Bulletin N° 1141
“Hearts
and Minds”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzxNRoGoSKU
by Peter Davis
(1:52:05,
with transcript)
The
film's title is based on a quote from President Lyndon B. Johnson: "the
ultimate victory will depend on the hearts and minds of the people who actually
live out there". The movie was chosen as Academy Award for Best
Documentary Feature at the 47th Academy Awards presented in 1975. The film
premiered at the 1974 Cannes Film Festival. Commercial distribution was delayed
in the United States due to legal issues, including a temporary restraining
order obtained by one of the interviewees, former National Security Advisor
Walt Rostow who had claimed through his attorney that
the film was "somewhat misleading" and "not representative"
and that he had not been given the opportunity to approve the results of his
interview. Columbia Pictures refused to distribute the picture, which forced
the producers to purchase back the rights and release it by other means. The
film was shown in Los Angeles for the one week it needed to be eligible for
consideration in the 1974 Academy Awards.
Grenoble
June 21, 2024
Subject: “Right vs. Left versus
right vs. wrong.”
Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,
The old folkloric adage -“two wrongs don’t make a
right”- as applied to the debacle of
modern nation-states which are in the process of destroying their own
populations as well as those of other nations (at the bidding of corporate
capitalist accumulation) remains an enigma enshrouded in a mystery to all who
fail to understand the fundamental material contradiction of capitalist
development, i.e. social class interests define any conflict, whether it be one
of personal emancipation, or wars of national defense, or wars of imperialist
expansion, or wars of national independence. . . . Awareness of existing conflicts
between social class interests is the Rosetta Stone
-the clue for understanding the forces around us and seeing which way the wind
blows, despite the many distractions leading into many culs-de-sac.
Class-conscious populations worldwide will change everything,
sooner or later….
Better sooner than later; it’s time to negotiate seriously.
Only class conscious populations can force this confrontation!
The 23+ items below are a selection of articles
and essays taken from recent publications in the Anglophone social media. They
reflect discussions stemming from the multiple crises we are now facing. Readers
are encouraged to enter into these discussions and join in the quest for
solutions to the many impediments we find on our path to a better future, to
overcome the obstacles to lucid class consciousness and an awareness of what
must be done to truly liberate ourselves from the vicious circles in which we
now find ourselves trapped, to the profit of some and to the misery of most.
Sincerely,
Francis McCollum Feeley
___
Professeur honoraire de l'Université Grenoble-Alpes
Ancien Directeur des
Researches
Université de Paris-Nanterre
Director of The Center for the Advanced Study
of American Institutions and Social Movements
(CEIMSA-in-Exile)
The University of California-San Diego
http://www.ceimsa.org
a.
“The Battle of Ðiên
Biên Phú at 70”
https://www.asia-pacificresearch.com/dien-bien-phu-70/5632030
by Patrick Lawrence
I had the most salutary email the other day, a reviving lift
amid these, humanity’s darkest days, surely, in the memory of anyone living. It
was from George Burchett, an Australian painter who resides in Hanoi, the city
of his birth.
George was
born in Hanoi because he is the offspring of Wilfred Burchett, one of the
towering greats among 20th century correspondents. Wilfred is celebrated for
many things, one of which is his coverage of Vietnam’s anti-imperialist wars,
of which there are two, from the North.
And George
wanted to remind those who receive his privately distributed newsletter, People’s Information Bureau, that it
is time to mark the 70th anniversary of the victory of the Viêt
Minh, Ho Chi Minh’s revolutionary movement, over the French at Ðiên Biên Phú,
a valley in the remote highlands hard by the Laotian border in northwestern
Vietnam.
The battle
of Ðiên Biên Phú lasted 55 days, from March 13 to May 7, 1954. Two
months after the French were catastrophically defeated they signed the Geneva
Accords, wherein they agreed to withdraw all forces not only from Vietnam but
also from Cambodia and Laos, France’s other colonial possessions in Indochina.
The Viêt Minh victory at Ðiên Biên Phú makes riveting history
all by itself. John Prados, a lately departed friend,
wrote my favorite among the many books on the topic. As the French grew
desperate, he recounted in The Sky
Would Fall (Dial, 1983), the Eisenhower administration made plans to
intervene against the Viêt Minh — plans that included
America’s second use of atomic bombs.
Eisenhower,
the Dulles brothers (John Foster at State, Allen at the C.I.A.), and others
never got beyond an extensive but covert operation before the French forces
under Christian de Castries went down. But we find in Prados’
book a suggestion of the madness and delusion that started the Second Indochina
War and prolonged it for 21 years.
Washington’s
policy cliques, not to mention certifiable paranoids such as the Dulles
brothers, are incapable of learning anything from anything, so captive are they within our republic’s exceptionalist
ideology. The post–Vietnam record of American foreign policy demonstrates this
all too amply.
But there
are lessons the rest of us can learn from the Vietnamese triumph at Ðiên Biên Phú
and its defeat of the Americans in the two decades and a year of war that
followed. Let us not miss these for the light they shed on the world we see out
our windows and how we should act upon it.
Strategic Genius
General Võ Nguyên Giáp
proved himself a strategic genius as he led the Viêt Minh forces to victory at Ðiên
Biên Phú. He famously
surrounded the French from the hills that enclosed de Castries’ garrison and
made full use of guerrilla tactics as he deployed heavy artillery, carefully
arranged for maximum impact, in an elaborate system of tunnels to evade French
bombardments.
As is
recounted in the histories, men and women in Ho’s revolutionary movement had to
disassemble Giáp’s heavy guns to transport them, on
foot and by bicycle, piece by piece, up the mountains surrounding the French,
where they were put back together and into service. Giáp
destroyed de Castries’ airstrip and, with heavy ground fighting, steadily
reduced the French perimeter until the fighting was bloodily close.
The Viêt Minh had defeated and captured 12,000 surviving French
troops in less than two months. Giáp had not lost a
single piece of artillery. The French were at the table in Geneva on May 8, a
day after de Castries surrendered. A month later the French government fell.
Thomas Meaney, in a brief but very good piece in the New Left Review’s Sidecar section,
described Ðiên Biên Phú as “the Stalingrad of decolonization.” For historical
perspective it does not get much pithier: Ðiên Biên Phú stands high among the
non–West’s first decisive triumphs against the aggressions of the imperial
powers during what we call “the independence era.”
How did
the Vietnamese prevail at that world-historical moment? In this lies one lesson
worth learning. . . . .
+
“West Sleepingwalking
into Major Wars”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56I0fq0NZ9o&si=I67OU5oJNocKlS5q
with Glen Diesen,
Alastair Crooke, and Alexander Mercouris
(1:19:06)
+
“‘The Train Has Left the Station
and No One Can Stop It’. Europe Will be at War with
Russia. Serbia’s President A. Vucic”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/train-left-station-no-one-stop/5859967
by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
These are the words of Serbia’s President Aleksander Vucic. He ought to
know. He is in the middle of it. He thinks Europe will be at war with Russia in
“not more than three or four months,” if that long.
President Vucic says “no one is attempting to stop the war. Nobody is
speaking about peace. Peace is almost a forbidden word.” Scroll down for text and 5 minute video
READ MORE:
The Ever
Widening War
Hungarian
leader Viktor Orban has a similar view as does
Slovakian president Robert Fico, who survived a recent assassination
attempt.
In Western
Europe, UK, and Washington everyone is talking about wider war with long
range missiles used for attacks deep into Russia. Such attacks cannot
revive the defeated Ukrainian military. Their purpose seems to be to provoke
Russia into a retaliation that Washington can use to widen the war.
President Vucic is correct. The West is making no effort–indeed, is
avoiding all effort–to defuse the dangerous situation. Instead, the West is throwing
oil on fire with long range missile attacks and French troops sent into
Ukraine.
It has
been completely clear from day one that Putin’s limited drawn-out war enabled
the West to get more and more involved into the conflict to the point that the
conflict now is really between the West and Russia. As President Vucic says, the West’s prestige is now involved and the
West cannot permit Russia to prevail.
It seems
that Putin might have finally realized that the war is no longer limited to
Donbas and has become a wider threat that is not subject to negotiation on
terms that Russia can accept.
Now that
Putin is backed into a corner with the prospect of NATO missiles striking deep
into Russia, President Vucic’s expectation that war
is close at hand is understandable. The way matters are shaping up, the
avoidance of war depends on how many provocations the Kremlin will accept and
for how long. Putin needs to quickly knock Ukraine out of the war before
Ukraine fills up with NATO military personnel.
Zelensky’s term has expired, making him
illegitimate. Russian forces should quickly take Kiev,
install a new government agreeable to Ukraine as a neutral country and to the
reunification of Donbas with Russia.
I don’t
know if Putin still has time to avoid a larger war by quickly winning the
current conflict or whether Putin has been fighting on the cheap and lacks the
force size to take Kiev and control the country.
If Putin
has been too limited in his goal and too parsimonious with his means, he has
bought himself a wider war.
+
“Russia Readies War With NATO”
https://www.youtube.com/live/A4fll7taZTw
with Judge Napolitano and Pepe Escobar
(35:02)
In this
eye-opening discussion, we sit down with the renowned geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar to delve into the escalating tensions between
Russia and NATO. Escobar provides an in-depth analysis of
Russia's strategic maneuvers, the implications for the ongoing Russia-Ukraine
war, and the potential for a broader conflict. We also explore the
recent deployment of Russian warships and submarines to Cuba, adding a new
dimension to the geopolitical chessboard. Don't miss this critical conversation
that sheds light on the future of global stability.
+
“Scott Ritter Reveals: Russia's
Hypersonic Strike on NATO Officers”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFE-E00CjJQ&si=GFnqiAdBVRlrV5f5
by Studio HD
(10:08)
Join Scott
Ritter as he reveals the shocking details of Russia's hypersonic missile strike
that wiped out 400 NATO officers in Lviv. In this
explosive analysis, we delve into the chaos and confusion that followed within
NATO ranks, the strategic implications of this devastating blow, and how it has
reshaped the conflict in Ukraine. Discover the untold story behind Russia's
precision strike and what it means for the future of this high-stakes conflict.
Stay informed on the latest developments and understand
the deeper complexities at play.
+
“The Heat | FAB-3000 Strikes Are
Intensifying | NATO Mission in Ukraine | Military Summary 2024.06.21”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CouDO5gGgXo
(27:11, with transcript)
+
“Outcome Document Is A Huge Blow
AGAINST Ukraine. The "Peace Formula" Is Gone!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpC75JN6-3A
(18:03, with Transcript)
Read the
surprising outcome document of the "peace summit" held in Switzerland
on June 15 and 16. Zelensky's "Peace
Formula" is nowhere to be found, and the main points of the document are a
no-brainer but STILL some crucial countries did not join the communiqué. Here
is the actual communiqué: https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/en/home/... While the media attention was all about the photo shoot, the actual
content of what was agreed on is near nothing which, in fact, might actually
open up the doors toward negotiations, since the content is so thin that Russia
might actually sign up to half of them.
+
“G7 and the decline of empire”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dn5E5RumYc
with Alexr Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris
(21:14)
+
“The
Decline of the West. The G7 ‘War Summit’”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/g7-decline-west/5860237
by Manlio Dinucci
The G7 Summit under the Italian
presidency, organized by the Meloni Government in
Puglia, proclaimed as its priority “the defence of the international system
based on the force of law”, declaring that “the Russian war of aggression on
Ukraine has undermined its principles and has unleashed growing instability,
visible in the various crisis hotspots.”
This was declared by the G7, where six members (United States, Canada,
Great Britain, France, Germany, and Italy) are NATO major powers, they exploded
the war in Ukraine against Russia, and Japan, NATO’s major partner in East Asia
against China, was added to.
Billions of Euros Paid by Us. They Feed War and Corruption
in Ukraine.
The idyllic staging with which this Summit was presented cannot hide the
fact that it is a war summit.
The United States signed a 10-year military pact with Ukraine, and the G7
granted a $50 billion loan to help it buy more weapons, a loan will be repaid
using interest accrued on $300 billion in Russian assets mostly deposited in
European banks and frozen. The defence ministers of the 6 G7 countries
belonging to NATO have simultaneously decided to provide Ukraine with further
significant military aid and to allocate 43 billion dollars a year to continue
fuelling the war in the heart of Europe.
In the G7’s sights, there is not only Russia but the entire BRICS
organization, this year under the Russian presidency, which has expanded from 5
to 10 members and is further developing: there are over 30 countries that want
to join it. Already today the gross domestic product of the BRICS exceeds that
of the G7 and the forecasts for 2024-2029 indicate an economic growth of the
BRICS, particularly China, of 44% compared to 21% of the G7. Not being able to
prevent the development of the BRICS with economic instruments, the G7 tries to
maintain its dominance with military instruments.
Pope Francis was invited to the G7 in Puglia to give a semblance of peace
to this war summit.
Here Pope Francis met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr
Zelensky, without saying a word about the fact
that he is persecuting the Russian Orthodox Church in Ukraine, from which the
Ukrainian church has carried out a schism, functional to the war against
everything Russian.
+
“Putin names conditions for
Ukraine peace talks”
https://informationclearinghouse.blog/2024/06/14/putin-names-conditions-for-ukraine-peace-talks/09/
by Russia
& FSU
===========
b.
“Dennis Kucinich: America Prepares
for Global War and Restarts the Draft for 18-26 Year Olds”
by Dennis Kucinich
Greetings to Young Americans: You
are Automatically Registered for the Draft
Conscription without Representation? Where and WHY are we sending our Kids to
War?
Our
government is planning a big draft, conscripting millions of young Americans
for an even bigger war!
I call to
your attention a Democratic amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA), which was slipped into the almost trillion-dollar Pentagon war spending
bill, by voice vote, in the House Armed Services committee.
The
Democratic Amendment to H.R. 8070, the National Defense Authorization (NDAA)
reads:
Section 531. Selective Service System:
Automatic Registration. SEC. 3. (a)(1) “Except
as otherwise provided in this title, every male citizen of the United States,
and every other male person residing in the United States, between the
ages of eighteen and twenty-six, shall be automatically registered under this
Act by the Director of the Selective Service System.”
