Bulletin N° 1044


“Pop Goes the Weasel”


Nursery Rhymes, Songs for Kids . . . .

'Round and 'round the cobbler's bench
The monkey chased the weasel,
The monkey thought 'twas all in fun
Pop! Goes the weasel.

A penny for a spool of thread
A penny for a needle,
That's the way the money goes,
Pop! Goes the weasel.



Subject: "Are You Free?"




June 10, 2022



Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,


For a long time now a ubiquitous graffiti (painted sometimes in red, somtimes in black) across the town of Grenoble reads: Êtes-vous libre?

It’s enough to raise the question; a complex problematic for any thinking person. At any rate our mind begins to work as we go about our daily life in these long summer days of massacres, destruction, and manufactured anxieties.


Corruption in high places is over the top and largely visible to most people. The question can be simply put: Will we become entirely acclimated to this environment with its brand of Papa Doc Voodoo as a way of life? Or will we become conscious of the fact that capitalism itself is organized crime and always has been? Just ask the victims!


Meanwhile we continue our presentation of analyses and interpretations of real social relationships in the profit-motivated culture of these “late-capitalist ” days and nights that absorb us.


The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma,

and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health”

by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (audio edition read by Bruce Wagner)


Audiobook, Part I

(the Dedication & Acknowledgements to Chapter 6)




Audiobook, Part II

(Chapter 7 to the Afterword)





”The Real Anthony Fauci”

(1035 page electronic MS)



(L’édition française : Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates et Big Pharma - Leur guerre mondiale contre la démocratie et la santé publique, trans. par Pierre Barois)


Table of Contents

Dedications and Acknowledgements…viii


Chapter 1: Mismanaging a Pandemic…(con’d.)

Chapter 2: Pharma Profits over Public Health…118

Chapter 3: The HIV Pandemic Template for Pharma Profiteering…126

Chapter 4: The Pandemic Template: AIDS and AZT…148

Chapter 5: The HIV Heresies…178

Chapter 6: Burning The HIV Heretics…209

Chapter 7: Dr. Fauci, Mr. Hyde: NIAID’s Barbaric and Illegal

Experiments on Children…243

Chapter 8: White Mischief: Dr. Fauci’s African Atrocities…257

Chapter 9: The White Man’s Burden…278



Chapter 10: More Harm Than Good…323

“It’s like waking up in your house with a room full of smoke, opening
the window to let the smoke out, and then going back to bed.”
—Unnamed Medical Expert


In the last chapter, we heard global public health advocates accuse Bill Gates and Dr. Fauci of hijacking WHO’s public health agenda away from the projects that are proven to curb infectious diseases (clean water, hygiene, nutrition, and economic development) and diverting international aid to wedge open emerging markets for their multinational partners and to serve their personal vaccine fetish. This chapter will examine Gates’ underlying assertion that his African and Asian vaccines are yielding a net public health benefit. (p.323)


Bill and Tony’s African Safari.
In the colonial era, Africa provided model precincts for testing new vaccines. In the 1950s, white colonial overlords rolled out the red carpet for pharmaceutical companies to perform vaccine experiments on compliant test subjects numbering in the millions. Drug companies spend some 90 percent of their drug development costs on Phase III human trials.4 Every trial delay eats into the critical time period when the product enjoys patent protection. In the 1980s, Pharma therefore moved most of its clinical trials to poor nations where human guinea pigs are cheap and even the most severe injuries will rarely delay the study. Government complicity and anemic corporate liability laws allow vaccine makers to write off injuries as collateral damage with little consequence or accountability.

Today, Pharma still regards Africa as the beau ideal to test immunizations, and as a lucrative receptacle for dumping expired and defective stocks. Bill Gates has played a key role in legitimizing this arrangement while collaborating with captive or corrupt WHO officials to scam Western donor nations into footing the bill, and guaranteeing rich profits for pharmaceutical companies in which, coincidentally, he holds hefty stock positions. Gates —the “biggest funder of vaccines in the world” — is heavily invested in lucrative partnerships with almost all the world’s largest vaccine companies. Bill and Melinda Gates have continued the tradition of human experimentation in Africa with the WHO stepping neatly into the role of an enabling colonial vassal.

Following the colonial era, most of Africa’s new nationalist governments considered healthcare a national priority, and many of them developed model health programs for their populations. During the 1970s, International Monetary Fund (IMF) austerity policies bankrupted the best of these programs and left African nations almost entirely dependent on the WHO to finance National Health Ministries and vital HIV programs. Using its control of the flow of international assistance, WHO exerts discipline, rewards compliance, and punishes resistance to Pharma’s African ambitions. WHO uses its funding power to bully Afican governments that slack on vaccine uptake. Gates’s pervasive control over WHO has made Africa his fiefdom. The continent’s populations have become his guinea pigs. Vaccines, for Bill Gates, are a strategic philanthropy that feed his many vaccine-related businesses and give him dictatorial control over global health policies affecting millions of human lives.

DTP Vaccine: African Genocide.
A wave of gruesome brain injuries and deaths followed the introduction of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccines in the United States and Europe in the 1970s. As early as 1977, a study published by British physicians and researchers in The Lancet established that the risks of the whole-cell pertussis jab (used in the DTP vaccine) exceed the risks qssociated with wild pertussis.10

Six years later, a 1983 NIH-funded UCLA study found that Wyeth’s DTP vaccine was killing or causing severe brain injury, including seizures and death, in 1 in every 300 vaccinated children. The resultant lawsuits caused the collapse of insurance markets for vaccines and threatened to bankrupt the industry. Wyeth—now Pfizer—claimed to be losing $20 in downstream liability for every dollar it earned on vaccine sales, and induced Congress to pass the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986 shielding vaccine makers from liability.


In 1985, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended the abandonment of the whole cell version of the pertussis vaccine—to avert the high incidence of encephalopathy and deaths. In 1991, the United States, E.U. countries, and Japan switched to a far safer (but less effective) dead cell (attenuated) vaccine—DTaP—and discontinued use of the DTP jab. While Western nations pulled the DTP, WHO gave pharma free rein and cash to dump its toxic inventories in Africa, Asia, and Central America, despite strong evidence of its deadly impacts.

Its dangers aside, the old DTP is cheaper to manufacture and more lucrative for pharma, and so, after 2002, Gates and his surrogates, GAVI, WHO, and Global Fund made DTP the flagship for their African vaccine program and continued giving this neurotoxic and often lethal vaccine to some 156 million African children annually. WHO’s use of DTP as its bellwether vaccine—to measure national compliance with WHO’s vaccine schedule—has made DTP today the most popular vaccine on Earth. Health ministries across the world must demonstrate specific uptake goals with the DTP recommendations in order to qualify for vital WHO assistance for HIV and other support.

Prior to 2017, neither HHS nor WHO performed the kind of study necessary to ascertain whether the DTP vaccine was actually yielding the beneficial health outcomes about which Gates frequently boasts. That year, the Danish government and the candinavian vaccine behemoths, Statens Serum Institut and Novo Nordisk, commissioned prominent Scandinavian scientists Søren Mogensen and Peter Aaby— both vocal champions of the Africa vaccine program—to lead an illustrious team of international researchers to examine all-cause ;ortalities after the DTP inoculations.

That massive study put the lie to Gates’s mantric  incantation that his investment in the DTP vaccine has saved millions of lives. In June 2017, the team published a peer-reviewed study in EBioMedicine, a high-gravitas journal in Elsevier’s publishing house armada. The article parsed data from a so-called “natural experiment” in Guinea Bissau, where half the children in certain age groups were vaccinated and the other half were not. The division was randomized.


That 2017 study (Mogensen et al., 2017) shows that, following their DTP immunization at three months, vaccinated girls had tenfold higher mortality than unvaccinated children. The girls were dying of a wide range of diseases—pneumonia, anemia, malaria, dysentery —and for two decades no one noticed that the dying children were predominantly those who received the vaccine. The DTP vaccine—while protecting children against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis—had ruined their immune systems, making them vulnerable to a wide range of deadly nontarget infections. Mogensen’s team arrived at that conclusion, as had the 1977 Lancet study researchers exactly forty years earlier: “DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.”

In other words, Gates’s DTP vaccine—instead of saving 10 million lives, as he claims—may have unnecessarily killed millions of African girls. At least seven other studies have confirmed DTP’s association with high mortality in vaccinated girls compared to unvaccinated. The idealistic Americans who donated to Gates’s African vaccine project —believing they were saving African babies—were actually funding a continent-wide female genocide.

After completing the study and verifying its shocking results, Peter Aaby—a virtual deity among African vaccine researchers—made an impassioned, and remorseful, plea to the WHO to reconsider the DTP vaccine. “I guess most of you think that we know what our vaccines are doing,” he said. “We don’t.”

Gates, WHO, and GAVI ignored Aaby’s appeal and redoubled their efforts to expand DTP vaccinations and to shore up support for the girl-killing jab. The Lancet published a commentary by Gates Foundation plenipotentiary Chris Elias, Dr. Anthony Fauci, and three apparatchiks from lesser Gates-funded consortia, WHO’s Margaret Chan, UNICEF’s Director Anthony Lake, and Seth Berkley of GAVI, who portray their deadly African DTP program as a public health triumph. These charlatans proclaimed DTP as one of the “bright spots” in global well-being and gasconaded that “more children are being immunized worldwide than ever before with the highest level of routine coverage in history (as measured by coverage of three doses of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP)-containing vaccine).” That project also involved reputationally demoting Aaby with a defamation campaign.

A subsequent expert review by the founder of the Cochrane Collaborative, Peter Gøtzsche, condemned the WHO’s attempt to downplay the risks of DTP vaccine. The
WHO, he observed, had been dismissive of studies finding detrimental nonspecific effects for the DTP vaccine while accepting studies finding beneficial nonspecific effects for the measles vaccine. The WHO is “inconsistent and biased toward positive effects of vaccines. When a result pleases the WHO, it can be accepted, but not when a result does not please the WHO.” Gøtzsche found the studies by Mogensen and Aaby “superior in every respect to the Gates-generated Lancet study.”

Gates and his WHO vassals continue to bully African nations into taking their lethal DTP vaccines by threatening to withdraw financial aid to their health departments and HIV programs if the government fails to achieve national uptake targets (90 percent). (pp.324-326)


. . .


Population and Sterilization Vaccines.
Early twentieth-century America saw the snowballing popularity of eugenics, a racist pseudoscience that aspired to eliminate human beings deemed “unfit” in favor of the Nordic stereotypes. Twenty-seven state governments enshrined elements of the philosophy as official policy by enacting forced sterilization and segregation laws and marriage restrictions. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt laws requiring sterilization of intellectually challenged Americans. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans.”

John D. Rockefeller, Jr.’s keen interest in eugenics colored his passion for population control. The oil baron scion joined the American Eugenics Society and served as trustee of the Bureau of Social Hygiene. The Rockefeller Foundation dispatched hefty donations in the 1920s and early 1930s to hundreds of German researchers, including those conducting Hitler’s notorious “twins studies” at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Berlin. The Rockefeller Foundation curtailed donations to Nazi Germany’s medical institutions before Pearl Harbor, but Rockefeller’s success promoting the eugenics movement had already captivated Adolf Hitler. “Now that we know the laws of heredity,” Hitler told a fellow Nazi, “it is possible to a large extent to prevent unhealthy and severely handicapped beings from coming into the world. I have studied with interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all
probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”

In the early 1950s, the Rockefeller Foundation conducted fertility studies in India that historian Matthew Connolly characterizes as an example of “American social science at its most hubristic.” In one of the collaborations with the Harvard School of Public Health and India’s Ministry of Health, the Rockefeller Foundation studied 8,000 tribal people in seven villages in the Khanna section of Punjab to determine whether  contraceptive tablets could dramatically reduce fertility rates. According to Linsey McGoey, “The villagers were treated like lab specimens, subjected to monthly questioning but otherwise ignored.”

Rockefeller’s researchers did not initially inform the Punjabis that their pills would prevent women from bearing children. McGoey describes the villagers as “shocked,” “dismayed,” and “resentful” to learn that the medication they credulously consumed was intended to render them infertile: “Some were incensed by the effort to limit their future progeny.”

Over the next two decades, the Rockefeller Foundation conducted frequent anti-fertility programs in India and elsewhere, earning the growing animosity of physicians, human rights activists, and poverty specialists who criticized the foundation for focusing on population growth while ignoring the realities of persistent poverty that makes large families so indispensable to Indian and African villagers.

“Today,” McGoey adds, “the Gates Foundation is pouring money into experimental medical trials that are facing criticism similar to those directed at the [Rockefeller Foundation’s] Khanna study. Like earlier philanthropic foundations, The Gates Foundation has the financial and political clout to intervene in foreign nations with relative impunity, and to remain unfazed when the experiments it funds go awry.”

Gates’s fetish for reducing population is a family pedigree. His father, Bill Gates Sr., was a prominent corporate lawyer and civic leader in Seattle with a lifelong obsession for “population control.” Gates Sr. sat on the national board of Planned Parenthood, a neo-progressive organization founded in 1916 by the racist eugenicist Margaret Sanger to promote birth control and sterilization and to purge “human waste” and “create a race of thoroughbreds.” Sanger said she hoped to purify the gene pool by “eliminating the unfit” persons with disabilities-preventing such persons from reproducing by surgical sterilization or other means.


In 1939, Sanger created and directed the racist Negro Project, which strategically co-opted Black ministers in leadership roles to promote contraceptives to their congregations. Sanger stated in a letter to her eugenics colleague, Clarence Gamble (of Procter & Gamble), “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

“When I was growing up, my parents were always involved in various volunteer  things,” Gates told Bill Moyers in 2003. “My dad was head of Planned Parenthood. And it was very controversial to be involved with that.”

Overpopulation, Gates’s father told Salon in a 2015 interview, was “an interest he’s had since he was a kid.” In 1994, the elder Gates formed the William H. Gates Foundation (the family’s first), focused on reproductive and child health in the developing world. Population control was an enduring preoccupation of his son’s philanthropy from its inception.

Gates has made a long parade of public statements and investments that reflect his deep dread of overpopulation. He describes himself as an admirer and proponent of the population doomsayer Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb, whom Gates describes as “the world’s most prominent environmental Cassandra,” meaning a prophet who accurately predicts misfortune or disaster.

By the way, I share Gates’s fear that if humanity persists in juxtaposing exponential population expansion atop linear resource growth, we will all land in a nightmarish Malthusian dystopia. I’m troubled, however, by his apparent comfort in using coercive and mendacious tactics to trick poor people into dangerous and unwanted contraceptive programs. The proven paths to zero population growth are the mitigation of poverty and empowerment of women. Women with alternative career opportunities seldom choose the heavy and hazardous burden of serial maternity. Virtually every nation with a stable middle class has fertility below replacement rates. But Gates’s careless public statements and the programs that he habitually funds suggest that Gates has involved himself in sketchy stealth campaigns to sterilize dark-skinned and marginalized women without their informed consent—including by the deceptive use of dangerous sterility vaccines.

On February 20, 2010, less than one month after he famously committed $10 billion to the WHO, Bill Gates suggested in his “Innovating to Zero” TED Talk in Long Beach, California, that reducing world population growth could be done in part with “new vaccines”:

The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9
billion [here he is almost quoting Bryant et al.]. Now, if we do a really
great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services,
we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent . . .

Gates’s defenders—and the Gates-subsidized “Fact Checker” organizations—scoff at critics who interpret literally Gates’s 2010 statement that he hoped to use vaccines to reduce population. They explain that Gates intended, by this inartful construct, to suggest that lifesaving vaccines will allow more infants to survive to adulthood, thereby reassuring impoverished parents that they need not have so many children. But this hypothesis rests on the sketchy premise that his vaccines reduce child mortality—a proposition that Gates has never demonstrated and that current science does not support. His peculiar choice of words naturally fueled speculation that he was engaging in a premeditated campaign to use vaccines to sterilize women. His questionable antics in promoting antifertility drugs and WHO’s widespread use of stealth sterility vaccines credibly fuel such sentiments.



Depo-Provera: A Cruel Irony.
Population control has been the central preoccupation of the Gates Foundation since its inception. In 1999, Gates’ $2.2 billion commitment to the UN Population Fund doubled the size of the Gates Foundation. The same year, he funded, with a $20 million contribution, the founding of the Johns Hopkins Center for Population.

In 2017, the Gates Foundation adopted the goal of administering contraceptives to 214 million women in poor countries. Gates’ contraceptive of choice is the long- term infertility agent Depo-Provera. Population planners have administered Depo-Provera primarily to poor and Black women in the United States since its invention in 1967. In the United States, 84 percent of Depo-Provera users are Black, and 74 percent are low-income. Depo-Provera’s biggest promoter, Planned Parenthood, specifically targets Blacks and Latinas in its marketing campaigns. UN data demonstrate that Depo-Provera is seldom administered to White or affluent women or girls in the United States or Europe.

Depo-Provera is a powerful poison, with a devastating inventory of wretched side effects: Under federal law, the Depo-Provera label must bear FDA’s most stringent Black Box warning—due to its potential to cause fatal bone loss. Furthermore, women have reported both missed periods and excessive bleeding; blood clots in arms, legs, lungs, and eyes; stroke; weight gain; ectopic pregnancy; depression; hair loss; decreased libido; and permanent infertility. Some studies have associated Depo-Provera with dramatic increases (200 percent) in breast cancer risk. The FDA warns women not to take Depo-Provera for longer than two years, but Gates’ program prescribes at least a four-year course—or indefinitely—for African women and goes to great lengths to avoid warning Black women about the concoction’s many drawbacks.

