and without proof of HIV infection.
For example, published reports acknowledge that NIAID, Genentech, and Micro-Genesys cosponsored a vaccine trial code-named ACTG #218. The ACTG #218 protocol states, “Patients must have: Documented asymptomatic HIV infection,” and the “Expected Total Enrollment” was seventy-two. However, an internal report acknowledges that NIAID was allowing the companies to openly violate those requirements: “125 immunized children proved to be HIV uninfected.”35 Another report stated: “A total of 126 children were not infected.”2© NIAID’s final analysis acknowledged that ACTG #218 “showed no clinical benefit to vaccine recipients.”37 Another HIV Phase I vaccine trial, ACTG 230, tested two experimental vaccines, one by Genentech, another by Chiron/Biocine. This time, the protocol openly declared: “Accepts Healthy Volunteers.”38 As Solomon discovered, the “volunteer” subjects of that unethical experiment were newborns aged three days or less."
Screenshots, The Real Anthony Fauci, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The Real Anthony Fauci, by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
TAKE ACTION: 27 States Now to Ban Vaccine Mandates
In 2004 independent journalist Liam Scheff covered the Fauci-funded experiments in the article "The House That AIDS Built," which served as the impetus for the BBC documentary. Scheff wrote:
“The drugs being given to the children are toxic — they’re known to cause genetic mutation, organ failure, bone marrow death, bodily deformations, brain damage, and fatal skin disorders,” he wrote."
“If the children refuse the drugs, they’re held down and force-fed. If the children continue to resist, they’re taken to Columbia Presbyterian hospital, where a surgeon puts a plastic tube through their abdominal wall into their stomachs. From then on, the drugs are injected directly into their intestines.”
“In 2003, two children, ages 6 and 12, had debilitating strokes due to drug toxicities. The 6-year-old went blind. They both died shortly after."
 Fauci is under a referral for investigation on criminal charges submitted by Senator Rand Paul, for lying to Congress in the matter of his NIH funding of gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab in China. The lab, which Fauci refers to as "partners," serves as the bioweapons research arm of the People’s Liberation Army.
Fauci and Gain-of-Function Research Report (view at Bitchute)
Holocaust Survivor Vera Sharav on Medical Mandates, Medical Fascism  (view at Bitchute)
Read Next...
As Cases Rise, Inventor of mRNA Vax Says Fauci Killed 500,000 People by Blocking Ivermectin/HCQ
Bill Gates Dictates: No “Normalcy” Until All Submit to Experimental Shots, “You Don’t Have a Choice”
Victims of the Experimental mRNA COVID Injections: The Names and Faces
Oklahoma National Guard Won’t Enforce Biden’s Vaccine Mandate — Defying Pentagon
Fauci Keeps Squashing Ivermectin Which Shows Efficacy Against Variants Like Omicron
Publius | December 2, 2021 at 1:50 am | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: https://wp.me/pc1fPT-2up
   See all comments
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

4. Hitler decrees that anybody who attacks him is attacking science by Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 12:29 EST)
Reply to list

Hitler Proclaims Anyone Who Attacks Him Is Attacking Science
November 29th, 2021 - BabylonBee.com
BERLIN—In an interview with CBS News, German Chancellor Adolf Hitler declared that anyone who attacks him or his methods is really attacking science itself. 
"Why do you think all these mean, angry people are attacking you with nasty words?" said the starstruck CBS interviewer. "Is it because they are dumb and stupid and don't understand your brilliance?"
"It's clear why people are attacking me. They hate science," said Hitler. "The science of Darwinian evolution and eugenics as an effective mechanism for the betterment of humankind is completely undisputed. The science is settled. It's clear what motivates the people who question my methods. They are just anti-science bigots."
The CBS interviewer nodded solemnly in agreement. "Hmmm. Anti-science bigots. So true," she replied. 
Click on the link for the rest.

5. If Germany locks down the "unvaccinated," can the USA/EU be far behind? by Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 12:39 EST)
Reply to list

Germany announces de facto lockdown for the "unvaccinated":
EU head calls for junking the Nuremberg Code, making "vaccination" mandatory throughout Europe:
80 Republicans join Democrats to pass HR 550, to fund a federal "vaccination" database:
Rhode Island to introduce "vaccine" passport:
Nevada becomes first state to impose surcharge on "unvaccinated" workers:

6. Have the "vaccinated" been chipped after all? Check out all those tiny rectangles by Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 12:45 EST)
Reply to list

7. A microchip containing your "vaccine" passport can now be embedded in your hand (and some Swedes are dumb enough to have it done) by Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 12:49 EST)
Reply to list

A Microchip Containing Your Vaccine Passport Information Can Now Be Embedded In Your Hand
November 30, 2021
Things are starting to get really weird.  What I am about to share with you sounds very strange, but it is all true.  Before I get into it, let me ask you a question.  If you could have a vaccine passport permanently embedded into your hand, would you do it?  Amazingly, some people in Sweden are willingly doing this to themselves.  They are putting microchips that contain their vaccine passport information into their hands, and they are raving about how convenient this is.  You can actually watch a video of this being done to someone right here.  The video is not in English, but you will be able to understand what is happening.
Click on the link for the rest.

8. This is it. Now you either say "Enough," or quit pretending that you're free, or even care to be (MUST-READ) by Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 13:08 EST)
Reply to list

The Vaccine Moment, part one
On the days of revelation
Paul Kingsnorth
Nov 24
This is the first installment of a two-part essay on the virus and the Machine. Part two follows next week, after which normal service will be resumed.
Perhaps it’s because I’m English, or perhaps it’s my age, or perhaps it’s just blind prejudice, but when I wake to the news that the Austrian government has interned an entire third of its national population as a ‘danger to public health’, a chill runs down my spine. 
Austria, I think to myself. Ah.
I look at the news photos of armed, masked, black-clad police stopping people in the streets to ask for their digital papers, and I read stories of others arrested for leaving their own house more than the permitted once a day, and I hear Austrian politicians intoning that those who refuse to accede to the injection are to be shunned and scapegoated until they acquiesce. Then I watch interviews with ‘ordinary people’, and they say that the ‘unvaxxed’ had it coming. Some of them say that they should all be jailed, these enemies of the people. At best, the ‘anti-vaxxers’ are paranoid and misinformed. At worst they are malicious, and should be punished.
A few days later I wake up to some more news about Austria: from next year, everyone in the country will have a covid vaccine forced into them by the state, overriding their right to what certain people, who have gone very quiet recently, used to call ‘bodily autonomy.’
Then I look across the border at Germany. I see that in Germany, politicians are also considering interning the ‘vaccine hesitant’, and are currently discussing forcing vaccination upon every citizen. By the end of the winter, says Germany’s refreshingly honest health minister, Germans will be ‘vaccinated, cured or dead.’ There is apparently no fourth option. 
They have been busy in Germany. Recently they put up fences in Hamburg to separate the Bad Unvaxxed from the Good Vaxxed at the Christmas markets. Outdoors. Perhaps they will also provide the Good people with rocks to throw across those fences. When I see cartoons like the one at the top of this page, which recently appeared in a mainstream German newspaper, I think that this may not be far off. Here, the man on the sofa has bought himself a first-person shooter game in which he can having fun killing unvaccinated people. It will be, says the cartoonist, ‘a big hit under the Christmas tree.’1
Ha ha ha, I think. Germany. Fences. Internment. Forced injections. Armed police. Scan your code. Kill the unvaxxed.
Ha ha ha.
I am watching all this from Ireland, the country which has the highest adult vaccination rate in Western Europe, at over 94% of the population. At the same time, curiously, we have some of the highest covid infection rates in Western Europe too. The government has not been able to explain this fact, but it is a trend that has recently manifested in some other highly-vaccinated places too: Gibraltar, Israel, West Flanders. High levels of vaccination do not seem to correspond with low-levels of disease; often quite the opposite.
Click on the link for the rest.

9. The BBC revealed what Dr. Fauci did to all those orphans (then took it down—but here it is again) by Mark Crispin Miller (03 Dec 2021 13:14 EST)
Reply to list

"America's doctor" is a criminal psychopath. 
Guinea Pig Kids BBC Documentary - Fauci
New World Order: Blueprint Of Madmen Published October 30, 2021 6,785 Views
Fauci's Dead Babies and Mass Graves From the Past

 The reception of Robert Kennedy Jr's book, 'The Real Anthony Fauci' is clear evidence of a mass awakening.
 The people are waking up to see Fauci for what he is: an absolute psychopath.
We've learned of how he directed experiments at the NIAID, in which beagles had their vocal cords removed and their heads enclosed in cages, where sand fleas ate them alive.
 And we've learned of how he fraudulently used PCR tests to illegitimately push a known deadly drug [AZT] upon tens of thousands of people.
 And many are now learning that in 1992, under the direction of Anthony Fauci, the NIAID funded drug trials on HIV-positive children – although many of the children were healthy and asymptomatic, they had merely tested positive via faulty PCR tests, administered through New York's Child Welfare Department, who then handed them over to the deadly experiments.
 Most of the drugs being tested on the children were already known to cause deformities, organ failure, brain damage and other lethal side effects.
 And yet, the children were required to continue with the drugs, regardless of negative side effects.
 Those administering the drugs were explicitly told that all adverse side effects witnessed in the children were being caused by the HIV infection and not the drugs.
 When parents refused to consent to these barbaric trials, children's services took their kids and placed them with foster families or children's homes, where participation in the trial would be assured.
 When the children resisted the deadly drugs, they were brought to Columbia Presbyterian Hospital, where plastic tubes were surgically inserted into their stomachs and the deadly drugs they were trying to escape were pumped directly into their bodies.
 Once the children died, their bodies were added to a mass grave in Hawthorne, New York – a large pit with Astroturf thrown over it.
 To get around the Nuremberg Code and other laws, the State of New York created a special review board comprised of the hospital stakeholders.
 One may wonder, other than torturing and killing innocent children, what were they trying to accomplish?
They already knew of the negative side effects that these drugs were having on adults.
 But the more we learn about Anthony Fauci, the more we realize that he is an absolute psychopath and it doesn't matter why psychopaths do what they do.
 Fauci and his criminal cohorts belong in cages, at the very least.
 Anthony Fauci is just one old crook in a massive conspiracy that is aggressively pushing to inject everyone's children with the new deadly and debilitating mRNA experimental jabs, whether you like it or not.
 Going after Fauci is a drop in the bucket but at least, it's a start.
 Running Time: 3 min

Visit News from Underground: https://markcrispinmiller.com
For archives, please go to: https://archives.simplelists.com/nfu





Julian Assange’s Father and Brother on:


the Public and Personal Urgency of His Case”


Tweet from Scheerpost

(December 10, 2021)


Assange Verdict: Vengeance Is Ours, Saith the Agency


by Ray McGovern


Assange Will Appeal High Court Decision Backing Extradition


The Dissenter


Press Freedoms Under 'Grave Threat'


as British Court Rules Assange Can Be Extradited to US


by Jake Johnson


Secret ‘CIA-funded’ Group Linked to UK Ministers


by Matt Kennard and Mark Curtis


Rights Groups Warn Extradition of Assange Would Have


'Dangerous Implications for Future of Journalism'


by Andrea Germanos


The Judicial Kidnapping of Julian Assange


by  John Pilger


US Wins Appeal over Extradition of WikiLeaks Founder Assange


by Al-Jazeera


Jailed for 51 weeks for protesting?