This amendment
is in the NDAA legislation and there is no pending amendment to strip it from
the bill. So, when the NDAA passes, as early as this week, Congress
will have taken steps to make automatic conscription the law of the land.
Why an
automatic draft? Members of Congress and the President have an obligation
to explain to the American people to which foreign land will
their sons, and perhaps their daughters, be sent to die?
The U.S.
has been in a continuous “State of Emergency” since September 11, 2001, which
provides a president with over 100 powers he would not ordinarily have.
Notwithstanding that the automatic draft provision will go into effect in a
year, a presidential order invoking emergency powers and/or an Act of
Congress, could readily move millions from their civilian lives to the front
lines of a war.
WHAT WE
KNOW:
President Biden’s recent D-Day speech, quoted in Politico, contained this noteworthy warning for young Americans: “The price of unchecked tyranny is the blood of the young and the brave.” . . . .
“Uncle Sam Wants You, to Kill and
Die for the Empire”
Man burns
draft card on the steps of the Capitol in Washington on January 10, 1967. (AP
Photo/Charles Tasnadi)
https://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php/index.php/uncle-sam-wants-you-kill-and-die-empire
by Margaret Kimberley
The Biden administration and congress work together in their
efforts to secure what they think is U.S. domination. They are playing a
dangerous game and now try to bring back a draft through sleight of hand.
The United
States ended conscription, the military draft, in 1973. The all volunteer
military came about because of mass protest over the Vietnam war.
Richard Nixon believed, and not without reason, that opposition to the war
would wane, and his re-election chances would improve, if young men didn’t fear
being called up for service. The draft was becoming more and more unpopular, as
activists raided
draft board offices and young men burned their draft
cards. In so doing they forced the issue which led to the end of conscription.
But it was
not long before a different kind of draft re-emerged. In 1980 under pressure
from the Iran hostage crisis and an election campaign in which he was painted
as being “weak” on defense, Jimmy Carter enacted a Selective
Service system which required young men to
register for a kind of quasi conscription when they turned 18 years of age.
They did not have to serve, but they had to sign up.
There were
punishments, including being charged with a felony, and various inducements
such as being eligible for student loans or government employment, which were
withheld from those who didn’t register. But registration continued to lag as
enforcement disappeared, memories grew short, and the military fell deeper into
disfavor with young people. The army, navy
and air force all fell short of their
recruitment goals in the last fiscal year.
Now as the
United States escalates tensions with Russia and China the issue has returned. Congress has added new provisions to
the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which will begin automatic
enrollment in Selective Service instead of
depending upon individuals to sign up. An additional proposal would expand the
enrollment requirement to young women.
There are
many among anti-war forces who saw a return to conscription
as the antidote to the post-September 11 forever wars. The thinking went that a
nation that might put persons from every class in harm's way would be more
hesitant to instigate aggressions. This theory is based on the assumption that
the United States has no other way to destabilize nations other than invading
militarily. But the assumption is faulty for two reasons.
One, the
United States does not always need the proverbial boots on the ground in order
to wage proxy wars or impose sanctions in order to harm the countries it
designates as its adversaries. Libya was destroyed with the help of jihadist
proxies. Not one American was ever on the ground in a combat role. Unilateral
coercive measures, sanctions, are imposed through financial means and can
devastate a nation without the need of bombs or bullets. A lack of personnel
was not an impediment to imperial plotting.
Secondly,
many things have changed as the crisis of the empire has worsened. The hands off approach doesn’t always work as the war makers
would like. The U.S. couldn’t invade Iraq in the Gulf wars
of 1991 and 2003 without calling in reservists. The three
service personnel killed in Jordan in January 2024
were all reservists. The all volunteer military can’t provide an empire with
more than 800 military bases around the world, and which has endless designs on
domination, with enough person power to do its dirty deeds.
Now the
Biden administration is escalating conflicts with Russia and China, giving
Ukraine the green light to attack inside of Russia and turning Taiwan into an
anti-China proxy. None of their designs work out quite as they expect, and
plans to turn the ruble to rubble or to dethrone China as an economic power
have failed thus far.
But
desperate times call for desperate and foolish measures. An inept and
amateurish administration just doubles down on its past failures. If sanctions don’t
bring regime change and economic collapse to Russia, perhaps a hot war will or
so the thinking goes among the people who thought blowing up the NordStream pipeline was a good idea.
The most
shocking thing about the automatic registration provision is how little ire it
has created. The few news stories are mostly written to debunk the idea that
conscription has returned. But it has returned, just on the sly. No one will
confess to bringing back the draft. They will talk about readiness and
fairness, as Democratic
representative Chrissy Houlahan
pointed out. “By using available federal databases,
the [Selective Service] agency will be able to register all of the individuals
required and thus help ensure that any future military draft is fair and
equitable.”
Why is
there a future need for a draft at all? The idea of using federal databases
ought to give everyone pause. Why does the federal government need to comb
through records of every teenage boy in the country if there is no intention of
going to war? The very idea is fascist by definition and should cause outrage..
This “just in case” scenario is a slippery slope for a crumbling yet
dangerous empire. The U.S. has either lost wars
outright as in Vietnam and Afghanistan, or triumphed over countries like Iraq
which were out of their depth militarily. Not only is draft registration
dubious but it will lead the foreign policy establishment to renew its
fantasies about winning wars when they can’t.
+
“NATO: 500,000 Troops on High
Readiness for War with Russia”
https://scheerpost.com/2024/06/18/nato-500000-troops-on-high-readiness-for-war-with-russia/
by Kyle Anzalone
Officials say
the alliance now has hundreds of thousands of soldiers ready to deploy to fight
Russia within a month.
+
“US Senator Says Ukraine Is ‘Gold
Mine’ with $12 Trillion of Minerals ‘We Can’t Afford to Lose’”
by Ben Norton
A
prominent US lawmaker has referred to Ukraine as a “gold mine”, insisting the
West must maintain access to its estimated $12 trillion worth of critical
minerals.
US Senator
Lindsey Graham made these comments in a June 10 interview on the CBS program
“Face the Nation”.
“They’re
sitting on $10 to $12 trillion of critical minerals in Ukraine”, Graham said.
“They
could be the richest country in all of Europe. I don’t want to give that money
and those assets to Putin to share with China”, he added.
Graham, a
Republican, recalled that, when Donald Trump was president, he sent Ukraine
military aid in the form of loans.
The
senator strongly implied that Ukraine should pay the West for weapons shipments
with its large mineral reserves.
+
“Marching to Armageddon”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GpPKjHGrK8
with George Galloway
(19:51)
Israel is
poised to invade Lebanon. Seventy-thousand Israeli soldiers disabled by
ragged-assed guerillas. Kim and Putin commune. Keep
your kids close!
===========
c.
REVOLUTIONARY SUMMER SCHOOL 2024
https://7q0j7.r.sp1-brevo.net/mk/mr/sh/1t6AVsd2XFnIGBpQkfOkP7c2Y0lzQi/Tdbe6jIPwycY
by The People's Forum
Summer 2024 is on fire! Today we
launch registrations for SPARK! Organizing for Revolution: Summer School at
The People's Forum, a six-week hybrid course for organizers, visionaries, and
all who are committed to struggle to build a new world, which will take place
from July 9 to August 15.
An unprecedented mass movement for
Palestine has taken the world by storm, igniting a profound shift in the
consciousness of millions, while the U.S. ruling class, desperate to maintain
its hegemony, is struggling to fulfill its imperialist agenda as it enters a
controversial election cycle in the midst of a serious political crisis. The
future, uncertain and volatile, holds many dangers but also many opportunities
for the working and oppressed class.
One thing is certain – the people of
the world demand change. But how does historical and societal change actually
occur? What does it mean to be a revolutionary in times of intense political
crisis? How do we organize for revolution?
+
“UK’s complicity in Gaza”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVfrjU7zW5c&si=DrxK5tBjZ5ECBo32
with George Galloway
(58:23, with transcript)
In this
week's episode of "Have it Out with Galloway," George Galloway delves
into UK’s General Election and explores Britain’s involvement in the
Israel-Gaza war. George is joined by Sameh
Habeeb - British-Palestinian
journalist, and a live audience.
+
“Europe’s Elections as a Mirror”
https://scheerpost.com/2024/06/16/patrick-lawrence-europes-elections-as-a-mirror/
by Patrick Lawrence
+
“Expanding
Middle East War. Planned
US-Israeli Attack on Iran, The War on Energy,
Strategic Waterways”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/planned-us-israeli-attack-on-iran-2/5615443
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky
This article originally published
on November 11, 2023 was revised on January 14th, 2024 with a focus on the
dangers of escalation and the role of “False Flags”.
In recent
developments, in response to Israel’s bombing of Iran’s Consulate in Damascus,
according to media reports:
Iran has
launched more than
300 cruise and ballistic missiles and drones at Israel, IDF officials said, a retaliatory attack weeks after an Israeli
strike on the Iranian consular building
in Syria killed two of Tehran’s top commanders.
“There
were explosions visible in the air over Jerusalem as air sirens rang throughout
the country.”
“Iran said
that after tonight’s attack, the “matter can be deemed concluded” unless there
is more violence.”
The
fundamental question is whether this retaliatory attack will lead to
escalation, including an Israeli counter-attack on Iran.
Video Interview
Video
produced in November 2023
Expanding Middle East War.
Planned
US-Israeli Attack on Iran,
The
War on Energy, Strategic Waterways
byMichel Chossudovsky
1. In
Solidarity with Palestine
We stand in Solidarity with Palestine. But we must recognize
that the United States Military and Intelligence apparatus
is firmly behind Israel’s genocide directed against the People of Palestine.
And this must be part of the solidarity campaign, namely to Reveal the Truth
regarding Washington’s insidious role, which is part of a carefully planned
military agenda directed against Palestine and the broader Middle East.
Netanyahu is a proxy, with a criminal record. He has the unbending support
of Western Europe’s “Classe politique”.
The U.S. led War on the People of
Palestine and the Middle East is a Criminal Undertaking
Israel and
the Zionist lobby in the U.S. are NOT exerting undue influence AGAINST
U.S. Foreign Policy as outlined by numerous analysts.
Quite the opposite. The Zionist lobby is firmly
aligned with U.S. foreign policy, and Vice Versa. It targets those who
are opposed to war, who call for a cease
fire. It exerts influence in favour of the
conduct of the U.S. military agenda in support of Israel.
The US military-intelligence
establishment in coordination with powerful financial interests is calling the
shots in regards to Israel’s genocidal intent to “Wipe Palestine off the Map”.
2. Triggering “False Flags”
Inciting
Escalation in The Red Sea and the Eastern Mediterranean
Let us be under no illusions.
Remember Pearl Harbor, The Gulf of Tonkin, 9/11. “False Flags” are part of the
history of modern warfare. They are sophisticated intelligence operations often
requiring infiltration into enemy ranks.
Starting in the immediate wake of
the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack, US-NATO war ships –including
aircraft carriers, combat planes, naval vessels have been deployed in both
the Eastern Mediterranean and the Red Sea.
These deployments have been
described in chorus by the mainstream media as a response to “Palestine’s
[alleged] Aggression against the Jewish State”.
They are
tagged as humanitarian undertakings: Coming to the rescue of Israel. Responsibility to Protect (R2P).
The False
Flag concept requires inciting your enemy or an armed jihadist group to
confront or “attack America” thereby providing a justification
to strike back in self defense: The Houthis in
the Red Sea and Hezbollah in the Eastern Mediterranean both of which
are allies of Iran.
Trigger
one or more incidents with a view to justifying a process of military
escalation.
In recent
developments, the “False Flag agenda” has evolved towards US-NATO air and naval
attacks against Yemen.
“Sadeh, Zubaydah, Abs, Bani, Sana, Hudaydah, and Taiz have been attacked by American forces, initiating yet
another war without Congressional approval, a branch of the US government
emptied of power.
The New
York Times, of course, blames the expansion of the conflict on the Houthis for interfering with shipping to
Israel.” (Paul Craig Roberts)
The
endgame is to incite Iran through various means to enter the Middle East
battlefield, which would lead eventually to a process of escalation. The media
is now using the term: “Iranian Proxies” in an ambivalent report by the
NYT:
According
to US officials, there is no direct evidence linking Iran to Red Sea attacks
There is
no direct evidence to show senior Iranian commanders ordered Yemen’s Houthi rebels to launch attacks on ships in the Red Sea,
according to a New York Times report citing US intelligence officials.The
unnamed sources said they continue to assess that Iran isn’t interested in a
wider war, even though it encouraged Houthi
operations in the Red Sea.
“The whole
purpose of the Iranian proxies, they argue, is to find a way to punch at Israel
and the United States without setting off the kind of war that Iran wants to
avoid,” the news report said.
“There is
no direct evidence that senior Iranian leaders, either the commander of the
elite Quds Force or the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali
Khamenei, ordered the recent Houthi
attacks on ships in the Red Sea.” (Quoted
by Al Jazeera)
3.
America’s Military Doctrine: Targeting and Killing Civilians . . . .
===========
d.
“Strip Away the Lies: Israel’s Naked
Colonialism Nears Its End”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARbhZQBlvJI
by BreakThrough News, with Professor Prof. Joseph Massad
To discuss
Israel’s genocide in Gaza and the myths its supporters use to justify it, Rania Khalek was joined by Joseph
Massad, Professor of Modern Arab Politics and
Intellectual History at Columbia University and the author of many books
including “The Persistence of the Palestinian Question,” “Islam In Liberalism”
and “Desiring Arabs.” He also writes a bimonthly column in Middle East Eye in
English and in Arabi21 in Arabic.