Between 1994 and 2006, Bill & Melinda Gates teamed with the Rockefeller and Andrew W. Mellon Foundations, the Population Council, and USAID to fund a seminal family-planning experiment administering Depo-Provera to approximately 9,000 impoverished women in the town of Navrongo and districts of Ghana. (Though USAID’s stated underlying principles for family planning are “volunteerism and informed choice,” it hasn’t always worked out that

A disturbing 2011 exposé of the collaboration by the Rebecca Project for Justice, “The Outsourcing of Tuskegee: Nonconsensual Research in Africa,” documented how Gates’ researchers lied to the Navrongo women, telling them that they were receiving “routine healthcare” and/or “social observations”—never informing them that they were part of a population control experiment. Gates’ researchers violated US research laws by failing to administer informed consent forms to the women they injected with Depo-Provera. Nor did they obtain institutional review board (IRB) approval for a human experiment that lasted an extraordinary six years. Under direction of Gates’s PI, Dr. James Phillips, and his fellow Pfizer and Gates’ PIs, deliberately fabricated and falsified research data to fraudulently “prove” Depo-Provera safe. Based on such “proofs,” in 2011, Gates expanded his project to fund Depo-Provera programs for some 12 million women across sub-Saharan Africa.

That same year, 2011, a study by a another prestigious BMGF & NIH-funded research team from Gates’s own Washington School of Public Health published an article inLancet Infectious Diseases, Heffron et al. (2012), reporting that African women who used injectable Depo-Provera were much more likely to acquire HIV/AIDS compared to untreated women. Depo-Provera injections double a woman’s risk of contracting and transmitting HIV. This result was not an enormous surprise. For twenty-four years, diverse studies have shown that Depo-Provera thins the vaginal wall, easing transmission of HIV. Furthermore, the researchers found Depo-Provera exacerbates the rates of HIV/AIDS infections to a recipient’s sexual partners. Despite her funding from Gates, the study’s lead author, Dr. Renee Heffron, and her fellow researchers recommended informing HIV-infected women of Depo-Provera’s grave risks and to use alternative non-progesterone-based contraceptives: “Women should be counseled about potentially increased risk of HIV-1 acquisition and transmission.” The confirmation of the risk by his own scientists posed an obvious conundrum for Gates since it pitted his passion for population control against his avowed commitment to end the spread of HIV in Africa. Population, it turns out, trumps HIV-prevention in Bill Gates’s catechism.

Without offering any scientific research to substantiate their claims, Gates’s deputies, a cabal of extreme population control advocates linked to Gates, worked with Pfizer intermediaries to viciously attack Heffron’s research findings. The critics included BMGF, Planned Parenthood, the UN, Ronald Gray of the Gates-funded Johns Hopkins University, James Shelton of USAID’s Office of Population, and others.

Under these fierce attacks by Gates’s minions in the medical cartel, Dr. Heffron and her research team courageously stood their ground and retained their professional integrity. The Lancet published Heffron’s withering response. Dr. Heffron pointed out that her attackers cited no convincing science and that the two recent studies—by Heffron and the WSPH team—capped a quarter-century of published research documenting increased HIV risk among women taking Depo-Provera.

To combat this crisis, WHO—by then, wearing Bill Gates’ boot on its neck— convened a group of handpicked experts, all sworn to secrecy, for a closed-door meeting in Geneva on January 31, 2012, to discuss damage control on the Heffron study and the mountain of HIV research that supported her. On February 16, 2012, WHO and its mysterious expert cabal—unsurprisingly—announced its preordained decision: Women living with HIV/AIDS or at high risk of HIV/AIDS can safely use Depo-Provera.

Betsy Hartmann, a longtime reproductive rights advocate, ridiculed WHO’s convenient new guidelines: “This reversal despite 25 years of studies citing an increased risk of HIV transmission among women using it raises question marks whether WHO abandoned caution due to ‘outside encouragement’ by special interest groups.” Hartmann was clearly referring to BMGF.


In the wake of WHO’s self-serving declaration, Melinda Gates announced in July 2012 a billion-dollar contribution as BMGF’s share of a four-billion-dollar collaboration with
USAID, PATH, and Pfizer with the goal of promoting Pfizer’s Depo-Provera across sub-Saharan Africa. Pfizer and USAID committed the remaining $3 billion to African contraceptive projects.

Outcry and censure from dozens of international women’s rights advocates and reproductive health groups greeted Melinda Gates’ announcement.

According to a detailed report by Jacob Levich, “The Real Agenda of the Gates Foundation,” “Mrs. Gates minimized the proven risk of acquiring HIV/AIDS with Depo-Provera by directing the public to a contrived eight-page ‘Technical Statement’ published by the Gates Foundation’s supplicants at WHO, assuring the public that Depo-Provera is safe, and that all contrary scientific research that linked Depo-Provera to HIV infection was “inconclusive.”

To quell the growing uproar, Gates funded a WHO study to debunk the HIV association once and for all. This time he skipped over Heffron to fund a more “reliable” group of researchers (environmental lawyers call this sort “biostitutes”). On October 21, 2015, WHO released its investigation—which, not surprisingly, concluded that “There is no evidence of a causal association between DMPA use and an incidence in women’s risk of HIV acquisition.” WHO then issued new guidelines that mirror precisely those recommended by Pfizer, Depo-Provera’s manufacturer.


Some forty reproductive health groups demanded that WHO’s director, Margaret Chan, sideline the new guidelines until Gates’s study could survive a rigorous reevaluation process. WHO ignored those pleas.

The centerpiece of the Gates $4 billion caper is a “self-injection” syringe—a plastic bubble attached to a needle—for administering Depo-Provera. Pfizer creates the gizmo, but Gates’ Seattle-based legate, PATH, markets it under the new brand name “Sayana Press.” PATH’s former director, Chris Elias, was by then president of the BMGF. Through PATH, Gates will distribute these devices, costing $1 per three-month dose, to 120 million women in sixty-nine of the world’s poorest countries. With contributions that Gates plans to squeeze from those governments, these lucky ladies will pay little or none of the cost.

Pfizer, of course, will make a killing. According to the Wall Street Journal’s Market Watch, “Pfizer could potentially earn approximately $36 billion in sales resulting from an unprecedented Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) investment—$560 million from BMGF, totaling $4.3 billion with government contributions—that promotes Depo-Provera as the optimum contraceptive for women of color and low-income women.”

Levich explains that this scheme is a cunning dodge to evade US regulations that require Pfizer’s label include its dire Black Box warning bearing the words: “FDA,” “Black Box,” “warning,” and “osteoporosis,” and that the administering clinician inform every recipient that the drug poses life-threatening harm. In the United States, pharmacists can never dispense Depo-Provera directly to a patient to self-inject, since the law requires that medical personnel counsel each patient about risks. Ignoring these safeguards in Africa would expose Pfizer to criminal prosecution and thousands of lawsuits under the Alien Tort Claims Act, which could allow aggrieved African women to sue negligent US drug makers in US courts if they suffer injuries as the result of failure to warn. Pfizer’s apparent strategy for insulating itself from liability is to use PATH and BMGF as surrogates to market its contraception.

Furthermore, to promote Depo-Provera’s uptake among Blacks, PATH makes a series of outlaw, off-label claims that Pfizer could not legally make about the product. PATH claims that Depo-Provera protects against endometrial cancer and uterine fibroids and reduces risks of sickle cell anemia and iron deficiency anemia—diseases that disparately injure Blacks. FDA has never approved Depo-Provera for cancer prevention or for any of these other uses. It is therefore illegal for Pfizer to promote these off-label claims. Presenting Gates and PATH as its intermediaries is apparently also Pfizer’s strategy for evading US laws that prohibit off-label claims. Levich adds: “These statements taken in totality are contextually false and designed to specifically circumvent the FDA’s Black Box warnings. If Depo-Provera is genuinely a safe and effective contraceptive, with only minimal side effects, why then are Gates, Hopkins, USAID, Planned Parenthood, and Pfizer’s other intermediaries deliberately concealing the plain “Black-Letter” FDA Black-Box warnings in their effort
to minimize and conceal Depo-Provera’s life-threatening harm?”


Put bluntly, Gates and his confederates are tricking African women into taking the contraceptive by deceiving them about its safety and lying about its efficacy against diseases that disproportionately harm Blacks—something Pfizer executives could go to jail for. Gates’s willing partner in this fraud is USAID.

USAID’s Director, Dr. Rajiv Shah, has been a serial coconspirator in Gates’ many racist flim-flams. For a decade prior to his gig running USAID, Shah worked for Bill Gates’ foundation (2001–2010) as the principal fundraiser for GAVI’s World Immunization Programs. Shah candidly acknowledged that BMGF’s and PATH’s stamp of approval on Depo-Provera serves as a clever strategy for insulating Pfizer from criminal and civil prosecution for violating FDA regulations. Gates’ caper aims to artfully remove the FDA’s jurisdiction by using PATH as its surrogate and by effectively transferring regulatory authority to the WHO.

The Rebecca Project for Justice characterizes Gates’  African project as “A family planning strategy that unethically targets women of color to prohibit births of beautiful [Black] children, by not informing mothers of Depo-Provera’s deadly risks as mandated under US law/regulations; thus, denying women of color their inalienable right to choose and access safe reproductive health.”

Depo-Provera came honestly to its notoriety as the tool of choice for racist eugenicists. Israel banned Depo-Provera in 2013 following a scandal in which government health workers seeking to radically reduce the number of Black births were targeting African Jews with Depo-Provera. Sharona Eliahu Chai, lawyer for the Association of Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), condemned the government policy of preventing Black Israelis from reproducing: “Findings from investigations into the use of Depo-Provera are extremely worrisome, raising concerns of harmful health policies with racist implications in violation of medical ethics.”

In 2002, India banned this dangerous drug from all family welfare programs after a similar scandal: government officials were targeting lower-caste Indians. Many other nations, including Bahrain, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, prohibit the use of Depo- Provera on their nationals. European countries largely restrict the use of Depo-Provera and require full disclosure of risks for women and informed consent prior to its use. Gates and USAID have taken advantage of political disorganization in Pakistan to administer “self-inject” Depo-Provera to Muslim women. In contrast to its US counterpart, USAID, the Swedish International Development Authority (SIDA) does not fund, purchase, or provide Depo-Provera for Swedish-assisted projects in developing countries.

Sterility Vaccines / Chemical Castration.
Gates’s defenders ridicule as “conspiracy theory” the suggestion that Gates, or any reputable public health authority, would use “life-saving vaccines” as a stealth vehicle for surreptitiously rendering women infertile. But one of Gates’s earliest philanthropic undertakings was a 2002 project to administer tetanus vaccines to poor women in fifty-seven countries. For reasons we are about to discover, critics credibly suggest that these vaccines may have been secretly laced with a formula the Rockefeller Foundation developed to sterilize women against their will.

On November 6, 2014, four years after Gates pledged at a TED Talk to use vaccines to lower birth rates, medical researchers and doctors associated with the Kenya Conference of Catholic Bishops (KCCB) and the Kenya Catholic Health Commission accused WHO, UNICEF, and GAVI of secretly conducting a mass sterilization program against Kenyan women, under the veil of eradicating tetanus disease. The Washington Post reported similar charges by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association (KCDA).

The Catholic doctors became suspicious due to WHO’s glaring departures from the usual tetanus vaccine protocols. Normally a single tetanus vaccine provides a decade of immunity. Since men and women are equally susceptible, both sexes routinely get the vaccine. But WHO instructed Kenyan doctors to give the vaccine in five administrations, six months apart, and only to girls of childbearing years.

“The defense that the WHO intended only to target ‘maternal and neonatal tetanus’ seems odd in view of the fact that males are about as likely as females to be exposed to the bacterium which is found in the soil everywhere there are animals,” observed a 2011 peer-reviewed study of the controversy. The Catholic doctors also noticed other unusual features of the campaign. For starters, WHO suspiciously initiated its jab campaign not from a hospital or medical center or any of the estimated 60 local vaccination facilities, but distributed shots from the luxurious New Stanley Hotel in Nairobi—an exclusive resort out of reach to most physicians or public health officials. At considerable cost, a police escort accompanied the shots to vaccination sites, where police officers strictly supervised their handling by nursing staff and required clinicians to return each empty vial to WHO officials at Nairobi’s only five-star hotel under the watchful eyes of armed officers.

Four years later, in October 2019, the Kenyan Catholic Doctors’ Association accused UNICEF, GAVI, and the WHO of rendering millions of women and girls barren. The doctors had by then produced chemical analyses of vaccines verifying their allegations. Three independent Nairobi accredited biochemistry laboratories tested samples of the WHO tetanus vaccine, finding human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) where none should be present. In October 2014, Catholic doctors obtained six additional vials and tested them in six accredited laboratories, finding hCG in half of those samples.

In 2019, a group of independent researchers from Kenya and Great Britain led by University of British Columbia neurologist Dr. Christopher Shaw studied the charges and concluded that “the Kenya ‘anti-tetanus’ campaign was reasonably called into question by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association as a front for population growth reduction.” The medical researchers characterized the WHO program “an ethical breach of the obligation on the side of the WHO to obtain ‘informed consent’ from those Kenyan girls and women.”

Catholic medical personnel made similar accusations about WHO’s tetanus projects in Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. Following indignant denials of all such accusations, and obligatory denunciations against its accusers, WHO grudgingly admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for decades. WHO nevertheless punished the Kenyan doctors and the community officials who reported the spiked vaccine by canceling contracts for future work.

The Sordid History of Sterility Vaccines.
It wasn’t the first time that Catholic medical authorities accused the WHO of a stealth sterilization campaign against African women. As early as November 1993, Catholic publications charged that the WHO was spiking tetanus vaccines to neuter dark-skinned women globally with potent abortifacients. WHO denied the explosive charges.

Shaw’s research team showed that WHO and Rockefeller Foundation scientists began research on “anti-fertility” vaccines for “birth-control” as early as 1972, by lacing hCG with tetanus toxoid, which acts as a carrier for the hormone. That year, WHO researchers at a meeting of the US National Academy of Sciences, reported their successful creation of a “birth-control” vaccine that diminishes the βhCG essential to a successful pregnancy and causes at least temporary “infertility.” Subsequent experiments proved that repeated doses could extend infertility indefinitely.

By 1976, WHO scientists had successfully conjugated a functional “birth-control” vaccine. The WHO researchers reported triumphantly that their formula could induce “abortions in females already pregnant and/or infertility in recipients not yet impregnated.” They observed that “repeated inoculations prolong infertility.” More recently, in 2017, WHO researchers were working on more potent antifertility vaccines using recombinant DNA. WHO publications explain that the agency’s long-range purpose is to reduce population growth in unstable “less developed countries.”

The Kenyan tetanus campaign occurred shortly after Gates made his pledge of $10 billion to the WHO with the stated purpose of reducing population with “new vaccines.”  Perhaps to emphasize his commitment to population control, Gates recruited his most influential vizier, Christopher Elias, as president of Global Development at the Gates Foundation the following year. Prior to that appointment, Dr. Elias was president/CEO of Gates’s nonprofit PATH, which partners with pharmaceutical companies to distribute vaccines to poor countries by persuading rich and poor governments to fork over moolah to multinational drugmakers in which Gates is invested. Elias ran PATH’s innovative “Sayana Press” injectable Depo-Provera project designed to end-run US safety regulations while reducing fertility of Black African women. That brainchild earned Elias the Klaus Schwab Foundation’s Social Entrepreneur of the Year award in 2005. The Gates Foundation provided numerous grants to PATH, including one in November 2020 (after Elias had moved over to BMGF) “to support clinical development of COVID-19 vaccines by Chinese manufacturers.”

Before PATH, Elias had been senior associate in the international Programs Division of the Population Council, with the responsibility of dampening fecundity throughout Southeast Asia. John D. Rockefeller III founded The Population Council in 1952 at a conference he convened for the high priesthood of population control, including the director of the new Planned Parenthood Federation of America and several well-known eugenicists. Lamenting that modern civilization had reduced the operation of natural selection by saving more “weak” lives and enabling them to reproduce, resulting in “a downward trend in . . . genetic quality,” the group agreed to create an organization devoted to the “reduction of fertility.” While Rockefeller formally launched the Council with a grant of $100,000 and served as the first president, the next two Council presidents were Frederick Osborn and Frank Notestein, both members of the American Eugenics Society. The NIH and USAID were among the “start-up” funders, and US and foreign governments soon became the Council’s largest
financial backers.

The Council does research promoting the use of artificial birth control and abortion and biomedical research to discover and develop new contraceptive drugs and technologies. It collaborated with the Ford Foundation and International Planned Parenthood Foundation to develop large-scale IUD programs abroad, despite its own research doctors warning about acute adverse side effects. Later, the Council played a key role in developing the extremely dangerous hormonal contraceptive implant Norplant.

Historian Donald T. Critchlow wrote that the Population Council “cultivated elite connections and avoided public controversy by identifying itself as a neutral, scientific organization.”

The US Agency for International Development (USAID) conducted a decades-long partnership with the Population Council and cultivated long-term alliances with the Rockefeller Foundation and the WHO researching the use of fertility controls to reduce world population, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. By 2014, Gates and Elias had a reliable collaborator at the federal program: USAID Director Rajiv Shah, who had, prior to winning that appointment, worked a decade for the Gates Foundation, running GAVI’s immunization program for African children.

Dr. Shah joined the Gates Foundation in 2001 and oversaw its alliance with the Rockefeller Foundation in launching the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa. He directed the International Finance Facility for Immunization. The IFFI is a shady agency that finances Bill Gates’ global vaccine enterprises in developing nations through a diabolically innovative bond issuance scheme that runs up huge debts in poor countries to finance Gates’ self-serving vaccines. Using sleight of hand, IFFI enriches Gates’ pharma partners with Western financial bonds by passing the costs to future generations in poor countries. Shah raised $5 billion through this swindle for GAVI. At USAID, his primary responsibility was reorganizing the agency to reflect its new biosecurity direction under Obama’s 2009 executive order. Shah left USAID to become president of the Rockefeller Foundation in 2017. Shah has deep links to the intelligence agencies and the oil and chemical cartels. Shah serves on both the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations, two globalist organizations that the Rockefeller/Kissinger alliance largely defined. Shah is a board member of the International Rescue Committee, a nonprofit with long-standing CIA ties. In his 1991 book, Covert Network: Progressives, the International Rescue Committee and the CIA, University of Massachusetts economics professor Eric Thomas Chester exposes IRC as a CIA front. Bill Casey, a lifelong spy, who as Ronald Reagan’s CIA Director helped manage the Iran-Contra affair in the 1980s, chaired IRC from 1970 to 1971. IRC operates in forty countries doing “humanitarian aid.” According to its current CEO, David Miliband, the former UK foreign secretary, Shah’s role on the high-level council is to “monitor political and non-health issues related to prevention and preparedness imperatives for a potential epidemic of global proportions.”