Britain is becoming a police state by stealth


by George Monbiot


Maxwell Trial Facade, Assange Extradition &


The “Vaccine Equity” Hypocrisy


with Whitney Webb






The Jeffrey Epstein Cover Up: Pedophilia, Lies,


and Ghislaine Maxwell


by Nick Bryant


‘Media Bears a Responsibility’ –


Protesters Demand Justice for Survivors amid Maxwell Trial


by Dan Cohen


Ghislaine Maxwell Is Finally on Trial!


by Philip Giraldi


Ghislaine Maxwell trial – live:


Epstein lured victim to ranch with gifts, witness says


by Oliver O’Connell, Arpan Rai, Eleanor Sly, and Alisha Rahaman Sarkar


American Satyricon


by Chris Hedges


Richest 1% Took 38% of New Global Wealth Since 1995.


The Bottom Half Got Just 2%


by Jake Johnson





“What Really Happened in Wuhan”


(Exclusive Interview)


with Sharri Markson  and Tucker Carlson



“Lab Leak or Natural Emergence:


What Really Happened in



(Documentary Film)


by Sharri Markson






From: Reclaim The Net [mailto:hello@reclaimthenet.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2021 9:24 PM
Subject: Twitter censors the American Heart Association

 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌  ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 

Reclaim The Net accepts no advertising and is funded entirely by the community. If you support free speech, the eradication of cancel culture, and restoring privacy and civil liberties, please become a supporter here.

Thank you.






Australian Defense Minister Peter Dutton has won a defamation lawsuit he filed against a Twitter user for a post and won $25,000 in damages.

It has given the Australian government shameless new ideas about how they can censor.

Become a supporter here.

Get the post






Twitter's direct and indirect suppression of opinions that in any way question the efficacy or safety of Covid vaccines continues unabated on the platform.

The latest example is a label that the social network is putting on links leading to an American Heart Association (AHA) study that shows the risk of developing heart conditions increases by 11 to 25% percent when mRNA vaccines (by Moderna and Pfizer) are administered.

Twitter users clicking on links shared in posts don't get to the study's page on the site of the Journal of the American Heart Association right away, but are instead redirected to Twitter's warning, stating that either Twitter or its "partners" (i.e., third party fact-checkers) have identified them as potentially spammy or unsafe, therefore running afoul of its URL policy.



The warning doesn't say what exact rule the AHA study page broke, but mentions broadly that the transgression could be a malicious link that steals personal information, a spammy one that misleads or "disrupts people's experience," as well as those that promote violent content causing real world harm.

Another reason to put this barrier between Twitter users and the AHA site is if the content was shared directly on Twitter and violates its rules and policies.

A big blue button then prompts users to go back to Twitter, and finally, at the very bottom of the message, those not scared enough are given the possibility to ignore it and continue to the page they were headed to.

What, if anything, from the AHA study - titled, MRNA COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning - matches any of these descriptions of links that deserve a warning label is not explained.



Reclaim The Net accepts no advertising and is funded entirely by the community. If you support free speech, the eradication of cancel culture and restoring privacy and civil liberties, please become a supporter here.







YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki has defended the company's moderation and censorship decisions in an interview as being consistently implemented for all creators in the same way - but that sits at odds with the reality of the platform's policy which promotes what it considers “authoritative sources” over independent creators.

Wojcicki herself in the past admitted that legacy media are allowed to post content that would otherwise fall into the "hate speech" category because they provide their own "context" for it. This would mean that the same moderation rules therefore do not apply to all.

But speaking for
Marketplace, Wojcicki claims that censorship ("moderation") decisions are not taken lightly, and are applied in a consistent manner that doesn't discriminate between creators.

She also used the fact both sides in the US political divide criticize YouTube (one side saying there is too much censorship, deplatforming and other kinds of restrictions, while the other believes there isn't enough) as proof that YouTube is getting it right and "striking a balance."

The interviewer also raised the issue, parroting the sentiments of "several researchers and some members of Congress" who disagree with simply censoring content in most cases, instead of getting rid of people or organizations posting it on YouTube - the case given is that of a "white supremacist" group that some think should be banned regardless of the content they upload and whether it has anything to do with "white supremacy."

Once again, Wojcicki revealed that she sees the company as being "incredibly consistent" and mentioned the three-strike system as something positive to highlight. Wojcicki also said that it would be "a dangerous line to start characterizing individuals and start saying, ''This person is not allowed," and reiterated that politicians and individuals are all held to the same standards.

But in the summer of 2020, Wojcicki spoke for the Washington Post to say that if President Trump or any elected official were found to be promoting hatred and violence their posts would be removed - but media outlets reuploading it would be fine, as long as they provide (presumably, "appropriate") context.

Earlier that year she told Bloomberg that media coverage was influencing what YouTube chooses to censor, again using the crutch of "context" for justification.

"If a news organization is covering it, it could be reinstated because it's got context and there's news associated with it but just a video by itself of someone speaking into the camera saying take this medicine and that' s something that we know is medically unsubstantiated (...) then that would be something that would be a violation and we would take it down,"
she said at the time.

So much for consistently implemented rules for all creators.






Last year, the UK medical register suspended a consultant surgeon for 12 months pending an investigation by the General Medical Council (GMC) for posting on social media that Covid-19 was being used by elites to control the world.

Colleagues wrote to the organization arguing he should not have been suspended for his personal opinion.

Mohammad Iqbal Adil, a Pakistan-born British doctor, has worked in the NHS for almost three decades. An interim orders tribunal suspended him for a year because of videos he posted on social media.

The doctor expressed “his point of view on the Covid-19 pandemic and the far-reaching effects of the lockdown on the economy, public health and wellbeing,” his campaign page states.

A spokesperson for the GMC at the time said: “The interim orders tribunal imposed an interim suspension on Dr Adil’s registration, following our referral, to protect patients and public confidence. This interim suspension remains in place while we consider concerns about Dr Adil’s fitness to practice.”

Some of his colleagues launched a petition on Change.org calling on the GMC to reinstate Dr. Adil. The petition argues that the GMC should have given him a chance to reflect on the videos “when the entire world is confused about the novel virus.”

The petition also noted that he had a family to support, adding, UK needs doctors to work. It would not be in the best interest of the public and health system to lose [an] experienced and highly qualified surgeon like him.

“We, the doctors community within [the] UK and across the world, feel that it’s injustice to suspend Mr Adil on his personal point of view on the covid-19 without giving him [a] chance to reflect upon his video before enforcing suspension.

“We request to the GMC to revoke his unfair 12 months suspension . . . and allow him fair chance to work in this country [for the benefit of] the health system, communities, and medical graduates.”

“Dr Adil has been making a stand for freedom of speech for all doctors and nurses to speak their truth without fear of recrimination or persecution,” his campaign page states.






Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt said Twitter’s new CEO should focus on removing bots on the platform.

Jack Dorsey stepped down earlier this week and was replaced by Parag Agrawal, who was the company’s chief technology officer.

In an interview with
Barron’s, Schmidt said: “There are too many automatic posters and not enough human posters. The next CEO should focus on that.”
Twitter claims that it identifies approximately 25 million accounts that could be spam or automated each month.

In a comment to Barron’s, a spokesperson for Twitter said the platform was working on expanding its harmful content detection systems.

“We’re now able to proactively surface more than 65% of abusive content that’s enforced on our service for human review instead of relying on reports from people using Twitter,” a spokesperson said.

Schmidt also addressed “misinformation” on social media companies.

“We can’t have a situation where the primary communication mechanisms are distorting truth,” Schmidt said.

He also noted social media’s reliance on polarizing content because it has the most engagement.

“To maximize revenue, you have to maximize engagement. To maximize engagement, you have to maximize outrage,” he said.

Schmidt recommended that the social media industry should come up with standards to address these issues. He also said more regulation and lawsuits could help address the problems.






Germany’s new coalition government is seemingly pro-encryption and supports other policies digital rights advocates have asked for years, including the right to anonymity. The previous government, led by Angela Merkel, supported more surveillance.

Privacy is a protected right under the German constitution. However, in an effort to fight crime, law enforcement agencies have undermined that right by fighting to access otherwise private data.

The previous German government, which was led by conservatives, joined other European nations in calling for a “legal access to encrypted data.” In 2020, the German-led European Council approved a resolution titled “Security through encryption and security despite encryption.” The resolution does not outlaw encryption but supports the use of backdoors for the purpose of law enforcement.

However, the recently elected government supports encryption.

The coalition agreement contained a lot of policies that satisfied the expectations of digital rights advocates. The coalition has promised a right to encryption and a right to anonymity. It has also promised to increase IT security and fund public code.

The coalition agreement promises a right to encryption and says state authorities will not be allowed to keep backdoors (vulnerabilities) secret. Espionage and intelligence agencies use backdoors to monitor potential criminals.

The contract states: "We require all government agencies to report security vulnerabilities they are aware of to the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) and to undergo regular external audits of their IT systems."

On strengthening IT security, the document states: "We will strengthen digital civil rights and IT security. It is the state's duty to guarantee them."

The agreement promises to respect anonymity:

"The right to anonymity both in public spaces and on the internet must be guaranteed.”Future government projects will be “commissioned as open source, and software will be made public as a matter of principle,” according to a report on Tutanota.

In line with a recent ruling by the European Parliament, the coalition contract prohibits the use of biometric recognition systems in public spaces.
Additionally, future laws on security will be evaluated by a panel of independent experts.







Palestine in Pictures: November 2021


by Nora Barrows-Friedman


UN Special Rapporteur on Israel's illegal occupation


of Palestinian Territories


with Michael Lynk, UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights on Human Rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territories



The Struggles of Ofer Cassif, an Anti-Zionist in Israel’s Knesset


by Miko Peled


“The fact that I am a Jew myself drove them crazy… If you are an Israeli Jew you must support Israel and the crimes it commits.” – Ofer Cassif


UNRWA stifles employee speech on Palestinian rights


by Khuloud Rabah Sulaiman


US college bars trauma services for Palestinians


by Nora Barrows-Friedman


Israel Directly Interferes In Iran Nuclear Deal Talks


by Robert Inlakesh


Israel's spyware hacks phones of US officials


by Memo


Killed by Israel's negligence


by Fedaa al-Qedra


Lebanon: Blast rocks Palestinian camp, causes casualties


Al Jazeera


Moroccans Protest Normalization of Ties with Israel


This article originally appeared in Peoples Dispatch


Details of 1948 Massacres against Palestinians Revealed


in Classified Israeli Documents


The Palestine Chronicle


On ‘Gassing the Arabs’ and Other Diseases: Is Israel a ‘Sick Society’?


by Ramzy Baroud


Western Media Cover Up Racist Israeli Settler Violence


by Robert Inlakesh


A database for the displaced


by Heba Salim





From: Cat McGuire [mailto:cat@catmcguire.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2021 7:56 AM
Subject: Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News -- December 4, 2021


One of the stories for this week’s news round-up included press coverage of me and my sister Colleen at the Ghislaine Maxwell trial that started this week in New York City.  Hear all about it!

Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – December 4, 2021

Past Shows
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – November 6, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – October 2, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – September 4, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News –- August 7, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – July 3, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – June 5, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – May 1, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – April 3, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – March 6, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – February 6, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – January 2, 2021
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – December 5, 2020
Cat co-hosts False Flag Weekly News – August 15, 2020





Biden Expected To Lock Down Travelers!


with Ron Paul

(25 :36)


 ‘The elites need a new bogeyman,’ and that bogeyman is inflation


with Marc Steiner





Countdown to World War III?


by Michael Klare


House Approves $778 Billion Military Budget


by Jake Johnson


The Competition Between China and the U.S.


with Richard Wolff



Olympolitik: Fake Peng Shuai Scandal Fuels US Effort


to Boycott Beijing Olympics


by Danny Haiphong


“Unregulated Capitalism is a Suicide Pact”: Noam Chomsky Talks


Climate, China, and More with Lowkey


by Lowkey


A CIA and Pentagon Production


by Ted Snider


Biden-Putin Talk Tuesday With Xi in the Wings


by Ray McGovern


US Imperialism and the Larger Context of the Kyle Rittenhouse Case


by  Vince Montes





Russia: Warns U.S. / NATO  -  Videos


with Sergey Lavrov


War in Ukraine? NATO expansion drives conflict with Russia


by Aaron Maté


Biden-Putin Teleconference:


Putin Rejects Biden’s Demand That U.S. Take Control Over


Negotiations Between Ukraine and Its Former Donbass Region


by Eric Zuesse


US holds off on $200mn military aid package to Ukraine


by Associated Press


Ukraine Leader Hopes for Talks With Russia Amid Tensions


by Associated Press


Tucke’s Crucial Fight Against Republican Russia Hawks


by David Stockman


Ukrainian Crisis:


Are We On The Verge Of WWIII Or Pax Multipolarity?


by Kim Kerby


The NATOstan Clown Show


by Pepe Escobar


Corrupting science: Shunning forensic expertise,


OPCW left Douma murders in Syria unsolved


by Aaron Maté


US continues training blacklisted terrorists in Syria


by Memo


Poll Finds Public Confidence In 'Woke' Military Is In Free Fall


by Tyler Durden


The Ronald Reagan Institute just announced that public confidence in the military has continued its precipitous drop. The institute’s November 2021 poll found that only 45 percent of those polled report "a great deal of trust and confidence in the military" — down 25 points in three years. The institute adds "Increasing numbers of Americans say they have little or not much confidence in the military, which is up 15 points in the last three years."

The military isn’t the only public institution suffering a bad reputation, but it is used to basking in public esteem. As a result, it may not know how to recover.





From: News from Underground [mailto:nobody@simplelists.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2021 1:55 AM
Subject: Daily digest for nfu@simplelists.com


1. "Plandemic 3" is coming! (MUST-WATCH/SHARE) - Mark Crispin Miller (05 Dec 2021 19:52 EST)
2. The US government CO-OWNS the Moderna "vaccine"?? - Mark Crispin Miller (05 Dec 2021 22:12 EST)
3. "Data is the new oil": James Corbett on the dangers of the "smart grid," and how might prevent them - Mark Crispin Miller (05 Dec 2021 23:18 EST)
4. Do lockdowns work? Jimmy Dore and Max Blumenthal call out the AWOL (i.e., complicit) "left" - Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 12:26 EST)
5. Tears of joy at one small victory for humanity - Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 14:15 EST)
6. First Omicron patients in South Africa, India and US were "fully vaccinated" - Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 14:35 EST)
7. Latest UK mortality statistics show "systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of C-19 vaccination" - Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 16:44 EST)
8. Dan Andrews doing coke - Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 16:54 EST)
9. PM Dan Andrews getting BLITZED on coke, right before a pop-eyed turn before Australia's press (which, of course, did not report it) - Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 17:24 EST)
10. A new anthem sweeps Australia (and just might sweep it clean!) - Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 17:35 EST)
11. No wonder They're so viciously attacking this archbishop - Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 18:04 EST)
12. German data makes it clear: The higher the "vaccination" rate, the higher the excess mortality - Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 18:28 EST)





1)"Plandemic 3" is coming! (MUST-WATCH/SHARE) by Mark Crispin Miller (05 Dec 2021 19:52 EST)
">Reply to list



2) The US government CO-OWNS the Moderna "vaccine"?? by Mark Crispin Miller (05 Dec 2021 22:12 EST)
">Reply to list

More specifically, Fauci's NAIAD co-owns the "vaccine" that he, and the government, are slowly forcing on us all.



3) "Data is the new oil": James Corbett on the dangers of the "smart grid," and how might prevent them by Mark Crispin Miller (05 Dec 2021 23:18 EST)
">Reply to list



4)Do lockdowns work? Jimmy Dore and Max Blumenthal call out the AWOL (i.e., complicit) "left" by Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 12:26 EST)
Reply to list



5)Tears of joy at one small victory for humanity by Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 14:15 EST)
Reply to list



6)First Omicron patients in South Africa, India and US were "fully vaccinated" by Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 14:35 EST)
Reply to list

first omicron patients in S. Africa, India and u.s. were fully vaccinated

 Search the following by title:

 [Search domain cnbc.com] https://www.cnbc.com › 2021 › 12 › 01 › first-us-omicron-patient-was-fully-vaccinated-and-has-mild-covid-symptoms-officials-say.html

5 days ago First U.S. omicron patient was fully vaccinated and has mild Covid symptoms, officials say Published Wed, Dec 1 2021 4:13 PM EST Updated Wed, Dec 1 2021 6:24 PM EST Spencer Kimball @spencekimball

First U.S. omicron patient was fully vaccinated and has ...

[Search domain co19debate.com] co19debate.com › first-u-s-omicron-patient-was-fully-vaccinated-and-has-mild-covid-symptoms-officials-say

The person in California who tested positive for the omicron variant of the virus that causes Covid-19 was fully vaccinated, has mild symptoms and is improving, officials said Wednesday. The patient was otherwise healthy when they returned to the San Francisco Bay Area from traveling in South Africa on Nov. 22, developed symptoms three days […]

First U.S. omicron patient was fully vaccinated and has ...

[Search domain covigilantresearch.com] https://covigilantresearch.com › first-u-s-omicron-patient-was-fully-vaccinated-and-has-mild-covid-symptoms-officials-say-cnbc

The first person in the U.S. diagnosed with the omicron Covid variant was fully vaccinated, has mild symptoms and has not been hospitalized, ...Read More Skip to content (877) 994-2272

Omicron variant: Did the first patient have severe COVID ...

[Search domain deseret.com] https://www.deseret.comcoronavirus › 2021 › 12 › 2 › 22813911 › omicron-variant-covid-first-case-details

Per Deadline, California Gov. Gavin Newsom released fresh details about the first omicron patients, their symptoms and how they got infected. The patient, a female, was "between the age of 18 and 49," Newsom said. The patient is a San Francisco resident. She is fully vaccinated. She visited South Africa and left for the U.S. on Nov. 21.

Omicron in India: Two fully-vaccinated men test positive ...

[Search domain firstpost.com] https://www.firstpost.com › health › omicron-in-india-two-fully-vaccinated-men-test-positive-for-new-covid-19-variant-karnatakas-bommai-calls-for-meet-1-pm-10182841.html

Omicron in India. According to authorities, the first patient is a 66-year-old South African man, who travelled to Bengaluru via Dubai. Authorities report that the veteran, who was fully vaccinated, travelled from South Africa on 20 November with a negative COVID-19 report. On his arrival, he checked into a hotel and his test reports came out ...

Omicron COVID Variant Found ONLY in Fully Vaccinated ...

[Search domain peckford42.wordpress.com] https://peckford42.wordpress.com › 2021 › 11 › 27 › omicron-covid-variant-found-only-in-fully-vaccinated

All four Botswana Omicron variant patients were fully vaccinated The "Omicron" variant of COVID arrived just in time to ruin Christmas. (Who didn't see this coming?) The variant with "more mutations than you shake a spike protein at" was first identified in Botswana and quickly became the most prevalent variant in South Africa. But before…

First known U.S. Omicron case found in fully vaccinated ...

[Search domain news.yahoo.com] https://news.yahoo.com › u-reports-first-case-omicron-190419554.html

The United States on Wednesday identified its first known case of Omicron, discovered in a fully vaccinated patient who traveled to South Africa, as scientists continue to study the risks the new COVID variant could pose. Public health officials said the infected person, who had mild symptoms, returned to the United States from South Africa on Nov. 22 and tested positive seven days later.

Omicron in India: Don't need fear, says health ministry as ...

[Search domain wionews.com] https://www.wionews.comindia-news › omicron-in-india-dont-need-fear-says-health-ministry-as-first-2-cases-found-one-patient-fully-vaccinated-433526

India's health ministry urged responsibility, not fear, as it confirmed on Thursday that two cases of Omicron variant of coronavirus have been found in the country. Both the cases were reported from the southern Karnataka state. Two males, aged 66 and 46, have tested positive. According to Bengaluru civic authorities, the 66-year-old foreigner had come to Bengaluru city on November 20 from ...




 - It is not famine, not earthquakes, not microbes, not cancer but man himself who is man's greatest danger to man, for the simple reason that there is no adequate protection against psychic epidemics, which are infinitely more devastating than the worst of natural catastrophes.

- Carl Jung


 - Weather forecasters and economists can be wrong a good deal of the time and still keep their jobs.  To this short list we can now add "medical experts" (such as Fauci).

         - Bill Ramsey on "The Ramsey Show"          


- One of the hardest things to do is to see what is right in front of your face. 

         - George Orwell (paraphrase)


Caveat:  I post articles, commentaries, etc., that I think are important for public discussion.  My posting them is not an endorsement.  I may attempt to do some basic fact-checking.  Other than that, I cannot verify the contents.  Please do your own thinking and research on every fact and issue, and everything I post.

Intermixed in what I post on the covid are often partisan political opinions which I do not necessarily support.


Unsubscribe:  Just send me an email (to "justice_freedom@earthlink.net") with "Please unsubscribe" in the Subject slot, and any message you wish to send in the message area.


7)Latest UK mortality statistics show "systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of C-19 vaccination" by Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 16:44 EST)
Reply to list