+
“Moving towards Lebanon offensive”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kdn2uqz9_k0&si=zdTPeXF4OwOM_jr8
with Alex Christoforou
and Alexander Mercouris
(12:49, with transcript)
+
“Israel and Hezbollah Prepare for
Full-Scale Conflict”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmOSS9TzEKE
by DW News
(11:36)
In a
televised address, Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah
warned that nowhere in Israel would be safe in the event of an all-out war. He
also threatened to attack Cyprus if it opened its airports and bases to Israeli
forces.
+
“Hezbollah publishes drone footage
claiming to show surveillance of Haifa”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvoRVKlVCug
by Al Jazeera
(10:57)
Hezbollah
has released a video of what it says is undetected drone footage of sensitive
military sites in Israel. The group says it shows various locations including
the Israeli city of Haifa and its vital civilian and military installations. Al Jazeera’s Zeina
Khodr has the latest updates from Beirut, Lebanon.
The Israeli government has banned Al Jazeera from
reporting there, so Hamdah Salhut
is monitoring the developments from the Jordanian capital, Amman.
+
“Hezbollah's
historic drone footage sends warning to Israel”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-C4rl9LoeU&si=Zg8xiebMQMJ_TWB7
with Jon Elmer
(18:30)
+
“Breaking news and analysis on day
257 of Gaza's Al-Aqsa Flood”
https://www.youtube.com/live/qkJrRmM16qk
with Nora Barrows-Friedman, Abubaker Abed, Aseel Mousa, and Jon Elmer
(3:00:25)
===========
e.
“Bombshell Drops: Israel Was In On
It!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Li164lMRR48
with Jimmy Dore and Ben Swann
(32:13)
Investigative
journalist Ben Swann has compiled substantial evidence demonstrating that the
Israeli government was aware well in advance that Hamas was planning the
October 7th attacks. Not only did Egypt warn Israel and the IDF had collected
their own intelligence, but Hamas was staging obvious military exercises
leading up to the fateful date.
+
“Gaza Horror: UN Finds Israeli
Forces Guilty of Sexual Abuse and Torture”
by Robert Inlakesh
A UN investigation
has revealed brutal acts by the Israeli military targeting men, women, and
children, with victims’ families forced to witness.
+
“German foreign minister flat out
lies about 7 October Hamas rape video”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoiAVzcDfS4
by The Electronic Intifada
(17:25)
+
“Why Have Ceasefire Negotiations
Over Gaza Repeatedly Failed?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1TOaSeI-QQ&si=zrcLnSKL0qRl0npQ
with Dr Azzam
Tamimi, and Daniel Levy
(18:19)
+
“Blinken’s
Lies About Hamas Rejecting a Ceasefire Reveal the
Biden Administration’s True Intentions”
by Mitchell Plitnick
“The
proposal that President Biden laid out 12 days ago was virtually identical to
one that Hamas had accepted and put forward itself on May the 6th. So
there’s no reason why this agreement should not be reached. The only
reason would be Hamas continuing to try to change the terms.”
So said U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken in an interview with Al Jazeera on Wednesday. The statement is part of an extended
campaign of deception that Blinken has spearheaded.
It featured President Joe Biden’s dramatic unveiling of a ceasefire proposal,
followed by a U.N. Security Council resolution and Blinken’s
latest tour of the Middle East — all ostensibly to reach a ceasefire.
The
subtlety hidden in the term “virtually identical” that Blinken
used attempts to hide some crucial differences, and betrays the real point of Blinken’s public relations sojourn.
Biden’s
proposal is very similar to the one Hamas accepted on May 6. Notably, the United States at the time explicitly said that
Hamas had not accepted the proposal. Blinken’s
blatant contradiction of his own agency’s words is typical of the prevarication
that the United States and Israel have maintained throughout recent weeks,
during which the Biden administration has gone to great lengths to create the
illusion of pressing for a ceasefire.
However,
there is a key difference between the May 6 proposal and the current one, and
it lies in Phase Two of the plan.
Biden’s
plan calls for a negotiation during Phase One that would lead to a permanent
ceasefire. He even noted, as did the Security Council, that if negotiations
need longer to succeed, Phase One, including its temporary ceasefire, will be extended
for as long as it takes.
But
crucially, the plan also says that if Israel decides Hamas is not negotiating
“in good faith,” it can resume its murderous rampage through Gaza. And if that
happened, it would be doing so with the full public blessing of the U.S. — a
blessing even more explicit than it has given until now.
The May 6
plan, by contrast, sees Phase Two as the final exchange of living hostages and
prisoners, the full withdrawal of all Israeli forces from Gaza, and a permanent
ceasefire put in place. Phase Two moves forward if the two sides fulfill the
practical obligations they would have committed to. In other words, there is no
need for “negotiation” because the fulfillment of the terms in Phase One leads to the execution of the terms of Phase Two.
Essentially,
the difference is that under Biden’s plan, Israel can free many hostages —
though not all — and can then simply accuse Hamas at its own discretion of not
negotiating in good faith, thereby resuming the genocide. Israeli
officials have repeatedly made this clear.
===========
f.
“Inside one Israeli death and torture camp”
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/tamara-nassar/inside-one-israeli-death-and-torture-camp
by Tamara Nassar
Torture, amputations and the fetid
smell of untreated wounds hang heavy in the air at the Sde
Teiman facility.
An army base situated between
Beersheba and Gaza in the southern Negev region, it was turned into a detention
center for Palestinians, including abductees from Gaza, before they are transferred
to other prisons.
Three Israelis who worked at the facility, and possibly
participated in abuses against Palestinians, gave testimonies and pictures to CNN of what they witnessed.
The
whistleblowers painted a grim picture of what amounts to a torture camp, where
Palestinians are held without charge, interrogated and filtered through to
detention centers or sent back to Gaza.
The
facility is segregated into two areas: one designated for the detention of 70
Palestinians from Gaza, where they are subjected to severe physical restraint,
CNN reported.
The other
section serves as a so-called field hospital, where injured detainees are
immobilized and strapped to their beds, forced to defecate in their diapers and
fed through straws.
At least
three army bases have been transformed into detention facilities since Israel’s
genocide in Gaza began on 7 October, at least so far as the Israeli military
has admitted to: Sde Teiman
in Israel, and the Anatot and Ofer
military bases in the occupied West Bank.
The number
of Palestinians detained at those facilities is unknown.
During its
ground invasion, the Israeli army converted schools within the Gaza Strip into
military bases and detention centers, according to
the group Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor.
One
notable example is the Salah al-Din preparatory school in Gaza City. That
school was transformed by Israeli occupation forces into a detention and
interrogation center for hundreds of Palestinians in February.
Recent
legal amendments have paved the way for such facilities, notably the “unlawful
combatant law,” which expands Israeli authorities’ powers to detain
Palestinians without charge, trial, seeing a judge or legal oversight for up to
75 days after arrest.
Detainees
may also be deprived of legal counsel for up to six months.
“Unlawful
combatants” have previously included individuals
such as an elderly Palestinian woman with Alzheimer’s.
Formerly
detained Palestinians at Sde Teiman
have also described the harrowing conditions inflicted by Israeli authorities.
Pictures
leaked to CNN depict rows of prisoners handcuffed, blindfolded and held behind
a fence under floodlights.
“The
prisoners are subjected to collective beatings and abuse by soldiers, using
profanities that prisoners are unable to repeat,” prisoners rights group Addameer reported.
“They are
also forced to kneel on gravel or asphalt, spending their days with their hands
bound and blindfolded, unable to speak to each other.”
Addameer said Israeli interrogators
torture detainees and subject them to “dignity-stripping treatment,” including
stress positions for hours as well as sleep deprivation.
+
“Australian Doctor REVEALS
Experience INSIDE Gaza”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pynvwAli_yo
(28:12)
Australian
Orthopaedic Surgeon, Dr Aziz Bhimani
recounts his first-hand experiences inside Gaza after participating in a United
Nations humanitarian medical convoy.
+
“Israel's national murder-suicide
pact”
https://electronicintifada.net/content/israels-national-murder-suicide-pact/46006
by Asa Winstanley
(3:38)
An Israeli father gave a frightening
TV interview back in February.
Thomas Hand grasped the small palm
of his 9-year-old daughter Emily. The girl had been released in a
prisoner exchange with Hamas only a few months prior.
As she watched
on, her father told Israeli interviewer Tali Moreno
he had been willing to sacrifice her, in order to further Israel’s genocidal
war effort against the Palestinians in Gaza.
Speaking
of her short time in Palestinian captivity, he said that the Israeli military
“had to do everything in its powers to destroy Hamas,” even if that meant
killing his own daughter.
“I
realized that she could be bombed, could be shot by friendly fire,” he said.
And yet: “That was a price that in my head, I could say: ‘Yeah okay.’ So long as we destroy Hamas.”
You can
watch the relevant clip in the video above.
The
interview was with Israel’s Kan, a
state-funded channel. Although conducted mostly in English, there are a few
exchanges in Hebrew with Emily herself. You can watch a subtitled version of
the full interview here.
But Hand’s
cold-blooded attitude towards his own child is only one example of a wider
phenomenon in Israeli society.
+
“‘We’re all at risk of being
targeted’: Doctors Evacuate Rafah’s Last Hospitals”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/doctors-evacuate-rafah-last-hospitals/5858086
by Ruwaida
Kamal Amer
Almost no facilities remain to treat
the wounded in Gaza's southernmost city, as doctors fear a repeat of Israel's
attacks on hospitals across the Strip.
On May 30, the World Health Organization announced that Rafah’s
last remaining hospital, the Al-Helal al-Emirati
Hospital, had gone out of service. The destruction of the southern Gaza city’s
health care system, which comes after more than two dozen hospitals across the
Strip have completely
shut down as a
result of Israel’s assault, encapsulates the human toll of the intensifying
Israeli military
operation in Rafah.
Far from
the “limited” invasion that Israel’s leaders proclaimed, Israeli forces are
currently occupying the heart of the city and remain in control of the Rafah Crossing and Philadelphi
Corridor, while airstrikes continue to pummel camps for displaced families.
Since Israel’s incursion began on May 6, more than 1 million
Palestinians have fled Gaza’s last refuge.
In
addition to the Emirati Hospital, the Abu Yousef al-Najjar Hospital and the Kuwaiti Hospital have been forced
to cease all functions in recent weeks. With several smaller clinics closing
too, all that remains to serve Rafah’s sick and
wounded is two small field hospitals in the coastal area of Al-Mawasi — one run
by the United Arab Emirates, and the other by the International Medical Corps —
which are ill-equipped to deal with the scale of suffering among those unable
or unwilling to flee the city.
With
Israel’s ground invasion continuing to advance toward western Rafah, these remaining clinics may also soon be forced to
evacuate. And while a trickle of seriously wounded patients had been leaving
Gaza via the Rafah Crossing for treatment abroad,
nobody has been able to escape the Strip since Israel occupied the crossing.
Muhammad Zaqout, the Gaza Health Ministry’s director general of
hospitals, told +972 that staff at Rafah’s hospitals
evacuated “because they feared a repeat of what happened at Nasser Medical
Complex and Al-Shifa Hospital.” Israeli forces
besieged and raided both hospitals in recent months, in Khan Younis and Gaza City respectively; after their withdrawal,
mass graves containing hundreds of bodies were found at both sites.
READ MORE: “Where Can We Go?”: Terror
and Panic Set In as Israel Readies to Invade Rafah
+
“Why Israel is in deep trouble”
https://youtube.com/watch?v=kAfIYtpcBxo&si=pvwT1uWODIbUNkMn
with John Mearsheimer
with Tom Switzer
(1:35:00)
US National
Security Adviser Jake Sullivan said on 29 September 2023 that “The Middle East
region is quieter today than it has been in two decades.” That all changed on
October 7 when Hamas attacked Israel, which unsurprisingly invaded Gaza to
destroy Hamas. After more than six months, it appears to
many that Israel is losing its war in Gaza. At the same time, Israel is
fighting Hezbollah on its northern border, relations between Jerusalem and
Washington are strained, and the International Court of Justice has ruled that
a plausible case can be made that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.
Meanwhile, there is great danger of escalation across the region, as the
fighting between Israel and Iran makes clear. Indeed, there is a possibility
the United States, which is already fighting the Houthis,
might end up in a war with Iran, which neither country wants. What might be the
lasting consequences of these conflicts? Who will emerge weaker and who
stronger? And what does this crisis mean for U.S. foreign policy in the region,
Ukraine and East Asia?
===========
g.
“Richard Wolff on the decline of
the US empire and the denial of the US”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogH0wRD0Vkw
(57:04)
+
“Why Does the Government Borrow
When It Can Print?”
https://scheerpost.com/2024/06/18/ellen-brown-why-does-the-government-borrow-when-it-can-print/
by Ellen Brown
In the first seven months of Fiscal Year (FY) 2024, net interest (payments minus income) on the
federal debt reached $514 billion, exceeding spending on both national defense
($498 billion) and Medicare ($465 billion). The interest tab also exceeded all
the money spent on veterans, education, and transportation combined. Spending on
interest is now the second largest line item in the federal budget after Social
Security and the fastest growing part of the budget, on track to reach $870
billion by the end of 2024.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, the federal budget deficit was $857 billion in the first seven months
of fiscal year 2024. In effect, the government is borrowing at interest to pay
the interest on its debt, compounding the debt. For the lender, it’s called
“the miracle of compound interest” – interest on interest compounds
exponentially. But for the debtor, it’s a curse, compounding like a cancer to
the point of devouring assets while still growing the debt. As Daniel Amerman, a chartered financial analyst, writes in an
article titled “Could A Compound Interest
Wildfire Threaten U.S. Solvency?”. . . .
+
“De-Dollarization Bombshell: The
Coming of BRICS+ Decentralized Monetary Ecosystem”
https://informationclearinghouse.blog/2024/05/23/de-dollarization-bombshell/
by Pepe
Escobar
Get ready for what may well be the geoeconomic bombshell of 2024: the coming of a
decentralized monetary ecosystem.
Welcome to
The Unit – a
concept that has already been discussed by the financial services and
investments working group set up by the BRICS+ Business Council and has a serious
shot at becoming official BRICS+ policy as early as in 2025.
According
to Alexey Subbotin, founder
of Arkhangelsk Capital Management and one of the Unit’s conceptualizers,
this is a new problem-solving system that addresses the key geoeconomic
issue of these troubled times: a global crisis of trust.
He knows
all about it first-hand: a seasoned financial professional with experience in
investment banking, asset management and corporate matters, Subbotin
leads the Unit project under the auspices of IRIAS, an international
intergovernmental organization set up in 1976 in accordance with the UN
statute.
The Global
Majority has had enough of the centrally controlled monetary framework put in
place 80 years ago in Bretton Woods and its endemic
flaws: chronic
deficits fueling irresponsible military spending; speculative bubbles; politically motivated sanctions and secondary sanctions; abuse of
settlement and payment infrastructure; protectionism; and the lack of fair
arbitration.
In
contrast, the Unit proposes a reliable, quick and economically efficient
solution for cross-border payments. The – transactional – Unit is a
game-changer as a new form of international currency that can be issued in a
de-centralized way, and then recognized and regulated at national level.
+
“WEST'S COLOSSAL MISTAKE: US
Decline, Rise of BRICS, Tariffs Damage US Economy”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KFSFQidUiQ
with Prof. Richard Wolff
(1:00:51)
===========
h.
“Globalist Succession Crisis”
https://corbettreport.com/nwnw555/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
with James Corbett
(25:36)
+
“Midazolam
deaths”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGk6_w1Bv6A
with Dr. John Campbell
(14:28)
+
“Mast cell activation syndrome”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYUV5cwysM8&si=zG-NCXt8nXQRRp5T
with Dr. John Campbell
(1:17:05)
+
“The Infected Blood Scandal: A
Shocking Window Into the Pharmaceutical ‘Business with
Disease’”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/infected-blood-scandal-pharmaceutical-business-disease/5858062
by Paul Anthony Taylor
Between the 1970s and early 1990s, over 30,000
patients in the UK were treated with blood transfusions or blood-derived
products contaminated with HIV or hepatitis C. This led to more than 3,000
deaths and left thousands of people with ongoing health problems. A new report has concluded that UK
authorities deliberately covered up and downplayed the scandal for decades,
with drug companies such as Bayer and Armour
Pharmaceuticals accused of knowing treatments were
infected but continuing to sell them anyway. The scandal provides a shocking
window into the profit-driven nature of the pharmaceutical ‘business
with disease.’
The problem began when, during the 1970s, the UK’s
National Health Service (NHS) was unable to meet the demand for blood and
blood-derived products. As a result, products were imported into the UK from
the United States and other countries where paid blood donors were used. These
donors included prisoners and drug addicts at high risk of being infected with
HIV or hepatitis C. Routine screening for HIV in blood and blood products
didn’t begin in the UK until 1985, with screening for hepatitis C starting in
1991.
People with hemophilia and other clotting disorders
were significantly impacted by the scandal as they received treatments made
from large batches of contaminated blood plasma. Inevitably, therefore,
infected individuals sometimes unknowingly passed on HIV or hepatitis C to
their partners. Despite the growing number of victims, for many years the NHS
and successive British governments refused to accept that any wrong had been
done. In reality, however, the UK was one of the last developed countries to
start screening blood for hepatitis C. It had also delayed the introduction of
heat treatment for blood products to eliminate HIV. Clearly, therefore, while
UK authorities have long pretended otherwise, the scandal was not an accident.
SEE, also the Video:
Vitamin D Is More Effective Than the COVID-19 Jab
“A
Day of Shame for the British State” . . . .
+
“The Rise of COVID 2.0? Beware the WHO’s Pandemic
Industrial Complex”
by Michael Welch, Dr. Meryl Nass, and Michelle Leduc Catlin
(audio,
59:00)
“We saw the buildup of events from the swine flu of 2009,
Zika, the Ebola scare of 2014, et cetera.
Escalating throughout the 2010’s into the Covid
scare of the past few years.
And now, we are on the cusp of potentially another scare
which might cause the actual political impetus and even
the public to get on board
with the idea of the World Health Organization swooping
in
to save
the day with their brand new pandemic agreement.”
– James
Corbett, November 2023[1]
“It is not a matter of if a pandemic will happen again; it is a matter of
when.”
– World
Health Organization (May 10, 2024)
At this
point in time when the worst of the sinister Coronavirus
“pandemic” is thought to be behind us, the arrival of another alert of another
killer disease may be stampeding toward us. [2][3]
After over
a year of seeing this moment in the distance, the monster is at the door, and
we must either yield to the moment and hope it isn’t as bad as some have
predicted, or fight with every fibre of our being to
preserve the rights and freedoms that may well be sacrificed to the discretion
of those who claim to safe-guard our public health.
From May
27th to June 1st, initiatives are being set before the World Health Assembly,
the decision-making body of the World Health Organization (WHO.) These include
changes to the 2005 International Health Regulation and the introduction of the
WHO Pandemic Agreement. [4][5]
What are
the implications of these changes? Essentially, according to critics, it would
turn the WHO from an agency giving advice on healing from the next pandemic to
giving orders to the world. Taking control. [6]
If you
recall, the advice during COVID-19 included lock-downs, and the massive PR
campaign related to what turned out to be a dangerous COVID-19 vaccine. As Professor
Michel Chossudovsky explains in his 2022 book,
The Worldwide Corona Crisis: Global
Coup D’etat Against Humanity,
these initatives have had very negative effects on
people throughout the globe. [7]
Should the
motions be adopted, the WHO would have even more power to command faulty
decisions to the masses.
As we
witnessed during the Corona scare, free speech could be gone, doctors questioning the health authorities could lose their medical license, travel could be
obstructed, surveillance of medical and online records an Orwellian outcome. All in an era when it seems to be getting easier
and easier to diagnose pandemics! [8]
There is
even the possibility that fighting climate change through the “One Health”
principle can open the door to extending the reach of the WHO, and by extension
the billionaires pulling the devolved WHO’s puppet
strings. [9][10]
These are
issues that should be brought to the attention of the masses. But, as is
consistent with that other marionette, the Mainstream (legacy) media, major
television, and radio stations will not likely go down this path. But the
Global Research News Hour sees it as news that IS fit for broadcast! And this
week, we will inspect some of the arguments put forward by critics.
In our
first half hour, Michelle Leduc Catlin joins us. Formerly the
spokesperson for the National Citizens Inquiry: Canada’s Response to COVID-19,
she plans to partake in the Geneva Project in the European Union next week to
rally against the WHO’s plans and put forward an alternative to the new normal
of pandemic fear forever. She talks about the trip and what Canadians can do to
help.
In our
second half hour, we are joined by Dr. Meryl Nass.
An outspoken doctor and researcher, she has been concerned for months about the
direction the Pandemic Agreement and IHR regulations may take us. She explains
in a little under half an hour the focus of her concerns, and what can and has
been done to stop politicians from signing away the rights of ‘We the People.’
What
follows is a brief review by Dr. Nass of what is at
stake. . . . .
===========
i.
“New Study documents COVID19 Vaccine harms -
Low platelets, GBS, Myocarditis - I unpack . . . ”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3dxOzpQXYg
by Vinay Prasad
MD, Professor of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medicine
(18:48)
+
“Pfizer is deeply sorry”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnVTj2Uy9yc
with Dr. John Campbell
(13:45)
+
“Confirmed horrifying scandal”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WhCu3CSu3o
with Dr. John Campbell
(19:19)
Rishi Sunak
“a day of shame for the British state” “Today’s report shows a decades-long moral
failure at the heart of our national life – from the National Health Service to
the Civil Service, to ministers in successive governments, at every level the
people and institutions in which we place our trust failed in the most
harrowing and devastating way. “They failed the victims and their families and
they failed this country.” “moral failure at the heart
of our national life” in which doctors, civil servants and ministers had put
reputations above patient safety. “On behalf of this and every government
stretching back to the 1970s, I am truly sorry.” https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024... The final report concluded Health service and governments took part in a
“chilling” cover-up, as they “closed ranks” to hide the truth, even destroying
documents to keep patients in the dark. Sir Brian Langstaff
the “horrifying” scandal could and should have been avoided, but a “catalogue
of failures” led to “calamity”. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024... “It will be astonishing to anyone who reads this report that these
events could have happened in the UK …that a level of suffering which it is
difficult to comprehend, still less understand, has been caused to so many”. victims of the scandal “have been forced into a decades-long
battle for the truth “Successive governments claimed that patients had received
the best medical treatment available at the time, and that blood screening had
been introduced at the earliest opportunity. Both claims were untrue. “Standing
back, and viewing the response of the NHS and of government overall, the answer
to the question ‘was there a cover-up?’ is that there has been. “Not in the
sense of a handful of people plotting in an orchestrated conspiracy to mislead,
but in a way that was more subtle, more pervasive and more chilling in its
implications. “In this way there has been a hiding of much of the truth.”
tragedy “was not an accident”. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024...
Transcription
. . . .
+
“End of life...”
https://youtu.be/YGk6_w1Bv6A?si=cmkOtWHbbZEIJ8AS
with Dr. John Campbell
(14:28)
+
“Midazolam
deaths …”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGk6_w1Bv6A
with Dr. John Campbell
(14:28)
+
“Child
Deaths in VAERS — Much Higher Than Reported!”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/child-deaths-vaers-much-higher-reported/5859729
by Dr. William Makis
Below is an excerpt from a report by Dr. Michael Nevradakis of the Children’s Health Defense, entitled “Number of Children Who Died After
COVID Shots Much Higher Than VAERS Reports Indicate, Analyst Says.”
Fetal deaths and miscarriages, sudden cardiac
arrest, sudden death and suicides — these are some of the causes of death
listed in reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) on children who received a COVID-19 vaccine.
Yet, these reports do not count toward the total
number of child deaths listed in VAERS data because the victims’ ages are officially
listed as “unknown,” according to VAERS analyst Albert
Benavides.
Benavides reviewed
the data for his
website, VAERSAware.com, and provided links to many of
these “unknown
age” child death reports on his site.
VAERS data as of May 31 lists 197 child
deaths following COVID-19 vaccination.
However, Benavides told The
Defender, “There
are approximately 418 properly documented deaths in children below age 18.
There are an additional approximate 120 kid deaths where the summary narrative
states ‘child, infant, neonate, baby.’”
Benavides identified these “unknown age” reports
using an algorithm and “manual intervention.”
Click here
to read the full article.
* * *
My
Take…
I have been able to confirm a lot of these deaths
myself.
Here are
182 post COVID-19 vaccine CHILD DEATHSs with “Age” left BLANK.
It’s actually shocking how many VAERS reports of
CHILD DEATHS there are, that don’t have the child’s age entered in the proper
location.
WHO
VigiAccess reports over 200,000 Pediatric Adverse
Events after taking a COVID-19 Vaccine: . . . .
Child
Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccine in the literature: (at least 4 child deaths in
peer-reviewed papers with autopsy) . . .
.
Example
of death one day after Pfizer mRNA jab: . . . .
===========
j.
“Dr. Makis
Reports VERY Good News: Paper That Lancet Published Proving Sudden Deaths By
Shots, Later Pulled Under Pressure By Pharma, Has NEW
Publisher: ‘There's Going To Be A Tsunami of Evidence.’”
by Celia Farber
Why Do The
Countless Abominations Of Longtime Lancet Editor Richard Horton Go Un-Remarked?
+
“German Lawyer Expresses Shock Over Judicial Derangement Of Fuellmich
Persecution: ‘Powers Outside Our Understanding Have Taken Control’"
by CeliaFarber
Describes a "Stasi Like Entity."
+
“THE COURAGEOUS LAWYER, GABRIELE
CURSCHMANN-KAESINGER, HAS AN IMPORTANT REQUEST. PLEASE SHARE.”
by Elsa
Gabriele Carschmann-Kaesinger, attorney at law, has shown tremendous
courage. She sent a criminal complaint against the management of Rosdorf Prison and
against the deputies on duty during the period from Friday, 3 May 24 up to and including
Sunday, 5 May 24.
You can
see the complaint here:
https://truthsummit.substack.com/p/charges-filed-against-illegal-treatmentof-reiner
So many of you ask: what can I do?
Here is one thing many of you could do: you could write a short email to
Gabriele that you support the criminal complaint.
This
morning I received a message from Katja, Reiner Füllmich’s main lawyer: . . . .
+
“BREAKING: Slovak Prime Minister
Shot and Gravely Injured, Firmly Opposed to ‘Pandemic Treaty’”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/slovak-pm-shot-gravely-injured/5857332
by Peter Koenig
PM declared Slovakia will not sign
the WHO Pandemic Treaty and the revised IHR.
Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico was shot
today – 15 May 2024 – and gravel insured, as he was greeting and shaking hands
with the crowd in the center town of Handlova,
Slovakia, where he had been attending a government meeting at the Palace of
Culture.
PM Fico is
an ardent opponent of the WHO Pandemic Treaty and the revised WHO International
Health Regulations (IHR).
PM Fico
was approached by a man in the crowd, who fired close range five shot at him,
severely injuring the PM, before the perpetrator was being tackled to the
ground and arrested by security officers.
Defense
Minister Robert Kalinak said,
“He has
multiple injuries, and his condition is extremely serious. We are still praying
for good news, but we don’t have that news yet. He has been in the operating
room for 3 ½ hours. His condition is very complicated.” . . . .
===========
k.
“‘D-day’ and WWII Examples of the
Fake Reality Offered Up by U.S. Corporate TV News Programming”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/d-day-wwii-examples-fake-reality/5860276
by Jay Janson
For much of
the past week, Western TV News has featured a Second World War anniversary
‘Glorious D-day’ celebration hailing the U.S., British Commonwealth and
Canadian amphibious invasion of France on June 6, 1944 as leading to
the defeat of Nazi Germany.Political leaders praised the veterans
still alive as having successfully fought for ‘freedom!’ Estimated
Allied Forces D-day casualties were about 10,000, with 4,000 confirmed dead.
[1]
It is agonisingly sad to imagine those, who got killed on D-day
following orders to wade forward into the firing line of German gun
emplacements, but living in true reality would mean knowing that the
Russians, (who were not invited to the D-day celebrations), had, at great
human cost, already defeated Germany the year before D-day, during the
cataclysmic battles of Stalingrad [2] and Kursk [3] in February and August
of 1943, and were by D-day 1944 pushing toward Berlin liberating Nazi
concentration camps on the way. [4]
In Western Legacy TV News Fake
Alternate Reality:
Americans,
with British Help, Defeated
Hitler’s Nazi German Armed Forces
In Reality, The
Red Army won World War II.
The Red
Army won World War II. The cost to the Soviets was between 9 million and
11 million military deaths. Adding in the Russian civilian deaths, the Soviet
Union won the war at the cost of between 25 million and 27 million Soviet
lives. By contrast total American military deaths in all of WWII were
approximately 219,723 (2,715 in North Africa,183,588
in Europe, and 108,504 in Asia) [5]
On
December 5, two days before, the United States entered World War Two, the Red
Army had begun it’s
successful enormous winter counter-offensive ending the Nazi siege of
Moscow. As early as June 1942 the Soviet Union had urged its
American and British allies to open a second front in Western Europe. It
would take the US and UK another two years to finally launch the invasion of
France. Meanwhile, the Red Army took the brunt of German military might and
millions died in the genocidal race war waged by the Nazis on the Eastern Front.[6]
Stalingrad
From 23
August 1942 to 2 February 1943, Germany and its allies fought
the Soviet Union for control of the city
of Stalingrad (now Volgograd) in Southern Russia. With
fierce close-quarters combat and heavy air raids, it was one
of the bloodiest battles in the history of warfare, with an estimated
2 million total casualties.
Soviet
forces are estimated to have suffered 1,100,000 casualties, 478,000 to 478,741
killed and approximately 40,000 civilians died. [7]
The German
defeat at Stalingrad was the turning point of the war on the Eastern Front, in
the war against Nazi Germany overall, and of the entire Second World War. [8]
German and
Axis casualties were enormous: 68 German, 19 Romanian, 10 Hungarian and 10
Italian divisions were mauled or destroyed. That represented 43% of Axis forces
in the east. After Stalingrad, the Red Army had the initiative, and the Wehrmacht was in retreat. Germany’s Sixth Army had ceased
to exist, and the armed forces of Germany’s European allies, except Finland,
had been shattered. In a speech on 9 November 1944, Hitler himself blamed
Stalingrad for Germany’s impending doom. The destruction of an entire
army, the largest killed, captured, wounded figures for Axis soldiers, during
the war, and the foiling of Germany’s grand strategy gave the battle at
Stalingrad global significance.[9]
Kursk
On 4 July
1943, Germany attacked Soviet forces around the city of Kursk, which
became the site of the largest tank battle in history
involving some 6,000 tanks, 2,000,000 troops, and 4,000 aircraft. German
forces exhausted themselves against the Soviets’
deeply echeloned and well-constructed defenses and then faced the Soviet counterattackThe Battle of Kursk marked the end of German
offensive capability on the Eastern Front [10]
While at
Kursk in Russia, 6,000 tanks and more than 2,000,000 men battled, on July 9,
1943, an American seaborne assault by the U.S. 7th Army, involving
only 150,000 troops, 3,000 ships and 4,000 aircraft landed on the southern
coast of Sicily.[11]
A Very Belated ‘D-Day’ (Operation
Overlord) at Normandy June 6, 1944
A fleet of
some 6,900 vessels landed the assault forces of slightly more than 156,000 men,
Americans, British and Canadians on five beaches,
By
the time the Allies did open this Western front in Normandy in June of
1944, the eventual defeat of Nazi Germany had already been established by the
Red Army victories at Stalingrad (August 1942-February 1943) and Kursk
(July-August 1943) the year before. At Stalingrad Germany had lost its Sixth Army
and four allied armies of over 400,000 men. Meanwhile, at Kursk
Germany had lost thirty divisions (over 500,000 men) including seven
Panzer divisions equipped with the new Panther and Tiger tanks, 1,500 tanks,
3,000 guns and 3,500 warplanes. (Thus, while the war was being won and
whole German armies destroyed at great human cost to the Soviet Red Army during
the month of July at Kursk, the Americans, British and Canadians in the same
month had been invading a weakly defended Sicily.
Throughout
most of World War II, the U.S. and the British faced 10 German divisions
combined. The Soviets were facing more than 200 German divisions. The Germans
lost approximately 1 million men on the Western front. They lost 6 million on
the Eastern front. There is reason why Churchill said the Red Army tore the
guts out of the German war machine. However, that’s not what Americans learn.[12]
The
success of the Allies after Normandy was largely due to the Germans having been
already weakened badly because of the pummeling they had taken from the Russian
Army, and were at the time of the D Day landing in retreat across Europe ahead
of the vast Red Army, which was then liberating the concentration camps. Majdanek on July 22–23, later that summer the Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka
killing centers.
By the
time Allied troops came ashore on June 6, 1944 the Russians had already fought
three years of devastating war on the Eastern Front, taking and inflicting
appalling casualties. The enormous and pivotal battles of Stalingrad and Kursk
had been fought and won.
In
addition, the greatest Soviet campaign began 17 days after D-Day.
Following
the defeat of Nazi Operation Zitadelle, the Soviets
launched counter-offensives employing six million men along a 2,400-kilometre
(1,500 mi) front as they drove the Germans westwards.
Operation Bagration, the Red Army offensive into Byelorussia from
June 23 to August 19, 1944, resulted in the destruction of 28 of 34 divisions
of the German Third Panzer, Fourth, and Ninth Armies of Army Group Center. The
gutting of German forces in the East liberated the last parts of the Soviet
Union and positioned the Red Army on the Vistula River, just across from Warsaw
and within striking distance of Berlin. [13]Operation Bagration
Was a Colossal Victory for the Red Army
– the Soviet destruction of German Army Group Centre – was,
arguably, the single most successful military action of the entire war. This
vital Soviet offensive was launched just after Allied troops had landed in
Normandy, and it is symptomatic of the lack of public knowledge about the war
in the East that whilst almost everyone has heard of D-Day, few people other
than specialist historians know much about the Soviet Operation Bagration. Yet the sheer size of Bagration
dwarfs that of D-Day. [14] Despite the recent Allied landing at
Normandy, the German army retained over 235 divisions in the East, in
comparison with roughly 85 in the West.[15]
On January
27, Soviet troops liberated Auschwitz.
February 13-14,
the U.S. continuously bombed Dresden killing 160,000 German civilians. RAF and
USAF air raids devastated Dresden, By this period,
Soviet forces had crossed the Oder River and were closing in on
Berlin. [14]
Examples of Western Press Admissions
of the Falsification of History . . . .
+
“D-Day
2024. Diana
Johnstone”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/d-day-2024-diana-johnstone/5859028
by Diana Johnstone
In retrospect, it becomes clear that
the Cold War “communist threat” was only a pretext for great powers seeking
more power.
Ceremonies were held last week commemorating the 80th
anniversary of Operation Overlord, the Anglo-American landing on the beaches of
Normandy that took place on June 6, 1944, known as D-Day. For the very
first time, the Russians were ostentatiously not invited to take part in the ceremonies.
The
Russian absence symbolically altered the meaning of the festivities. Certainly
the significance of Operation Overlord as the first step in the domination of
Western Europe by the English-speaking world was more pertinent than ever. But
without Russia, the event was symbolically taken out of the original context of
World War II.
Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelensky
was invited to give a video address to the French Parliament in honor of the
occasion. Zelensky pulled out all the rhetorical
stops to demonize Vladimir Putin, describing the Russian president as the
“common enemy” of Ukraine and Europe.
Russia, he
claimed “is a territory where life no longer has any value… It’s the opposite
of Europe, it’s the anti-Europe.”
So after 80 years, D-Day
symbolically celebrated a different alliance and a different war — or perhaps,
the same old war, but with the attempt to change the ending.
Here was a
shift in alliances which would have pleased a good part of the pre-war, British
upper class. From the time he took power, Adolf Hitler had many admirers in
Britain’s aristocracy and even in its royal family. Many saw Hitler as
the effective antidote to Russian “judeo-bolshevism.”
At the end
of the war, there were those who would have favored “finishing the job” by
turning against Russia. It has taken 80 years to make it happen. But the seeds
of the reversal were always there.
D-Day
& the Russians. . . .
===========
l.
Video: “Geopolitical Issues. “War
is a Racket… The Most Profitable”. Fear, Poverty and
Homelessness, The Depopulation Agenda”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/geopolitical-issues-peter-koenig-tnt-radio/5859182
by Peter Koenig and Charles Kovess
(54:40)
Transcript
TNT Radio: Today, there are wars in Ukraine, the Middle East, and elsewhere, and
military tensions are rising in Asia. What do you think are the underlying
reasons for wars around the world?
Peter Koenig (PK): Let me begin with a famous quote:
“WAR is a
racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most
profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope.
It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses
in lives.”
This is a quote from a 1935 speech
and short book by Smedley D. Butler, a retired United States Marine Corps Major General and two-time Medal of
Honor recipient. Based on his career military experience, Butler discusses how
business interests commercially benefit from warfare.
Butler
goes on summarizing on how to get out of the War Racket:
“Three
steps must be taken to smash the war racket. 1. We must take the profit out of war.
2. We must permit the youth of the land who would bear arms to decide whether
or not there should be war. 3. We must limit our military forces to home
defense purposes.”
Smedley D. Butler, was one of the Unites States’ most decorated
soldier – turned Anti-War activist.
Explaining
this in economic terms – how it works – is easy. It is demonstrated on a daily
basis, mostly by the United States, the so-called empire of the last and
present century.
It is a
question of supply and demand.
They – the
Hegemon and /or its puppets – plant conflict in an
area of their political and economic interest – say the Middle East, rich in
hydrocarbons and a strategic transit region – then they have a reason to
intervene and “resolve” the conflict militarily.
To create
a conflict, you create first an enemy, then you
infiltrate a “terror group” – which also is created artificially by the same
self-styled empire, the US of A, like Al Qaeda, created in the late
1980s.
To
diversify the terror, you create more terror groups, like the Islamic State
(IS), or Hamas – a creation in 1987 by Israel’s Mossad,
the CIA and UK’s MI6 – so, Zionist-Israel has an enemy to fight whenever it is
convenient.
The
current war in Gaza and on a larger scale, prompted by the planned 7 October
2023 Hamas “attack” against Palestine has been prepared for at least four years
– and now is the time to basically eradicate Palestine. That is the Zionists
argument, always under the pretext “Israel has the right to defend itself”
What the
Zionists, representing Israel do, is of course NOT “self-defense” – but
outright slaughter, genocide, Human Rights abuse – of the worst kind, never
seen before in recent history.
The
western leaders (a miserable misnomer) look on, even applause, and support
Israel, supplying them weapons and cash to continue their killing machine.
Billions of dollars-worth of weapons – you see, weapons are a huge cash
generator for the war industry. Human lives, misery, and
death – creating massive and horrendous suffering.
+
“From Palestine to the World:
Angela Davis & Dr. Gabor Maté on the global
struggle for liberation”
https://www.youtube.com/live/z69vUN79CXA
(24:24)
This
conversation is part of the release of the new documentary film "Where
Olive Trees Weep" https://whereolivetreesweep.com/. The full version of the conversation will be released as part of the
film premiere and the 21-day program on a donation basis.
…
Drawing
parallels between the oppression faced by Palestinians and the systemic
injustice confronting marginalized communities around the world, Angela and
Gabor will shed light on the common roots of violence, occupation, and
dehumanization. They will examine how trauma, both individual and collective,
perpetuates cycles of conflict and how healing these wounds is integral to
achieving genuine liberation. Science and Nonduality
(SAND) contemplates and reveres the beauty, complexity, pain, and great mystery
that weave the infinite cycles of existence. We explore beyond ultimate
truths, binary thinking, and individual awakening while acknowledging humanity
as a mere part of the intricate web of life.
===========
m.
“Putin:
‘Let Me Warn Them’”
https://informationclearinghouse.blog/2024/06/01/putin-let-me-warn-them/10/comment-page-1/#comments
by Times Now
(censored)
Russian President Vladimir Putin has
launched a fierce critique against NATO, accusing the military alliance of
direct involvement in orchestrating long-range precision strikes on Russian territory.
Putin
LIVE, Russian Prez Questions Zelenskyy's
Legitimacy, Accuses NATO, Russia-Ukraine War LIVE. Russian President Vladimir
Putin has launched a fierce critique against NATO, accusing the military
alliance of direct involvement in orchestrating long-range precision strikes on
Russian territory. Putin's comments suggest a significant escalation in the
ongoing conflict, implicating NATO in active military operations against
Russia. Putin’s remarks were made during a press briefing, where he responded
to questions about the deployment of advanced weaponry in the conflict.
"If the NATO Secretary General is talking about the possibility of strikes
on Russian territory with long-range precision weapons, he should know that
such weapons cannot be used without space reconnaissance means," Putin
stated, highlighting the sophisticated level of coordination required for these
operations.
+
“Putin’s answers to media
questions following the visit to Uzbekistan”
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/74132
(34:25)
Vladimir
Putin answered questions from the Russian media following his state visit
to the Republic of Uzbekistan. The press availability took
place at Tashkent Airport.
+
“Washington Attacks Key Element of
Russia’s Nuclear Umbrella Threatening Entire Global Nuclear Security
Architecture”
Washington’s “deep involvement in the armed conflict and
total control over Kiev’s military planning means that the claims that the US
does not know about Ukrainian plans to strike Russia’s missile defense system
can be discarded.” Russian Senator Dmitry Rogozin
by Mike Whitney
The Biden
administration, using its proxy forces in Ukraine, launched an unprecedented
attack on “a key element of Russia’s nuclear umbrella” on Thursday effectively
blinding the Russian military from detecting incoming nuclear-armed ballistic
missiles. “Satellite imagery confirms” that multiple drones severely damaged “a
Russian strategic early warning radar site in the southwestern end of the
country” leaving Moscow more vulnerable to enemy attack. The western media has
largely blacked-out any coverage of the incident which should have been
presented in headlines across the country. According to Russian nuclear
doctrine, any attack on Russia’s essential nuclear first-alert system provides
a justification for nuclear retaliation. Given the gravity of the situation
we must assume that Washington’s frustration with Ukraine’s performance on the
battlefield has precipitated a dramatic change in policy that includes
high-risk provocations aimed at triggering an overreaction that leads to direct
NATO intervention. Clearly, the Biden administration has decided that it
cannot prevail in Ukraine absent NATO involvement. To that end, the US—via
its proxies in Ukraine—will continue to launch increasingly lethal attacks on
Russian territory forcing Moscow to respond in kind. This is from an article at
The Warzone:
“Satellite
imagery confirms a Russian strategic early warning radar site in the
southwestern end of the country was substantially damaged in a reported
Ukrainian drone attack earlier this week. This looks to be a
first-of-its-kind attack on a site linked to Russia’s general strategic
defense. As such, it points to a new and worrisome dimension to the
conflict, especially when it comes to the potential use of nuclear weapons….
(Satellite
imagery) shows severe damage to both structures housing the Voronezh-DMs at Armavir. There is also clear evidence of multiple hits on
the radar buildings. …(The) radar arrays are generally
very sensitive and fragile systems, and even relatively limited damage can
result in a “mission kill,” rendering them inoperable for an extended period of
time….
Since
receiving a new tranche of ATACMS ( Army Tactical Missile System) in secret
earlier this year, the Ukrainian armed forces have been using those weapons to
good effect against Russian air bases, air defense nodes, and other targets.
The latest batch of ATACMS are also longer-range
versions than had previously been delivered to Ukraine’s military, which have
allowed them to hold more targets at risk….
The two Voronezh-DMs at the facility
are a key part of Russia’s larger strategic early warning network and their
loss, even temporarily, could only degrade the country’s ability to detect
incoming nuclear threats. There are also concerns about
how this could impact the ability of Russia’s overall strategic warning network
to evaluate potential threats and eliminate false positives due to possible
loss of overlapping coverage in certain areas. Strike On Russian Strategic
Early Warning Radar Site Is A Big Deal, The Warzone”
We should assume that the plan to
strike the facility was concocted and authorized at the highest level of
government, perhaps, President Biden himself. Certainly, no low-ranking officer would risk his own career and possible
court martial on a venture so audacious and potentially catastrophic. Also, the
fact that the media has largely swept this blockbuster story under the rug
suggests that corporate journalists are, once again, colluding with government
officials to prevent Washington’s transgressions from being revealed to the public.
Aside from slandering any and all opponents of US foreign policy, the media’s
primary duty is concealing the crimes of the state.(which are too numerous to
count.) Here’s more from The Warzone:
“Russia’s
early warning network is part of the country’s broader nuclear deterrent
posture.
The conditions specifying the
possibility of nuclear weapons use by the Russian Federation” include any
“attack by [an] adversary against critical governmental or military sites of
the Russian Federation, disruption of which would undermine nuclear forces
response actions,” according to the Basic Principles
of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence the Kremlin put
out two years ago.
All of
this follows the start of tactical nuclear drills by Russian forces in the
country’s Southern Military District, which borders Ukraine, on Tuesday. Strike On Russian Strategic
Early Warning Radar Site Is A Big Deal, The Warzone”
The attack on a critical Russian nuclear defense facility—that could
serve as a pretext for a nuclear exchange—shows that we have entered a new and more
dangerous phase of Washington’s war on Russia. It’s clear that the public debate concerning the use of long-range
missiles to strike deep into Russian territory, is
largely a hoax intended to convince the American people that the matter will be
decided by their elected representatives after an exhaustive debate. But it
won’t be. As we can see, the train has already left the station. The
decision to provoke a war with Russia has already been made, and that policy is
being implemented as we speak.
It’s also
worth noting (as one analyst said) . . . .
===========
n.
“The NeoCons' Proxy
War "Against Ukraine": Nuclear War is On the Table. The Privatization
of Ukraine”
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky
First
published by GR on June 29, 2023.
Introduction
In this article, I will be focussing
on the NeoCon agenda, largely inspired by The Project
for the New American Century. (PNAC).
The Neocons exert control over foreign
policy. They are involved in bribing and manipulating politicians and
decision-makers. They have played a key role in defining nuclear doctrine on
behalf of powerful financial interests.
The PNAC has called for establishing “Superiority in Nuclear
Weapons” (applied to Russia) coupled with a profit driven expansion of the
military industrial complex.
The NeoCon agenda, as formulated
by the PNAC (2000) follows in the footsteps of The Cold War “Truman Doctrine”
In the words of George Kennan:
“The day is not far off when we are
going to have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then hampered
by idealistic slogans, the better”
The NeoCons are not intent upon
“Winning the War”.
Their agenda is to “Destroy Countries”.
It is a profit-driven agenda: “Destruction” leads to
“Reconstruction”.
What is at stake is the engineered economic and social
destruction of sovereign nation states. The creditors are there to “pick up the
pieces” and “appropriate real wealth”.
The second part of this article will focus on the NeoCons’ agenda to “privatize countries” on behalf of the
financial establishment.
The privatization of Ukraine as an impoverished derelict
Nation State has already commenced via the creation of the Ukraine
Reconstruction Bank (URB) by BlackRock and
JPMorgan.
Ukraine is
a country with a vast territory and tremendous resources. The proxy Kiev
Regime has an unsurmountable external debt in the
trillions which has been building up since the February 2014 EuroMaidan Neo-Nazi Coup d’Etat,
instrumented by Washington.
We are no
longer in the realm of IMF “strongly economic medicine”.
What is
unfolding is the corporate take over and
appropriation of an entire country.
The Danger of Nuclear War
The use of nuclear weapons is on the drawing board of
the Pentagon. It has the support of the U.S State Department.
Meanwhile legislation is being put forward in the
U.S. Congress to initiate World War III.
“Senators Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and
Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) introduced on June 22nd a Resolution which if passed and signed by President Biden,
… would commit the U.S. as the head of NATO to launch, on behalf of NATO, war
directly against Russia (See Eric Zuesse, Duran, June 20, 2023)
click lower right corner for full screen
The NeoCon
Agenda:
The Project for the New American
Century
The NeoCons are firmly
behind the Ukraine agenda.
The Project for the New
American Century (PNAC) dominates US foreign policy on behalf of
powerful financial interests.
The PNAC dispels the planning of “consecutive”
military operations: it describes:
America’s “Long War” as follows:
“fight and decisively win multiple,
simultaneous major theater wars”
The
conduct of “Simultaneous theater Wars” is
the backbone of America’s hegemonic Agenda.
It’s a
project of global warfare. The PNAC controlled by the NeoCons
also dispels the holding of real peace negotiations.
The Nuclear Agenda and Global
Warfare
The PNAC
was published at the height of the presidential election campaign in September
2000, barely 2 months prior to the November 2001 elections. It has become
the backbone of US foreign policy. It is the basis for the carrying out a
hegemonic global warfare agenda, coupled with the imposition of a “Unipolar World Order”.
Victoria Nuland who sits in the State Department, currently advising President Biden is
the spouse of PNAC’s Robert Kagan.
Why Does
the Biden administration require a $1.3 trillion nuclear weapons program
which is slated to increase to $2.0 trillion in 2030?
Superiority in Nuclear War is the backbone of the NeoCon agenda as
expounded in the PNAC.
The
objective is to “Maintain Nuclear Superiority”, specifically in relation to the US-Russia balance.
The Post War Era
The US
has conducted numerous wars since the end of what is euphemistically
called the post war era:
Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia,
Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yemen… and now Ukraine.
The
unspoken objective is not to “win the war” but to engineer the
destruction of entire countries, create political and social chaos, with a
view to ultimately “picking up the pieces” and taking control of the national
economies of sovereign nation states.
This
agenda is also conducted through “regime change”, “color revolutions” and the
concurrent demise and criminalization of the state apparatus coupled with
“strong economic medicine” and the imposition of a soaring dollar denominated
debt.
That is what happened in Vietnam. The Destruction of an entire country which was then “privatized” in
the early 1990s:
“Vietnam
never received war reparations payments from the U.S. for the massive loss of life
and destruction, yet an agreement reached in Paris in 1993 required Hanoi to
recognize the debts of the defunct Saigon regime of General Thieu.
This agreement is in many regards tantamount to obliging Vietnam to compensate
Washington for the costs of war.”
And now
what is ongoing in Ukraine is the outright privatization of an entire
country.
The Privatization of Ukraine
BlackRock, which is the World’s largest
portfolio investment company together with JPMorgan have
come to the rescue of Ukraine. They are slated to set up
the Ukraine Reconstruction Bank.
The stated
objective is “to attract billions of dollars in private investment to assist
rebuilding projects in a war-torn country”. (FT, June 19, 2023)
“… BlackRock, JP
Morgan and private investors, aim to profit
from the country’s reconstruction along with 400 global
companies, including Citi, Sanofi
and Philips. … JP Morgan’s Stefan Weiler
sees a “tremendous opportunity” for private investors. (Colin Todhunter, Global Research June 28, 2023)
The Kiev Neo-Nazi
regime is a partner in this endeavour. War is Good for Business. The greater the destruction, the
greater the stranglehold on Ukraine by “private investors”:
“BlackRock and JPMorgan Chase are helping the Ukrainian
government set up a reconstruction bank to steer public seed capital into
rebuilding projects that can attract hundreds of billions of dollars in private
investment.” (FT, op cit)
The Privatization of Ukraine was launched in November 2022 in liaison with BlackRock’s
consulting company McKinsey, a public relations firm
which has largely been responsible for co-opting corrupt politicians and
officials Worldwide not to mention scientists and intellectuals on behalf of
powerful financial interests.
“The Kyiv
government engaged BlackRock’s consulting arm in
November to determine how best to attract that kind of capital, and then added
JPMorgan in February. Ukraine president
Volodymyr Zelenskyy
announced last month that the country was working with the two financial groups
and consultants at McKinsey.
BlackRock and Ukraine’s Ministry of Economy
signed a Memorandum of Understanding in November 2023.
In late
December 2022, president Zelensky and BlackRock’s CEO Larry Fink agreed on an investment
strategy.
Ukraine Reconstruction: The London
Conference Venue
Careful Timing (See Timeline Below). The Prigozhin-Wagner “Failed Coup”
(June 23-24, 2023) was initiated on the day following the Ukraine
Reconstruction Conference in London hosted by the Kiev Regime and His Majesty’s Government on June 21-22, 2023. Is it a coincidence?
“The
Ukraine Development Fund remains in the planning stages and is not expected to
fully launch until the end of hostilities
with Russia. But investors will have a
preview this week at a London conference co-hosted by the British and Ukrainian
governments.
The World
Bank estimated
in March that Ukraine would need
$411bn to rebuild after the war, and recent Russian attacks have driven
that figure higher.
No formal
fundraising target has been set but people familiar with the discussions say
the fund is seeking to raise low-cost capital from governments, donors and
international financial institutions and leverage it to attract between five
and 10 times as much private investment.
BlackRock and JPMorgan are donating their
services, although the work will give them an early look at possible
investments in the country. The assignment also deepens JPMorgan’s
relationship with a longstanding client.
What
Ukraine needed, BlackRock advised, was a development
finance bank to find investment opportunities in sectors such as
infrastructure, climate and agriculture and make them attractive to pension
funds and other long-term investors and lenders. JPMorgan was brought in partly
for its debt expertise.
… most investors want to wait for the end of
hostilities. “The important part is that Ukraine is already thinking
ahead,” Weiler said. “When the war is over,
they’re going to want to be ready and start the rebuilding process immediately.”
(FT, 19 June, 2023, emphasis added)
.
King Charles V hosted a reception at St James’s Palace on the eve of the Ukraine
Recovery Conference. See below.
Guests included the Prime Minister of Ukraine, Mr.
Denys Shmyhal; President of European Commission, Dr.
Ursula Von der Leyen
and His Majesty’s Ambassador to Ukraine, Dame Melinda Simmons, who
presented. Ukrainian civil society leaders. These
leaders included Mr. Masi Nayyem
[involved in the Neo-Nazi sponsored 2014 EuroMaidan],
a decorated Ukrainian veteran and lawyer who received shrapnel wounds to the
head on a combat mission during the invasion and now campaigns for veterans rights and support.
.
The Ukraine Privatization
Chronology . . . .
===========
o.
“The Dangers of Nuclear War: Russian Warnings About NATO’s Nuclear Escalation”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/russian-warnings-nato-nuclear-escalation/5858691
by Drago Bosnic
Earlier this week, I argued that NATO’s latest actions in Ukraine
(and beyond) are tantamount to a declaration of war
on Russia. Attacks
on Moscow’s strategic assets, particularly early warning radar stations, as
well as Stoltenberg’s openly declared support for long-range strikes on Russia
using NATO-sourced weapons, make it quite clear what the political West is planning to
do. Men like Jens Stoltenberg are
certainly not making any real decisions, but serve mostly as glorified
spokespeople.
However,
his threats to the Kremlin finally show the true intentions of the
world’s most aggressive racketeering cartel. To make
matters worse, the latest statements of actual leaders of NATO countries show
that the political West is desperate to prevent the Neo-Nazi junta’s defeat by raising
the stakes to a direct confrontation with Moscow (i.e. WW3).
This
leaves Russia with no choice but to be prepared for any eventuality. It recently held military exercises involving
simulated usage of tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs). This is quite important, as the Kremlin owns not just the
world’s most powerful strategic arsenal, but also
fields the largest number of TNWs, including nuclear shells for its unrivaled
artillery formations. Thus, if you thought Russian
artillery couldn’t possibly be scarier than it is already, think for a second
that this only relates to its conventional capabilities. So, when President
Vladimir Putin says “you still haven’t seen anything”, that’s exactly how
it should be interpreted. And normal people surely wouldn’t want to see such escalation. However,
as the political West keeps sinking into utter madness, we cannot expect its leaders to conduct realpolitik
and make sensible decisions.
On the
other hand, while Russian leadership previously tried maintaining contact to
avoid a disaster of global proportions, it now realizes that this is not only
futile, but also counterproductive, if not even self-defeating. Accustomed
to invading largely helpless opponents (think of
a grown man barging into a kindergarten and punching preschool children), NATO
has become completely detached from reality. Although it’s now after a
near-peer adversary (the same analogy, just instead of those preschool kids you
have a giant MMA fighter), the belligerent alliance still lives in the
illusion that it’s vastly superior and that it will prevail. This is forcing Moscow not to engage in dialogue (as previously
mentioned, it would be pointless), but to
openly talk about the possibility of nuclear war with the United States and NATO.
Historically,
the Kremlin always tried to keep talks about it behind closed doors, as is
customary for those still honoring diplomatic etiquette. However, as the
political West’s concept of foreign policy is now equivalent
to banditry and piracy, this too has become futile. This
is why Russia is now warning about NATO’s preparations for nuclear war.
According to the Russian military and intelligence services, the belligerent
alliance is secretly engaged in military exercises that involve preparations
for potential nuclear strikes on Russia. Army General Vladimir Kulishov, First Deputy Director of the FSB and Head of
its Border Service, actually said so in a recent interview. This includes not
only a massive increase in NATO’s activity around Russia’s
borders, but also the aforementioned
nuclear drills that the belligerent alliance is trying to conceal.
“Near the
Russian border, NATO’s reconnaissance activities are increasing, the intensity
of operational combat training of the alliance’s troops is growing, during
which scenarios for conducting combat operations against the Russian
Federation, including the launch of nuclear strikes on our territory, are being
worked out,” General Kulishov said in an interview with RIA Novosti, adding: “The situation requires taking appropriate steps to protect and
secure our borders.”
Many in
the political West might ignore or even outright reject his words, but it seems
the Russian general didn’t even need to say anything, as EU/NATO leaders
themselves are effectively confirming this virtually every day. Namely, after
French President Emmanuel Macron supported the usage of NATO-sourced long-range
weapons against Russia, US President Joe Biden joined the chorus of those
who suddenly want to blow up the world. It
should be noted that, although a mere formality at this point, this marks a disturbing change in rhetoric. While Washington DC previously tried maintaining a level of “plausible
deniability”, it’s now openly talking about strikes on a country with the
world’s largest thermonuclear arsenal. As
second only to Russia in terms of its own
strategic weapons, the US has a huge
responsibility.
However,
instead of being far more careful in its statements and actions, the
belligerent thalassocracy is doing the opposite. President
Putin and Foreign
Minister Sergei Lavrov have been warning against such behavior for years and continue to do so even now. Unfortunately, such sensible messages seem to fall on deaf ears. Worse
yet, NATO not only keeps ignoring this, but is escalating attacks on Russian early warning systems through its Neo-Nazi puppets in Kiev. Such systems play no role in
Moscow’s military operations in Ukraine, meaning that the Kiev regime certainly
wouldn’t be bothering to use its forces and resources, already
spread far too thin across the collapsing frontlines, for such attacks – unless ordered to do so by its puppet masters in the
halls of power in Washington DC and, to a lesser extent, Brussels.
Obviously,
NATO’s motivation to do this would be to diminish Russia’s ability to detect
and track potential nuclear strikes. However, the
world’s most aggressive racketeering cartel seems to
have forgotten about Moscow’s “Perimeter” (known in NATO as the “Dead Hand”)
system that ensures retaliation even in the case that the entire Russian leadership is killed in a
possible “decapitation strike” that the Pentagon has been
openly talking about in recent years. In
addition, the Kremlin’s world-class nuclear submarines also ensure deterrence
even if the Eurasian giant ceased to exist. Its eight Borei-class
SSBNs each carry 16 R-30 “Bulava” SLBMs, while every
missile is armed with up to ten 150 kt thermonuclear
MIRV warheads. To put that into perspective, the Hiroshima bomb was 15 kt. Do the math.
+
“To Avoid Nuclear War, Putin Needs to be a Little Crazier”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/avoid-nuclear-war-putin-needs-crazier/5858820
by Mike Whitney
+
“Jeffrey Sachs Warns: The West Has
FORGOTTEN The DANGERS AND HORRORS Of Nuclear Weapons”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koOESdp6E8E
by Quỳnh
Học Vẽ, with
Jeffrey Sachs
(31:40)
+
INTERVIEW: “What is the US
military up to in Jordan?”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hRAhIagKCg
with George Galloway and Ken Klippenstein
(14:18)
Why has
the US covertly moved thousands of troops to Jordan? What is the target?
Intrepid reporter Ken Klippenstein posits the answers
===========
p.
“Russia Setup ICBM in North Korea,
Strengthen Nuclear in Cuba Threaten U.S”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gb1A-7aM8cE
by Douglas MacGregor
(35:31)
Douglas MacGregor Warning: Russia Setup ICBM in North Korea,
Strengthen Nuclear in Cuba Threaten U.S In this urgent analysis, Douglas MacGregor, a former senior military advisor and respected
defense analyst, delves into Russia’s strategic move to position
Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) in North Korea and bolster nuclear
capabilities in Cuba. This development presents a direct and escalating threat
to the United States, increasing global military tensions significantly.MacGregor
examines the motivations behind Russia's decision, suggesting that this marks a
significant shift in global military strategy aimed at countering U.S.
influence and extending Russia's strategic reach. He discusses the implications
for U.S. national security, analyzing the potential threats these moves pose to
the stability of international relations and peace.Additionally,
MacGregor explores the broader consequences for NATO
and its allies, highlighting the challenges of responding effectively to
Russia's expanded military presence in such critical regions. He provides
insights into the possible countermeasures and strategic adjustments that the
U.S. might consider to mitigate these new threats.This
video offers a comprehensive overview of the current geopolitical landscape,
with MacGregor’s expert commentary shedding light on
the complexities of these military developments and their potential to reshape
the global order.
+
“U.S. F-16s to Ukraine, Russia
Nuclear Sub Activated in Caribbean, WEST Panics”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkhAkDdMgYE
with Scott Ritter
(33:14)
+
“Israel is being WIPED OUT and the
IDF is Losing Big on All Fronts”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObXJ3WEjJvg&si=-5YjPftaWbyF6Pa-
with Danny Haiphong and Scott Ritter
(21:38)
+
“Russia Begins to Attack US. NATO Base
Collapsed, West Prepared to Retaliate”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=000VJMbDKWg
with Larry Johnson
(18:16)
+
“NATO's Nuclear & B-52 Are
Flying to Russia, West Panic After Putin's Missiles
Attack”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S12dnFRkcOw
with Larry Johnson
(24:50)
+
“U.S. Missiles Strike Deep Inside
Russia, NATO in Danger, The World at Stake”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zPa8KTiXVY
with Larry Johnson
(22:36)
+
“Iran & Turkey join Russia,
North Korea sent Nuclear Bombs after Meeting Putin”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zPa8KTiXVY
with Douglas Macgregor:
(22:13)
===========
q.
“The ‘Climate Emergency’ Is a
Myth, Says Nobel Prize Winner John Clauser. Here’s
Why He’s Right”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/climate-emergency-myth-john-clauser/5860277
by Dr. Rudolph Kalveks
In a recent lecture, Nobel Laureate physicist John Clauser exposed how the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) models and analyses, which are relied upon by politicians and
activists to support claims of a ‘climate crisis’, do not meet basic standards
of scientific enquiry. Clauser received his Nobel prize in 2022 for the observational measurement of quantum
entanglement and understands well the problem of distinguishing a physical
signal from background noise.
Clauser shows that, when corrected for
the IPCC’s error prone arithmetic and statistics, the observational data do not
support the power imbalance claimed to be responsible for global warming.
Furthermore, the outputs of climate models are at variance with the
observational record. Clauser discusses the roles of
convection, clouds and their variability in providing a negative feedback
mechanism, and proposes that this acts as a thermostat that stabilises
surface temperatures. Clauser’s conclusion is that
claims of a ‘climate crisis’ lack scientific substance and that Net Zero
policies are an unnecessary hindrance.
Figure 1. Schematic
representation of the global mean energy budget of the Earth. Numbers
indicate best estimates for the magnitudes of the globally averaged energy
balance components, together with their uncertainty ranges (5%-95% confidence),
representing climate conditions at the beginning of the 21st Century. Note that
amounts are expressed in terms of power flux (Watts per square metre or W/m2), which equals energy per second
per unit area (Joules/s/m2). (Source: IPCC AR6 WG 1 report p.934)
Clauser’s talk is available on YouTube. However, there is merit in
reviewing the physics arguments that draw on the observational data about
atmospheric energy flows to refute the notion of an anthropogenic global
warming (AGW) induced climate crisis.
===========
r.
“2020
Documentary: Who Is Bill Gates? How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/full-documentary-bill-gates/5857856
with James Corbett
(2:05:57)
+
“Bill Gates, new RNA vaccines”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WgoixKhPaMY&si=EctU4pyRStq_NH2L
with Dr. John Campbell
(11:00)
+
“Pfizer court case, Kansas”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubZvXkLHCwU&si=RGs-5FnvqGCTZala
with Dr. John Campbell
(13:02, with transcript)
Pfizer misled the public that it had
a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine. https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx...
Pfizer said
its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was
connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis
and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths.
Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public. Pfizer said
its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID- 19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19
variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the
public. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19
even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission
of COVID-19. To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to
censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its
COVID-19 vaccine. Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a “safe and effective” vaccine
resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19
vaccine sales in just two years. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to
its COVID-19 vaccine violated previous consent judgments with the State of
Kansas. Pfizer’s actions and statements relating to its COVID-19 vaccine
violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act Pfizer must be held accountable for
falsely representing the benefits of its COVID- 19 vaccine while concealing and
suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness,
and inability to prevent transmission. 28. Millions of
Kansans heard Pfizer’s misrepresentations about its COVID-19 vaccine. 29. In
May 2021, Pfizer advertised to Kansans on Facebook
about its “life-saving vaccines” and its “cures.” 30. Pfizer took advantage of
Kansans’ fear of COVID-19 and desire for safety by offering a “safe and
effective” COVID-19 vaccine, while concealing, suppressing, and omitting
material information that undermined its safety and effectiveness claims. in Kansas. B. Pfizer used confidentiality agreements to
conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19
vaccine. 57. Pfizer has kept data hidden through confidentiality agreements
with governments around the world. C. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to
conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19
vaccine. 65. Scientists were outraged that they still could not review Pfizer’s
COVID-19 study data. “Pfizer’s pivotal COVID vaccine trial was funded by the
company and designed, run, analysed, and authored by
Pfizer employees. The company and the contract research organisations
that carried out the trial hold all the data.” D. Pfizer used FOIA denial and
delay to conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its
COVID-19 vaccine. E. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group, which will
conceal critical data relating to the safety and effectiveness of its COVID-19
vaccine. 86. Pfizer planned to follow COVID-19 vaccine study participants, both
vaccine and placebo recipients, for 24 months to monitor the safety and
effectiveness of its vaccine. 87. Once the FDA approved Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine
through an emergency use authorization in December 2020, Pfizer unblinded the study participants and offered vaccine
placebo recipients the option to receive the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. 88. Of the 21,921 vaccine trial participants who received the placebo,
more than 20,000 placebo participants decided to receive the Pfizer COVID-19
vaccine as of March 13, 2021.
+
“Kansas accuses Pfizer of
misleading public about COVID vaccine in lawsuit”
by Brendan Pierson
===========
s.
News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller
“2 Marines go into cardiac arrest
on same day; 2 TN sheriffs have pancreatic cancer; high schooler,
15, goes into cardiac arrest playing football; girl, 5, walks to school for
help after mom collapses”
by Mark Crispin Miller
+
“Performers
dropping dead, or falling sick, on stage. (Spain, Italy, India)”
by Mark Crispin Miller
More
unprecedented post-"vaccination" weirdness mid-performance
+
“Swedish rocker Dennis Lyxzén has "massive heart attack"; Danish actor
Charlotte Bøving has cancer (again); S. Korean pop
star Yoo Ara, 31, has
cancer; Irish pol Jennifer Whitmore in ICU”
by Mark Crispin Miller
+
“You can run, but you can't hide”
by Mark Crispin Miller
+
“Lulu Santos has 3 illnesses in 1
week; Haitian PM Garry Conille has emergency surgery;
Brit model Roxy Horner has diabetes, Hayley Tamaddon
("Emmerdale"), singer Amelia Lily both
rushed to hospital”
by Mark Crispin Miller
+
“A day in the life of the streets
of Toronto (which is exactly like a day in the life of nearly every other city
on the planet)”
by Mark Crispin Miller
+
“In memory of those who "died
suddenly" in the United States and worldwide, June 10-June 17, 2024”
by Mark Crispin Miller
Actors in
US (3), Mex., Argen., Germ., Poland, Ghana, Nigeria
(2), Russia (2), India, Australia; athletes in US (2), Canada, Argen. (3), Chile, UK (3), Ire., Montenegro, Tonga,
Australia (2), NZ; more
+
“Sammy Hagar Regrets Getting
Vaccinated”
by Mark Crispin Miller
+
“Vera Sharav
survived the Holocaust; and so she will not stand for ANY genocide, even (or
especially) if it's carried out by Jews”
by Mark Crispin Miller
This
survivor (whom I'm proud to call my friend) understands that those who use the
Holocaust to justify the Gaza genocide are actually DISHONORING the memory of
those millions killed back then
===========
t.
BREAKING: “Biden's State Dept
Official Admits Great Replacement Theory is Real;
'They Want to Change the Demographics of the United States'”
https://www.projectveritas.com/
by Project Veritus
Today
Project Veritas provides an inside look at the Biden
Administration’s disastrous handling of the mass illegal immigration crisis.
On camera,
we have a Biden State Department official admitting the true reason for why the
Southern Border has been left wide open: to change the demographics of the United States.
Key Quotes:
• “The
truth is they want to change the demographics of the United States.” – Consular
Officer, U.S. State Department
• “I wish
people knew we were letting in criminals [to the United States] daily.” –
Consular Officer, U.S. State Department
•
“Migrants are coming from elsewhere, like Venezuela. So we’re like, this [the
Root Causes Strategy] doesn’t solve that problem.” – Dan Fitzgerald, Country
Coordinator U.S. State Department
• “It
looks bad for any administration because no one solves migration… it’s like the
end all, be all, kill pill for politics.”- Dan Fitzgerald, Country Coordinator
U.S. State Department
These two
officials from within the U.S. State Department described a government out to
replace the people they rule for ideological reasons.
Read on for the Full Report:
Daniel
Fitzgerald, a State Department Official responsible for allocating U.S. foreign
aid across the Western Hemisphere told a Veritas
investigative journalist that the U.S. State Department will be forced to
answer to Congress for its failure to slow migration from Central America.
He
describes failed efforts to pour ‘four billion over four years’ into Central
America as part of the Biden Administration’s “Root
Causes Strategy.”
Under this
plan, Washington provides U.S. taxpayer money to Latin American countries in
order to relieve economic hardships that would trigger migrants to come to the
U.S.
However,
Fitzgerald shares that the plan isn’t working because migrants are now
coming from new countries they didn’t plan for.
“Migrants
are coming from elsewhere, like Venezuela. So, we’re like, this [the Root
Causes Strategy] doesn’t solve that problem.”
Fitzgerald admits that while he
didn’t originally see illegal immigration as a problem, his mind has changed
and those who raise issue with unchecked immigration are ‘on to something’
because the levels are so high.
“In my
mind, I’m like oh, it’s not that much [illegal immigration]. And then I see the
chart, I’m like oh that’s a lot compared to twenty years ago.”
As the
U.S. experiences an unparalleled influx of illegal border crossings, Fitzgerald
admits he and his colleagues are puzzled and without solutions. “There’s no
clear answer,” he says.
This is an admission of either
incompetence or unwillingness of the Biden Administration’s ability to get a
handle on the Southern Border.
Fitzgerald
admits this situation could threaten Biden’s reelection odds.
“It looks bad for any administration
because no one solves migration… it’s like the end all, be all, kill pill
for politics.”
In another
division within the U.S. State Department, an International Consular Officer
criticized this administration’s handling of mass migration and expressed a
desire to tell the world what he’s witnessing in his role.
“I wish people knew we were letting in
criminals [to the United States] daily.”
The
official went on to explain that Mexico is sending “the worst of the worst”
into the U.S. He described a scenario where illegal immigrants send billions in
U.S. wages back to Mexico, stating Mexico enjoys the influx of cash and has no
incentive to intervene.
The end goal of unchecked migration,
the official says, is demographic change in the U.S.
“Traditional,
standard Americans are not leftists. Latin Americans are all leftists. This is
just to try and change the demographics [of the United States].
The
intentional goal of elites to replace ethnic European populations with
demographically and culturally different groups through mass migration is an
idea known as “the Great Replacement,” popularized by French novelist and
political activist, Renaud Camus.
This
theory of demographic substitution is often criticized by legacy media as
racist and xenophobic and results in violence. Those who suggest that it may be
true and notice it happening, or who note that Democrats may be using illegal
immigration to secure votes, are routinely deplatformed
and demonized.
This has
happened to people as prominent and as diverse as billionaire Elon Musk, Presidential candidate Vivek
Ramaswamy, or journalist Tucker Carlson – who are
routinely flogged by media and labeled as 'conspiracy theorists' for noticing
that this theory might be true.
Critics of
the Great Replacement idea omit that the demographics of the United States have
indeed changed – at numerical levels
greater than at any time in American history.
===========
u.
“Father of Sputnik V tells Russian
child scary bedtime story about anti-vaxxers”
by Edward Slavsquat
+
“The Illusion of Consensus : Episode 61: Psychological Warfare in Pharma Marketing”
with Jay Bhattacharya and Robert W
Malone
(1:29:33)
+
“How (and why) Bird Flu is About
to Enter the “Mass Testing” Phase”
https://off-guardian.org/2024/06/18/how-and-why-bird-flu-is-about-to-enter-the-mass-testing-phase/
by Kit Knightly
CNN is frantic with worry – “We aren’t doing enough about the
risk of bird flu – but we can”. Popular Science is relatively
calm, asking “Can we prevent a bird flu pandemic
in humans?”, before
reassuring us that we can…as long as we all do as we’re told.
All of
these stories talk about “gathering data”, “flying blind”, and the need for
“prevention”. And all of that is really code for “testing”. Almost every
article talks up the need to increase testing – both of humans and animals.
But anyone
who’s been paying attention since 2020 knows PCR tests don’t gather data, they
create data. They are machines for generating “cases”. Far from preventing a
pandemic, they can be used to manufacture one.
There are
even early signs of mandating tests going forward, such as this
Politico article bemoaning the lack of farmers voluntarily signing up for government
surveillance programs: . . . .
+
“Bird Flu Update: signposts of the
coming rollout”
https://off-guardian.org/2024/06/20/bird-flu-again-a-little-i-told-you-so-a-sign-of-things-to-come/
by Kit Knightly
Two days
ago we published my latest bird flu article, “How (and why) Bird Flu is About to Enter the “Mass Testing”
Phase”.
Less than
12 hours later Salon published a 3000-word article about bird flu, which
dedicates about 2000 of those words to “experts” talking about how we’re not
testing enough [emphasis added]:
…experts
have said that cases are likely flying under the radar. So far this year, three
Americans have been infected by H5N1 viruses that started in cows, and all of
them recovered, but some experts say that patients may be avoiding doctors or refusing
tests”
[…]
most experts expressed a concern that the lack of data and surveillance
is a major issue. Jetelina said the government isn’t
doing “even close to enough” testing on animals and humans.
[…]
“Testing still seems somewhat random and voluntary. We should be doing more
— both in cattle and humans,”
[…]
There is also no legal requirement to report test results
[…]
Rasmussen said part of the issue with testing is that it requires a
collaboration between multiple state and local agencies, as well as the USDA
and CDC, which don’t always cooperate. It also requires participation and
consent from the affected farms.
[…]
“As a result it’s hard to know how much testing has been done and how much will
be done going forward,” Rasmussen said. “It can differ a lot by jurisdiction.”
Poulsen elaborated and said there are too
many “legal and political barriers” to testing
The
nascent narrative is clear – “we need
to run more tests, and we need new rules to enforce mandatory testing, we need
to cut through agency/state jurisdiction with some new federal law”.
This
message – or some variation of it – has been repeated in half a dozen more
articles since we published our piece
just two days ago.
That
includes the Guardian (obviously) and the World
Socialist Website, who continue their Covid-era
policy of abandoning any pretense of being an “independent” media outlet and
repeating (or even exaggerating) mainstream claims to further their own political agenda.
But the
Salon article has more than just some predictable
agenda talking points, it also has some (accidentally) revealing insights into
potential future developments [again emphasis added]:
“States
that are testing more are likely to report more cases.”
[…]
“I would prefer to see more testing of farm workers and milk…I would like to
see serology to see if workers were infected asymptomatically.
[…]
He added there is no “CLIA requirement for animal testing,” referring to
federal lab standards and private labs can do all the testing they want.
[…]
Jetelina said that even at-home flu tests will
likely pick up H5N1 because it’s closely related to influenza A
[…]
“The big challenge will be fall, as we will not be able to differentiate
between [seasonal] flu and H5 unless we have a more specific test,”
To be
clear, these experts admit in this article:
·
The more you test the more cases
you find
·
Animal testing is not subject to
lab standards
·
Many of those “missed” human cases
will be “asymptomatic infections”
·
At-home tests can’t differentiate between “bird flu” and
common seasonal flu
·
…which means, when flu season
starts in the fall, reported “bird flu” cases may rise sharply
Remember
this, because this is exactly the kind of information that will get
memory-holed when/if the new pandemic narrative takes off in earnest.
In the
meantime, let’s ask a simple question:
What happens when you start to
legally enforce widespread testing to find asymptomatic cases using at-home
tests that can’t differentiate between your new “pandemic” and ‘seasonal flu’?
Covid 2: Electric Boogaloo,
that’s what happens.
Anyway,
here’s hoping I don’t have to use the words “bird flu” again for a while.
….Oh, one
more thing, did you know climate change is making bird flu worse?
What else can
you do but laugh at this point?
===========
v.
Take Action to Free Assange
Here is a new list from Assange Defense to keep making calls to Congress for
Julian |
If you prefer to use a script, here is one for contacting
U.S. Representatives:
“My name is ____ and I would like Congressperson ____ to sign on to House
Resolution 934 to free Julian Assange.
I am hoping that _______will add (his or her) name to the bipartisan House
Resolution 934 to drop the charges and extradition request for Assange.
“All major press freedom and human rights organizations are opposed to this
extradition. Additionally, an overwhelming majority of Australians, along with
Australian PM Anthony Albanese have forcefully called for this extradition to
be dropped as well. That is because they all understand our ability to know
what our government is doing in our name and with our tax dollars is essential
to our democracy – and that this can only occur with a free press.
“Protect press freedom! Please sign on to H. Res. 934. Thank you!”
Senators
Now, please call the following members of the Senate. Ask them to
urge President Biden to drop the charges against Julian Assange
and to drop the request for his extradition.
You can reach all of them through the Capitol Switchboard
at 202-224-3121 or use the numbers below:
If you prefer to use a script, here is one for contacting U.S. Senators:
“My name is ____ and I would like Senator ____ to stand up for press freedom
and Julian Assange.
“I am hoping that _______will urge President Biden to drop the charges and
extradition request for Assange.”
“All major press freedom and human rights organizations are opposed to this
extradition. Additionally, an overwhelming majority of Australians, along with
Australian PM Anthony Albanese have forcefully called for this extradition to
be dropped as well. That is because they all understand our ability to know
what our government is doing in our name and with our tax dollars is essential
to our democracy – and that this can only occur with a free press.“Protect
press freedom! Thank you!”
Thank you for all your efforts for Julian Assange!
+
“ICC Arrest Warrant for Vladimir
Putin for “Kidnapping Ukrainian Children”, Russia Accused of “Genocide-like
Deportation” at the Switzerland Peace Conference”
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky
Introductory Note
NATO now firmly acknowledges that the war started in
2014 which would have required that from the very outset in February
2014 the warring parties abide by the Four Basic Principles of The Law of Armed Conflict
(LOAC) which consists in:
“….respect
for and protection of the civilian population and civilian objects, the
Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian
population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives
and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military
objectives.” [Additional Protocol 1, Article 48]
Civilian population (children) and civilian objects (schools, hospitals, residential areas) were the deliberate object of UAF and
Azov Battalion attacks in blatant violation of the Law of Armed Conflict
(LOAC).
In accordance with the LOAC, Moscow
took the decision starting in February 2014 to come to the rescue of Donbass civilians including children.
Visibly
the president of the I.C.C. Piotr Hofmanski in accusing President Putin of “unlawful
kidnapping of Ukrainian children” hasn’t the foggiest understanding of Article 48. of the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC).
Is this an
issue of incompetence?
Or has Piotr Hofmanski been co-opted
into endorsing or casually ignoring the extensive crimes against humanity
committed by the Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion, which happens to be supported by
US-NATO?
At the
Peace Conference in Switzerland (15-16 June, 2024), Russia has been accused of
“Genocide-like
Deportation of Ukrainian Children”.
See this (first minute) with Trudeau who
supports the Neo-Nazi regime:
“Russia kidnapped thousands of
Ukrainian kids, its genocide, it’s pure colonialism”
And then see where
these children were sent . .
. .
+
INTERVIEW: “If you really want to
stop a g***cide you have the tools to do it”
with George Galloway and Arab Barghouthi
Israel has
a blank cheque from the international community to
carry out its atrocities. It’s obvious, they want to
ethnically cleanse the Palestinians.
+
“On Poking Dragons”
https://informationclearinghouse.blog/2024/06/12/on-poking-dragons/15/
by Fred Reed
I wonder
how many Americans quite understand what the Us is
facing in its aggressive confrontation with China. Washington clearly prepares
the public for another unnecessary war. Given America’s routine defeat in
war and catastrophic miscalculations in fighting small powers, picking a fight
with what, increasingly, is again becoming the Middle Kingdom seems less than
bright. Yet within the Beltway there is the usual smug complacency, the
unshakable arrogance that appears to think the China is just a big Norway or
Guatemala that needs to be put in its place.
A quick glance at China: . . . .
===========
w.
The Electronic Intifada – ARHIVES
https://electronicintifada.net/
+
Al Jazeera – ARCHIVES
+
Middle East Eye – ARCHIVES
https://www.middleeasteye.net/home
+
Palestine Chronicle - ARCHIVES
https://www.palestinechronicle.com/
+
The Last American Vagabond - ARCHIVES
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/category/top-news/
+
MintPress News - Archives
https://www.mintpressnews.com/
+
Consortium News – ARCHIVES
+
OffGuardian – ARCHIVES
+
The Grayzone - Archives
+
Black Agenda Report - ARCHIVES
http://www.blackagendareport.com/
+
The Defender • Children's Health Defense - ARCHIVES
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/
+
BitChute - ARCHIVES
https://www.bitchute.com/listing/
+
Unlimited Hangout - ARCHIVES
+
CovertAction Magazine -
ARCHIVES
https://covertactionmagazine.com/
+
ScheerPost - Archives
+
Global Research - Archives
https://www.globalresearch.ca/
+
CounterPunch – Archives
+
Information Clearing House – Archives
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/
|
+
AntiWar.com