In 1974, USAID and WHO collaborated on the creation of a top-secret “Kissinger Report.” Henry Kissinger—whose patron was Nelson Rockefeller and whose career was deeply enmeshed with the Rockefeller Foundation—drafted the classified White Paper, which became official US policy under President Gerald Ford in 1975. That report, known as the US National Security Study Memorandum 200, outlined the geopolitical incentives for reducing population growth in “less developed countries” (LDCs) to near zero by “reducing fertility” so as to safeguard the economic interests of the United States and other industrialized nations in imported mineral resources.

Kissinger observed that the industrialized West was already having to import significant quantities of aluminum, copper, iron, lead, nickel, tin, uranium, zinc, chromium, vanadium, magnesium, phosphorous, potassium, cobalt, manganese, molybdenum, tungsten, titanium, sulphur, nitrogen, petroleum, and natural gas at high cost. The Kissinger Report anticipated rising prices as population growth triggered instability in African nations.

The high-level US government commitment explains the WHO’s monumental commitment to sterility vaccines. Shaw et al. found 150 research publications emanating from WHO on various infertility formulations between 1976 and 2016 with many thousands of citations.

In the years 1993 and 1994, WHO launched antifertility vaccination campaigns in Nicaragua, Mexico, the Philippines, and Kenya in 1995. In each country, WHO and local government clinicians vaccinated women of childbearing age, telling them that the purpose of the WHO immunizations was to “eliminate maternal and neonatal tetanus.”

A subsequent WHO study of birth control policy, Bryant et al., acknowledged that WHO’s family planning “services” had involved routinely deceiving the persons “served”133 with “sterilization procedures being applied without full consent of the patient.”134 Similarly, a 1992 study titled “Fertility Regulating Vaccines” published by the UN and WHO Program of Research Training in Human Reproduction, reported “cases of abuse in family planning programs” dating from the 1970s including:

incentives . . . [Such as] women being sterilized without their
knowledge . . . being enrolled in trials of oral contraceptives or
injectables without . . . consent . . . [and] not [being] informed of
possible side-effects of . . . the intrauterine device (IUD).

The authors of that WHO report advised their partners against characterizing their work as “anti-fertility measures for population control,” observing that milder descriptions like “family planning” and “planned parenthood” were more palatable for public appetites. Speaking on behalf of the WHO, Bryant et al. admitted, “It is perhaps more conducive to a rights-based approach to implement family planning programs in response to the welfare needs of people and communities rather than in response to international concern for global overpopulation.”

The targeted regions for the WHO tetanus campaigns are principally the same developing nations that the Kissinger Report targeted. For example, a 2015 news release by Associated Press announced “[tetanus] immunization campaigns to take place in Chad, Kenya, and South Sudan by the end of 2015 and contribute toward eliminating [maternal natal tetanus] in Pakistan and Sudan in 2016, saving the lives of countless mothers and their newborn babies.”

The Kenya schedule was identical to the one published for the WHO birth-control conjugate of tetanus toxoid linked to βhCG: five spaced doses of “TT” vaccine at six-month intervals, which, of course, strongly contrasts with the published schedule for authentic tetanus immunization schedules.


. . .


In Syria, the Gates-backed GAVI committed $25 million for polio immunization in 2016. The following year, the WHO reported that fifty-eight Syrian children had been paralyzed by the vaccine-derived form of the virus.


Other vaccine-strain polio outbreaks occurred in China, Egypt, Haiti, and Malaysia. A study by Oxford’s Clinical Infectious Diseases Periodical found that Gates’s oral polio vaccine is not only giving kids polio, but also “seems to be ineffective in stopping polio transmission.” By 2018, the WHO conceded, 70 percent of global polio cases came from Gates’s vaccines.


As the British Medical Journal reported in 2012, “the most recent mass polio vaccination programs [in India], fueled by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, resulted in increased cases [of polio].”

In an interview with NPR, professor of microbiology Raul Andino said, “It’s actually an interesting conundrum. The very tool you are using for polio eradication is causing the problem.”

Dr. Henderson argued that Gates’ futile campaign would strip money from other areas of need, forcing nations to prioritize polio immunization at the expense of other public health investments. Arthur Caplan, an eminent bioethicist and a polio vaccine fanatic who himself suffered from polio as a child, also criticized Gates’s obsession with polio eradication, pointing out that “government budgets and resources in poor nations are diverted from other far more pressing local problems to try and capture the last marginal cases.” Donald Henderson observes that only Western nations (and billionaires like Gates) consider eliminating the disease as a priority. Polio kills far fewer people in developing regions than scourges such as malaria, TB, malnutrition, and the greatest killer: dysentery from deficient water supplies. When Gates first floated his dream of eradicating polio, developing nations feared a diversion of resources towards an area where the money was least warranted.

“When you’re doing polio, you’re not doing other things,” Henderson says. “At least through 2011, in several countries—Nigeria, India, and Pakistan—they were giving polio caccines.” “In 2012, there were only 223 reported cases of polio worldwide. . . . By any measure, polio is not one of the world’s greatest killers. Road accidents, for example, kill about 1.25 million people each year. Measles kills about 150,000 children each year.”  “A number of villagers say, ‘What is polio? We’ve never seen it—why are we worried about it?’”

Rather than provoking reevaluation, Henderson’s concern seems to infuriate Gates. “I’ve got to get my D. A. Henderson response down better,” Gates mumbled to one of his aides in 2011 after the New York Times editorial board interviewed him during his transglobal trek soliciting rich and poor governments to ratchet up their commitment to his polio enterprise. A reporter overheard and reported Gates’s whispered comment. That response suggests that he is aware of the criticism by the man most knowledgeable about eradicating diseases. Instead of integrating Henderson’s critique into his strategy or executing a mid-course correction, Gates treated Henderson’s caveats as a marketing challenge and lumbered onward. His imperviousness to self-assessment allows him to treat the hundreds of thousands of casualties of his policies as acceptable collateral damage in his self-serving schemes for humanity.

Gates’ strategic investments have made him immune to criticism by the media and the scientific community, and so, despite these atrocities, the Gates Foundation steers WHO like a rogue destroyer floundering forward full speed ahead through the mayhem, and the carnage of dead and paralyzed children whose ruined lives bob in their wake. In 2020, the BMGF boasted that the WHO is now providing “unprecedented levels of technical assistance” for polio vaccination campaigns in Nigeria, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.(pp.329-343)

. . .


Before its Indian debut, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, and Vietnam previewed the pentavalent jab. In each of these countries, unexplained deaths followed immunization. Bhutan suspended the immunization program in October 2009 after five cases of encephalopathy/encephalitis occurred following the vaccine. WHO persuaded health officials to resume the program, insisting that viral meningoencephalitis caused the deaths. Bhutan obeyed and four infants died. Bhutan no longer uses the pentavalent vaccine. The director of Public Health, Dr. Ugen Dophu, observes that there have been no more cases of meningoencephalitis among infants after the vaccine was withdrawn.

Sri Lanka unleashed the pentavalent vaccine in January 2008 and then suspended the program four months later after five babies died. Under pressure from WHO, Sri Lanka reintroduced the vaccine in 2010. Between 2010 and 2012, there were fourteen additional deaths following the vaccine, making the total number of deaths in Sri Lanka nineteen.
Vietnam introduced the pentavalent jab in June 2010 and suspended the jab in May 2013, after twenty-seven infant deaths.

The experience in Pakistan was similar, including at least three reported deaths. India introduced pentavalent vaccine in December 2011. Up to the first quarter of 2013, health officials reported eighty-three serious Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI). Twenty-one babies have died in India following immunization with the pentavalent vaccine.


Gates and WHO simply trivialize the deaths as sad coincidences or collateral damage. The vaccine has effectively reduced the incidence of Hib disease in India. However, there has been a proportionate increase in non-Hib strains of H. influenzae, including non-serotypable strains, causing invasive disease in the post-Hib vaccine era. As usual, there was no accounting.


This is only one of many examples of the Gates Foundation prioritizing the mandate for high-cost vaccines in the national immunization programs that Bill Gates effectively controls. Putting aside questions about net costs and benefits from these dangerous jabs, McGoey agrees with Puliyel that the diversion of sanitation and nutrition money is also deadly: “The problem is that by prioritizing the delivery of expensive vaccines, other proven interventions lose out.”

Real-world evidence, including his investments in pharmaceutical, petroleum, chemical, and GMO, processed, and synthetic food, suggests that Gates’ obsession with vaccines does not evince any genuine commitment to healthy populations. According to Amy Goodman, Gates owns investments in sixty-nine of the world’s worst-polluting companies.203 His single-minded obsession with vaccines seems to serve his impulse to monetize his charity and to achieve monopoly control over global public health policy. His strategies and corporate alliances in the food, public health, and education sectors may also reflect messianic conviction that he is ordained to save the world with technology, top-down centralized cookie-cutter solutions to complex human problems, and a godlike willingness to experiment with the lives of lesser humans.

And Gates’ vaccine cartel has amassed Midas-like riches. Early in 2021, a TV interviewer, Becky Quick, observed that Gates had spent $10 billion on vaccines over the past two decades and asked Gates, “You’ve figured out the return on investment for that and it kind of stunned me. Can you walk us through the math?” Gates responded: “We see a phenomenal track record . . . there’s been over a 20-to-1 return. So if you just looked at the economic benefits, that’s a pretty strong number.” The interviewer pressed him: “If you had put that money into an S&P 500 and reinvested the dividends, you’d come up with something like $17 billion dollars, but you think it’s $200 billion dollars.” Gates continued: “Here, yeah,” hastening to add that “helping young children live, get the right nutrition, contribute to their countries, that has a payback that goes beyond any typical financial return.”204

The key to it all, he added, is “Having that big portfolio.”


And the key to much of that portfolio is having Anthony Fauci.(pp. 348-349)




Chapter 11: Hyping Phony Epidemics: “Crying Wolf”…357


“Governments do like epidemics, just the same way as they like war,
really. It’s a chance to impose their will on us and get us all scared so
that we huddle together and do what we’re told.”
—Dr. Damien Downing, President, British Society of Ecological
Medicine (Al Jazeera, 2009)

“Fear is a market. To instill fear in people also has advantages. Not
only in terms of drug use. Anxiety-driven people are easier to rule.”
—Gerd Gogerenzer, Director Emeritus at the Max Planck Institute for
Educational Research (Torsten Engelbrecht,Virus Mania, 2021)

In 1906, infectious disease caused a third of all annual deaths in the United States, and 800–1000 of every 100,000 Americans died of infectious disease. By 1976, fewer than fifty Americans per hundred thousand died of infectious diseases, and CDC and NIAID were under extreme pressure to justify their budgets. Hyping pandemics became an institutional strategy in both agencies. Pharmaceutical companies and international health agencies, banking and military contractors soon found purchase in the ecosystem, and random pandemics discovered their own self-perpetuating rationale. Dr. Fauci’s critics chide him for routinely exaggerating—and even concocting—global disease outbreaks to hype pandemic panic, elevate the biosecurity agenda, boost agency funding, promote profitable vaccines for his pharma partners, and magnify his own power. The historical record supports these charges.


1976 Swine Flu.
As chief of the NIAID’s Clinical Physiology Section of the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, Dr. Fauci was, in 1976, a frontline spectator during the NIH’s bogus swine flu pandemic. That year, a soldier at Fort Dix died of a lung ailment following a forced march. Army physicians sent some samples to CDC, which identified the malady as a swine flu. Dr. Fauci’s NIAID boss, Richard Krause (who Dr. Fauci would shortly replace), labored with his CDC counterpart, David Sencer, to spread terror of a catastrophic pandemic and initiate public demand for a vaccine. The NIAID chief convened in-house strategy sessions with Merck’s iconic vaccine developer Maurice Hilleman and other immunization industry nabobs. Congressional investigators subsequently landed the notes from those consultations, in which Dr. Hilleman candidly confesses that the resulting vaccine “had nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics.” In the August 2020 Rolling Stone, Gerald Posner, author of Pharma: Greed, Lies, and the Poisoning of America, recounted how Merck and other manufacturers utilized their secret meeting with the regulators to hatch a scheme that would guarantee industry profits while shielding Pharma from liability. This  innovation—now a persistent feature of Big Pharma’s business model—turned out to be carte blanche for negligent and even criminal behavior.

Pharma and NIAID told Congress, the White House, and the public that the Fort Dix swine flu was the same strain responsible for the 1918 Spanish flu pandemic, which, they warned, had killed 50 million people worldwide. They were lying; scientists at Fort Dix, the CDC, and HHS knew that H1N1 was an ordinary pig virus posing no risk for humans. Nevertheless, NIAID conducted a hard-sell campaign warning of one million deaths in the United States. Working with the pharmaceutical companies, NIAID, CDC, and Merck persuaded incoming president Gerald Ford to sign a bill appropriating $135 million for vaccine manufacturers to inoculate 140 million Americans against the pestilence.

At the behest of federal regulators, Ford appeared on TV urging all Americans to get vaccinated. Ford’s obligatory references to the 1918 Spanish flu mass fatalities inspired some 50 million US citizens to hotfoot it to their local health center for injections of hastily concocted, shoddily tested, zero-liability vaccines that HHS and Merck conspired to rush to market. CDC director David Sencer set up a swine flu “war room” to bolster public fear amongst an enthused media. The government launched a full-scale promotional campaign, including terrifying TV commercials depicting remorseful patients who dodged their vaccination and suffered serious illness. A CDC press release claimed that popular TV star Mary Tyler Moore had taken the jab. Moore told 60 Minutes she had avoided the shot due to her concerns about side effects. She said that she and her doctor were very happy she didn’t get it.


In the end, the actual number of pandemic swine flu casualties in 1976 was not 1 million, but one. Dr. Harvey Fineberg, who authored the government’s 1978 comprehensive postmortem of NIAID’s response to that fake pandemic, told the WHO Bulletin: “In ’76, the virus was detected in a single military installation, at Fort Dix, New Jersey. In the ensuing weeks and months, not one related swine flu case was reported elsewhere in New Jersey, the USA or anywhere else in the world. . . . At the same time, political decision-makers consistently thought that the scientists were giving them no choice but to go ahead with a mass immunization program.”

NIH’s influenza and flu vaccine expert senior bacteriologist and virologist Dr. John Anthony Morris informed his HHS bosses that the flu scare was a farce and that NIAID’s campaign was a boondoggle to promote a dangerous and ineffective flu vaccine for a greedy industry. Dr. Morris had worked for thirty-six years at federal public health agencies beginning in 1940. His office, at the time of the 1976 “outbreak,” was a few doors down the hall from Tony Fauci’s. Morris served as the government’s chief vaccine officer and led research on the flu and flu vaccines for the Bureau of Biologics Standards (BBS) at NIH and later at FDA. Morris enjoyed a distinguished career researching viral respiratory diseases. When Dr. Morris protested the fraud, his direct superior ordered him to stand down, advising Morris “not to talk about this.” His NIH bosses threatened Dr. Morris with loss of employment and professional ruin if he failed to keep his mouth shut. When vaccine recipients began reporting adverse reactions, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), Dr. Morris disobeyed orders. Publicly declaring that there was zero evidence that the Fort Dix swine flu was contagious to humans, he reiterated, the vaccine could induce neurological side effects. In response, HHS officials confiscated Dr. Morris’s research materials, changed the laboratory locks, moved him to a small room with no telephone, reassigned his laboratory staff, forbade him to see visitors except with permission, and blocked his efforts to publish his findings. Finally, after months of threats and petty harassment, HHS fired Morris for insubordination, citing a long list of drummed-up charges, including failure to return library books on time.

Over at CDC, scientist Dr. Michael Hatwick was also warning HHS bigwigs that the flu vaccine could cause widespread brain injuries.

The 1976 swine flu vaccine was so fraught with problems that HHS discontinued the jab after vaccinating 49 million Americans. According to news accounts, the incidence of flu was seven times greater among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Furthermore, the vaccine caused some 500 cases of the degenerative nerve disease Guillain-Barré Syndrome, 32 deaths, more than 400 paralyzations, and as many as 4,000 other injuries.


Public health officials pulled the vaccine. President Ford fired David Sencer.

American taxpayers ended up paying for the swine fluvaccine coming and going, through guaranteed profits for Merck at the front end and outlays for piles of lawsuits from vaccine injury victims on the other side.

The government paid $134 million for the swine flu vaccine program. Injured plaintiffs filed 1,604 lawsuits. By April 1985, the government had paid out $83,233,714 and spent tens of millions of dollars adjudicating and processing those claims. In 1987, Dr. Morris testified before Congress, “These figures give some idea of the consequences resulting from a program in which the federal government assumes liability of a product known to produce, in an indeterminate number of recipients, serious damage to health. . . . When I left the FDA in 1976, there was no available technique to measure, reliably and consistently, neurotoxicity or potency of most of vaccines then in use, including DTP vaccines. Today [1987], 11 years later, the situation remains essentially the same.” Dr. Morris’s research found that flu vaccines often induced fever in children and in pregnant women, and serious harm to the fetus. He worried that there were hidden risks for everyone because the vaccine was “literally loaded with extraneous bacteria.” According to Dr. Morris, “There is a great deal of evidence to prove that immunization of children does more harm than good.” In what serves as a concise epithet for his crosses, Dr. Morris stated, “There is a close tie between government scientists and manufacturing scientists. My results were hurting the market for flu vaccines.”

In 1977, Dr. Morris instituted a wrongful dismissal suit. The court overturned all NIH’s charges against him. Subsequently a grievance committee unanimously found that his supervisors had harassed and wrongfully terminated Dr. Morris. A group of former FDA and NIH scientists endorsed Dr. Morris’s criticisms of the agency. The New York Times quoted a fellow scientist, B. G. Young, who characterized NIH’s reprisals against honest scientists as “suppression, harassment, and censorship of individual investigators. . . . I finally came to realize that you either had to compromise yourself or leave. Morris and (Bernice) Eddy are the real heroes in that place because they stayed and fought. The others voted with their feet and left.”