In short, it's a huge scam. 
From Dr. Mike Yeadon (on Telegram):
I’m disappointed but no longer surprised.
It looks like the Covid19 vaccines don’t have any beneficial effects. Because I assure you that industry knows they don’t work. The regulatory agencies know. Leading figures in each government administration know.
All they do is mark you as jabbed. Entitled to a digital ID, goody! (It’s not good, you’ll be tracked 24/7 & every transaction you make).
The narrative never hung together for those with their brains in gear.
I’m a bit surprised to see no benefit at all. How hard is it to build in some effectiveness?
There you go. If ever you’re tempted, under duress, do remember that those insisting you get vaccinated KNOW they don’t work AND are toxic.
So…..why again are they so keen to get that needle into your arm & that of your children?
It’s clearly not for your health. All those officials, enforcing stupid rules which play no role whatsoever in maintaining public health?
They are today’s equivalents of German Nazis. A very large proportion of the population eventually chose to join the party. In part because if they didn’t, they were excluded from all sorts of things (sound familiar?).
One of the most striking observations made about ordinary people in extraordinary times is how readily the vast majority of people adapt to the new rules. As in Germany, discrimination here is the thing, sorting people into Good & Bad categories. This ready adaptation to living in a world of ghastly wrongness is disturbing.
But it’s the absence of responses to truly awful things, such as people being dragged away, the tops of their shoes bouncing off the cobbles, it all being “Fur Seine Sicherheit” (for your safety), that gave rise to the expression, “The banality of evil”.
We can & should resist. Reject vaccine passports at first sight. They’re not neutral. Once established in any country, their use can easily be widened.
So spread seeds of doubt, every day on each opportunity, to ask, rhetorically, “How very odd things are, don’t you think? I no longer believe what we’re being told, do you?”
Finally. Whatever crappy reason you’re given, NO ONE has primacy over your right to bodily autonomy. Our government has signed us up to various human rights conventions. They all include “bodily autonomy”. It’s THE central feature of western liberal democracy, the primacy of the individual to go about their lawful business unhindered by the state.
Insist on it, with others around you.
Look for allies. Among even those who’ve been vaccinated, some will know it’s wrong to discriminate.
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon
PreprintPDF Available
Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination
December 2021
Project: Covid-19
Martin Neil
Queen Mary, University of London
Norman Elliott Fenton
Queen Mary, University of London
Joel Smalley
Clare Craig
Show all 8 authors
Preprints and early-stage research may not have been peer reviewed yet.
Download file PDF
References (12)
The risk/benefit of Covid vaccines is arguably most accurately measured by an all-cause mortality rate comparison of vaccinated against unvaccinated, since it not only avoids most confounders relating to case definition but also fulfils the WHO/CDC definition of "vaccine effectiveness" for mortality. We examine the latest UK ONS vaccine mortality surveillance report which provides the necessary information to monitor this crucial comparison over time. At first glance the ONS data suggest that, in each of the older age groups, all-cause mortality is lower in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Despite this apparent evidence to support vaccine effectiveness-at least for the older age groups-on closer inspection of this data, this conclusion is cast into doubt because of a range of fundamental inconsistencies and anomalies in the data. Whatever the explanations for the observed data, it is clear that it is both unreliable and misleading. While socio-demographical and behavioural differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated have been proposed as possible explanations, there is no evidence to support any of these. By Occam's razor we believe the most likely explanations are systemic miscategorisation of deaths between the different categories of unvaccinated and vaccinated; delayed or non-reporting of vaccinations; systemic underestimation of the proportion of unvaccinated; and/or incorrect population selection for Covid deaths.
Discover the world's research
20+ million members
135+ million publications
700k+ research projects
Join for free
Public Full-text 1
Content uploaded by Martin Neil
Author content
Content may be subject to copyright.
Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic
mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain
effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination
Martin Neil
, Norman Fenton1 Joel Smalley
, Clare Craig2, Joshua Guetzkow
, Scott McLachlan1, Jonathan
Engler2 and Jessica Rose
3 December 2021
The risk/benefit of Covid vaccines is arguably most accurately measured by an all-cause
mortality rate comparison of vaccinated against unvaccinated, since it not only avoids most
confounders relating to case definition but also fulfils the WHO/CDC definition of “vaccine
effectiveness” for mortality. We examine the latest UK ONS vaccine mortality surveillance
report which provides the necessary information to monitor this crucial comparison over time.
At first glance the ONS data suggest that, in each of the older age groups, all-cause mortality
is lower in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Despite this apparent evidence to support
vaccine effectiveness - at least for the older age groups - on closer inspection of this data, this
conclusion is cast into doubt because of a range of fundamental inconsistencies and anomalies
in the data. Whatever the explanations for the observed data, it is clear that it is both
unreliable and misleading. While socio-demographical and behavioural differences between
vaccinated and unvaccinated have been proposed as possible explanations, there is no
evidence to support any of these. By Occam’s razor we believe the most likely explanations are
systemic miscategorisation of deaths between the different categories of unvaccinated and
vaccinated; delayed or non-reporting of vaccinations; systemic underestimation of the
proportion of unvaccinated; and/or incorrect population selection for Covid deaths.
1. Introduction
Our recent articles [1, 2] have argued that the simplest and most objective way to assess the overall
risk/benefit of Covid-19 vaccines is to compare all-cause mortality rates of the unvaccinated against the
vaccinated in each separate age-group. For such an assessment we need accurate periodic data on both
age-categorized deaths and the number of vaccinated/unvaccinated people in each age group for that
Any systemic errors or biases can lead to conclusions that are inversions of the real situation. For example,
simply reporting deaths one week late when a vaccine programme is rolled out will (with statistical
certainty) lead to any vaccine, even a placebo, seemingly reducing mortality. The same statistical illusion
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary, University of London, UK
Independent researcher, UK
Hebrew University Jerusalem, Israel
Institute of Pure and Applied Knowledge, Public Health Policy Initiative, USA
Citations (0)
References (12)
Discrepancies and inconsistencies in UK Government datasets compromise accuracy of mortality rate comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated
Full-text available
Oct 2021
Martin Neil
Norman Elliott Fenton
Scott Mclachlan
Show abstract
Monitoring sociodemographic inequality in COVID-19 vaccination coverage in England: a national linked data study
Full-text available
Oct 2021
Ted Dolby
Katie Finning
Allan Baker
Vahé Nafilyan
Show abstract
Paradoxes in the reporting of Covid19 vaccine effectiveness: Why current studies (for or against vaccination) cannot be trusted and what we can do about it
Full-text available
Sep 2021
Norman Elliott Fenton
Martin Neil
Scott Mclachlan
Show abstract
Humoral and cellular immune response and safety of two-dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients
Full-text available
Aug 2021
Victoria G Hall
Victor H. Ferreira
Matthew Ierullo
Deepali Kumar
Show abstract
BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting
Feb 2021
Noa Dagan
Noam Barda
Eldad Kepten
Ran Balicer
Show abstract
Necessity of 2 Doses of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 Vaccines
Feb 2021
J Am Med Assoc
Edward H Livingston
Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 2
Sep 2021
C Bermingham
J Morgan
V . Nafilyan
Bermingham C., Morgan J. and Nafilyan V.. ONS. "Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 2 January and 24 September 2021". 1 November 2021.
Ethnic differences in life expectancy and mortality from selected causes in England and Wales
Jan 2011
ONS. Ethnic differences in life expectancy and mortality from selected causes in England and Wales: 2011 to 2014. 26 July 2021. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/a rticles/ethnicdifferencesinlifeexpectancyandmortalityfromselectedcausesinenglandandwales/2011to201 4#life-expectancy-by-ethnic-group-data
Health state life expectancies by national deprivation deciles
Jan 2015
ONS. Health state life expectancies by national deprivation deciles, England and Wales: 2015 to 2017. 27 March 2019. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/healthinequalities/bulle tins/healthstatelifeexpectanciesbyindexofmultipledeprivationimd/2015to2017
Sustained Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Vaccines Against COVID-19
Tenforde et al. Sustained Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna Vaccines Against COVID-19
Show more
Discover more
Norman Elliott Fenton
Martin Neil
William Marsh
Christian Dahlman
The project aims to improve evidence-based decision-making in areas such as medicine, law, forensics, and transport. What makes it radical is that it plans to do this in situations (common for crit ... [more]
View project
PAMBAYESIAN (PAtient Managed decision-support using Bayesian networks)
Norman Elliott Fenton
William Marsh
Martin Neil
PAMBAYESIAN is a 3-year EPSRC funded project to develop a new generation of intelligent medical decision support systems based on Bayesian networks. The project focuses on home-based and wearable r ... [more]
View project
CAUSAL-DYNAMICS ("Improved Understanding of Causal Models in Dynamic Decision-making")
Norman Elliott Fenton
Martin Neil
Magda Osman
Psychologists have extensively studied dynamic decision-making without formally modelling causality. In contrast, statisticians, computer scientists, and AI researchers have extensively studied cau ... [more]
View project
Bayesian Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making under Uncertainty
Anthony C. Constantinou
Norman Elliott Fenton
Martin Neil
Yang Liu
To develop an open-source system that will enable end-users to quickly and efficiently generate Bayesian Decision Networks (BDNs) for fully optimised decision-making under uncertainty. Part of the ... [more]
View project
Full-text available
Discrepancies and inconsistencies in UK Government datasets compromise accuracy of mortality rate co...
October 2021
Martin Neil
Norman Elliott Fenton
Scott Mclachlan
UPDATE: A significantly revised version of this report is here:http://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~norman/papers/inconsistencies_vaccine.pdf To determine the overall risk-benefit of Covid-19 vaccines it is crucial to be able to compare the all-cause mortality rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated in each different age category. However, current publicly available UK Government statistics do not ... [Show full abstract]
View full-text
Full-text available
Misinterpreting statistical anomalies and risk assessment when analysing Covid-19 deaths by ethnicit...
July 2020
Norman Elliott Fenton
Martin Neil
Scott Mclachlan
Magda Osman
When analysing Covid-19 death rates by ethnicity in the USA it has been shown that, although the aggregated death rate for whites is higher than for blacks, in each main age subcategory the death rate for blacks is higher than for whites. This apparent statistical anomaly is an example of Simpson's paradox. While the paradox reveals blacks are more at risk than whites, this is only because age is ... [Show full abstract]
View full-text
Full-text available
Paradoxes in the reporting of Covid19 vaccine effectiveness: Why current studies (for or against vac...
September 2021
Norman Elliott Fenton
Martin Neil
Scott Mclachlan
Given the limitations of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Covid19 vaccines, we must increasingly rely on data from observational studies to determine vaccine effectiveness. But over-simplistic reporting of such data can lead to obviously flawed conclusions due to statistical paradoxes. For example, if we just compare the total number of Covid19 deaths among the vaccinated and ... [Show full abstract]
View full-text
Full-text available
What proportion of people with COVID-19 do not get symptoms?
April 2021
Norman Elliott Fenton
Martin Neil
Scott Mclachlan
This is about the widely publicised claim that "1 in 3 people with Covid-19 have no symptoms".
View full-text
Last Updated: 05 Dec 2021
About us
Help Center
Business solutions
© 2008-2021 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved.


8)Dan Andrews doing coke by Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 16:54 EST)
Reply to list

Someone sent me a video of what certainly looked like Andrews doing a furtive bit of coke before a recent dictatorial effusion for the press.

Now I can't find it (which often happens in this daily, hourly DELUGE). So if any of you have the link, or know where it is, please send it.

(It's a very Nazi thing, the Covid tyrants getting high like that.)



9)PM Dan Andrews getting BLITZED on coke, right before a pop-eyed turn before Australia's press (which, of course, did not report it) by Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 17:24 EST)
Reply to list

Some day the true depravity of all the globalist accomplices (and of the globalists themselves) will come to light.

My thanks to Lynn Landes, and Jim, both of whom sent this to me:


On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 5:58 PM Mark Crispin Miller (via nfu list) <nfu@simplelists.com> wrote:

Someone sent me a video of what certainly looked like Andrews doing a furtive bit of coke before a recent dictatorial effusion for the press.

Now I can't find it (which often happens in this daily, hourly DELUGE). So if any of you have the link, or know where it is, please send it.

(It's a very Nazi thing, the Covid tyrants getting high like that.)




10)A new anthem sweeps Australia (and just might sweep it clean!) by Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 17:35 EST)
Reply to list

Laughter is the best medicine, against those globalist ghouls. 



11)No wonder They're so viciously attacking this archbishop by Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 18:04 EST)
Reply to list



12)German data makes it clear: The higher the "vaccination" rate, the higher the excess mortality by Mark Crispin Miller (06 Dec 2021 18:28 EST)
Reply to list


Support News from Underground:
Visit News from Underground:
For archives, please go to:




A Litmus Test for Democracy?


Democratic Deficits at the Summit for Democracy


by Alfred de Zayas


Biden’s Democracy Summit Is a PR Stunt.