Up until his death in July 2014, Dr. Morris remained an outspoken critic of CDC’s annual flu shot program. In 1979, Dr. Morris told the Washington Post, “It’s a medical rip-off. . . . I believe the public should have truthful information on the basis of which they can determine whether or not to take the vaccine. . . . I believe that given full information, they won’t take the vaccine.” Dr. Morris’s 2014 New York Times obituary reported his statement, “The producers of these [influenza] vaccines know they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.”

Dr. B. G. Young told the New York Times that NIH’s industry-dominated culture at the vaccine division had driven away all the honest regulators—those willing to stand up to pharma. Dr. Fauci, in contrast, is the rare scientist who lasted fifty years at HHS. He has done so largely by aligning himself with NIH’s pharma overlords and carrying industry water.

The same weapons that NIH used to silence Dr. Morris— enforced isolation, disgrace, prohibiting him from publishing papers, presenting at conferences, or talking to the press, changing his laboratory locks to prevent further research—were already pieces of an established Soviet-style template for silencing dissident scientists at NIH. The agency first unsheathed those weapons in the 1950s to destroy the career of its award-winning virologist, Dr. Bernice Eddy, the discoverer of the poliomyelitis virus—who later found a cancer-causing monkey virus in the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines. When her research disclosed problems with vaccine safety, NIH officials banned Dr. Eddy from her lab, changed her office locks, and ordered her to refrain from interviews and speeches. After silencing Eddy, NIH gave the contaminated vaccine to 99 million baby boomers, who suffered a tenfold increase in soft tissue cancers, resulting in a public health disaster that dwarfs the harms of polio. Dr. Fauci and government health regulators later used these same techniques to muzzle a parade of in-house scientists, including Dr. Judy Mikovits, NIH contract researcher Dr. Bart Classen, and CDC’s varicella (chicken pox) vaccine researcher Dr. Gary Goldman, who dared to tell hard truths about vaccine safety and efficacy.

The 1976 swine flu event was the first time that the federal government agreed to serve as pharma’s insurer. The episode taught the public an important lesson: tort immunity incentivizes dangerous and ineffective vaccines. Industry and the magisterial class learned an entirely different morale from the tragic episode. In 1986 they made swine flu vaccine template the model for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which shielded all mandated vaccines from liability.

At the dawn of Dr. Fauci’s career, he learned that both pandemics and fake pandemics provide an opportunity to expand the bureaucracy’s power and to multiply the wealth
of its pharma partners.(pp.357-360)

. . .


Pandemic Championships.
There is an old saw about a cuckold with a murderous grudge against a lion tamer but no gumption for homicide. For years, he follows the circus hoping to be in attendance on that inevitable day when an aggrieved feline turns on the trainer. When decades of frustrated waiting for divine justice finally exhaust his patience, he sneaks into the lion tamer’s dressing room to sprinkle pepper in his wig powder. That evening, the lion sneezes and decapitates its
philandering handler.

The compelling evidence suggesting that COVID-19 emanated from a Fauci-funded Little Shop of Horrors in Wuhan, China, raises the ironic possibility that the man whom two US presidents have charged with leading the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic may be the same man who spawned it. That strange paradox might cause some to cynically ponder the logic behind Dr. Fauci’s peculiar decisions to defy President Obama’s 2014 gain-of- function moratorium, to dodge NIH’s internal safety review committee, to launder money to Chinese scientists with military affiliations through a sketchy bioweapons grifter, to finance criminally reckless experiments minting souped-up pathogens in a shabby Chinese lab with lax safety protocols. Are we justified in asking ourselves whether Tony Fauci, after decades of concocting toothless pandemics, was finally peppering the wig? . . .


[Click link  for copy of original drawing of “Dr. Fauci’s March Madsnezss Bracktology Pics”]


But putting aside Dr. Fauci’s involvement with Wuhan and his decades of fashioning flop contagions, we must acknowledge that in 2020, he finally hit the jackpot with COVID-19. Among the more revealing documents in Dr. Fauci’s June 2021 email dump is a rough schematic (opposite) that Dr. Fauci signed “Tony F.” depicting a March Madness–style tournament bracket scoring the pestilential contestants during two decades of mostly phony contagions. COVID-19 finally emerges as champion. The doodle is titled “Dr. Fauci’s March Madness Bracketology Picks” and dated March 11, 2020. In his macabre pool, Coronavirus—top-seeded out of the East region—defeats the entire field that includes his long litany of contrived diseases including smallpox, chickenpox, bird flu, swine flu, Zika, hepatitis B, smallpox, MERS, and measles. The drawing suggests Dr. Fauci’s pride in a final, satisfying victory after a long, often-triumphant career engineering global pandemics:-pp.371-372)


Chapter 12: GERM GAMES/WAR GAMES: Genesis of the Biosecurity State…378


“Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
—Benjamin Franklin


“Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal. The
short response is: never. Nothing will ever return to the “broken”
sense of normalcy that prevailed prior to the crisis because the
coronavirus pandemic marks a fundamental inflection point in our
global trajectory.”
—Klaus Schwab,The Great Reset (July 2020)


“I want to be straight with you: There will be no return to the old
normal for the foreseeable future.”
—Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization



History of Bioweapons.
The United States began its first large-scale offensive bioweapons research during World War II in the spring of 1943 on orders from President Franklin Roosevelt, as a collaboration between the US military and its pharmaceutical industry partners. Pharma titan George W. Merck ran the Pentagon’s offensive bioweapons program while simultaneously directing his drug manufacturing behemoth. Merck boasted that his team could deliver biowarfare agents without vast expenditures or constructing huge facilities. Another advantage of bioweapons, he remarked, was that their development could proceed under the guise of legitimate medical research.

The intelligence agencies were involved in the top secret program from the outset. George Merck’s hands-on employee, Frank Olson, was an American bacteriologist, biological warfare scientist, and CIA officer. He worked for the United States Army Biological Warfare Laboratories (USBWL) at Fort Detrick with Merck and the US military developing the US bioweapons and psywarfare arsenal. Project Artichoke was an experimental CIA interrogation program that used psychoactive drugs like LSD in pursuit of “enhanced” interrogation methods. The project was part of a larger CIA program exploring approaches for controlling both individuals and populations. Olson was involved with Project Artichoke with moral misgivings, beginning in May 1952: after watching a documentary on Protestant reformation leader Martin Luther, a conscience-stricken Olson informed his bosses he intended to quit the biowarfare program.

Around the time of that announcement, Olson’s CIA colleague, Sidney Gottlieb, head of the CIA’s MKUltra program, covertly dosed him with LSD. A week later, on November 28, 1953, Olson plunged to his death from a window of New York’s Hotel Statler. The US government first described his death as a suicide, and then as misadventure. In 1975, the government admitted its guilt in the murder and offered Olson’s family an out-of-court settlement of $1,250,000, later reduced to $750,000, which they accepted with an official apology from President Gerald Ford and then-CIA Director William Colby.

By 1969, the US bioweapons program had developed weapons of a “nuclear equivalence,” according to David Franz, who, for twenty-three years, served as commander of the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). The principal limitation, Franz acknowledged, was the difficulty of managing bioweapons so as to prevent accidental escape. Ironically, Franz would later play a key role in the Pentagon/Fauci gain-of-function programs leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic.

It all ended—seemingly—in late 1969, when President Nixon traveled to Fort Detrick to announce the closure of America’s bioweapons program for moral and strategic reasons. America signed the Biological Weapons Convention in 1972—forbidding development, use, and stockpiling of biological weapons—and mothballed most of its labs. But the agreement—a supplement to the Geneva Convention—left thousands of scientists, military contractors, and Pentagon caliphs as stranded assets yearning for the program’s revival.

The treaty also included a yawning loophole: it allowed production of anthrax and other biological warfare agents for vaccine production. The Pentagon and CIA spooks continued to cultivate bioweapon seed stock. Between 1983 and 1988, Searle Pharmaceuticals CEO Donald Rumsfeld, acting as Ronald Reagan’s envoy in Iraq, arranged for the top-secret shipment of tons of chemical and biological armaments, including anthrax and bubonic plague, to Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, hoping to reverse his looming defeat by Iran’s million-man army. Ayatollah Khomeini’s victorious Iranian forces were then routing Saddam in their war over the Persian Gulf. The Bush administration feared the impact on global oil supplies if Iran prevailed in that conflict.

The Birth of the Biosecurity Agenda

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1988–1991, the military-industrial complex began rummaging about for a more reliable enemy to permanently justify its hefty share
of the GDP. While most Americans eagerly awaited the ballyhooed “peace dividend,” Pentagon mandarins and their emporium of contractors may have considered with dismay that someone else would be spending money that was rightfully theirs. The peace dividend never materialized. Beginning with the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993 and culminating in 9/11, Islamic terrorism replaced the Soviets as the essential adversary in US foreign policy. It may have provided solace to the military and its contractors that “terrorism” was a more reliable long-term foe than the Soviets. Since terrorism is a tactic, not a nation, an imprecisely defined “terrorism” had the allure of an enemy that could never be vanquished. We can imagine the defense contractors’ relief when Vice President Dick Cheney declared the “Long War”—one, he promised, would last for generations—with battlegrounds “scattered in more than 50 nations.”

Military contractors held tight to their gravy train with the mission of building an expensive new arsenal of anti-terror technologies. But terrorism had its own shortfall, namely, the challenge of sustaining public fear sufficient to justify spending substantial portions of GDP to meet a threat that killed fewer Americans annually than lightning strikes. By 1999, some farsighted Pentagon planners were already looking ahead to the more exuberant and sustainable prosperity that would come with a war on germs.

Most historians date the nativity of the modern “Biosecurity Agenda” to the October 2001 anthrax attacks. But years earlier, military and medical industrial complex planners were already conceptualizing biosecurity as a potent strategy for leveraging potential pandemics or bioterrorism into vast funding increases, and as a device for metamorphosing America, the world’s exemplary democracy, into a national security state with global dominance.

Robert Kadlec: “Let The Games Begin”.

Bioweapons expert Robert P. Kadlec is an American physician and retired Colonel in the United States Air Force who served as Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services for Preparedness and Response from August 2017 until January 2021, and who managed the COVID-19 crisis during the Trump administration. Second only to his longtime crony and comrade in arms Anthony Fauci, Robert Kadlec played an historic leadership role in  fomenting the contagious logic that infectious disease posed a national security threat requiring a militarized response. Since the 1993 World Trade Center terror attack, Kadlec had been evangelizing about an imminent anthrax attack that would doom the American way of life. In the mid-1990s, Kadlec served as part of an elite Air Force operations unit of UN weapons inspectors fruitlessly hunting the Iraqi desert for Saddam Hussein’s suspected stores of anthrax and botulism following the first Persian Gulf War.

* * *

At 2:47 in the early morning of February 1, 2020, four hours after his loyal grantee, virologist Kristian Andersen, informed Dr. Fauci that he and other leading biologists believed that the genetic sequence responsible for the “furin cleave” on the virus's “spike protein”—the peculiar structure that allows the organism to bind tightly to, and infect cells with the ACE-2 receptor—was highly unlikely to be the product of natural selection, Dr. Anthony Fauci fired a carefully worded email to Kadlec. Dr. Fauci’s other emails from that evening suggest that he was intensely worried that the Chinese experiments that may have created this striation in the novel coronavirus would bear his fingerprints. If Dr. Fauci’s gain-of-function research had indeed minted COVID-19, then Kadlec would also be implicated. Kadlec served on the small so-called P3CO Committee charged with approving NIH’s gain-of-function experiments, and it is clear from Dr. Fauci’s email that the subject was also on Kadlec’s mind. Dr. Fauci attached an article10 to his email to Kadlec. It was “Bat Lady” Shi Zhengli’s deceitful effort to downplay the laboratory leak hypothesis. “Bob: This just came out today,” Dr. Fauci told his gain-of-function confederate. “Gives a balanced view.” Subsequent events proved that the author of that article was deliberately lying to conceal the Wuhan lab’s manipulation of coronavirus pathogens that were nearly identical to the microbe that caused COVID-19. Both Kadlec and Fauci had been involved, for over a decade, in promoting and funding these dangerous experiments through NIAID and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), the biosecurity funding agency that Kadlec had helped create, including funneling millions of dollars in US funding to Zhi, the hapless writer of the exculpatory article. Dr. Fauci’s email shows these two technocrats, and others, patching together evidence for the dubious official story that they would tell the world. Over the next few weeks, Dr. Fauci would pull the reliable old levers that he had manipulated for decades to transform convenient canards into official orthodoxies. The contrived cosmologies he thereby constructed would hold for a full year before they finally began to unravel.


* * *

Kadlec is a Dr. Strangelove knockoff with deep ties to spy agencies, Big Pharma, the Pentagon, and military contractors who profiteer from the spread of bioweapons alarmism. Intelligence agency historian and journalist Whitney Webb describes Kadlec as a man “enmeshed in the world of intelligence, military intelligence and corporate corruption, dutifully fulfilling the vision of his friends in high places and behind closed doors.” In 1998, Kadlec created an internal strategy paper for the Pentagon, promoting the development of pandemic pathogens as a stealth weapon that the Pentagon could deploy against its enemies without leaving fingerprints:

Biological weapons under the cover of an endemic or natural disease
occurrence provides
an attacker the potential for plausible denial.
Biological warfare’s potential to create significant economic losses
and consequent political instability, coupled with plausible
deniability, exceeds the possibilities of any other human weapon.

* * *

Kadlec, in 1999, organized his paranoia into several “illustrative scenarios” to demonstrate the United States’ vulnerability to biological attack. In one of Kadlec’s doomsday fantasies dubbed “Corn Terrorism,” China clandestinely sprays corn seed blight over the Midwest from commercial airliners. Kadlec warns, “China gains significant corn market share and tens of billions [of] dollars of additional profits from their crop,” while leaving the US Corn Belt in ruin. Another Kadlec scenario, titled “‘Lousy Wine,” envisions “disgruntled European
winemakers” covertly releasing grape lice concealed in cans of pâté to target California wine producers.

In an April 2001 study for the National Defense University National War College, Kadlec urgently recommended the creation of a Strategic National Stockpile to warehouse  countermeasures including vaccines and antibiotics, and recommended regulatory changes to provide for mandatory vaccinations and coercive quarantines in the event of a pandemic. Those ideas helped win him an appointment as Special Assistant for Biodefense Planning to President George W. Bush after the post–September 11 anthrax attacks later that same
year. From this sinecure, Kadlec’s fervent lobbying persuaded Congress to establish a Strategic National Stockpile, whose contents are currently worth $7 billion. Kadlec would come to control purchases for that stockpile, and—following the lead of his comrades, Bill Gates and Tony Fauci—he would use that power to enrich his vaccine industry friends and sideline public health. As journalist Alexis Baden-Mayer observed, “Kadlec created the biodefense industrial complex as we know it. And he rules it like a czar.”


The Bill Gates/Anthony Fauci-Funded Biosecurity: “Let the War Games Begin”.
In 1999, Dr. Kadlec organized a simulation of a smallpox terrorist attack on US soil for a joint exercise by the newly formed Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies and the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). The founder of the Center was D.A. Henderson, famed for leading the program that eradicated smallpox in 1977. The Senior Fellow and cofounder of the Johns Hopkins Center was a CIA spook and pharmaceutical industry lobbyist named Tara O’Toole. She took over as chief when Henderson left. The third Center Director was Tom Inglesby, who remains in that role. In 1999, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation committed $20 million to Johns Hopkins to establish the Bill & Melinda Gates Institute for Population and Reproductive Health For the next two decades, Gates would direct a vast stream of funding to the enterprise of elevating biosecurity as the national priority.  Some of his most visible investments funded a series of simulations presided over by Inglesby at his Johns Hopkins Center. Those simulations would make Inglesby the congenial face of biosecurity paranoia, feed the burgeoning biodefense industry, and help lay the foundation for the modern security state.

The deal pipeline from NIH and NIAID to Johns Hopkins —an astonishing $13 billion since 2001—dwarfs Gates’s contributions to the school. But shoddy or perhaps deliberately obscure reporting makes it nearly impossible to determine how many of these dollars flowed to Inglesby and his center.

Kadlec’s simulations, and over a dozen that would succeed it over the next twenty plus years—many under Bill Gates’s direction—shared common features. None of them emphasized protecting public health by showing Americans how to bolster their immune systems, to eat well, to lose weight, to exercise, to maintain vitamin D levels, and to avoid chemical exposure. None of these focused on devising the vital communications infrastructures to link frontline doctors during a pandemic or to facilitate the development and refinement of optimal treatment protocols. None of these dealt seriously with the need to identify off-the-shelf (now known as “repurposed”) therapeutic drugs to mitigate fatalities and to shorten a pandemic’s duration. None of them considered ways to isolate the sick and protect the vulnerable—or how to shield people in nursing homes and other institutions from infection. None of them questioned the efficacy of masks, lockdowns, and social distancing in reducing casualties. None of them engaged in soul-searching about how to preserve constitutional rights during a global pandemic.


Instead, the simulations war-gamed how to use police powers to detain and quarantine citizens, how to impose martial law, how to control messaging by deploying propaganda, how to employ censorship to silence dissent, and how to mandate masks, lockdowns, and coercive vaccinations and conduct track-and-trace surveillance among potentially reluctant populations.

“Coercion should be the last strategy to consider in a pandemic,” remarked physician and biological warfare expert Meryl Nass, MD. “If you have a remedy that works, people will flock to get it. It’s troubling that the first and only option was creating a police state.”

The Still-Unsolved Mystery of the Post-9/11 Anthrax Attacks.

Contemporaneously with Johns Hopkins’ smallpox simulation, the Pentagon launched a top-secret project at a former nuclear weapons site in the Nevada desert to test the feasibility of building a small anthrax production facility using off-the-shelf equipment easily available in hardware stores and biological supply catalogs. Code-named Project Bacchus, a small cohort of faux terrorists—military weapons experts—succeeded in producing a few pounds of anthrax. Two years after the Pentagon’s Nevada anthrax project, someone associated with the United States Army mounted a far-reaching campaign of sending anthrax to members of Congress and key media figures, officially launching the “Biosecurity Era.”

In the light of subsequent events, we cannot exclude the possibility that someone in our government carried out a false flag attack against Americans as a provocation for some larger agenda. This is not an outlandish conspiracy theory. During my uncle’s presidential administration, the Joint Chiefs of Staff submitted a plan— termed Operation Northwoods—proposing false flag attacks, including mass murders of random American citizens, to justify an invasion of Cuba. My uncle reacted with horror to Joint Chief Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer’s Northwoods briefing pitch and abruptly walked out of the presentation. “And they call us the human race,” he remarked to his secretary of state, Dean Rusk.

US intelligence agencies and military industrial complex insiders initially (and ultimately wrongly) blamed the 2001 anthrax letter attacks on Saddam Hussein or al-Qaeda and later used similarly incorrect pretexts to launch a war against Iraq. The mailing of anthrax introduced Americans to a new enemy more frightening than garden-variety terrorism. While terrorists could destroy key buildings and airliners, the biosecurity narrative warns that pathogens could enter any American home and invisibly slay its occupants. Germs, therefore, easily outgunned al-Qaeda as a reliable wellspring of terror. This was the lesson Kadlec had been broadcasting for five years. The delivery of anthrax through the mail brought home his jeremiads. By 2020, biosecurity would altogether eclipse Islamic terrorism as the spear tip of US military and foreign policy. The topic of “infectious diseases” suddenly became the
most effective way to open government pockets.(pp.378-383)


. . .


The CIA Dips In Its Toe.
The CIA had a long, sordid history of secretly promoting the US bioweapons program. One of the agency’s first projects was establishing a network of so-called “ratlines” that Army intelligence officers used to smuggle some 1,600 chemicals and bioweapons and WMD experts—many of them Nazi Party kingpins and notorious war criminals—out of the reach of the Allies’ Nuremberg prosecutors following World War II. The directors of a notorious operation, code-named Paperclip, provided these researchers with new identities and put them to work developing US germ warfare capacity at Ft. Detrick and elsewhere even after 1972. As late as 1997, the CIA defied the Bioweapons Treaty to launch a top-secret—and highly illegal—effort to create a doomsday “bacteria bomblet.”

The CIA officially made its open debut in the biosecurity racket in 2004, with its launch of Argus, a project that monitors biological, terrorist, and pandemic threats in 178 nations. CIA operative and pediatrician Jim Wilson set up the program at Georgetown University with funding from DHS and the Intelligence Innovation Center to create and implement global foreign biological event detection and tracking capability, capable of assessing millions of pieces of information about social behavior daily and to train government officials in pandemic preparedness. One of the key figures in this global surveillance effort was CIA officer Dr. Michael Callahan.


Dr. Michael Callahan is one of the biggest names in bioweapons research. Dr. Callahan ran a biosecurity program for the former CIA surrogate USAID before serving as Director of DARPA’s bioweapons research program. At DARPA, he competed to outdo NIH in laundering money through Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance to perform bioweapons research, including at the Wuhan lab.

And as DARPA director, Callahan launched the PREDICT project in 2009 following Jeremy Farrar’s fake bird flu pandemic. PREDICT appeared to be a reincarnation of the CIA’s Argus project under the cover of USAID. PREDICT is the largest single source of funding to Daszak, with a $3.4 million subgrant routed through the University of California (2015–2020). PREDICT became the largest funder of gain-of-function studies and served as the principal funding vehicle through which the gain-of-function cartel evaded Barack Obama’s 2014 presidential moratorium.

When, during the height of the presidential gain-of-function moratorium, Ralph Baric and the  UTMB lab’s Vineet Menachery brazenly published their alarming 2015 study—describing their reckless experiments to breed pandemic bat coronaviruses that could spread via respiratory droplets in humanized mice—they omitted mentioning, in their initial online version of the article, that one of the funding sources was USAID-EPT-PREDICT. Apparently hoping to cover its tracks, PREDICT hadlaundered its grant through Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance.


USAID’s PREDICT program boasts that it has identified almost a thousand new viruses, including a new strain of Ebola, and trained some 5,000 people. In October 2019, not long before COVID-19 emerged, USAID abruptly ceased funding PREDICT, a decision bemoaned by Daszak in theNew York Times as “definitel y a loss.”

Callahan had a chummy relationship with Daszak, with whom he coauthored several articles—including throughout  the gain-of-function moratorium. In April 2015, for example, the names of Michael V. Callahan and Peter Daszak appeared as coauthors on a paper published in theVirology Journal and titled “Diversity of Coronavirus in Bats
from Eastern Thailand.”

Callahan was well aware that he and his confederates were toying with fire. In 2005, Callahan testified before Congress as he was moving into his new office at DARPA. He concluded the hearing  with a chilling warning about the nation’s new commitment to Janus-faced gain-of-function science that Drs. Fauci, Robert Kadlec, Callahan himself,
and many others would proceed to blithely ignore:

the dark science of biological weapon design and manufacture
parallels that of the health sciences and the cross mixed disciplines
of modern technology. Potential advances in biological weapon
lethality will in part be the byproduct of peaceful scientific progress.
So, until the time when there are no more terrorists, the US
Government and the American people will depend on the scientific
leaders of their field to identify any potential dark side aspect to
every achievement.

Even after leaving DARPA and USAID, Callahan periodically boasted of his continuing influence over US pandemic response policies at the highest levels of government. He
alluded to his confidence in these mysterious connections in 2012: “I still have federal responsibilities to The White House for pandemic preparedness and exotic disease outbreak which will continue for the near future.”

On January 4, 2020, Callahan called Dr. Robert Malone from China just as the coronavirus began taking its first wave of casualties. Malone, a former contractor to the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases and the chief medical officer at Alchem Laboratories, is the inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology platform. Malone first met Callahan in 2009 through Malone’s sometime business partner, Daryl Galloway, a CIA officer who formerly served in the US Navy and at one point held the post of director of JSTO in the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. To Malone, Galloway introduced Callahan as a fellow CIA officer. During his January 4 phone call, Callahan told Malone that he was just outside Wuhan. Malone assumed that Callahan was visiting China under cover of his Harvard and Massachusetts General Hospital appointments. Callahan told Malone that he had been treating “hundreds” of COVID-19 patients. Callahan subsequently described to National Geographic how he had pored through thousands of case studies at the outbreak’s epicenter. He giddily reported his amazement at the virus’s “magnificent infectivity,” and its capacity to explode “like a silent smart bomb in your community.”91 Callahan later confessed to Malone that he lacked authority to be in Wuhan and had escaped by boat when the government imposed its quarantine. Callahan repeated parts of this story to Brendan Borrell, a writer for Science. Later, DTRA scientist Davis Hone, a GS15 officer, warned Malone to stop talking about Callahan, saying that “We had no military personnel in Wuhan at the time of the outbreak and Michael was lying about his presence.” Malone told me, “That would mean that Michael also lied to Brendan Borrell.” On leaving China, Callahan returned to Washington to brief federal officials and then went directly to work as a “special adviser” to Robert Kadlec, managing the government’s response to the coronavirus.(pp.395-397)


. . .


Laying Pipe for Totalitarianism.
Following the success of the SPARS simulation, Gates  projected a progressively darker and more martial tone and stepped up his declarations about the need for authoritarian coercion to cinch compliance with vaccination against the impending pandemic.

On April 18, 2018, Gates delivered a speech at the Malaria Summit in London, warning that a deadly new disease could arise within a decade, taking the world “by surprise,” spreading globally and killing tens of millions. Hinting at the need for increased coordination between health officials and militaries, Gates reiterated: “The world needs to prepare for pandemics in the same serious way it prepares for war.” Gates’s simulations invoke the concept of “total war,” meaning the mobilization of entire populations, the sacrifice of global economies, and the obliteration of democratic institutions and civil rights.

Appreciating the challenges of imposing tyrannical controls in a democracy, Gates increasingly focused his efforts on enrolling critical allies in Big Tech and the military.

On April 27, Gates told the Washington Post that he had warned President Trump about “the increasing risk of a bioterrorism attack.” Emphasizing his frequent contacts with the president and military advisers, he publicly disclosed having regular meetings with H. R. McMaster, Trump’s former national security advisor.


Gates was simultaneously building bridges with social media tycoons, including Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, whose support he would need for his master plan. Like all totalitarian capers, Gates’ gambit would require some book burning, and Bezos would be there to oblige. Beginning in March 2020, Amazon would outright ban or throttle the delivery of entire categories of books and videos that questioned official orthodoxies—including the scientific basis for the lockdown that would multiply Bezos’s wealth by tens of billions. In the finest Operation Mockingbird tradition, Bezos’s Washington Post also pitched in, including a shrill yet adoring propaganda tract under the headline “Bill Gates calls on US to lead fight against a pandemic that could kill 33 million.” That month Gates announced a $12 million Grand  Challenge, in partnership with the family of Google’s cofounder Larry Page, to accelerate developing a universal flu vaccine.  Google’s parent company, Alphabet, was already heavily investing in vaccine manufacturing start-ups and had signed a $76 million partnership with GlaxoSmithKline. Apparently anticipating rich returns to Big Tech from the lockdown he would orchestrate, Gates was, by then, among the largest shareholders of Amazon, Google, Facebook, and, of course, Microsoft.

The day after the Post story ran, a board member of the EcoHealth Alliance emailed zoologist and bioweapons expert Peter Daszak: “Any connections with Bill Gates we could [re]-activate given this perfect alignment in mission?”

Daszak responded: “re: gates and google—we have good connections at both orgs . . .” We’ll definitely be reaching out to them again. . . . Ever since the Ebola outbreak [G]ates [foundation] are now getting more into pandemic preparedness.”

Daszak, at that juncture, was acting as a conduit through which Tony Fauci, Robert Kadlec, the Pentagon (DARPA), and USAID—formerly a CIA cover and nowadays reporting to the National Security Council—were laundering grants to fund gain-of-function experiments, including at the Wuhan Institute of Virology Biosafety Lab. In 2018, the French government had warned US government officials that the Wuhan lab, which the French helped build, was shoddily maintained and inadequately staffed and secured. For example, the French construction company, bioMérieux, which built the lab, had neglected to properly complete the negative airflow system—a critical piece of infrastructure to prevent the escape of viruses deliberately enhanced to create pandemics. Dr. Fauci ignored the warning.

When in May 2021 I emailed bioMérieux’s ex-CEO (2007–2011), Stéphane Bancel, to ask him if he knew that his company had violated its contract to provide a functional system, he did not reply. Bancel by that time was CEO of Moderna and a partner of Bill Gates and Tony Fauci, operating a company that would be the primary beneficiary of the lab leak, quickly making Bancel’s 9 percent stake worth over $1 billion and counting. In March 2019, eight months before COVID-19 began circulating, Bancel had reapplied for a patent for an mRNA technology for Moderna’s new vaccine. The US patent office had previously rejected his application. But this time he approached the patent office with special urgency, expressing “a concern for reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus.”


Between Germ Game simulations, Gates continued his barnstorming tour laying pipe for mass panic and authoritarian rule. At the annual Shattuck Lecture on April 27, 2018, in Boston, he warned: “We can’t predict when, but given the continual emergence of new pathogens, the increasing risk of a bioterror attack, and how connected our world is through air travel, there is a significant probability of a large and lethal, modern-day pandemic occurring in our lifetimes.” Biological weapons of mass destruction, he warned, had “become easier to create in the lab.” Gates went on to add that “we are supporting efforts by others, including the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, whose vaccine candidate [presumably Moderna] is expected to advance to human safety trials in about a year.”

Clade X 2018.
Then, on May 15, 2018, inside the darkened ballroom of Washington’s Mandarin Oriental Hotel, foreboding military music introduced another “pandemic/biowarfare preparation exercise” hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (formerly the Hopkins Population Center, which Gates and NIH fund). The daylong event, dubbed Clade X, "simulate[d] the response to a fictitious bioengineered pathogen for which there is no vaccine.”  Hoping to reduce world population, an elite cult released their genetically engineered bug from a Zurich lab. The disease spreads first to Germany and Venezuela and then to the United States, killing 100 million people globally as “health-care systems collapsed, panic spread, the US stock market crashed.”

The simulation included “a series of National Security Council-convened meetings of ten US government leaders, played by individuals prominent in the fields of national security or epidemic response.” The exercise emphasized the need for militarized pandemic responses and explored strategies for controlling media and social media. It was a training drill to prepare political, bureaucratic, military, and intelligence officials to support the coup d’état against American democracy and the US Constitution. Participating were a kitchen cabinet of former top leaders of the FDA and CDC, as well as a former CIA general counsel. Playing themselves were ex-Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle and Indianapolis Congresswoman Susan Brooks. Daschle, a former Army Intelligence officer who was among the targets of the 2001 anthrax-laced letters, became a pharmaceutical industry lobbyist by 2018. Susan Brooks, the so-called “Member from Eli Lilly,” founded the Congressional Biodefense Caucus. She also introduced a successful bill in 2015—the Social Media Working Group Act of 2014—to establish a Social Media Bureau within the Department of Homeland Security to facilitate censorship of social media during national emergencies. Another of her bills in 2015 sought to streamline implementation of coercive vaccination programs by the federal government during pandemics.


Clade X livestreamed on Facebook before about 150 invited guests, including carefully selected representatives of major media. The simulation left his adulatory press quaking with fear. “This mock pandemic killed 150 million people. Next time it might not be a drill,” Jeff Bezos’sWashington Post headlined. The New York Post assured readers that “the world is completely unprepared for the next pandemic.”

As the Post’s reporter summarized:

The simulation mixed details of past disasters with fictional elements
to force government officials and experts to make the kinds of key
decisions they could face in a real pandemic. It was a tense day. The
exercise was inspired in part by the troubled response to the Ebola
epidemic of 2014. Unlike Ebola, “which spreads through direct
contact and bodily fluids,” this latest “was a flulike respiratory virus,
which would spread far more easily from person to person through
coughing and sneezing . . .”
In the exercise, schools closed, the demand for surgical masks
and respirators far exceeded supply, and hospitals in the United
States were quickly overwhelmed.” Among the “difficult questions”:
“An entry ban on flights from other countries?” “Who should get the
vaccines first?”

It’s noteworthy that none of the Hopkins simulations contemplate the efficacy of repurposed medications to mitigate or end the pandemic. And none of them allow for soul-searching about the abolition of constitutional rights and the wholesale destruction of America’s political and judicial systems in favor of a tyrannical medical and military junta. None of them recognize that there is no pandemic exception in the United States Constitution. Instead, they were too busy war-gaming a high-level mutiny against American democracy.

All of the Hopkins simulation stories end with the same affirmations: the advisability of militarized police state response and the dire need for broadly deployable mRNA vaccines upon which Gates and Fauci had already invested billions of dollars: “Players underscored the need for the United States to ‘go from bug to drug’ faster.”

And each simulation highlighted the so-called “need” to quarantine and isolate the healthy, censor criticism of the Gates/Fauci vaccines and coerce the population into receiving vaccines rushed into distribution, all in opposition to logic, common sense, and previous public health practices.

Hopkins Center Director Tom Inglesby explained that the event’s immediate purpose was to “provide experiential learning” for new decision makers in the Trump Administration. Of course, the event’s embedded press corps lauded Gates as the hero of the day—the beneficent billionaire whose genius, alone, would save us from the murderous contagion.

An adulatory New Yorker article, “The Terrifying Lessons of a Pandemic Simulation,” giddily embraced the images of a nation at war with Gates as the general atop his gleaming white steed: “Philanthropist-in-chief Bill Gates drew on models developed by the [Gates-funded] Institute for Disease Modeling [IMHE], a venture founded by his former Microsoft colleague Nathan Myhrvold, to warn that, at our current state of readiness, roughly thirty-three million people would die within the first six months of a global pandemic similar to the 1918 flu.” (Gates would deploy his IMHE minions in January 2020 to grotesquely exaggerate the COVID-19 predicted mortalities—22 million dead in 12 months—to justify Tony Fauci’s draconian lockdown.)

Where did the mock virus originate? In this scenario, “someone has genetically modified a mostly harmless parainfluenza virus to kill,” recounted MIT TechnologyReview. “The fictional culprit is A Brighter Dawn, a shadowy group promoting the philosophy that fewer people —a lot fewer—would be a good thing for planet Earth.” Johns Hopkins pandemic specialist Eric Toner created the scenario after carrying out “meticulous research to come up with a plausible threat using real virology and epidemiological models. The result was so realistic that the organizers chose not to present too many details.”

A clear strategic objective for Gates and Fauci was the repetition of the message that a global pandemic was inevitable, that only mandatory vaccines could avert catastrophe, and that obliteration of civil rights will be required. Most astonishing was their capacity to mobilize the obliging global media to uncritically swallow and promote these propositions in complete contradiction of all previously accepted science and history.

That same month, PBS’s NewsHour—once revered as the most incorruptible of all US television media—ran an adoring feature on Dr. Fauci prominently, touting the need
for a universal flu vaccine in a two-part report on “Why another flu pandemic is likely just a matter of when.”


PBS cut to a tour of Fauci’s Vaccine Research Center with Dr. Barney Graham, coinventor of Moderna’s mRNA vaccine. In the next segment, the PBS reporter asked Dr. Fauci about “a shot to protect against all known and  unknown strains of the [flu] virus.” Dr. Fauci replied:“Several years ago, I wouldn’t have been able to give you even an approximation of when that would be, because the science wasn’t giving us the clues that we could actually do that. Now with these exquisite techniques of structure-based vaccine design, I think we are in shooting distance.” Dr. Fauci continued, “We have got to be able to have something that, when a new pandemic virus emerges, we already have something on the shelf to do something about it, something that you could make and it would be useable so that, when you stockpile it, it really is a stockpile.”

The show was functionally an infomercial for Moderna and mRNA vaccines. PBS didn’t mention that Dr. Fauci’s NIAID had pumped massive funding into Moderna’s vaccine or that NIAID claimed patent rights and stood to profit handsomely from its approval. Nor did PBS acknowledge that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation had previously given PBS NewsHour millions of dollars, or that, by 2019, Gates had also bet millions on Moderna’s mRNA vaccine. Gates owns a substantial equity stake in the company.