We Need Real International Democracy


by Alfred de Zayas


Democracy is not a commodity, nor is it a weapon to be aimed at geopolitical rivals


How Greenwald, Covid and Rittenhouse Exposed a Plague


Among Progressives


by Riva Enteen


Democratic Party Betrayal, Abortion, and the Supreme Court


by Magaret Kimberley


'This Is Horrific':


US Supreme Court Keeps 6-Week Abortion Ban in Place


by Julia Conley


El Salvador Offers a Dark Glimpse Into Our Post-Roe Future


by Cyril Mychalejko




Edward Bernays:


Propaganda and the U.S.-Backed 1954 Guatemalan Coup


by Robert Skvarla


Eighty Years of Lies: President Franklin Roosevelt Told Public Pearl


Harbor Was A Surprise Attack—However There Is Considerable Evidence


Demonstrating Government Foreknowledge


by  Jeremy Kuzmarov


Fauci as Darth Vader of the Covid Wars


by Pepe Escobar


Why There Are So Few Whistleblowers?


by Melvin Goodman





Beyond Passive Resistance:


Against Democratic Surrender in a Time of Fascitization


by Paul Street


The tribal left’s a mirror image of the tribal right


by Jonathan Cook


 “In a death-making institution, the formation


of a social life-support system is a rebellious act,”


says Kelly Hayes


with Kelly Hayes

(audio, 36:21)


BAR Book Forum: Jennifer S. Ponce de León’s


Another Aesthetics Is Possible”


by Roberto Sirvent


A cop tried to keep him from recording a traffic stop,


but now he's fighting back to change the law


with Taya Graham and Stephen Janis



FBI Document Says the Feds Can Get Your WhatsApp Data


-- in Real Time


by Andy Kroll


Flattening the curve or flattening the global poor? How Covid lockdowns


obliterate human rights and crush the most vulnerable


by Stavroula Pabst and Max Blumenthal


Frantz Fanon Lives! 60 Years After His Death, Fanon’s Ideas Remain


the Weapons of the Oppressed


by Danny Shaw


Further | At Gitmo, A Soul-Crushing Parade of Horribles | Opinion


by Abby Zimet


Revival of Class Politics in the U.S.… Will It Be Socialism or Fascism?


by Finian Cunningham


The U.S. empire, like the USSR, is imploding out of its own corruption, says Harriet Fraad in an interview with Finian Cunningham.


Collectivism among us youth


by Brandon Smith


Right-Wing Authoritarianism and the Crisis of Education


by Henry Giroux


People Centered Human Rights and the Black Radical Tradition


by Ajamu Baraka




“Every Option Is on the Table”:


US Prepping for Libya-Style Intervention in Ethiopia


by Alan Macleod


AFRICOM, the US Africa Command,


Tool of U.S. Global Hegemony


[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mis-bKztVnc ]

with Ann Garrison





From: News from Underground [mailto:nobody@simplelists.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2021 1:59 AM
Subject: Daily digest for nfu@simplelists.com




1. "Absolute and unmitigated liars": Former DC National Guard official says generals fabricated January 6th account - Mark Crispin Miller (07 Dec 2021 20:29 EST)
2. Your tax dollars at work: Hospitals paid up to $100,000 for each patient diagnosed with "COVID-19" (and then imprisoned there, and killed) - Mark Crispin Miller (07 Dec 2021 20:33 EST)
3. "Pope, you are a heretic!": Bergoglio heckled by Greek Orthodox priest (who's then violently dragged away by Greek police) - Mark Crispin Miller (07 Dec 2021 20:37 EST)
4. Those outtakes from the "moon landing" footage are bogus; but so was the "moon landing," as these other videos make clear - Mark Crispin Miller (07 Dec 2021 23:40 EST)
5. Through COVID (and, of course, "America's doctor"), the CIA "pulled off the ultimate coup d'etat": RFK, Jr.'s shattering indictment, justly hailed by Ed Curtin - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 11:27 EST)
6. How they've taught our children to be hateful slaves - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 12:25 EST)
7. New German study finds that children are at ZERO risk from COVID; Leigh Dundas on current legal actions vs. bio-fascism; Idaho is another Free State; UK's insanely punitive new mask mandate; and much more from R.S. - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 12:37 EST)
8. MCM and Dr. Zelenko talk about the "forces of evil," and how best to fight them, and prevail - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 17:51 EST)

(Previous discussion continued)

9. What happened at Sandy Hook? We need to have the courts adjudicate that question - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 17:53 EST)
10. Please help the nurse Amal Arafa, suffering with her family in the Gaza Strip - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 18:01 EST)
11. Indiana University honors Dr. Fauci for his heroic "defense of science and truth" (on what planet?) - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 18:10 EST)
12. HALF the American people now oppose the "vaccine" mandates: NBC poll - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 18:19 EST)



1)      "Absolute and unmitigated liars": Former DC National Guard official says generals fabricated January 6th account by Mark Crispin Miller (07 Dec 2021 20:29 EST)
Reply to list

"Absolute And Unmitigated Liars": Former "Absolute and Unmitigated Liars": Former DC National Guard Official Says Generals Fabricated January 6th Account

by Tyler Durden

Dec. 7, 2021


A former DC National Guard official has accused two senior Army officials of lying to Congress about the circumstances surrounding the January 6th Capitol riot in order to protect a top Army official who didn't want to send the Guard to the Capitol, Politico reports.

In a 36-page memo sent to the Jan. 6 select committee this month, Col. Earl Matthews - who held high-level National Security Council and Pentagon positions under Trump - accused Army General Charles Flynn and Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt of being "absolute and unmitigated liars" for how they characterized the events of Jan. 6.

Click on the link for the rest.

2)      Your tax dollars at work: Hospitals paid up to $100,000 for each patient diagnosed with "COVID-19" (and then imprisoned there, and killed) by Mark Crispin Miller (07 Dec 2021 20:33 EST)
Reply to list

 November 17, 2021

Biden’s Bounty on Your Life: Hospitals’ Incentive Payments for COVID-19



By Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D. and Ali Shultz, J.D. – https://www.truthforhealth.org/

Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment protocol with roots in Ezekiel Emanuel’s “Complete Lives System” for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a shockingly high mortality rate. How and why is this happening, and what can be done about it?

As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona admitted meeting several times a week to lower standards of care, with coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’ families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being done to their loved ones.

The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations) and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for waivers to  CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, “CMS has granted ‘waivers’ of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient visitation, and to be free from seclusion.” She notes that “rights do not come from the hospital or CMS and cannot be waived, as that is the antithesis of a ‘right.’ The purported waivers are meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed consent.”

Creating a “National Pandemic Emergency” provided justification for such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal government under the auspices of the NIH. These “bounties” must paid back if not “earned” by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the COVID-19 protocol.

The hospital payments include:

A “free” required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.
Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
A 20 percent “boost” bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.
Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.
More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.
A COVID-19 diagnosis also provides extra payments to coroners.

CMS implemented “value-based” payment programs that track data such as how many workers at a healthcare facility receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Now we see why many hospitals implemented COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They are paid more.

 Outside hospitals, physician MIPS quality metrics link doctors’ income to performance-based pay for treating patients with COVID-19 EUA drugs. Failure to report information to CMS can cost the physician 4% of reimbursement.

Because of obfuscation with medical coding and legal jargon, we cannot be certain of the actual amount each hospital receives per COVID-19 patient. But Attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers have calculated a total payment of at least $100,000 per patient

Click on the link for the rest.

3)      "Pope, you are a heretic!": Bergoglio heckled by Greek Orthodox priest (who's then violently dragged away by Greek police) by Mark Crispin Miller (07 Dec 2021 20:37 EST)
Reply to list



4)      Those outtakes from the "moon landing" footage are bogus; but so was the "moon landing," as these other videos make clear by Mark Crispin Miller (07 Dec 2021 23:40 EST)
Reply to list

Thanks to all who have alerted me to the fraudulence of that footage said to be from Wikileaks. It actually appears to be a cunning blend of shots taken on the set of Capricorn One, and bits of the alleged "moon landing" footage—probably crafted to discredit "moon landing" skeptics.

For the latter (except those who've already seen them), I recommend Massimo Mazzucco's epic documentary American Moon, and Bart Sibrel's classic A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, which includes a smoking gun: some footage inadvertently released by NASA, showing the Apollo crew faking a shot of Earth from "130,000 miles out." Among the many brilliants passages in the Mazzucco documentary, there's a long dissection, by several photographic experts, of the stills universally represented as having been taken on moon, but which were obviously taken in an Earthbound studio. (I also recommend Sibrel's other documentary, Astronauts Gone Wild, and Dave McGowan's deft and hilarious analysis, Wagging the Moondoggie.)

It's way past time for us to stop pussy-footing around vis-a-vis all such bogus spectacles. The CIA's "conspiracy theory" propaganda has most of us afraid to call it like we see it, even when the evidence of fakery is overwhelming. Such reticence has made it dangerously easy for our Overlords—with the assistance of the media—to jerk the world around with ever more disastrous frauds, culminating in the world catastrophe we're fighting now. 

So let's no longer hesitate to seek the truth, and share it when we've found it, because the consequences of ignoring it are much, more worse than getting jeered at by careerist dimwits.



5)      Through COVID (and, of course, "America's doctor"), the CIA "pulled off the ultimate coup d'etat": RFK, Jr.'s shattering indictment, justly hailed by Ed Curtin by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 11:27 EST)
Reply to list

Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr.’s Heroic Resistance to the CIA’s Continuing Covid Coup D’état

December 7, 2021 ejcurtin 17 Comments


A Meditation

With his extraordinary new book, The Real Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, RFK, Jr. has made it very clear that he will not allow Orwell’s 1984 totalitarian boot to stamp on his face.  His is a very rare moral courage, and he is asking us to join him, before it is too late and we enter into a new dark age, in recognizing and resisting the evil forces intent on stamping out democracy around the world.  He is not pulling his punches with language as he accuses the political-intelligence-media-money-medical-corporate-pharmaceutical conspirators of executing “the controlled demolition of American constitutional democracy.”  For a brilliant and highly accomplished lawyer and excellent writer and speaker, the choice of those words “controlled demolition” is clearly intentional.

For anyone who doubts that the Covid-19 crisis is an intelligence-run operation controlled by spooks working with medical technocrats like Anthony Fauci, billionaires such as Bill Gates, the military, media, Big Pharma, the World Economic Forum, etc., a close reading of this book – with its 2,194 references – will disabuse one of that illusion.

The CIA has long been deeply involved with vaccines, viruses, drugs, weaponizing cancer, biological weapons, and of course massive mind-control operations – deadly propaganda in plain English – for use in controlling U.S. Americans and foreigners alike.  As Kennedy writes in an ironically understated way, “The pervasive CIA involvement in the global vaccine putsch should give us pause.”  Yes, a long pause.  He continues:

There is nothing in the CIA’s history, in its charter, in its composition, or in its institutional culture that betrays an interest in promoting either public health or democracy. The CIA’s historical preoccupations have been power and control. The CIA has been involved in at least seventy-two attempted and successful coup d’état between 1947 and 1989, involving about a third of the world’s governments. Many of these were functioningd democracies. The CIA does not do public health. It does not do democracy. The CIA does coups d’état. [my emphasis]

Just as it does Kennedy assassinations.

Character assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is what the CIA and its media mouthpieces have been doing for years. This has become more and more necessary as they have realized the great growing danger he poses to their agenda. Calling him an anti-vaxxer, conspiracy theorist, and names far worse, is part of a concerted smear campaign to turn the public away from his message, which is multi-faceted and supported by deep research and impeccable logic. Like his father and uncle, he has become an irrepressibly eloquent opponent of the demonic forces intent on destroying the democratic dream.

With The Real Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, he has pinned his indictment of those forces to the world’s wall for all to read.

Just as this new book will not be reviewed by the corporate mainstream media, not even negatively for fear of promoting it by doing so, so too the last book he wrote, American Values: Lessons I Learned from My Family, was completely ignored by such media.

As I wrote three years ago in the only review of that book:

When a book as fascinating, truthful, beautifully written, and politically significant as American Values: Lessons I Learned from My Family, written by a very well-known author by the name of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and published by a prominent publisher (HarperCollins), is boycotted by mainstream book reviewers, you know it is an important book and has touched a nerve that the corporate mainstream media wish to anesthetize by eschewal.

American Values is part memoir, part family history, part astute political analysis, and part-confessional, and is in turns delightful, sad, funny, fierce, and frightening in its implications.

What implications?   It is the heart of that book that had the obedient reviewers avoiding it like the plague, a plague introduced by a little mockingbird, as in Operation Mockingbird.  No member of the Kennedy family since JFK or RFK had dared to say what RFK, Jr. did in that book. He indicted the CIA in a carefully crafted and fully factual way for a vast array of crimes.  He spelled out the long war between the Kennedys and the CIA that resulted in the deaths of his father, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and his uncle President John Kennedy.  He threw a gauntlet down in the midst of telling an entertaining and touching family saga, which included a critique of his own youthful transgressions.

But the nation’s spooks smelled danger in the tale and they are now more acutely aware that they must censor him because his message is finding an expanding audience of people sick of government lies  and very hungry for the truth.  More and more people are willing to follow this brave man into the darkness of our history and the ongoing coups d’état underway at home and abroad.  They smell a demonic author behind the Covid-19 propaganda.

While Dr. Anthony Fauci understandably stands at the center of this new book, and deservedly so for his evil machinations over so many decades, it is important to recognize that he is an obedient, albeit very powerful, underling in a systemic structure of evil, who has greatly materially profited from the sale of his soul.  Yet while this is true, to read Kennedy’s chapters on Fauci’s commanding role in the HIV/Aids fraud, the AZT shakedown, illegal experiments on children that killed at least 85, etc., is enough to make your blood boil and to realize that such actions must spring from a source far deeper than the thirst for lucre.  Something fiendish and sinister is at work with all this with the suffering and death it has caused, and in the ways it has foreshadowed the COVID-19 propaganda and the complicity of the mass media in fronting for Fauci and his allies, then and now.

Kennedy exhaustively details Fauci’s work as a drug dealer for Big Pharma, even while his job at NIAID is to protect and improve the people’s health, which has deteriorated dramatically over his tenure.  (It is important to mention parenthetically but not at all incidentally that the CIA “manages” the so-called war on drugs in a similar manner.)  Thus we have a war of drugs and a “war on drugs” working in tandem in a perfect scheme to drug as many people as possible.  Here are a few details:

Fauci has an annual $6 billion budget, most of which goes toward the research and development of new drugs.
He is the highest paid federal employee, more than the President, with an annual salary of $417, 608.
He controls 57 percent of global biomedical medical funding directly and indirectly via the NIH, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Wellcome Trust, and therefore controls the scientists looking for research money.
He has for decades overseen the regulatory capture of government health agencies by Big Pharma.
The CDC, a paramilitary organization, spends $4.9 billion of its $12 billion budget buying and distributing vaccines, the vaccines that Fauci has been pushing. It also owns 57 vaccine patents.
Fauci and other officials receive yearly emoluments of up to $150,000 in royalty payments on products that they help to develop and push through the approval process.
He has for many years promoted false pandemics to promote novel vaccines, drugs, and pharmaceutical company profits.
Forty-five percent of the FDA’s budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry through what are euphemistically called “user fees.”
Fauci has a “strange fascination with,” and has invested in “gain of function” experiments to engineer superbugs, which is part of a long CIA history of weaponizing viruses, etc.

RFK, Jr.’s detailed exposure of Fauci’s role reminds me of reading Moby Dick and meditating on Melville’s description of Ahab – one has to enter a different mental space to begin to comprehend such evil, and even then one is struck dumb by its extent and the media’s complicity in covering it up for so long.

Click on the link for the rest.


6)      How they've taught our children to be hateful slaves by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 12:25 EST)
Reply to list


This is What We’re Teaching Our Children



By Brett Wilcox, author JABBED: How the Vaccine Industry, Medical Establishment and Government Stick It to You and Your Family

This is what we’re teaching our children.

We’re teaching our children that when adults are afraid the Constitution is null and void.

That most adults fear nature more than they love freedom.

That bullying is bad except when it’s government sponsored and culturally sanctioned.

That hate speech is bad except when targeting the people the government trains us to hate.

Click on the link for the rest.


7)      New German study finds that children are at ZERO risk from COVID; Leigh Dundas on current legal actions vs. bio-fascism; Idaho is another Free State; UK's insanely punitive new mask mandate; and much more from R.S. by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 12:37 EST)
Reply to list

From R.S.:

A good explanation of what the injections do to your immune system over time. Read or listen

 Another Doctor Tries to Warn Us. Will You Hear Her? – 4 minutes

"I am a natural doctor. I have about 1,600 patients, many are vaccinated, just to give you a little backstory about my credibility.

 "What I've seen so far is all information from physicians, medical physicians, natural physicians and also immunization and virology doctors, things like that and then, also nurses.

 "So, what I'm about to share with you is the first vaxxine, the second vaxxine and then the boosters and what it does to you.



 Wow. This woman is the real thing. I learned a lot about what is going on that we have not been told. Put on her presentation and just listen while you make dinner or something. It is very impactful.

 Attorney Leigh Dundas Gives Updates on Current Legal Actions Regarding Vaccine Mandates – 54 minutes

California Civil Rights attorney Leigh Dundas recently spoke at a symposium in Texas.

 We have published the work of Attorney Dundas in the past. She is a mother and a passionate advocate for children.

She is also fearless, and not afraid to call out the tyrants.

 In this update she explains the full ramifications of the nationwide walkout and strike that happened in November protesting the COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

 You didn’t hear about that? Not surprising.

 Learn it now from Leigh.



 The. Kids. Are. Not. At. Risk. Period. End of story.

German Study Finds ZERO COVID-19 Deaths in Healthy Children but the Children are Now Dying from the Vaccine

new study published in Germany looked at “risk of Hospitalization, severe disease, and mortality due to COVID-19” in children.

Their results found very little risks among children for serious events or deaths.

 While the overall hospitalization rate associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 35.9 per 10,000 children, ICU admission rate was 1.7 per 10,000 and case fatality was 0.09 per 10,000.

 However, when they looked at comorbidities, they could not find a single case where a healthy child in the 5 to 11 years old age group died from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

 Children without comorbidities were found to be significantly less likely to suffer from a severe or fatal disease course. The  lowest risk was observed in children aged 5-11 without comorbidities. In this group, the ICU admission rate was 0.2 per 10,000 and case fatality could not be calculated, due to an absence of cases.(Full study.)

 Unlike the U.S. and Israel where this age group is now being injected with Pfizer COVID-19 shots, this age group has not been approved for COVID-19 shots in Germany yet, although there appear to be plans in place to start this soon.



 More on Pfizer hiding the results of the first 3 months of their trial. Where are the lawsuits??

 Pfizer smoking-gun secret document: their deadly COVID vaccine

In short, the Pfizer document (which was never supposed to see the light of day but was disclosed as part of a FOIA suit) describes the adverse effects from just the first three months of injections with the company’s COVID vaccine:

 158,000 adverse events, 1223 deaths. In a half-sane world, this would have been more than enough to halt all injections and cancel the vaccine.

 I’ve queried two attorneys. They both looked at the Pfizer document and state they believe it’s authentic.

 The appendix of the Pfizer document is the most astonishing section. It’s beyond astonishing. It lists all the types of vaccine adverse events Pfizer logged---again, in just three months of injections.

 Page after page after page after page of types of adverse events. Each type of event cast in medical language, the language of the dead. The proponents of this technical-ese speak, as it were, from beyond the grave. They’re super-educated brainwashed zombies. It’s as if they’re listing and counting abstractions in an academic board game.



 It’s good to see info like this getting out.


"Absolute And Unmitigated Liars": Former DC National Guard Official Says Generals Fabricated January 6th Account

Matthews accuses Flynn and Piatt of lying to Congress about how they responded to urgent requests for the DC guard to be quickly deployed, and claims that the Pentagon inspector general's November report on the attack was "replete with factual inaccuracies."

 He says the Army has created its own 'closely held' revisionist document regarding the riot that's "worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist.'



 Illinois, here it comes. Seems illegal to me but that hasn’t stopped them so far.

 Unvaccinated To Pay Out-Of-Pocket Under IL Rep's New Bill

If the measure is passed, anyone who is eligible for a vaccine but chooses not to get one would have to foot their own hospital bills.

 Unvaccinated Illinoisans could eventually be paying their own hospital bills, whether they have health insurance or not. A new bill proposed by state Rep. Jonathan Carroll, a Northbrook Democrat, would require anyone who is eligible for a COVID-19 vaccine but who chooses not to get one to pay out of pocket if they are hospitalized with COVID-19.


If passed, the amendment to the Illinois Insurance Code would go into effect with policies issued or renewed after Jan. 1, 2023.



 I hear Idaho is a wonderful place to live.




 Christine Massey filed FOIA request with 137 institutions in 25 countries asking for proof that SarsCOV2 exists. The replies showed that they have no record of any virus ever having been purified at all. No HIV, no HPV, no West Nile virus, nothing. No lab, no government no one has an example of any of these deadly pathogens. We have been lied to for decades. Terrain theory anyone?


Christine Massey and Mike Adams – 53 minutes

Christine Massey reveals to the Health Ranger: Covid-19 “virus” has NEVER been isolated and shown to cause disease…



 Britain cracks down

 New face mask rules as fines up to £6,400 for people who refuse to wear masks in shops

The government is bringing back face mask restrictions to battle the new Omicron Covid variant

 People who refuse to wear a face mask in shops or on public transport could be fined up to £6,400 as the government reintroduces Covid restrictions to battle the new potentially more potent Omicron Covid variant.

 Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced on Saturday that face covering and mask rules will be brought back from 4am on Tuesday.

It will be the first time that masks have been mandatory in shops and on buses and trains since July, although many businesses have still encouraged people to wear one.



 A bit of good news.

 Biden’s COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for Federal Contractors Now Blocked Nationwide

A federal court on Dec. 7 blocked President Joe Biden’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors.

 Georgia and other plaintiffs suing Biden over the mandate “will likely succeed in their claim that the president exceeded the authorization given to him by Congress,” U.S. District Judge R. Stan Baker, a Trump nominee, wrote in a 28-page decision agreeing to enter a preliminary injunction.

 Baker barred Biden and his administration from enforcing the mandate in any state, an expansion of a Nov. 30 ruling that applied to just three states.

 The mandate was going to take effect on Jan. 4, 2022, unless it was blocked by the courts. The deadline, originally delayed in November, was initially set for Dec. 8.

 “Yet another one of President Biden’s vaccine mandates has been temporarily shut down because the states—including Idaho—took a stand against his unprecedented government overreach into Americans’ lives and businesses.” Idaho Gov. Brad Little, a Republican, said in a Dec. 7 statement.



  Steve Kirsch has really jumped in and done a great job with his substack reporting. He is vaxxed. He also figured out what happened and has been writing about it ever since.