In September 2019, the Gates-funded John Hopkins Center for Health Security followed up on its Clade X event by issuing an eighty-four-page report, “Preparedness for A High-Impact Respiratory Pathogen Epidemic.” The report focused on the only end point that seemed to really concern Gates—the Gates/Fauci mRNA vaccine project. If there was any doubt that pushing mRNA vaccine was the entire purpose of the exercise, the white paper cleared that up. The Clade X summary called for making the top priority of all government, media, and biosecurity players the coordinated drive for: R&D aimed at rapid vaccine development for novel threats and distributed surge manufacturing. . . . Nucleic acid (RNA and DNA)–
based vaccines are widely seen as highly promising and potentially rapid vaccine development pathways, though they have not yet broken through with licensed products. Both Gates and Fauci had already invested such enormous financial resources in that technology. In this light, the simulations can be interpreted as marketing and public relations exercises designed to recruit and train political, military, media, and public health officials to advance their enterprise using censorship, propaganda, and state-sponsored violence, if necessary. The report concluded with a revealing warning about biosafety, “particularly for countries that are funding research with the potential to result in accidents with pathogens that could initiate high-impact respiratory pandemics.” The report warned that the possibility of deliberate release “could substantially add to the extraordinary consequences that would follow a naturally occurring pandemic event with the same agent. Mass vaccination strategies should be developed and put in place to increase immediate access.” Put simply, through the medium of this sponsored report Gates, is saying that we need a rapid mass vaccination strategy in place to anticipate the accidental or deliberate release of the kind of enhanced pathogens that his working partner, Dr. Fauci, was funding the development of in Wuhan, under the pretext of vaccine research. Though Gates’s simulation highlighted the need for masks and respirators, Gates, Dr. Fauci, and Kadlec ignored stockpiling these items, and the same for any antiviral drugs that might successfully treat sick people. Instead, they were laser-focused on next-gen vaccines, on compulsory administration to healthy uninfected populations, on censorship and other coercive devices, on constructing and controlling global health agencies, and on surveillance technologies.


Global Preparedness Monitoring Board.
Later, in May 2018—with imprimatur from the WHO and the World Bank Group— Gates created a kind of permanent standing committee called the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB), including some of the most powerful global public health kingpins, to institutionalize the lessons derived from all these scenario planning drills. The global committee would serve as the real-life authoritative collective for imposing rules during the upcoming pandemic. This so-called “independent” monitoring and accountability body’s purpose was to validate the imposition of police state controls by global and local political leaders and technocrats, endorsing their efforts to take the kind of harsh actions that Gates’s
simulation modeled: subduing resistance, ruthlessly censoring dissent, isolating the healthy, collapsing economies, and compelling vaccination during a projected worldwide health crises. GPMB’s board includes a pantheon of technocrats whose cumulative global power to dictate global health policy is virtually irresistible: Anthony Fauci; Sir Jeremy Farrar of Wellcome Trust; Christ Elias of BMGF; China’s CDC director, George Gao; Russian health minister, Veronika Skvortsova; WHO’s health director, Michael Ryan; its former director, Gro Harlem Brundtland; its former programming director, Ilona Kickbusch; and UNICEF’s Henrietta Holsman Fore, who is former director of USAID, that used to be a reliable CIA front.


In June 2019, about twenty weeks before the start of the COVID pandemic, Dr. Michael Ryan, executive director of the WHO’s health emergencies program, summarized the
conclusions of GPMB’s pandemic report, warning that “we are entering a new phase of high impact epidemics” that would constitute “a new normal” where governments worldwide would strengthen control and restrict the mobility of citizens.


Crimson Contagion 2019.
That August—not even ten weeks before the first COVID-19 infections were reported in Wuhan—a 2019 war game code-named Crimson Contagion capped eight months of
planning overseen by Robert Kadlec, who was, by then, President Trump’s Disaster Response Leader. Also involved in this virus war game scenario was Anthony Fauci representing the NIH, Dr. Robert R. Redfield of the CDC, and HHS Secretary Alex Azar. The HHS Office of Preparedness and Response teamed with the top spooks at the National Security Council to lead the four-day nationwide “Functional Exercise.”

So now Kadlec—who had, for twenty years, been writing scripts for using a pandemic to overthrow democracy and curtail constitutional rights—was in a perfect position to do just that. With this virus simulation, he included all the key players who would manage what was to become a de facto coup d’état sixty days hence. While earlier simulations functioned as training drills for high-level political, military, press, intelligence agency, and regulatory commissars, the 2019 Crimson Contagion simulation functioned as a nationwide crusade to evangelize state-level health bureaucracies, municipal officials, hospital and law enforcement agencies across America with the messages developed in the preceding simulations


Under a veil of enforced secrecy, organizers staged the Crimson Contagion exercise nationwide at over 100 centers. “Participation included 19 federal departments and agencies, 12 key states, 15 tribal nations and pueblos, 74 local health department and coalition regions, 87 hospitals, and over 100 healthcare and public health private sector partners.” The simulation scenario envisioned a “novel influenza” pandemic originating in China labeled H7N9. As with COVID-19, air travelers rapidly spread the deadly respiratory illness across the globe.

In this scenario, by the time US health officials first identify the virus in Chicago, it is already galloping like the Grim Reaper across other metropolitan areas, forcing the HHS Secretary to declare a national public health emergency. The WHO delays a month before declaring a pandemic. The multistate, multiregional exercise that took place just months before the real-world COVID-19 pandemic focused on “critical infrastructure protection; economic impact; social distancing; scarce resource allocation; prioritization of vaccines and other counter-measures.” (Again not including therapeutic medicines.) The Crimson Contagion exercise achieved eerily accurate forecasting with numbers that precisely predicted the official casualty data for COVID-19: million forecasted illnesses, 7.7 million predictedhospitalizations, and 568,000 deaths in the United States alone.

The draft report, dated October 19, 2019, and marked “not to be disclosed,” didn’t become public until the NewYork Times obtained a copy under the Freedom of Information Act and published a front-page article on March 19, 2020, eight days after the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Only under pressure from another FOIA request did Kadlec’s HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary of Preparedness and Response release the January 2020 After-Action Crimson Contagion Report the following September. It is available online here: governmentattic.org/38docs/HHSaarCrimsonContAAR_2020.pdf.

The Times story contained this paragraph: “The October 2019 report documents that officials at the Department of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services, and even at the White House’s National Security Council, were aware of the potential for a respiratory virus outbreak originating in China to spread quickly to the United States and overwhelm the nation.”The New York Times takeaway missed altogether the larger and more significant stories: that the Crimson Contagion’s planners precisely predicted every element of the COVID-19 pandemic—from the shortage of masks to specific death numbers—months before COVID-19 was ever identified as a threat and that their overarching countermeasure was the preplanned demolition of the American Constitution by a scrupulously choreographed palace coup.


The Crimson Contagion draft report complains that existing federal funding sources were insufficient to combat a pandemic and concluded, predictably, that government officials needed far more money and far more power: “A significant topic of concern centered around the inadequacies of existing executive branch and statutory authorities to provide HHS with the requisite mechanisms to serve successfully as the lead federal agency in response to an influenza pandemic.” The team noted that “The group . . . concluded they would soon need to move toward aggressive social distancing, even at the risk of severe disruption to the nation’s economy and the daily lives of millions of Americans.” .(pp.417-424)


. . .


Event 201: October 2019.
Under Gates’ direction in mid-October 2019, only two months after Crimson Contagion and three weeks after US intelligence agencies believe that COVID-19 had begun circulating in Wuhan, the cabal of potentates and institutions that compose the Biosecurity Cartel began preparing decision makers for the mass eviction of informed critics of the vaccine industry from social media. That month, Gates personally organized yet another training and signaling exercise for government biosecurity functionaries. This war game consisted of four tabletop
simulations of a worldwide coronavirus pandemic. Participants included a group of high-ranking kahunas from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University Populations Center, the CDC, various media powerhouses, the Chinese government, a former CIA/NSA director, vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson, the globe’s largest pharmaceutical company; finance and biosecurity industry chieftains, and the president of Edelman, the world’s leading corporate PR firm. Conspiracy-minded critics dub this cabal the “Deep State.” The World Economic Forum Director Klaus Schwab has christened their agenda the “Great Reset.”

Event 201 was a signaling exercise, but it was also, as we shall see, a training run for a “government in waiting.” Its principals would quickly move into key positions to run pandemic response a few  months later.


At Gates’ direction, the participants role-played members of a Pandemic Control Council, war-gaming a contagion that serves as pretext for this insurgency against American democracy. They drilled a retinue of psychological warfare techniques for controlling official narratives, silencing dissent, forcibly masking large populations, and leveraging the pandemic to promote mandatory mass vaccinations. Needless to say, there was little talk of building or fortifying immune systems, existing off-the-shelf remedies, or off-patent therapeutic drugs and vitamins. Instead, there was abundant palaver about expanding government’s authoritarian powers, imposing draconian restrictions, curtailing traditional civil rights, which might include of rights of assembly, free speech, private property, jury trials, due process, and religious worship, as well as promoting and coercing the uptake of new, patentable, antiviral drugs and vaccines. The participants walked through imaginary global coronavirus contagion scenarios that focused on fear-mongering, blanket censorship, mass propaganda, and police state strategies culminating in compulsory mass vaccination.

As with the Clade X simulation, the most trusted Pharma-friendly media attended. Forbes and Bloomberg participated in the exercise, which focused on war-gaming the medical cartel’s censorship initiative. The Bloomberg Foundation is a major funder of the Johns Hopkins Center. Oddly, Gates later claimed that this simulation didn’t occur. On April 12, 2020, Gates told BBC, “Now here we are. We didn’t simulate this, we didn’t practice, so both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted territory.” Unfortunately for that whopper, the videos of the event are still available across the Internet. They show that Gates and team did indeed simulate health and economic policies. It’s hard to swallow that Gates had forgotten.

Organizers billed Event 201 as a vehicle for delineating “areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.” They reminded attendees that “experts agree” that it is only a matter of time before one of these epidemics becomes “global.”


Event 201 was as close as one could get to a “real-time” simulation. It was a meeting of a hypothetical Pandemic Emergency Board, in the same week that COVID-19 was already claiming its first victims in Wuhan. “We’re not sure how big this could get, but there’s no end in sight,” warns one hypothetical physician in an opening briefing. Gates’s simulated coronavirus epidemic was far worse than the authentic COVID-19 outbreak that would hit America just weeks later. The simulated version caused 65 million deaths at the eighteen-month end point and global economic collapse lasting up to a decade.251 Compared to the Gates simulation, therefore, the actual COVID-19 crisis is a bit of a dud. Public health officials claim 2.5 million deaths “attributed to COVID” globally over 13 months. The death counts from COVID in our real-life COVID-19 predicament are highly inflated and questionable. Further, the death of 2.5 million must be put in the context of a global population of 7.8 billion, with around 59 million deaths expected annually in any event. Event 201’s predictions of decade-long economic collapse will probably prove more accurate—but only because of the draconian lockdown promoted by both Gates and Dr. Fauci.


The theme of Event 201 was that such a crisis would prove an opportunity to promote new vaccines and tighten information and behavioral controls through propaganda, censorship, and surveillance. Gates’ script anticipates vast anti-vaccine resistance triggered by mandates and fanned by Internet posts. (pp.425-426)


. . .


Gates’s Event 201 global pandemic war game quickly demonstrated that it was reaching and indoctrinating its intended audiences—the globe’s top-level decision makers. A week after Event 201, presidential aspirant Joe Biden read a Washington Post article about the follow-up to the Event 201 report coauthored by the Hopkins Center for Health Security. According to a newly invented Global Health Security Index assessing 195 countries, “No country —the United States included—is fully prepared to respond to a deliberate or accidental threat with the potential to wipe out humanity.” Biden tweeted a response on October 25, 2019: “We are not prepared for a pandemic. . . We need leadership that . . . focuses on real threats, and mobilizes the world to stop outbreaks before they reach our shores.”

At the end of November 2019, Robb Butler—the head of WHO/Europe’s Vaccine Preventable Diseases and Immunization Program from 2014 to 2018—told the European Scientific Conference on Applied Infectious Disease Epidemiology that “vaccine hesitancy” must be tackled and “immunization is a best buy.”


The Triumph of the Military/Intelligence Complex: Intelligence Agencies and COVID-19.
In November 2020, the British spy agency MI6 announced that its spooks would be surveilling foreigners all over the world (presumably including Americans) who questioned
official orthodoxies about COVID-19 vaccines. Declaring the launch of an “offensive cyber-operation to disrupt anti-vaccine propaganda,” the Foreign Branch hinted that it would henceforth target individuals who asked awkward or impudent questions about vaccines or questioned official COVID proclamations or countermeasures. The agency promised to deploy the same arsenal of monitoring and harassment weaponry and dirty tricks that it formerly reserved for terrorists. According to The Times, “The spy agency is using a toolkit developed to tackle disinformation and recruitment peddled by Islamic state.” A government source assured the paper they weren’t kidding around: “GCHQ has been told to take out anti-vacciners online and on social media. There are ways they have used to monitor and disrupt terrorist propaganda.”

Federal law forbids US spy agencies from spying on or surveilling US citizens, but the Western intelligence bureaucracies work in collaboration with one another, and the CIA often deploys European, Israeli, and Canadian agencies as surrogates to skirt US laws.

In August 2020, after I appeared as a keynote speaker before an estimated crowd of 1.2 million democracy and civil rights advocates from every European nation protesting COVID restrictions at a Peace and Justice Rally in Berlin, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency announced that it would begin monitoring the top leaders of the group that invited me. The spy agency accused COVID protesters of trying to “permanently undermine trust in state institutions and their representatives,” according to the news agency AFP. “Now, the definition of terror is so broad,” says former CIA official Kevin Shipp, “that any mention of COVID vaccines comes under their purview.”

These were the first explicit acknowledgments of the pervasive involvement by Western intelligence agencies in the vaccine enterprise that the global press has long overlooked. As two decades of Germ Game simulations foreshadowed, US and foreign clandestine agencies have a secretive but dominating presence in the COVID-19 pandemic response. Intelligence community alumni and active officers occupy key positions in the international agencies that promote global vaccinations. For example, President Biden’s director of USAID is former WHO Ambassador Samantha Power. Power is an imperialist war hawk who as President Obama’s National Security Advisor persuaded him to intervene militarily in Libya. She has
declared that her primary goal at USAID is “to restore US prestige by getting American-made vaccines ‘into arms’ around the world.” UNICEF’s Director, Anthony Lake, was President Bill Clinton’s national security advisor and his nominee to be CIA Director until corruption charges derailed his appointment. In January 2020, UNICEF telegraphed its brave new embrace of authoritarianism by cheerleading the Maldives legislature’s passage of a bill
making it a criminal offense for parents to decline any government-recommended vaccine for their children. UNICEF’s unsheathed enthusiasm makes clear that the organization regards the Maldives innovation as a pilot program for humanity.

GlaxoSmithKline’s spinoff, the Wellcome Trust, has played a central role in the marriage of Big Pharma to the Western spy agencies. From 2015 until October 2020, the Chair of Wellcome Trust—the UK version of the Gates Foundation—was the former director general of MI5, Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, a thirty-five-year counterespionage veteran who also functioned as official liaison between British and US intelligence agencies. Anthony Fauci’s emails reveal that Wellcome Trust Director Sir Jeremy Farrar worked directly with Dr. Fauci to orchestrate the cover-up of the Wuhan lab leak evidence, assigning a staff of five Wellcome Trust operatives to manage the fraud.


Dame Manningham-Buller has served as chair of the Imperial College London since 2011. Anthony Fauci and Western health officials widely cited the Imperial College’s inaccurate COVID-19 fatality projections—ginned up by the Wellcome Trust’s notorious  pidemiologist, Neil Ferguson—to justify the draconian global lock-downs. Ferguson’s guileful projections overestimated fatality rates by more than an order of magnitude. He did the same with mad cow disease and other diseases du jour. MI6 spy Christopher Steele is a leader of the British organization “Independent SAGE,” a sketchy, yet highly influential collective of social scientists, psychologists, and professional propagandists who use the news media to relentlessly pressure the UK government anytime it hesitates to deploy the flinty authoritarianism needed to achieve “zero COVID.”

Steele is only one of many former intelligence officers who cheerlead draconian responses to COVID and applaud the onset of totalitarianism. One of the early promoters of the marginalization, demonization, and officially sanctioned abuse of vaccine-hesitant parents is Juliette Kayyem, the former assistant secretary for Homeland Security under President Obama, and former member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the National Committee on Terrorism. Kayyem was forced out of her high-level job at the Washington Post when critics leaked her involvement with the Israeli spyware company that makes the software system used to track and murder Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi. As early as April 2019, she was editorializing for the Washington Post that parents who declined measles vaccines for their children should face “isolation, fines, arrests” and be treated to the same sanctions that government uses against terrorists and sex offenders.  As early as 1977, Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein documented the CIA’s control over 400 leading American journalists and institutions, including the New York Times and TIME Magazine. The CIA’s long and pervasive domination of the Washington Post via Project Mockingbird, beginning with its owners Katharine and Phil Graham and leading editors and reporters, is well documented. There is little evidence that its new owner, Jeff Bezos, has pruned away these corrupting influences. The Post and the Times have been the leading media cheerleaders for draconian pandemic response. On September 5, Max Blumenthal—son of frequent Washington Post contributor Sidney Blumenthal—exposed the Post for publishing a phony “Doctor on the Street Interview” in which a supposedly typical DC physician called for extrajudicial murder of the vaccine-hesitant parents through medical neglect. Blumenthal pointed out that the physician was actually the vice president of Technical Staff at In-Q-Tel.

The CIA and other intelligence agencies aggressively recruit scientists like Jeremy Farrar, whose research involves postings in foreign countries. Additionally, it uses vaccination drives as a cover for broader strategic actions. Between 2011 and 2014, for example, the CIA used the WHO’s Global Eradication Program to conduct fake polio and Hepatitis B vaccine programs in Pakistan as a way to surreptitiously collect DNA from individuals in its efforts to track down Osama bin Laden.

These are only a few of the myriad examples of the closely kept involvements by spy agencies in treating vaccination as a foreign policy tool and as an instrument of fear, suppression, and control independent of any genuine health concerns.

* * *

In July 2021, one year and four months into the misery of the global lockdown, the FAA had to divert air traffic over a section of the country stretching from the West Coast to Michigan to make room for the fleets of private jets converging on Sun Valley, Idaho, for the thirty-eighth annual meeting of the world’s most exclusive conclave, sometimes called the Summer Camp for Billionaires, or “Mogul Fest.” The 2021 meeting included Bill Gates, Apple CEO Tim Cook, Mark Zuckerberg, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Mike Bloomberg, Google founders Larry Price and Sergey Brin, Warren Buffett, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings, Disney Chair Robert Iger, Viacom/CBS Chair Shari Redstone, and one of the lockdown’s most influential propagandists, Anderson Cooper, who has acknowledged that he responded to a CIA recruitment poster while attending Yale and worked an indeterminate number of summers thereafter in Langley.


All the discussions at the event were, as usual, closely guarded, but participants acknowledged conversing about cryptocurrencies and artificial intelligence. This year, the robber barons hosted, as their guest of honor, CIA Director William Joseph Burns, and by all reports, the mood among the titans was bullish. By that time, US billionaires were well on their way to increasing their collective wealth by $3.8 trillion in a single year, while obliterating the American middle class, which permanently lost about the same amount. These tech and media magnates, who had magnified their billions from the lockdown, were the same men who had used their media and social media platforms to censor complaints about the lockdown, even as it filled their coffers past the bursting point.

Each of these fat cats had helped grease the skids for the calamitous collapse of America’s exemplary constitutional democracy. The Bill of Rights was, by then, indefinitely suspended. The participants of that event had privatized the public square and then obstructed the free flow of information and open debate—the oxygen and sunlight of democracy. Their censorship allowed their allies in the technocracy to effect the most extraordinary curtailment of American constitutional rights in history: closing churches across the country, shuttering a million businesses without due process or just compensation, suspending jury trials for corporate malefactors, passing regulations without constitutionally guaranteed transparency public hearings or comment, violating privacy through warrantless searches, and track-and-trace surveillance and abolishing the rights of assembly and association.

After twenty years of modeling exercises, the CIA—working with medical technocrats like Anthony Fauci and billionaire Internet tycoons—had pulled off the ultimate coup d’état: some 250 years after America’s historic revolt against entrenched oligarchy and authoritarian rule, the American experiment with self-government was over. The oligarchy was restored, and these gentlemen and their spymasters had equipped the rising technocracy with new tools of control unimaginable to King George or to any other tyrant in history.

* * *

COVID-19: A Military Project.


In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition
of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the
military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of
misplaced power exists and will persist.

We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our
liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for
granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the
proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of
defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and
liberty may prosper together.
—Dwight Eisenhower, 1961

With all the preparations for a coordinated military response, with deep involvement from intelligence agencies, it should come as no surprise that the government’s COVID-19 response quickly emerged as a military project.

On Sept. 28, 2020, science journalist Nicholas Florko published in STAT a leaked organizational schematic exposing the $10 billion Operation Warp Speed project as a highly structured Defense Department campaign with “vast military involvement.” The byzantine flowchart shows four generals and sixty other military officials commanding Operation Warp Speed, badly outnumbering civilian health technocrats from HHS, who represented a mere twenty-nine of the roughly ninety leaders on the chart.

HHS’s Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy, Paul Mango, told STAT that the Department of Defense was deeply enmeshed in every aspect of the project, including creating more than two dozen vaccine pop-up manufacturing plants, airlifting in equipment and raw materials from across the globe, and erecting cybersecurity and physical security operations “to ensure an eventual vaccine is guarded very closely from ‘state actors who don’t want us to be successful in this.’” This paranoid addendum seems like a pretextual effort to link vaccine-hesitant Americans to sinister foreign governments, thereby justifying a military and intelligence agency response. It is, in short, a “conspiracy theory,” albeit an official one. Mango told STAT that Warp Speed planning and debriefing occurs “in protected rooms used to discuss classified information.” A senior federal health official told STAT he was struck by the sight of soldiers in military uniforms ambling about HHS’s headquarters in downtown Washington, including over 100 soldiers in the HHS corridors wearing “Desert Storm fatigues.”

Health officials complained to STAT that they found themselves marginalized as Warp Speed devolved into a partnership between the military and the pharmaceutical industry, presided over by Robert Kadlec—who, according to Mango, personally signed off on every business agreement made by HHS for Operation Warp Speed.


Warp Speed has secret deals with six major drug companies developing COVID-19 vaccines. The operation’s chief adviser is Moncef Slaoui, a former GlaxoSmithKline official who prior to the pandemic served as chairman of Moderna, the Fauci/Kadlec/Gates collaboration that would be Warp Speed’s primary beneficiary. By characterizing his post as an “outside contractor,” Slaoui, who holds roughly $10 million in GSK stock, dodged the application of federal ethics rules. Slaoui has since promised to donate any increase in the value of his stock.


“The first person to be fired should be Dr. Slaoui,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) responded at a hearing. “The American people deserve to know that COVID-19 vaccine decisions are based on science, and not on personal greed.”


Dr. Fauci had direct hands-on involvement with Warp Speed through his employee Larry Corey, who described himself as an “ex-officio” member of the Warp Speed governance. Corey runs Dr. Fauci’s COVID-19 prevention network, which transforms HIV clinical trial networks into Phase 3 COVID-19 clinical trials.

Dr. Fauci was undaunted by the military takeover of US health policy, applauding the Operation as a “talent show.” Dr. Fauci told STAT he was untroubled by the dearth of public health experience among Warp Speed’s Pentagon leadership: “If you go through the organizational boxes of Operation Warp Speed, they’re very, very impressive.” Tom Inglesby also lauded the military involvement. “There is deep knowledge of science and on how to manage complex government operations,” said Inglesby. “It’s clearly operating in a challenging pandemic and political environment, and we won’t know if we have a safe and effective vaccine until the trials are finished. But it’s a highly competent group of people working to make it happen.”

HHS secretary Alex Azar—a former Pharma CEO and lobbyist—and defense secretary Mark Esper share top billing as the organizational chairs. Slaoui, the project’s formal civilian leader, and Gen. Gustave Perna serve as Operation Warp Speed’s CEO.


Immediately beneath Perna and Slaoui are Lieutenant General (Retired) Paul Ostrowski, a former Special Forces soldier who manages distribution of an eventual vaccine, and Matt Hepburn, who specializes in futuristic warfare projects for the Pentagon, including a program to implant high-tech sensors into soldiers to detect illnesses and for other purposes.

“This should be a medical and not be a military operation,” Holocaust survivor and medical ethics advocate Vera Sharav told me. “It’s a public health problem. Why are the military and the CIA so heavily involved? Why is everything a secret? Why can’t we know the ingredients of these products, which the taxpayers financed? Why are all their emails redacted? Why can’t we see the contracts with vaccine manufacturers? Why are we mandating a treatment with an experimental technology with minimal testing? Since COVID-19 harms fewer than 1 percent, what is the justification for putting 100 percent of the population at risk? We need to recognize that this is a vast human experiment on all of mankind, with an unproven technology, conducted by spies and generals primarily trained to kill and not to save lives.” What could possibly go wrong?(pp.430-435)




The 21 + items below offer a selection of recent articles and essays in the Anglophone social media that will challenge our understanding of the social system and structure of which we are a part. The collective situation which we share should remind us of our interconnectedness and the dire need for us to get our act together, before it is too late.



Francis McCollum Feeley


Professeur honoraire de l'Université Grenoble-Alpes
Ancien Directeur des Researches
Université de Paris-Nanterre
Director of The Center for the Advanced Study
of American Institutions and Social Movements
The University of California-San Diego




As Russia heads toward victory after all, Ukraine's imagineers put out fake videos of Russia "losing"


from Mark Crispin Miller



The Dreizin Report - Ukraine War & Aftermath


with Jacob Dreizin

(video, 34:11)

In this video, the Dreizin Report explains the general principles of breaking a static defensive line, from the perspective of the advancing Russian and Donetsk/Lugansk forces. However, we start with some comedy from Foreign Affairs magazine, which shows just how crazy the scene has gotten here in the USA. (Not mentioned in the video, it turns out the author of the piece in question is Anders Aslund, one of the architects of the misguided and catastrophic, economic “shock therapy” in Russia in the early-mid 1990s, which gave us the oligarchs among other problems.)



NATO Launches Big Baltic War Games...”What Could Go Wrong?”


with Ron Paul




Putin's warning. Olaf Scholz fears Zelensky will invade Russia with German weapons


with Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris




Pressure Mounts on Pentagon Over Lack of Oversight for Ukraine Military Aid


by Dave DeCamp

Interpol warns that the weapons being flooded into Ukraine will end up in the hands of criminals





Day 100 of the Russia-Ukraine War


by William Walter Kay



Ukraine War! What Is It Good For? Part 5 - Transformation


by Iain Davis



Watch "Disappeared! Video Proving U.S. Involvement In Ukraine Coup


with Jimmy Dore




Donbass: Russell Bentley ("Texas") about his first battle and friends he lost in the battle


with Russell “Texas” Bentley

(video, 13:03)

Militiaman from the US, Texas, visits the church near the Donetsk airport, now controlled by the Donetsk People's Republic and talks about the first attacks of the Ukrainian fascists that he experienced when he joined the militia and about the destroy of churches in Ukraine. The number of churches destroyed by the Kiev junta in Donbass as of January 6, 2015, was at least 10; 70 churches were damaged in shellings. The current number is not yet known. But more than that: churches get raided by Nazis all over Ukraine. Priests get persecuted. All of this is a natural extension of fascism. Fascism brings paganism. Supposedly "pre-Christian" religions of Ukraine get promoted - the Ukrainian neo-paganism known as "RUN-Vira" ("Native Ukrainian National Faith"), which attempts to replace Christianity. The most massive attack against Christianity in the 21st century has started in Ukraine. Christians! This bell tolls for you. Act. The people of Donbass will rebuild their churches in any case. But you can help them. "Essence of Time - Donetsk People's Republic" Television, issue 493 Link to original: https://youtu.be/U4lfcn5wcNk Humanitarian aid for Donbass (Rostov-on-Don): https://vk.com/svhelpdonbass Essence of Time movement website: http://eot.su Help for the South-East of Ukraine movement's website: http://vognebroda.net Essence of time group in VK: http://vk.com/eotsu Anti-Misinformation - Civil Resistance: http://vk.com/vognebrodanet



Donbass: The Final Battle - Mariupol - Prisoners, Biolabs


with Regis Tremblay and Russell “Texas” Bentley

(video, 32:26)



Where Does Military Aid to Ukraine Comes From


by Katharina Buchholz



Why America Needs War


by Dr. Jacques R. Pauwels



Military Hardware for Ukraine: Who Plans to Supply What?


by an D. Walter



Are France and NATO Shipping Depleted Uranium Weaponry Into Ukraine?


by Freddie Ponton





Scully and Mulder nailed it in 2016!


from Mark Crispin Miller

A year before Dr. Fauci predicted the "pandemic" under Trump, "The X-Files" foretold its use to cull the human race, and crush America



Science versus Scientism (part 1)


by Robert W Malone MD, MS

More root cause analysis of the COVIDcrisis



Science versus Scientism (part 2)


by Robert W Malone MD, MS



The Forgotten Side of Medicine : “Adverse Reactions to COVID Vaccines I Have Come Across”


by A Midwestern Doctor

“I have spent the last year working to document this. It is a lot to take in but I feel it needs to be said.”



Gearing Up for the Big Reveal: HHS Releases FDA Gene Editing Guidance, May Soon Admit mRNA COVID Shots Are Actually Gene Therapy Products


by Kevin Hughes (with Stew Peters and Dr. Jane Ruby




Bayer Head Admits COVID-19 Vaccine Is Gene Therapy


by Martin Armstrong



First Ever NIH/NIND Study on Vaccine Caused Neurological Injuries


with Drbeen Medical Lectures






"Vaccidents" will happen, everywhere (and not just to the "vaccinated")


from Mark Crispin Miller



"Vaccidents" keep spiking all around the world—and "our free press" keeps on denying that the jabs have anything to do with it


from Mark Crispin Miller



‘We're Dealing With a Criminal Syndicate’, Doctors Send Stark Warning to Parents…


by Children’s Health Defense



First COVID Vaxx Injury Payout To Canadian Man


with Jimmy Dore




FDA/Pfizer Malfeasance in Pfizer Document Dump


by Naomi Wolf



Lipid Nanoparticle/Modified Gene COVID Injection Is A "Nuclear Bomb" & The SIDS/SADS/MIS-C Deception


with Ryan Cristián




Study Finds Athlete Deaths Are 1,700% Higher Than Expected Since COVID-19 Vaccination Began


by The Daily Expose



Zero Increased Myocarditis Risk For Unvaxed, Ukraine's Fake News Exposed & "Global Water Security"


with Ryan Cristián




Selected Articles: We’re Now in the Last Stage of a Tyrannical Takeover


by Global Research News



Pharma Companies Exposed For Bribing Family Doctors To Prescribe Drug 50X’s Stronger Than Heroin


by Matt Agorist





“Tyranny of the Modelers”


by Robert W Malone MD, MS

Intersection of Utilitarianism, Geopolitics, Public Health and Hubris



June 3, 2022

“The Defender – Children’s Health Defense”


from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.



June 2, 2022

“The Defender – Children’s Health Defense”


from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.




Friday Funnies


from Robert Mahone

“It is a choice, but compliance is the only option.”



Covida Commedia


by John Griffin       



The Power of Lies


by Craig Murray





FLASHBACK: Feudalism 2.0 (2007)


with James Corbett

(37 :16)



WATCH: 15 Things I’ve Learned in 15 Years


with James Corbett




8 Infamous "Conspiracy Theories” That Turned Out To Be True


by Arjun Walia



Derrick Broze Interview - WEF's 2022 Davos Meeting Reveals Your Future, Whether You Like It Or Not


with Ryan Cristián




Beyond bilderberg(er)'s Civil War


with James Corbett






Palestine in Pictures

May 2022


by The Electronic Intifada



The Ethnic Cleansing of Masafer Yatta: Israel’s New Annexation Strategy in Palestine


by Ramzy Baroud



West Bank: Harrowing Accounts of Palestinians Shot Dead by Israeli Forces Over 24-hour Period


by Middle East Eye



Israel's Dance of Flags is a Zionist Hate Parade and, by Definition, an Act of War


by Miko Peled



Israeli Occupation Forces Kill 5 Palestinians As Tensions Boil


by Robert Inlakesh



Israel’s assaults on public health infrastructure amount to war crimes


by Emily Hacker



Canada Votes Against Healthcare for Palestinians at WHO Assembly


by The New Arab



Further | Battle Tested On Palestinians


by Abby Zimet



Uproar in Cyprus After Israel Carries Out Military Exercise Aimed at Lebanon


by The New Arab



Lebanon’s Elections And The Ever-Shifting Narrative Of Western Propaganda


by Robert Inlakesh



Why is an Israeli intelligence-linked company filtering US journalists' emails?


by Lowkey



India and Israel: The Arms Trade in Charts and Numbers


by Azad Essa



Israel's New Racism: The Persecution of African Migrants in the Holy Land


by  Nation


About 60,000 African migrants have arrived in Israel since 2006, fleeing unrest in their home countries. But upon arrival in the ostensibly democratic country, the migrants have faced intense persecution and have been branded as "infiltrators" by right-wing politicians and activists.



Israel tells African migrants to leave Jerusalem


by Mint


African migrants demonstrated Wednesday outside the Rwandan embassy in Israel's Herzliya against the Israeli government's policy to deport African refugees and asylum seekers from Israel to a third country.



Selected Articles: A New War in the Middle East? Israel Military Exercises Simulates Invasion of Lebanon, War with Hezbollah, and Iran


by Global Research News





From UNESCO Study 11 to UNESCO 2050: Project BEST and the Forty-Year Plan to Reimagine Education for the Fourth Industrial Revolution


by John Klyczek



Silicon Valley Taking Control of History


by Caitlin Johnstone



US State-Affiliated NewsGuard Targets Consortium News


by Joe Lauria



Paul Mason's covert intelligence-linked plot to destroy The Grayzone exposed


by Kit Klarenberg and Max Blumenthal·



The Mysterious Death of Osama bin Laden


by Prof Michel Chossudovsky – July 8, 2013

Who Was Killed in Abbottabad in May 2011? Osama bin Laden or Someone Else? Pentagon Ordered Purge of Osama "Death Files" from Data Bank



US Battled World War II Nazis, Today US Side-by-side Ukraine Nazis


by Renee Parsons





America’s Role in the Syrian Civil War


by Noam Chomsky - Raghav Kaushik



Blowback to G7 Ban on Russian Oil?


with Eric Draitser




Summit of the Americas or Summit of the United States of America?


by Bertony Dupont



The People’s Summit for Democracy Offers a Progressive Vision to Counter U.S. Dominance in the Region


by Sheila Xiao and Manolo De Los Santos



Gustavo Petro Wins in Colombia, 2nd Round Battle Begins


by  Orinoco Tribune





Is US/NATO (with WEF help) pushing for a Global South famine?


by Michael Hudson



Globalists Are Taking Over the Food System — It's Part of Their Plan to Control You


by Children’s Health Defense



5 signs they are CREATING a food crisis


by Kit Knightly

It’s no secret that, according to politicians and the corporate press, “food shortages” and a “food supply crises” have been on the way for a while now. They have been regularly predicted for several years.

What’s really strange is that despite its near-constant incipience, the food shortage never seems to actually arrive and is always blamed on something new.

As long ago as 2012, “scientists” were predicting that climate change and a lack of clean water would create “food shortages” that would “turn the world vegetarian by 2050”.

In 2019, UN “experts” warned that “climate change was threatening the world’s food supply”.

Later the same year, the UK was warned that they could expect a food shortage as a result of “post-Brexit chaos”.