 Stories that the press will not cover

Nurse is COVID recovered yet shunned by her peers. That makes no sense.
Neighbor is proud to get vaxed; 4 weeks later loses both her husband and her baby
School jabs kids over objection of parents
Hospitals go from empty to full thanks to the safe vaccines

Here’s an interesting comment from the same post. I have seen this too. It seems there is no reasoning with the vaxxed.

Christine Livesay

1 hr ago

I went to a elementary school hosted vaccine clinic in my kids school district to hand parents packets that I made up that consisted of documents from our Federal government showing VAERS data. FDA October 2020 presentation adverse events, court case docket numbers to complaints on the CDC, FDA, NIH and HHS for them to look up and even an article from Steve Kirsh. Sadly the parents didn’t care. One woman wouldn’t even take the packet. She looked like a demon possessed. Couldn’t wait to walk her young child to their possible death or permanent injury. Other parents looked at the first page that showed over 18,000 deaths from the vaccine and still walked in the clinic door to vaccinate their children.

Two weeks before this I planned a protest at another elementary school hosted clinic in the same district and parents were giving us the finger, making faces at us and talking shit as they drove by us.

The point of this story is that these people that refuse to acknowledge data and facts are in a cult. This is a new religion. The COVID cult. When all common sense, rational and critical thinking fly out the window due to fear. They have been brainwashed. Drank the koolaid if you will. It scares me.



 From Dr. Mercola this morning. PDF attached in case you miss the 30 hour window

 Excess Deaths Exploding Despite Mass Vaccination


·         In the week ending November 12, 2021, the U.K. reported 2,047 more deaths than occurred during the same period between 2015 and 2019; heart disease and strokes appear to be behind many of the excess deaths

·         In the last 13 weeks alone, about 107,700 seniors died above the normal rate, despite a 98.7% injection rate

·         In Vermont, where the majority are also injected, excess deaths are the highest they’ve been since before the pandemic

·         An investigation using official data from NHS and the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) found that deaths among teenagers increased 47% since they started getting COVID-19 shots

·         Deaths from COVID-19 also went up among 15- to 19-year-olds after the shots were rolled out for this age group

·         Even with mass injections and some receiving two and even three shots in their arm, excess deaths are rising



Always worth a scan, and sometimes more than a scan.

 Coffee & Covid ☙ Wednesday, December 8, 2021 ☙ FLEEING NEW YORK 🦠

Good morning, C&C team, and Happy Wednesday! We have a big roundup for you today, with stories about: a new lawsuit shuts down the federal contractor mandate nationwide; a stellar Epoch Times article mentions C&C; de Blasio’s new private-employer mandate runs into problems; Florida’s Governor stands up for masked employees and offers passport-free beers to tourists; The Atlantic publishes an unintentionally hilarious booster article and gets virally flamed; UF professors suddenly discover constitutional rights after getting hit in the pocketbook; Florida finds Omicron and yawns; a New York Post columnist writes passionately about deciding to become a Florida Covid refugee; and a new study nukes the injections. A sign of the end?



 Here is the link to the article from Jeff’s post above.

 Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Evolution Revealing Vaccine-Resistant Mutations in Europe and America

Specifically, vaccine-resistant mutation Y449S in the spike (S) protein receptor-binding domain, which occurred in co-mutations Y449S and N501Y, has reduced infectivity compared to that of the original SARS-CoV-2 but can disrupt existing antibodies that neutralize the virus. 

 By tracking the evolutionary trajectories of vaccine-resistant mutations in more than 2.2 million SARS-CoV-2 genomes, we reveal that the occurrence and frequency of vaccine-resistant mutations correlate strongly with the vaccination rates in Europe and America. We anticipate that as a complementary transmission pathway, vaccine-breakthrough or antibody-resistant mutations, like those in Omicron, will become a dominating mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 evolution when most of the world's population is either vaccinated or infected.



 This makes sense. We shall see if it happens

 We have DECODED the globalist plan to destroy Bitcoin and the DeFi crypto ecosystem… and they seek to replace it with heavily regulated digital wallets under totalitarian central bank control

The upshot of what we appear to be uncovering is that globalists are carrying out a plan to destroy Bitcoin and the DeFi cryptocurrency ecosystem from within, then replace it with globalist-run central bank electronic currencies which they will claim are “safer” because they are heavily regulated. This is, of course, all part of the globalist attempt to enslave humanity under digital currency controls, where they can track your every expenditure, seize funds from your accounts in mere seconds, inflict negative interest rates on your account holdings and even loot your digital wallets as “automatic taxation” operations.



 The courts in Europe are even more compromised than the states. Much more info is written out in the article if you don’t want to listen for an hour. This is an excellent update on what they must do to move forward and our part in it.

 Attorney Reiner Fuellmich on Nuremberg 2.0: Justice will Not Come Through the Courts but by the People Rising Up – 54 minutes

He stated:

The only way to end this is by the people rising up and telling the authorities that this is the end of the line.

It is not the courts of law. The courts of law, maybe we can use them to clean things up. But I am afraid that they are not even good for that. Because they are so infiltrated by the other side that we’re going to have to setup a whole new judicial system.

That doesn’t mean that they are not going to proceed with a trial that will be similar to the original Nuremberg trials. He states that there will be a real judge, real lawyers, and real witnesses, but the jury will be “the people” who will watch it via live stream. And he expects this to happen soon, before the end of the year.

The only advice I can give you is, don’t play along. Connect with everyone else. Setup your own parallel universe, connect with all of the people who are on the good side, and then when the time comes, and it will come, I think it will come soon. We all will rise up and we will send them to hell, where they came from.



 Share, Share, Share




excess-deaths-exploding-despite-mass-vaccination-pdf.pdf (application/pdf)


8)      MCM and Dr. Zelenko talk about the "forces of evil," and how best to fight them, and prevail by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 17:51 EST)
Reply to list



9)      What happened at Sandy Hook? We need to have the courts adjudicate that question by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 17:53 EST)
Reply to list

Is it not baffling—and a bit macabre—that people tend to be enraged by the suggestion that maybe all those children were not slaughtered? Is that possibility not good news?

Of course it is. But one cannot take comfort in that counter-narrative if one (a) unconsciously enjoys the pathos of the official story (and the self-righteous indignation of defending it, "for the parents' sake"), and (b) would rather think those kids were massacred than that the authorities—and "our free press"—would pump out so egregious a Big Lie.

So let the courts adjudicate the matter at long last, as Mary Maxwell argues here. Why not?

Those who are not up to speed on this as-yet-unsettled matter should check out what James Fetzer's lawyer, William Scott, 

is up to.


Real Adjudication Is Called For in the “Sandy Hook” Affair

by Mary W. Maxwell, LLB

Dec. 4, 2021


by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

It is time now to wrap up nine years of “Sandy Hook.” I’ve put quote marks around the name Sandy Hook to imply that I am not talking about the district of Newtown, Connecticut known as Sandy Hook, I am referring to “the Sandy Hook story.”

As or the actual district, I have no criticism, nor do I think ill of its people.  If anything, I sympathize with the large number of residents there who were ordered to tell lies.

“The Sandy Hook story” says that a massacre occurred there on December 14, 2012. No such thing happened.  It is all fictional. It’s very important for Americans to grasp this as soon as possible. It is quite common for the MSM (mainstream media) to put out stories — some big, some small — that are fictional.

What can we do about this? In the old days, journalists had a Code of Ethics. It required that they not publish, as fact, an item for which they had only one source. They needed to find a second source, or go out and personally investigate the allegation to determine its worth.

False Flags

I do not know the solution to today’s lying by the media.  On four occasions, I have been so annoyed by false-flag stories that I have gone out and investigated them myself, to the extent of writing a book. The first three were: Port Arthur massacre of 1996, the Sydney siege of 2014, and the Boston Marathon bombing of 2013.

I hadn’t considered the 2012 Sandy Hook story to be false. I thought it was true and assumed that the hoopla about it on the Internet was perhaps a psy-op unto itself. I was particularly disgusted when a Connecticut citizen named William Brandon Shanley sued various newspapers. That looked to me like a way for those newspapers to mock conspiracy theory (the judge dismissed the case). But I later concluded that Shanley knew the truth. Too late to apologize to him, as he is now deceased.

Here, in a nutshell, is the false story of Sandy Hook Elementary School: A guy named Adam Lanza, age 20, broke into the school at 9.30am on a school day, went into a classroom of first graders and shot dead 16 kids. Then he went into another classroom and shot dead 4 more, plus he shot dead 6 staff members. He also shot and wounded a staff member named Natalie Hammond, but she has never appeared in an interview as far as I know. There is also a wounded child whom we have never seen. Adam then killed himself.

Here, in a nutshell, is the correct story: It has been common for over half a century for powerful persons in the US to arrange for real violence to occur, to make us think our neighbors are to be feared. A possible early example of a shooter killing randomly is that of Charles Whitman in 1966. He reportedly stabbed to death his mother and his wife and then climbed a tower at the University of Texas to shoot students. He killed 15 and wounded 21, until a policemen shot him dead. His motive? Wikipedia “settles the matter” by saying:

“In the months prior to the attack, Whitman had sought professional help for “overwhelming, violent impulses”, including fantasies about shooting people from the tower. An autopsy conducted after his death revealed a hypothalamic tumor.“

To the contrary, I think Charles may have done all of that under hypnosis.  

Whole Cloth — Gulf of Tonkin

At some point, the powerful realized that they could make up a story “from whole cloth.” This happened in the Gulf of Tonkin episode.  In 1964, President Lyndon Johnson told Congress, deceitfully, that a US ship in a Vietnam harbor, had been torpedoed by the Viet Cong (the communist enemy).  It did not really happen, but the telling of it was enough to make Congress approve LBJ’s large escalation of the Vietnam war.

The purpose of a false flag is to blame the enemy for some atrocity which will galvanize the domestic public. Often, a government itself carries out an atrocity so that a false flag can be hung on the perpetrator. He will be labeled a Viet Cong, or a Muslim jihadist, or whatever.

In that example from 1964, the atrocity was very inexpensive — no ship was torpedoed at all! I guess you could say our brain was torpedoed.  Note: a German analyst of false flags, Elias Davidsson, looks at the 9-11 false flag where 19 Arabs were — absurdly — credited with hijacking 4 planes.  He entitles his book “Hijacking America’s Mind on 9-11.”

So there we are, torpedoed and hijacked.  We had better improve our game, and soon. Anyone with a working intellect needs to join this effort.

The Purpose of Sandy Hook

To create a fictional story of a school massacre would naturally require a lot of money and a lot of effort. So why bother? What was gained? I have heard three purposes suggested.

The first is gun control. Certainly much is made of the shooting by persons who do not want the public to easily acquire a gun. And the bereaved families (I mean the “bereaved” families) at Sandy Hook have taken a prominent role in the anti-gun movement. A helpful book, co-edited by James Fetzer and Mike Palecek, is entitled: “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook: It Was a FEMA Drill To Support Gun Control.”

The second possible purpose of Sandy Hook was to use it as a try-out for later events, such as the Boston Marathon bombing. In other words, the powerful were testing the public’s gullibility. It seems we passed with flying colors.  Although there are many critics of Sandy Hook who publish comments on the Internet, no official action has taken place in opposition to this false flag. (Note: It took Congress nine years, from its Gulf of Tonkin gullibility in 1964 to its official opposition in the 1973 War Powers Act.)

I go along with those first and second purposes of Sandy Hook — nuking the Second Amendment and prepping for the Marathon affair — but I am especially devoted to a third purpose. Namely, the powerful want us to stop making any distinction between fact and fiction. This is the premise of my book “Unreality: Sandy Hook Messes Minds.” I claim that the Sandy Hook issue is meant to expose us to huge lies, whilst we sort-of-realize they are lies, and finally give up on trying to distinguish between reality and unreality.

Click on the link for the rest.


10)  Please help the nurse Amal Arafa, suffering with her family in the Gaza Strip by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 18:01 EST)
Reply to list

On Wed, Dec 8, 2021, 5:41 PM GAZA PALESTINE <anahona366@gmail.com> wrote:

I am the nurse Amal Arafa is a nurse and I have 3 children. I have been helping the injured for 3 years in the Gaza Strip

My husband was exposed to eczema and chest infections 10 years ago..and now he has contracted the corona virus and his condition is very dangerous

I am doing a great job not to give my husband or any of my family any of the Corona vaccinations because my husband suffers from chest allergies and I am afraid that the disease will increase on him due to the virus and vaccination

And now my husband is at home and needs special health care and needs expenses that I can't take care of

For a long time, I prevented my family from taking doses and vaccinations for the Corona virus

My husband can't get a job now because he doesn't have a vaccination paper because life here doesn't continue without a vaccination paper

If I go with my husband to the hospital, the preventive medicine will give my whole family this vaccination and I do not want this to happen because I am afraid of this vaccination and I fear for my husband because he is in a bad condition

I want to get a sum of money so that I can continue my life by treating my husband without vaccinations and not getting any kind of vaccinations for my children.

I am in a very critical time and I need your support and I need $200 in principle to go to my husband to a private hospital so that I do not give him a dose of vaccination

And he needs another amount to help him relieve eczema, because he is in a very bad situation because he suffers from the flu, a great fever and a great pain in the chest.

And my goal for a long time was not to take any vaccination because of what I read in the news and after what I read on Dr. Mark’s page and what he personally told me that vaccination is not good..

I hope you will support and help me





11)  Indiana University honors Dr. Fauci for his heroic "defense of science and truth" (on what planet?) by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 18:10 EST)
Reply to list

Do a quick search on "Indiana University" and "Gates Foundation," to see how much the latter has donated to the former over the last several years.



IU To Present Dr Anthony Fauci With Leadership Award During Webinar On Monday


By Janet D. Peachey Last updated Dec 6, 2021


The UI School of Public Health in partnership with the Rural AIDS / STD Prevention Center will present Dr.Anthony Fauci with the Ryan White Distinguished Leadership Award during a webinar at 5:15 p.m. Monday.

The award is given to individuals who have demonstrated excellent work in the fight against HIV / AIDS. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, has worked to promote AIDS education and research during his 37 years as a director.

RCAP Senior Director and Head Professor Dr William Yarber worked closely with Ryan White’s mother Jeanne White-Ginder to establish the award in 2009. Since then the award has been presented to 14 people, the first of which is White-Ginder. , in honor of White’s legacy.

Recent: Swastika seen near 6th and Lincoln, Chabad reacts by lighting candles

White, originally from Indiana, was diagnosed with AIDS as a result of a blood transfusion in 1984. He became a national face of the epidemic after enduring social and health problems and being denied l access to his school. Since his death in 1990, Yarber said his mother White-Ginder worked to continue his story.

Yarber said he was eager to hear White-Ginder speak during Monday’s webinar.

“His words touch the hearts of those who listen,” Yarber said.

Yarber said he and White-Ginder wanted to recognize Fauci for the work he has done in AIDS research and education and his dedication to science. Fauci and White-Ginder originally became connected through their work together on the Ryan White CARE Act, which protected federal funding of HIV / AIDS-related resources for low-income or uninsured citizens in the United States.

Yarber said he was grateful for Fauci to join even for a short time, although they were unsure if he could due to his work on the pandemic.

For Yarber, Fauci’s dedication to science, although his role is so closely tied to politics, is what makes his work so admirable.

“It’s a delicate job he has,” Yarber said. “He’s a civil servant, he works for the president, but yet he’s a scientist. And he was able to navigate the defense of science and truth, and not be guided by politics. He is criticized a lot, but he is also revered. That is why we pay tribute to him.

Click on the link for the rest.


12)  HALF the American people now oppose the "vaccine" mandates: NBC poll by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Dec 2021 18:19 EST)
Reply to list

NBC Poll:  50% Americans oppose “requiring that everyone who is now eligible must get a COVID-19 vaccine.”  


Support News from Underground:
Visit News from Underground:
For archives, please go to:





MSM Frantically Hides How Omicron Is Being Spread


By The Injected


& Study Finds COVID/5G Correlation


with Ryan Cristián



Sincere Devotion to the Vaccine. Encounters with a COVID Believer


with Michael Welch and Dr. Tara Moriarty

(audio, 59:24)


Will Omicron Finally End the Covid-19 Pandemic?


by Stephen Londe


Remdesivir Recall, Omicron Lie Exposes Delta

& 292 Athlete Cardiac Arrests Following Jab (167 Dead)


with Ryan Cristián



Omicron Has Zero Deaths, Data Shows Vaxed More Likely To Get


COVID/Die & UK COVID Pass Expanded


with Ryan Cristián






Nurses unions around the world mobilize against Big Pharma


by Barsha Gandikota-Nellutla


The fight to organize teachers in small-town Wisconsin


with Maximillian Alvarez






The Indian farmers’ movement has shattered


Narendra Modi’s strongman image


by Ashique Ali T


Sandinistas Won a Landslide Victory Not Through Fraud


But Because They Uplifted Nicaragua’s Poor


by Yader Lanuza





A Dozen Major US Cities Hit All-Time Murder Records


With 3 Weeks Still Left In 2021


by Jack Phillips


“It’s Time to Free Leonard Peltier,


America’s Longest Serving Political Prisoner”


by Kevin Sharp


The American Prison System’s War on Reading


by Alex Skopic





Slaying some myths, swallowing others


by Rod Such


Ralph Nader:


Critical Exposés Everywhere as the Corporate State Worsens


by Ralph Nader


The Open Technology Fund


That Makes All Your Favorite Privacy Apps is Staffed Full of Spies


by Alan Macleod


Video: Digital Tyranny


and the Rockefeller-Gates WHO “Vaxx-Certificate Passport”:


Towards a World War III Scenario


by Peter Koenig



Writing A New Narrative – #SolutionsWatch


with James Corbett





From: News from Underground [mailto:nobody@simplelists.com]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 1:25 AM
Subject: Daily digest for nfu@simplelists.com


1. L.A. School District "poised to remove" its "vaccine" mandate - Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:13 EST)
2. The tide is turning: Former pro-"vax" PhDs are now refusing boosters - Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:19 EST)
3. More fascism from "the left": Green Party comes out for "vaccine" mandates, quarantine - Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:29 EST)
4. More on NYU admitting that my teaching has not violated any of its policies - Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:34 EST)
5. The Atlantic laughs off child sex trafficking - Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:41 EST)
6. If we don't stop the "vaccine" passports, it's all over (MUST-WATCH/SHARE) - Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:46 EST)
7. "God help us all" - Mark Crispin Miller (12 Dec 2021 11:45 EST)


1. L.A. School District "poised to remove" its "vaccine" mandate by Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:13 EST)
Reply to list



2. The tide is turning: Former pro-"vax" PhDs are now refusing boosters by Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:19 EST)
Reply to list

From: Steve Kirsch's newsletter
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2021 10:26 PM
Subject: The tide is turning: former pro-vax PhDs are now refusing the booster

Want to know what changed their minds? ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

The tide is turning: former pro-vax PhDs are now refusing the booster
Want to know what changed their minds?
Steve Kirsch
Dec 12
People are starting to wake up.
Recently, I received news that top researchers at multiple highly respected institutions (including Harvard) who had earlier been publicly promoting the vaccine have now changed their minds and are privately refusing to get the booster.
How is that possible? Did we finally convince them with the data? Most of my truthteller friends have been censored and/or deplatformed. So what is causing these people to shift their views so quickly?
The credit for the attitude shift goes our best convincer: the vaccine itself.
These researchers are seeing first hand how dangerous the vaccine is because they are involved in studies in hospitalized and/or outpatients and they see the numbers first hand.
Of course, they can’t say anything officially since they would be fired or have their funding taken away.
I just wanted you to know that people are finally waking up to what is really going on here.

Thanks for subscribing to Steve Kirsch's newsletter. This post is public, so feel free to share it.
© 2021 Steve Kirsch Unsubscribe
548 Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104


3. More fascism from "the left": Green Party comes out for "vaccine" mandates, quarantine by Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:29 EST)
Reply to list



4. More on NYU admitting that my teaching has not violated any of its policies by Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:34 EST)
Reply to list

NYU Dean Of NYU Jack Knott Tells Mark Crispin Miller He Violated No Teaching Rules: Miller's Libel Suit Now Bolstered
What Was NYU Thinking?
Celia Farber


5. The Atlantic laughs off child sex trafficking by Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:41 EST)
Reply to list

So it's a "far right" thing to care about that problem?
They are beneath contempt (and may—who knows?—be pedophiles themselves).
The Atlantic goes tone-deaf on child sex trafficking
Our media obsess over Pizzagate but barely mention Ghislaine Maxwell
December 10, 2021 | 7:17 am
People gather to protest human trafficking at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse where the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell is being held (Getty)
Written by:
Stephen L. Miller
In the midst of the highest profile child sex trafficking trial in recent history, the intellectual thought leaders at the Atlantic have seemingly found the real problem: internet wine moms who have gone down one too many 4Chan rabbit holes.
The magazine, ever playing to its crowd of agreeable elites, recently published a longform piece by Kaitlyn Tiffany titled “The Great (Fake) Child-Sex-Trafficking Epidemic.” It takes in all the usual sights: Twitter and Instagram hashtags, 4Chan trolling conspiracies, Reddit groups. In other words, it centers on people with little power to do anything except post online and talk in groups. Rather than examining more powerful actors like, say, the CIA or Ghislaine Maxwell.
Outlets like the Atlantic have carved out an entire cottage industry, dedicating millions in resources to covering the kook fringe right. That’s all well and good, but these same outlets and infotainment click-sites claim to be speaking truth to power. So it comes as a bit of a surprise that the Atlantic would run this thoroughly researched (read: spent time looking at 4Chan) piece suggesting that child trafficking is an elaborate hoax.
Related Stories
Ghislaine Maxwell ‘thinks Epstein was murdered’
No, the media doesn’t treat Biden worse than Trump
We will learn nothing from Oxford and Waukesha
Ghislaine Maxwell blames the victim
What to expect from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial
That’s especially true when you consider that the piece ran in the middle of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, and comes on the heels of an explosive report — in BuzzFeed of all places — that the CIA had evidence of employees and contractors committing sexual crimes against children, and took no action. It was also published in the same week that it emerged that a top Sony executive had been caught in a pedophile sting.
Click on the link for the rest.


6. If we don't stop the "vaccine" passports, it's all over (MUST-WATCH/SHARE) by Mark Crispin Miller (11 Dec 2021 23:46 EST)
Reply to list



7. "God help us all" by Mark Crispin Miller (12 Dec 2021 11:45 EST)
Reply to list


Support News from Underground: https://bit.ly/NFUSupport

Visit News from Underground: https://markcrispinmiller.com

For archives, please go to: https://archives.simplelists.com/nfu