The Coming Food Apocalypse: Kit Knightly on the Global Research News Hour


with Kit Knightly

(audio, 59:17)

“Prices are more or less 78% higher than average in 2021, and this is cracking up the production side of agriculture. In many regions, farmers simply can’t afford to bring fertilizers to the farm, or even if they could, the fertilizers are not available to them…And it’s not just fertilizers, but agrichemicals and fuel as well. This is a global crisis and it requires a global response.”
Theo de Jager, President of World Farmers Organization


“If you control oil, you control nations. If you control food, you control people.”
- Henry Kissinger



Africa's Escalating Food Crisis: African Union (AU) Leaders Meet with Russian Government


by Abayomi Azikiwe



From: Cat McGuire <cat@catmcguire.com>
Date: Jun 10, 2022
Subject: USA-based destroyed food manufacturing plants

An updated list of USA-based destroyed food manufacturing plants

Holodomor 2.0 (same perpetrators as 1.0)


1 4/30/21 Monmouth Smithfield Foods pork processing plant

2 7/25/21 Memphis Kellogg plant

3 8/13/21 JBS beef plant

4 8/24/21 Patak Meat Company

5 7/30/21 Tyson River Valley ingredient plant

6 10/21/21 Darigold plant

7 11/15/21 Garrard County food plant

8 11/29/21 Maid-Rite Steak Company

9 12/13/21 San Antonio food processing, West side Foods

10 1/7/22 Hamilton Mountain poultry processing Plant

11 1/13/22 Cargill-Nutrene feed mill. Lacombe, La

12 1/31/22 Winston-Salem fertilizer plant

13 2/3/22 Wisconsin River Meats

14 2/3/22 Percy dairy farm

15 2/5/22 Wisconsin River Meats processing facility destroyed by fire in Mauston, Wisconsin.

16 2/15/22 Bonanza Meat Company goes up in flames in El Paso, Texas

17 2/15/22 Shearer's Foods Food processing plant explodes in Hermiston, Oregon.

18 2/16/22 Indiana Louis-Dreyfus soy processing plant

19 2/18/22 Bess View Farms

20 2/19/22 Lincoln premiere poultry

21 2/22/22 Shearer's Foods potato chip plant

22 2/22/22 Fire destroys Deli Star Meat Plant in Fayetteville, Illinois.

23 2/28/22 nutrient AG Solutions fertilizer facility burns

24 2/28/22 Shadow Brook Farm & Dutch girl Creamery burns

25 3/4/22 294,800 chickens destroyed at farm in Stoddard, Missouri

26 3/4/22 644,000 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Cecil, Maryland

27 3/8/22 243,900 chickens destroyed at egg farm in New Castle, Delaware

28 3/10/22 663,400 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Cecil, MD

29 3/10/22 915,900 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Taylor, IA

30 3/14/22 Wayne Hoover dairy farm, barn full of vows burns

31 3/14/22 2,750,700 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Jefferson, Wisconsin

32 3/16/22 Walmart Distribution Center burns for 76 hours in Plainfield Ind.

33 3/16/22 Nestle Food Plant extensively damaged in fire and new production destroyed Jonesboro, Arkansas

34 3/17/22 5,347,500 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Buena Vista, Iowa

35 3/17/22 147,600 chickens destroyed at farm in Kent, Delaware

36 3/18/22 315,400 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Cecil, Maryland

37 3/19/22 Walmart Food Distribution center catches fire in Plainfield, Indiana

38 3/22/22 172,000 Turkeys destroyed on farms in South Dakota

39 3/22/22 570,000 chickens destroyed at farm in Butler, Nebraska

40 3/24/22 Major Fire at McCrum Potato Plant in Belfast, Maine.

41 3/24/22 418,500 chickens destroyed at farm in Butler, Nebraska

42 3/25/22 250,300 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Franklin, Iowa

43 3/26/22 311,000 Turkeys destroyed in Minnesota

44 3/27/22 126,300 Turkeys destroyed in South Dakota

45 3/28/22  1,460,000 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Guthrie, Iowa

46 3/29/22 Maricopa, Az. Food Pantry burns down 50,000 pounds of Food destroyed in Maricopa, Arizona.

47 3/31/22 Rio Fresh Onion factory damaged by fire in San Juan, Texas.

48 3/31/22 76,400 Turkeys destroyed in Osceola, Iowa

49 3/31/22  5,011,700 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Osceola, Iowa

50 4/6/22 281,600 chickens destroyed at farm in Wayne, North Carolina

51 4/9/22 76,400 Turkeys destroyed in Minnesota

52 4/9/22 208,900 Turkeys destroyed in Minnesota

53 4/12/22 89,700 chickens destroyed at farm in Wayne, North Carolina

54 4/12/22  1,746,900 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Dixon, Nebraska

55 4/12/22 259,000 chickens destroyed at farm in Minnesota

56 4/13/22 Fire destroys East Conway Beef & Pork Meat Market in Conway, New Hampshire.

57 4/13/22 Plane crashes into Gem State Processing, Idaho potato and food processing plant

58 4/13/22 77,000 Turkeys destroyed in Minnesota

59 4/14/22 Taylor Farms Food Processing plant burns down Salinas, California.

60 4/14/22 Salinas food processing plant

61 4/14/22 99,600 Turkeys destroyed in Minnesota

62 4/15/22 1,380,500 chickens destroyed at egg farm in Lancaster, Minnesota

63 4/19/22 Azure Standard nation’s premier independent distributor of organic and healthy food, was destroyed by fire in Dufur, Oregon

64 4/19/22 339,000 Turkeys destroyed in Minnesota

65 4/19/22 58,000 chickens destroyed at farm in Montrose, Colorado



“We’re Now in the Last Stage of a Tyrannical Takeover”


with Naomi Wolf






“US Imperialism is the Greatest Threat to Life on Our Planet”: Mapping US Imperialism


by Global Research News



The Frontman of Empire: How Bono’s “Activism” Serves the Powerful


by Alan Macleod



Le pass sanitaire prolongé dans l'Union Européenne dès cet été


avec Radio SUD

(10 :03)



Labor Activists Launch New Organization to Challenge AFL-CIO Foreign Policy


by Prof. Kim Scipes



Psychopathic Politicians: Role Models of a “Slave Society”


by Julian Rose



The Links Between Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gates Explained


by The Week



For Bill Gates, It’s “Moneypox”: Simulation of Fictitious Monkeypox Virus Pandemic in March 2021, Goes Live in May 2022


by Prof Michel Chossudovsky





Pan-Africanism Yes! U.S. AFRICOM and NATO No!


by Abayomi Azikiwe



Black Skin, White Mask


by Jeremy Kuzmarov



Africa, the Collateral Victim of a Distant Conflict


by Vijay Prashad



The Rise of NATO in Africa


by Vijay Prashad  





Why Economic Policy = Class Struggle


with Richard Wolff


Prof. Wolff underscores the importance of calling US “economic policy” what it really is: class struggle. The current inflation, as well as the Federal Reserve’s choice to raise interest rates, is hurting the working class significantly more than the employer class. This is class struggle—the 1% vs the 99%—because if employers struggle economically, they can raise prices while keeping employees’ wages stagnant throughout the inflation. In this struggle, Prof. Wolff reminds us, there are alternatives the government can do to control the inflation and we should not be fooled when they say otherwise.



These Are The Biggest US Importers And Exporters


by Tyler Durden

Which companies are the biggest importers and exporters in the U.S.?

The majority of people will know the names of the businesses that ship the most goods into the country (measured by volume transported on container ships), but, as Statista's Katharina Buchholz notes, most of the biggest exporters hardly ring a bell.




Goldman Pinpoints "July/August" Will Be Return Of US West Coast Port Congestion 


by Tyler Durden

U.S. West Coast ports have experienced at least three months of easing bottlenecks thanks to China's zero-COVID policies, locking down Shanghai, home to the world's busiest seaport, which slowed exports to the U.S. The reopening of Shanghai's economy and restarting of factories will undoubtedly spur an export wave of backlogged goods to the U.S., which could spark another round of congestion. 

The lingering question is, when will this tsunami of goods, such as electronics, clothing, and whatever else China makes, flood U.S. ports? To answer that, Goldman Sachs analyst Jordan Alliger details in a new Tracking U.S. Supply Chain Congestion report that "July/August" could be the start of shipping congestion to reemerge after falling much of this year.  



Biden Hikes Medicare Prices and Funnels Profits to Private Insurers


by Matthew Cunningham-Cook



White House Tells Americans They Have It Better Than Europeans On Gas Prices


by Steve Watson



Biden White House in search of an off-ramp in Ukraine


with Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris




Dictator-in-Chief: The President’s Secret, Unchecked Powers


by John & Nisha Whitehead

“Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness have given way to permanent crisis management: to policing the planet and fighting preventative wars of ideological containment, usually on terrain chosen by, and favorable to, our enemies. Limited government and constitutional accountability have been shouldered aside by the kind of imperial presidency our constitutional system was explicitly designed to prevent.”
- David C. Unger, The Emergency State: America’s Pursuit of Absolute Security at All Costs




Will Biden Provoke War with China?


by Patrick Lawrence



Bilderberg Meets in Washington: Bilderberg Does China. An Economic Hurricane is Coming


by Pepe Escobar




Black Sea Geopolitics and Russia's Control of Strategic Waterways: The Kerch Strait and the Sea of Azov


by Prof Michel Chossudovsky



US Wants to Surround China with Missiles – But Can’t Find Asian Country to Host Them


by Ben Norton



The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework and the Decline of the American Empire


by Danny Haiphong





Wolff Responds: “Great Replacement Theory - A Critique


with Richard Wolff




Censorship and the War on Black America


with  Danny Haiphong




Disinformation Board: Leaked Documents Expose Agenda Behind DHS ‘Ministry of Truth’




LEAKED INFORMATION: They Are Trying To Delete This"


with Russell Brand




"Plot To Take Down Anti-War Journalists Exposed!"


with Jimmy Dore




911 Is a Joke: Preferring to Shoot Unarmed Blacks, Cops Find It Ain't No Fun When the Rabbit Has the Gun


by Jon Jeter



The connections between policing and militaristic assault on the world are endless


by Roberto Sirvent and Julian Akil Rose





New Evidence Implicates CIA, LAPD, FBI and Mafia as Plotters in Elaborate “Hit” Plan to Prevent RFK From Ever Reaching White House


by Jeremy Kuzmarov





with reallgraceful




US State-Affiliated NewsGuard Targets Consortium News


by Joe Lauria

The Pentagon and State Dept.-linked outfit, with an ex-N.S.A. and C.I.A. director on its board, is accusing Consortium News of publishing “false content” on Ukraine, reports



Serbia Resists US-led Bullying


by Gregory Elich



Boris’ days as UK PM are numbered, Putin regime change plan backfires


with Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris






Russian Defense Minister Shoigu says land bridge complete, which may signal phase 3 Odessa


with Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris




A new generation of US-trained extremists is fighting Russia. Are we prepared for the blowback?


by TJ Coles



Ukraine volunteer fighter and US citizen Craig Lang armed by Colombia to overthrow Venezuela’s gov't, FBI source says


by Alexander Rubinstein



DHS ‘Concerned’ Over Nazis Returning to US After Fighting in Ukraine. Why Isn’t the Media?


by Alexander Rubinstein



YouTuber 3D Prints "World's First" Rocket Launcher And Fires At Target


by Tyler Durden

3D printing has revolutionized gun-making and has come a long way since the single-shot "The Liberator" pistol was available for download in 2013. Now entire semiautomatic pistol carbines can be entirely printed at home, and weapon-making appears to have graduated to rocket launchers. 

Youtuber "Ordnance Lab" (also known as Ordnance Lab LLC and holds a Type 10 FFL) published a video showing what they say is the "world's first 3D printed rocket launcher." 

"In this video we team up with D&S Creations, who have developed 3D printed rockets and rocket launchers. We test both a smaller caliber rocket and a larger one, along with a prototype for a shaped charge warhead. This is just the start of our working on 3D printed rockets. We have the launch and detonation figured out, now we need to work on getting the accuracy figured out," Ordnance Lab said in the video's description. 



 “Our BROKEN State”


with Chris Hedges






June 7, 2022

The Defender

Children’s Health Defense – News and Views


by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.



Reports with Max Blumenthal - Archives


(audio reports)



The Gray Zone - Archives


with Max Blumenthal




Daily digest for nfu@simplelists.com, June 3


from Mark Crispin Miller



Daily digest for nfu@simplelists.com, June 9


from Mark Crispin Miller





News From Underground by Mark Crispini Miller


In memory of those who "died suddenly" in the United States, May 31-June 6 (Part 1)




In memory of those who "died suddenly" in the United States, May 31-June 6 (Part 2)




In memory of those who "died suddenly" in the UK, Ireland, France, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovenia and Spain, May 31-June 6




In memory of those who "died suddenly" in Canada, Mexico and South America, May 31-June 6




In memory of those who "died suddenly" in Italy, May 31-June 6




Italy is a death camp: In memory of those others who "died suddenly" throughout the country, May 31-June 6 (Part 2)




In memory of those who "died suddenly" in Israel, Zimbabwe, Benin, Ukraine, Georgia and—especially—Russia, May 31-June 6




In memory of those who "died suddenly" in India, China, Taiwan, Malaysia, Japan and New Zealand, May 31-June 6




NIH/NIND Vaccine Injury Study Participant Interview (Dr. Danice Hertz)


with Drbeen Medical Lectures






URGENT: Tell FDA Hands off Our Children - No EUAs for COVID Shots!


by Children’s Health Defense


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is declaring war on our children and it’s on each of us to be unrelenting as we defend the next generation from Big Pharma and its allies. We need to stop the FDA’s attack, beginning with a campaign to end unethical and unsubstantiated Emergency Use Authorizations (EUA) that will subject younger and our most vulnerable children to the unnecessary risks of COVID shots.

Please join Children’s Health Defense in telling the FDA to get their #HandsOffOurChildren and let regulatory authorities know that #ParentsAreWatching.



Only Mass Protest Can Save Abortion Rights


by Paul Street



Abortion funds, telehealth care, biohacked medicines: Crisis planning for post-Roe America


by Shane Burley

EDITOR’S NOTE: It remains unclear how the legal landscape may change nationally and within individual states in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade, but we wish to draw readers’ attention to warnings issued by abortion advocates and security experts about the potential use of data tracking to criminalize abortion seekers. We encourage all readers to take precautions with protecting their personal data, communications, and search histories. While there are no guarantees that any method will eliminate the threat of criminalization, we recommend consulting resources like the Digital Defense Fund





From: News from Underground
Date: Jun 9, 2022
Subject: Daily digest for

1.Following USDA guidance, state clinics destroyed thousands of cans of useable baby formula - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 14:34 EDT)

2.A huge uptick in disabilities is clearly due to "vaccine" injury - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 16:19 EDT)

2.Study finds that athletes' deaths are 1700% higher than expected - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 16:22 EDT)

4.New Yorkers, we now have a Medical Freedom Party! - Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 17:53 EDT)

1.Following USDA guidance, state clinics destroyed thousands of cans of useable baby formula by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 14:34 EDT)
Reply to list

ERIC BOEHM | 6.8.2022 10:50 AM


2.A huge uptick in disabilities is clearly due to "vaccine" injury by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 16:19 EDT)
Reply to list

A Massive Spike in Disability is Most Likely Due to a Wave of Vaccine Injuries

A Midwestern Doctor

17 hr ago



Note: When this article was originally written, I thought the dataset was referring to individuals on SSI disability, not individuals who met a different criteria of being disabled. The central point still holds true (this data set more directly shows the correlation to vaccine injury, but less clearly shows the economic impacts of that injury), but the information in this article has been heavily revised and I apologize for the initial error. I think the experience vaccine injured have with the disability process is important so I am keeping that within the article even though it is no longer directly relevant to this data.

Early in my medical practice, I elected to work with individuals seeking disability because there was a shortage of doctors in my area willing to do these exams (they do not pay well and we had a physician shortage to begin with). My personal reason for involvement was that due to this shortage, many individuals who desperately needed disability were facing significant delays moving through the process, which often rippled out into causing significant problems in their lives and those around them.

While a few people I saw were suffering from self-created problems and some were either faking their condition or exaggerating their disability for money (which is the typical lens disability claimants are seen through), I found the majority had been through significant hardship that resulted in a life impairing disability (some of their experiences were pretty horrific). I took this as a sign a lot of vetting was done by the state before they were sent to me.

In many of these cases, I felt if the individual had been my patient, they would not have arrived at the place they needed to seek disability. Many of them either had iatrogenic complications from the poorer quality of medical care that individuals in state insurance programs like Medicaid have access to, and had problems that would relatively fixable within a more integrative model of medical care if they had had access to one.

A frequent topic of discussion with my colleagues was whether granting someone disability was ultimately a harmful thing to do since it removes their motivation to address their illness. This is important because in almost all cases, being disabled and receiving disability is a far worse life than not being disabled and having employment. I always kept this in mind when I evaluated these claimants, and ultimately recommended disability for many of them.

I found the majority of claimants I saw did not want to be disabled, had tried over and over to get better, hated going through the process and were only doing this because they had no other choice left. It also made me particularly sad that many of them said I was one of the first doctors they met who treated them as a human being, something I once again view as a consequence of my working in a socioeconomically impoverished rural area where these patients only had access to the inferior quality of medical care afforded by state medical insurance.

From this job, I came to view the disability process as the last stop on the train for individuals who had been failed by the system. Due to the legal requirements of providing an impartial medical evaluation, I was not allowed to provide any type of medical advice to these individuals and I eventually quit the job because it just made me depressed and there was nothing I could do to help the people I saw.

Today I learned 
Ed Dowd (the Blackrock executive who broke the story of the spike in life insurance claims following the vaccine rollout) discovered something very, very concerning (which can be verified here):

Click on the link for the rest.


3.Study finds that athletes' deaths are 1700% higher than expected by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 16:22 EDT)
Reply to list

4.New Yorkers, we now have a Medical Freedom Party! by Mark Crispin Miller (08 Jun 2022 17:53 EDT)
Reply to list

Hello from an admirer and fellow New Yorker!

In the realm of politics, of possible interest to you will be New York's recently-founded Medical Freedom Party. For information -- and statements from the candidates who are running for office -- see the Web site below.

Best wishes,

Peter Allemano

Medical Freedom Party

Medical Freedom Party


Support News from Underground:
Visit News from Underground:
For archives, please go to: