Bulletin N° 1151
“Land of the Blind”
https://www.bitchute.com/video/c1xTDryGwGDI/
written and directed by Robert Edwards
(1:42:09)
A 2006 British-American drama film starring Ralph Fiennes, Donald Sutherland, Tom Hollander and Lara Flynn Boyle.
This political satire is based on several incidents throughout history in which tyrannical rulers were overthrown by new leaders who proved to be just as bad, if not worse. It had its world premiere in competition at the International Film Festival Rotterdam, and was the Opening Night Gala film at the 2006 Human Rights Watch Film Festival in London.
The title is taken from the saying by Desiderius Erasmus: "In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."
Its U.S. premiere was in competition at the 2006 Tribeca Film Festival. The film sparked intense reaction during its festival run, attacked by both left and right, each of which saw the film as a critique of its position.
Subject : Sham Elections and More Imperialist Wars: The System is Working!
Grenoble
November 7, 2024
Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,
The circus has come and gone, and a new clown show is in the offing. We may expect the distractions to come fast and furious, as the system grinds out ever more profits for big investors. While working-class consciousness is being sabotaged by the nearly omnipotent media outlets around the world, the so-called “elite oligarchs” are comfortable, but the real centers of power lie with the plutocrats (not exactly the same thing). “Elitist theories” have predictably brought much confusion to the debate over the appropriation of political power and what is to be done to reduce pernicious inequalities, while the possiblity for revenge against “guilty” individuals remains the hallmark of “leftist” thinking.
The systemic view is less sexy; a historic and contextual comprehension requires cognitive acumen, which in the past has been exhibited by the working class. But the thought-control mechanisms now in place all but inhibit such thinking, and this has a drastic effect on the behavior of victims of monopoly capitalism today. We are encouraged to accept life in a fool’s paradise with no concern for inequalities and corporate crimes, including genocide, which will come home to eat us if we do not stop them.
The 20+ items below are articles and essays taken these past few days from the Anglophone social media; they speak to the dire straits we now find ourselves in. The “Big Lie” strategy once promoted in Nazi Germany is a historic lesson which has not been lost on neo-conservative strategists who are busy engineering new relationships today in the corporate capitalist environment. As always, our culture stems from our actions (and our inactions) . . .
Sincerely,
Francis McCollum Feeley
___
Professeur
honoraire de l'Université Grenoble-Alpes
Ancien Directeur des Researches
Université de Paris-Nanterre
Director of The Center for the Advanced Study
of American Institutions and Social Movements
(CEIMSA-in-Exile)
The University of California-San Diego
http://www.ceimsa.org
a.
“The Politics of Fear: Laying the Groundwork for Fascism, American-Style”
by John & Nisha Whitehead
“No one can terrorize a whole nation,
unless we are all his accomplices.”
-- Edward
R. Murrow, broadcast journalist
America is in the midst of an epidemic of historic proportions. The contagion being spread like wildfire is turning communities into battlegrounds and setting Americans one against the other.
Normally mild-mannered individuals caught up in the throes of this disease have been transformed into belligerent zealots, while others inclined to pacifism have taken to stockpiling weapons and practicing defensive drills.
This plague on our nation—one that has been spreading like wildfire—is a potent mix of fear coupled with unhealthy doses of paranoia and intolerance, tragic hallmarks of the post-9/11 America in which we live.
Everywhere you turn, those on both the left- and right-wing are fomenting distrust and division. You can’t escape it.
We’re being fed a constant diet of fear: fear of terrorists, fear of illegal immigrants, fear of people who are too religious, fear of people who are not religious enough, fear of extremists, fear of conformists, fear of the government, fear of those who fear the government, fear of those on the Right, fear of those on the Left…The list goes on and on.
The strategy is simple yet effective: the best way to control a populace is through fear and discord.
Fear makes people stupid.
Confound them, distract them with mindless news chatter and entertainment, pit them against one another by turning minor disagreements into major skirmishes, and tie them up in knots over matters lacking in national significance.
Most importantly, divide the people into factions, persuade them to see each other as the enemy and keep them screaming at each other so that they drown out all other sounds. In this way, they will never reach consensus about anything and will be too distracted to notice the police state closing in on them until the final crushing curtain falls.
This is how free people enslave themselves and allow tyrants to prevail.
This Machiavellian scheme has so ensnared the nation that few Americans even realize they are being manipulated into adopting an “us” against “them” mindset. Instead, fueled with fear and loathing for phantom opponents, they agree to pour millions of dollars and resources into political elections, militarized police, spy technology and endless wars, hoping for a guarantee of safety that never comes.
All the while, those in power—bought and paid for by lobbyists and corporations—move their costly agendas forward, and “we the suckers” get saddled with the tax bills and subjected to pat downs, police raids and round-the-clock surveillance.
Turn on the TV or flip open the newspaper on any given day, and you will find yourself accosted by reports of government corruption, corporate malfeasance, militarized police and marauding SWAT teams.
America has already entered a new phase, one in which children are arrested in schools, military veterans are forcibly detained by government agents because of their so-called “anti-government” views, and law-abiding Americans are having their movements tracked, their financial transactions documented, and their communications monitored.
These threats are not to be underestimated.
Yet even more dangerous than these violations of our basic rights is the language in which they are couched: the language of fear. It is a language spoken effectively by politicians on both sides of the aisle, shouted by media pundits from their cable TV pulpits, marketed by corporations, and codified into bureaucratic laws that do little to make our lives safer or more secure.
This language of fear has given rise to a politics of fear whose only aim is to distract and divide us. In this way, we have been discouraged from thinking analytically and believing that we have any part to play in solving the problems before us. Instead, we have been conditioned to point the finger at the other Person or vote for this Politician or support this Group, because they are the ones who will fix it. Except that they can’t and won’t fix the problems plaguing our communities.
Nevertheless, fear remains the method most often used by politicians to increase the power of government. . . . .
+
“November Open Thread (2024)”

https://corbettreport.com/november-open-thread-2024/
by James Corbett
Ahhhh, November! The air is turning crisp, the beautiful fall colours are dappling the leaves and people everywhere are settling in for a beautiful winter filled with family gatherings, holiday celebrations and peace on earth.
. . . But for some reason you’re stuck in front of a device reading this on a screen right now. So, as Broc and his wife welcome their new child into the world (congratulations, Broc!) and video production at The Corbett Report slows down for a bit, feel free to discuss the latest news and information from around the world here . . . .
+
“Post-Election Truths: The Things That Won’t Change. No Matter Who Wins”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/post-election-truths-things-wont-change/5871843
by John W. Whitehead and Nisha Whitehead
If voting could ever really change anything, it’d be illegal.”— Thorne, Land of the Blind (2006)
After months of handwringing and mud-slinging and fear-mongering, the votes have finally been cast and the outcome has been decided: the Deep State has won.
Despite the billions spent to create the illusion of choice culminating in the reassurance ritual of voting for Donald Trump or Kamala Harris, when it comes to most of the big issues that keep us in bondage to authoritarian overlords, not much will change.
Despite all of the work that has been done to persuade us to buy into the fantasy that things will change if we just elect the “right” political savior, the day after a new president is sworn in, it will be business as usual for the unelected bureaucracy that actually runs the government.
War will continue. Drone killings will continue. Surveillance will continue. Censorship of anyone who criticizes the government will continue. The government’s efforts to label dissidents as extremists and terrorists will continue. Police shootings will continue. SWAT team raids will continue. Highway robbery meted out by government officials will continue. Corrupt government will continue. Profit-driven prisons will continue. And the militarization of the police will continue.
These problems have persisted—and in many cases flourished—under both Republican and Democratic administrations in recent years.
The outcome of this year’s election changes none of that.
Indeed, take a look at the programs and policies that will not be affected by the 2024 presidential election, and you’ll get a clearer sense of the government’s priorities, which have little to do with representing the taxpayers and everything to do with amassing money, power and control.
The undermining of the Constitution will continue unabated. America’s so-called war on terror, which it has relentlessly pursued since 9/11, has chipped away at our freedoms, unraveled our Constitution and transformed our nation into a battlefield, thanks in large part to such subversive legislation as the USA Patriot Act and National Defense Authorization Act. These laws—which completely circumvent the rule of law and the constitutional rights of American citizens, re-orienting our legal landscape in such a way as to ensure that martial law, rather than the rule of law, our U.S. Constitution, becomes the map by which we navigate life in the United States—will continue to be enforced.
The government’s war on the American people will continue unabated. “We the people” are no longer shielded by the rule of law. While the First Amendment—which gives us a voice—is being muzzled, the Fourth Amendment—which protects us from being bullied, badgered, beaten, broken and spied on by government agents—is being disemboweled. Consequently, you no longer have to be poor, black or guilty to be treated like a criminal in America. All that is required is that you belong to the suspect class—that is, the citizenry—of the American police state. As a de facto member of this so-called criminal class, every U.S. citizen is now guilty until proven innocent. The oppression and injustice—be it in the form of shootings, surveillance, fines, asset forfeiture, prison terms, roadside searches, and so on—will come to all of us eventually unless we do something to stop it now.
READ MORE: Electing the Next Dictator: Ugly Truths You Won’t Hear from Trump or Biden
The shadow government— a.k.a. the Deep State, a.k.a. the police state, a.k.a. the military industrial complex, a.k.a. the surveillance state complex—will continue unabated. The corporatized, militarized, entrenched bureaucracy that is fully operational and staffed by unelected officials will continue to call the shots in Washington DC, no matter who sits in the White House or controls Congress. By “government,” I’m not referring to the highly partisan, two-party bureaucracy of the Republicans and Democrats. Rather, I’m referring to “government” with a capital “G,” the entrenched Deep State that is unaffected by elections, unaltered by populist movements, and has set itself beyond the reach of the law.
The government’s manipulation of national crises in order to expand its powers will continue unabated. “We the people” have been subjected to an “emergency state” that justifies all manner of government tyranny and power grabs in the so-called name of national security. Whatever the so-called threat to the nation, the government has a tendency to capitalize on the nation’s heightened emotions, confusion and fear as a means of extending the reach of the police state. Indeed, the government’s answer to every problem continues to be more government—at taxpayer expense—and less individual liberty.
Endless wars that enrich the military industrial complex will continue unabated. America’s expanding military empire is bleeding the country dry at a rate of more than $93 million an hour (that adds up to $920 billion annually). Incredibly, although the U.S. constitutes only 5% of the world’s population, America boasts almost 40% of the world’s total mil
+
“People’s Choice”

https://off-guardian.org/2024/11/03/peoples-choice/
by Jordan Henderson, artist painter
Comments . . . .
+
“The End Run – US Elections 5 November 2024. ‘Uncontrolled immigrant Flood’"

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-elections-5-november-2024/5871760
by Peter Koenig
Burning topics that American citizens should know about before they cast their vote.
In one day, US Presidential elections will be held. If one believes the official media, it is a neck-on-neck race between former President Donald Trump and current Vice-President Kamala Harris.
The reality is quite different. Donald Trump is leading everywhere. Maybe with a landslide. But will elections be fair? They have not been fair in 2020, and strong suspicions are circulating that the Dems will find ways to manipulate the election results this time again.
Question is, would they manage to prevail with stolen elections? Or would they risk political upheavals?
Under these circumstances, it appears important that Americans know some late emerging facts, about the Biden-Harris administration’s machinations.
The US Border Chief Aaron Heitke, who served under 5 different administrations, says the “US Government has been run by a terrorist”. He means it, and explains how especially the southern borders were kept open to bring in millions of illegal immigrants, of whom many women and children.
Many of the children and women disappeared. Some 325,000 immigrant children this year alone are missing (acknowledged by RFK Jr, see video below).
Kamala Harris who is responsible for border protection did nothing to prevent the illegal border-crossing, and does nothing to find the missing children.
Many of the children and women disappeared. Some 325,000 immigrant children this year alone are missing (acknowledged by RFK Jr, see video below).
Kamala Harris who is responsible for border protection did nothing to prevent the illegal border-crossing, and does nothing to find the missing children.
US Border Chief Mr. Heitke suggests that the missing children and women.”have been raped, abused, trafficked, bought and sold, families that have spent months in terrible conditions, sickness, and despair.”
See this – 5 min. video clip of 31 October 2024. or click screen below
This suspicion is also shared by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. See this Gand Finale video of 2 November 2024, in Glendale Arizona.
“Today’s Democratic Party is the party of war. It’s the party of the CIA. You had Kamala giving a speech at the Democratic Convention that was written by neocons, that was belligerent”.
Mass Immigration in the European Union . . . .
Interview: “No Escape for RFK Jnr.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyvpsbQBLWs
with George Galloway
(10:31)
Hassan Chami's confrontation with RFK Jnr is a viral smash on social media. 'He just kept saying it's not a genocide it's a war'
+
“James Corbett and The Great Awakening on Breaking the Spell”
by The Spellbreakers Podcast, with James Corbett
(1:09:30)
=======
b.
“CJ Hopkins: Covid Critic Faces Prison”
by The Skeptic, with CJ Hopkins
This is just a quick news update before all hell breaks loose next week.
I’m down with Round 2 of The Berlin Flu, or Round 47 of stress-induced burnout, or both, so … nothing terribly creative or witty this time. Just a few news items.
Item No. 1.
The Daily Sceptic released this special episode of The Sceptic today. It’s an in-depth 42-minute interview I did with Laurie Wastell, Associate Editor of The Daily Sceptic. It is probably the clearest, most comprehensive, up-to-date video feature on my case and the broader global crackdown on dissent available at the moment. I’m grateful to Laurie Wastell, Toby Young, and The Daily Sceptic team for producing it. If you want to share a piece about my case with anyone, I recommend sharing this one.
+
“Here's what REALLY happened with the Covid vaccine”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1t4KYNjHPY&si=YgXLa_2VOdBD3MeX
by Redacted
(13:42)
+
“The Erroneous Claim of Safety of the Covid Vaccine: Open Letter to Canada’s Fraser Health Authority”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/open-letter-fraser-health-authority/5871593
It is time to cease the unqualified claim that “vaccines are safe, effective and necessary”.
Open Letter to the Fraser Health Authority
We are writing in response to the information currently being disseminated by various public health officers at the request of Fraser Health Authority utilizing the ‘Healthy Schools Communications Toolkit’.[1]
The broader medical community, the public, and especially parents look to health authorities such as Fraser Health Authority to provide accurate, up-to-date information to assist in making informed decisions regarding the health and safety of children.
Statements in the ‘Healthy Schools Communication Toolkit’ issued by Fraser Health Authority in recent weeks claim, with no conditions or qualifiers, that vaccines are ‘safe, effective and necessary’ for the health and safety of children.
These statements are inaccurate and misleading.
Of particular note for being misleading and outright dishonest are the following:
· Tdap-IPV: protects against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough) and polio.
· “Vaccines are safe and are your child’s best protection.”
· Repeatedly misrepresenting “vaccination” as “immunization”[2]
· “The COVID-19 vaccines . . . are safe, effective and will save lives.”
· “Vaccines do more than protect the people getting vaccinated, they also protect everyone around them. The more people in a community who are immunized and protected from COVID-19, the harder it is for COVID-19 to spread.”
· “The best way to protect others and reduce the risk of getting sick with the flu and COVID-19 is to get immunized. The flu and COVID-19 vaccines are safe, effective and available for free to anyone aged six months and older. It is much safer to get the vaccines than to get the illnesses.”[3]
These statements are especially disconcerting given recent disclosures related to the lack of evidence of the safety of childhood vaccines and the COVID ‘vaccine’ in particular.
The COVID ‘Vaccine’
The claim of safety of the COVID ‘vaccine’ cannot be made in the face of the May 29, 2024 admission by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) in response to an order paper question from Conservative MP Cathay Wagantall.[4] The Public Health Agency of Canada acknowledged that booster recipients have higher death numbers than the unvaccinated. The report states:
“Across all weeks in the time period of interest, the number of deaths were highest among those with a primary series and 1 additional dose.”
Despite PHAC urging caution in interpreting the data, they fail to address their own misleading definitions when they identify vaccine recipients as “unvaccinated” during the first 14 days following vaccination, the period of high lethality after the injections. The misleading use of the term “unvaccinated” renders all information from the PHAC and Health Canada unreliable and validates the safety and efficacy concerns surrounding these products.
Researchers investigating the safety and effectiveness of Pfizer’s vaccine in fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated children and teens found cases of myocarditis and pericarditis only in vaccinated children.[5] The study also found that initial protection by BNT162b2 vaccination against positive SARS-CoV-2 tests in adolescents aged 12-15 had waned by 14 weeks after vaccination. Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer of Children’s Health Defense states:
“This study clearly shows that Pfizer’s COVID vaccine provides almost no benefit to children and adolescents but does increase their risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. It begs the question: Why does the CDC continue to recommend these unlicensed shots for kids? Where is the data they use to support their statement that the benefits of these vaccines outweigh the risks?”
On October 7, 2024, Florida State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo announced new guidance regarding mRNA vaccines.[6] The Florida Department of Health conducted an analysis to evaluate vaccine safety. This analysis found that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination. Non-mRNA vaccines were not found to have these increased risks. As such, the State Surgeon General recommends against males aged 18 to 39 from receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.
The Department continues to stand by its Guidance for Pediatric COVID-19 Vaccines, issued March 2022, which recommends against use in healthy children and adolescents 5 years old to 17 years old. This now includes recommendations against COVID-19 vaccination among infants and children under 5 years old.
The following is beyond medical debate and considered accepted medical knowledge:
· The COVID injections do not stop COVID infection or transmission.
· Healthy young people have essentially zero risk of serious illness and death from COVID.
· Since the COVID mRNA “vaccines” were given to the public, over 1.6 million adverse events and over 38,000 deaths related to these injections have been reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in the US. Among these toxicities, increased rates of myocarditis—sometimes fatal—in young people, especially boys, have been demonstrated in recipients of the mRNA injections.
· Additionally laboratory analysis has found high levels of DNA adulteration, and multiple undeclared genetic sequences in both Moderna and Pfizer Covid-19 genetic “vaccines”.
· The Pfizer and Moderna COVID mRNA injections, while commonly called vaccines, are not true vaccines, but a type of mRNA-based gene therapy. In effect, they are ‘vaccines-in-name-only’.
Childhood Vaccine Schedule Led to ‘Greatest Decline in Public Health in Human History’
There is no legitimate medical justification for healthy children or young adults to receive the COVID mRNA injections. Any institution continuing to refer to these injections as ‘vaccines’ and declaring them to be “safe and effective” is intentionally misinforming the public and health practitioners alike. This demonstrates a blatant disregard for scientific evidence and the health of our children and youth.
Lack of Proven Safety of Childhood Vaccines . . . .
=======
c.
“Prof. Jeffrey Sachs Exposes the People Who Truly Run U.S. Foreign Policy”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCzNhmmiuqc&si=Dfs58wXLmmq2tVgF
with Jeffrey Sachs
(8:14, with transcript)
+
“‘The Train Has Left the Station and No One Can Stop It’. Europe Will be at War with Russia”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/train-left-station-no-one-stop/5859967
by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
These are the words of Serbia’s President Aleksander Vucic. He ought to know. He is in the middle of it. He thinks Europe will be at war with Russia in “not more than three or four months,” if that long.
President Vucic says “no one is attempting to stop the war. Nobody is speaking about peace. Peace is almost a forbidden word.” Scroll down for text and 5 minute video
Hungarian leader Viktor Orban has a similar view as does Slovakian president Robert Fico, who survived a recent assassination attempt.
READ MORE: The Ever Widening War. Putin’s Inaction Continues to Widen the Conflict
In Western Europe, UK, and Washington everyone is talking about wider war with long range missiles used for attacks deep into Russia. Such attacks cannot revive the defeated Ukrainian military. Their purpose seems to be to provoke Russia into a retaliation that Washington can use to widen the war.
President Vucic is correct. The West is making no effort–indeed, is avoiding all effort–to defuse the dangerous situation. Instead, the West is throwing oil on fire with long range missile attacks and French troops sent into Ukraine.
It has been completely clear from day one that Putin’s limited drawn-out war enabled the West to get more and more involved into the conflict to the point that the conflict now is really between the West and Russia. As President Vucic says, the West’s prestige is now involved and the West cannot permit Russia to prevail.
It seems that Putin might have finally realized that the war is no longer limited to Donbas and has become a wider threat that is not subject to negotiation on terms that Russia can accept.
Now that Putin is backed into a corner with the prospect of NATO missiles striking deep into Russia, President Vucic’s expectation that war is close at hand is understandable. The way matters are shaping up, the avoidance of war depends on how many provocations the Kremlin will accept and for how long. Putin needs to quickly knock Ukraine out of the war before Ukraine fills up with NATO military personnel.
Zelensky’s term has expired, making him illegitimate. Russian forces should quickly take Kiev, install a new government agreeable to Ukraine as a neutral country and to the reunification of Donbas with Russia.
I don’t know if Putin still has time to avoid a larger war by quickly winning the current conflict or whether Putin has been fighting on the cheap and lacks the force size to take Kiev and control the country.
If Putin has been too limited in his goal and too parsimonious with his means, he has bought himself a wider war.
+
LIVE Speech: “Europe On Brink Of War With Russia: Putin’s Top Aide Issues Ultimatum To Europeans”
https://www.youtube.com/live/lEXO4FvftfQ
by Times Of India
Russian foreign minister has sounded big alarm for Europe amid Ukraine war. Sergey Lavrov has warned that the U.S. and the UK are pushing Europe into a military faceoff with Russia. He also slammed the West for taking orders from the U.S. Watch for more.
+
“ISRAEL on Brink of WAR with Iran? Leaked documents? WW3 avoided!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GYZ291q4qM
by IaintTheHerb
(14:53)
As "leaked" intelligence documents predicted, Israel launched an attack against Iran and claimed to penetrate their air defenses. But what really happened, and why did they not complete their attack? Maybe Iran wasn't penetrated at all, and Israel may be up against more than Netanyahu understands. Brink of WW3 may have been narrowly avoided.
+
“Poland’s Military Loan Proposal to Ukraine Shows That Warsaw Is Finally Wising Up”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/poland-military-loan-proposal-ukraine/5871787
by Andrew Korybko
This is in response to Polish public opinion souring on the proxy war and the ruling liberal-globalist coalition consequently trying to exploit that in an attempt to raise the chances that their candidate replaces the outgoing conservative-nationalist president during next year’s election.
Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski proposed that Ukraine can order military equipment from his country on credit and then pay it back once the conflict ends in response to Zelensky complaining about Poland supposedly withholding some of its armaments such as the MiG-29 fighter jets. Sikorski also reminded Zelensky that Poland has done more for Ukraine than any other country in reference to President Andrzej Duda’s disclosure over the summer that it already gave 3.3% of its GPD to the cause.
Another important point that he made is that Poland is a “frontline country” against Russia and must therefore maintain its minimum national defense needs just in case the conflict spirals out of control. This echoed what Duda earlier said during his trip to South Korea about how
“There is no scenario in which we hand over weapons that we have recently bought for billions of zlotys from the pockets of our taxpayers. These weapons must serve the security and defense of the Republic of Poland.”
That possibility had been discussed over the past few weeks amidst reports of North Korean troops fighting Ukraine, the rumors of which (whether true or not) were assessed here as a means for getting South Korea to send some of its enormous shell stockpile to Ukraine at this crucial moment in the conflict. Russia continues gaining ground, and its potential capture of Pokrovsk could prove to be a turning point for the reasons explained here. Even US intelligence and military officials fear the worst.
Poland’s refusal to give away any more of its military equipment for free, let alone that which it just obtained from South Korea, despite how urgent the situation has recently become isn’t surprising. Not only did it already max out everything that it can donate by this summer without endangering its minimum national defense needs, but it’s also wising up to the fact that it’s been exploited by Ukraine, which reportedly receives strings-attached military aid from everyone else but Poland.
=======
d.
“Tony Norfield |Israel's Miscalculations: Will the Harsh Reality of the Middle East Finally Catch Up?
https://www.youtube.com/live/a65LacYQnhQ?si=OcQ9Oh3R9_oERMdA
with Nima Alkhorshid and Tony Norfield
(57:53)
For nearly twenty years, Tony Norfield worked in bank dealing rooms in the City of London. For ten years he was an Executive Director and the Global Head of FX Strategy in a major European bank, travelling to some forty countries on business, negotiating with finance ministries, central banks and major corporations. He was frequently quoted in the Financial Times, Wall Street Journal, Guardian and Telegraph, and on news services such as Reuters, Bloomberg, CNN and CNBC. In 2014, he was awarded a PhD in Economics from the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. Tony's Blog: https://economicsofimperialism.blogsp...
+
“Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, meets the press”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T72SpHzBjs
by UN Human Rights Council
(56:54)
Following the presentation of her latest report to the @unitednations General Assembly the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, Francesca Albanese, held a press conference at the UN headquarters in New York on 30 October 2024. The report says that "the violence that Israel has unleashed against the Palestinians post-7 October is not happening in a vacuum, but is part of a long-term intentional, systematic, State-organized forced displacement and replacement of the Palestinians." The Special Rapporteur is part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Comprising the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, Special Procedures is the general name of the Council's independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity. The Human Rights Council is a subsidiary body of the United Nations General Assembly.
+
“UN expert shuts up reporter for questioning integrity, slams America’s veto woman”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6hNfG7Dp6o
by Janta Ka Reporter
(14:38)
UN expert Francesca Albanese has presented another report to the UN General Assembly saying that Israel had expanded its je no cidal campaign to the occupied West Bank as well. Albanese had presented another report in March this year saying that Israel had crossed the threshold pf jen ocide in Gaza. Reacting to her damning report, America’s veto woman, Linda Thomas Greenfield called her antisemitic. Albanese lashed out at the American representative at the UN. She also shut up a reporter after he questioned her integrity.
+
“Day 390: Steadfastness amid grief and loss”
https://electronicintifada.net/blogs/nora-barrows-friedman/day-390-steadfastness-amid-grief-and-loss
and
with Nora Barrows-Friedman
(2:53:39)
=======
e.
“Alastair Crooke: Iran's Bold Move Threatens U.S. - Israel! West SHOCKED”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cq0snoFqTGk&si=jSxzmdqbjiZYgOl_
with Judge Napolitano and Alastair Crooke, Nov. 4, 2024
(28:12)
Alastair Crooke: Iran's Bold Move Threatens U.S. - Israel! West SHOCKED by Advanced Missile Systems! This video, featuring insights from Alastair Crooke, examines the shifting strategic landscape in the Middle East, emphasizing Iran's influence over Israel and the United States. Iran is positioning itself as a regional leader focused on "decolonizing" the Middle East and reducing foreign dominance. Iran's Supreme Leader has warned of more forceful actions targeting Israel and the U.S. as Arab nations cautiously pursue peace agreements without alienating the U.S. The video highlights Iran's technological advancements, including missile and radar systems that defy Western assumptions about its capabilities. This shifting power dynamic also affects the West, where mounting debt and economic challenges hinder military readiness, evoking comparisons to the Soviet Union's decline. Iran's strengthened military alliances, such as with Russia, and confidence in its strategic position underscore the declining influence of Western powers, particularly the U.S., in the region.
+
“Iran: The Road to Armageddon?”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/iran-the-road-to-armageddon/7193
with Felicity Arbuthnot
They are at it again. Remember when Milosovic was labelled “the butcher of Belgrade”, the new Hitler?
Then Saddam Hussein was “the butcher of Bagdad” and, of course the most dangerous man since Hitler – with weapons of mass destruction which could be unleashed on the world “in forty five minutes”.
Colin Powell lied to the U.N., about the danger Iraq posed to the planet;
George Bush lied to anyone who would listen;
Tony Blair lied to Parliament and aides concocted dossiers so dodgy they were laughable, yet in spite of the millions who marched, protested and knew the lies for what they were, there were millions who bought fiction as fact.
And here we go again. Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (wait for “the tyrant of Tehran”) threatens the planet, is supplying weapons to Iraq’s resistance, is destabilising the region and the paradise that is occupied Iraq.
Whilst there are indeed plenty of Iranians or Iranian sympathisers in Iraq, they came in with the occupiers. Many in high places in Iraq’s corrupt, militia driven, American puppet government, speak Farsi, not Arabic.
The increasingly hysterical claims regarding Iran, the latest threat to life as we know it, is being brought to you by the very same warmongers who wrought the duplicity that resulted in Iraq’s murderous decimation, the hawks’ nest which is the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and their friends.
A glance at the AEI website lists those including:
Paul Wolfowitz (“entrepreneurship and development”),
Michael Rubin (“Arab democracy”),
Richard Perle (“defence …intelligence”),
Joshua Muravchik (“global democracy”),
John Bolton (“foreign policy”),
Lynne Cheney, whose husband, as ever, is believed a driving force behind the attack plan (“culture and education”),
Michael Ledeen (latest book: “The Iranian Time Bomb: The Mullah Zealots Quest for Destruction”),
Daniell Pletka (“Vice President for foreign and defence policy studies”) who, writing in the “Wall Street Journal” (28th September 2007) referred to Iran’s “illegal nuclear weapons … Washington’s impotence” and “clear information of a link to a weapons of mass destruction programme”. This in spite of the International Atomic Energy Authority finding no indication of such programmes.
It all sounds chillingly familiar . . . .
+
INTERVIEW: “Israel and the fire to come”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6sHeGHubWA
with George Galloway and Mohammad Marandi
(17:49)
No one will welcome Trump or Harris in Tehran, says Prof Seyed Marandi. Israel? It can't even take a dot on the map called Gaza. And Iran's response will be monumental
+
“Chas Freeman: Iran's POWERFUL Slap Shatters Israel's PARANOIA! IDF’s DEVASTATING Defeat In Lebanon”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xe37R79PcQ4
with Kamil Kerimov
(47:12)
+
“Mohammad Marandi WARNS: Iran Poised To Target US Bases In Middle East! Netanyahu’s GRAVE MISTAKE”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6ZEKTr4sF4
with Mohammad Marandi
(57:24)
=======
f.
“Video: A Nuclear Bunker Buster Bomb against Iran Would Initiate World War III, On the Drawing Board of the Pentagon”
by Union of Concerned Scientists and Prof Michel Chossudovsky
(2:27)
Introduction
The video below produced in 2006 by the Union of Concerned Scientists in collaboration with the Pentagon reveals the consequence of the use of a Nuclear Earth Penetration Bomb in an attack on Iran.
This is an important video production, carefully documented by the UCS.
I should mention that the option to use bunker buster bombs against Iran is currently on the drawing board of the Pentagon, despite the fact that there is no evidence that Iran has stockpiled Weapons of Mass destruction in so-called bunkers, as conveyed in the video.
Implied in the video-montage is that Iran constitutes a WMD threat, when in fact there is no evidence to that effect.
The Nuclear Earth Penetrating Bomb (NEPB) should be distinguished from the so-called tactical nuclear weapons (mini-nukes) which are low yield.
“The simulation in the Flash Animation pertains to a one megaton bunker buster thermonuclear bomb with an explosive capacity of 60 times a Hiroshima bomb. Its use would result in millions of deaths and radioactive fallout extending eastwards into Pakistan and India.
The earth penetrating technology is similar. The explosive capacity of the B61-11 and 12 series which are deployed in Western Europe have an explosive capacity from one third to 12 times a Hiroshima bomb.
“the B61-11 has several “available yields”, ranging from “low yields” of less than one kiloton, to mid-range and up to the 1000 kiloton bomb. In all cases, the radioactive fallout is devastating. Moreover, the B61 series of thermonuclear weapons includes several models with distinct specifications: the B61-11, the B61-3, B61- 4, B61-7 and B61-10. Each of these bombs has several “available yields”.
What is contemplated for theater use [against Iran] is the “low yield” 10 kt bomb, two thirds of a Hiroshima bomb”.
In the simulation based on a model of the Pentagon pertaining to the RNEP (image below) “more than three million would be killed and more than thirty five million people would be exposed by cancer causing radiation.”
+
“Iran Sends Big Message To Muslim World Before Iran Attack”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8YDsNSTJLQ&si=VrfQWhqAS8eKZkvr
by Times Of India
(3:16)
A senior IRGC commander, Brigadier General Gholamreza Soleimani, stated that Iran has not yet revealed its full military capabilities. He claimed that Israel's "irreparable" defeat signifies a turning point for the Palestinian cause. Soleimani emphasized that miscalculations by Israel will lead to its downfall, and he called for action to save the Holy Quds. Meanwhile, Brigadier General Ali Mohammad Naeini, another IRGC official, promised a decisive response to Israeli aggression, highlighting Iran's successful missile operations against Israel. Both commanders predict that Israel is on the brink of collapse.
+
“Douglas Macgregor: Who Is CONTROLLING Middle East's Game? SOMETHING BIG IS GOING TO HAPPEN SOON”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ywso4cSwnJ4&si=OYoKVvgJYUXgwJti
with Douglas Macgregor
(30:07)
+
“US Bombers Arrive in Middle East as Part of New Deployment for Israel”
by Dave DeCamp
US B-52 bombers arrived in the Middle East on Saturday as part of a new deployment to “defend” Israel amid speculation over whether or not Iran will respond to Israel’s October 26 attack.
“B-52 Stratofortress strategic bombers from Minot Air Force Base’s 5th Bomb Wing arrived in the US Central Command area of responsibility,” US Central Command wrote on X.
The Pentagon announced it was beefing up its military presence in the region on Friday, saying Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin ordered the “deployment of additional ballistic missile defense destroyers, fighter squadron and tanker aircraft, and several US Air Force B-52 long-range strike bombers to the region.”
The Pentagon said the purpose of the deployment is the “protection of US citizens and forces in the Middle East, the defense of Israel, and de-escalation.” The US also recently deployed a THAAD missile defense system and about 100 troops to Israel.
Iranian officials have been vowing there will be a response to Israel’s attack, which killed four Iranian soldiers and one civilian. Israel launched the airstrikes on Iran in retaliation for the October 1 Iranian missile barrage that was fired into Israel in response to a string of Israeli escalations and assassinations in the region.
Axios has reported that Israeli intelligence suggests Iran is planning to launch a major attack from Iraqi territory and that it could happen before the US presidential election on November 5. However, a report published by The Wall Journal on Sunday said that Iran didn’t want to influence the US election and would likely wait until after.
The Journal report, which cited unnamed Arab and Iranian officials, said Iran has told Arab diplomats it’s planning a complex response against Israel that would involve more powerful warheads and other weapons not used in its previous attacks on Israeli territory. One source said Iran would likely target military facilities again “but much more aggressively than last time.”
Another Axios report said the US warned Iran that if it attacked, the US wouldn’t be able to restrain Israel. “We told the Iranians: We won’t be able to hold Israel back, and we won’t be able to make sure that the next attack will be calibrated and targeted as the previous one,” a US official told Axios.
+
“Selling War: How Raytheon and Boeing Fund the Push for NATO's Nuclear Expansion”
https://www.mintpressnews.com/raytheon-boeing-fund-push-nato-nuclear-expansion/288300/
by Alan Macleod
To “counter Russia’s nuclear blackmail,” the Atlantic Council confidently asserted, “NATO must adapt its nuclear sharing program.” This includes moving B-61 atomic bombs to Eastern Europe and building a network of medium-range missile bases across the continent. The think tank praised Washington’s recent decision to send Tomahawk and SM-6 missiles to Germany as a “good start” but insisted that it “does not impose a high enough price” on Russia.
What the Atlantic Council does not divulge at any time is that not only would this drastically increase the likelihood of a catastrophic nuclear war, but that the weapons they specifically recommend come directly from manufacturers that fund them in the first place.
The B-61 bombs are assembled by Boeing, who, according to its most recent financial reports, gave tens of thousands of dollars to the organization. And the Tomahawk and SM-6 are produced by Raytheon, who recently supplied the Atlantic Council with a six-figure sum.
Thus, their recommendations not only put the world at risk but also directly benefit their funders.
Unfortunately, this gigantic conflict of interest that affects us all is par for the course among foreign policy think tanks. A MintPress News investigation into the funding sources of U.S. foreign policy think tanks has found that they are sponsored to the tune of millions of dollars every year by weapons contractors. Arms manufacturing companies donated at least $7.8 million last year to the top fifty U.S. think tanks, who, in turn, pump out reports demanding more war and higher military spending, which significantly increase their sponsors’ profits. The only losers in this closed, circular system are the American public, saddled with higher taxes, and the tens of millions of people around the world who are victims of the U.S. war machine.
The think tanks receiving the most tainted cash were, in order, the Atlantic Council, CSIS, CNAS, the Hudson Institute, and the Council on Foreign Relations, while the weapons manufacturers most active on K-Street were Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and General Atomics.
These think tanks directly affect conflicts around the world. CSIS, for example, are among the loudest advocates for arming Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel, even as the latter carries out a genocide in Palestine. A recent report lays out a shopping list of U.S. weapons that would help the Israeli military, including Excalibur artillery projectiles, JDAM bomb guidance systems, and Javelin missiles. Those weapons are manufactured by Raytheon, Boeing, and Lockheed Martin, respectively, all of whom are among CSIS’ top funders.
U.S. arms are being used daily to carry out illegal and deadly attacks against civilian populations in Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria, making arms manufacturers directly complicit in war crimes.
One example of this is the recent Israeli bombing of the Al Mawasi humanitarian zone in Gaza. Israel dropped three one-ton MK-84 bombs on the camp, killing at least 19 people. Dozens more are still missing.
According to the UN, MK-84 bomb blasts rupture lungs, tear limbs and heads from bodies, and burst sinus cavities up to hundreds of meters away.
The MK-84 bombs were produced in the U.S. by General Dynamics and sent to Israel with Washington’s blessing. General Dynamics has made huge profits from the slaughter; the D.C.-based arms manufacturer’s stock price has jumped by 42% since October 7.
Conflicts and Conflicts of Interest
Think tanks are an essential part of K-Street, the collective term for the assembly of lobbyists, trade associations and other organizations that attempt to alter government policy. Think tanks are groups of intellectuals who come together to discuss and advocate for policies in the hope of affecting government policy and the public debate. They carry out and publish in-depth research on government policy, help write laws, and serve as go-to experts for the media. Many talking heads on cable news or guest writers penning op-eds in newspapers work at think tanks. As such, they are a key driver of political discourse across the country . . . .
+
“Leaked documents reveal US intel cutout’s Iranian counter-revolution plans”
https://thegrayzone.com/2024/09/19/us-intel-cutouts-iranian-counter-revolution/
by Kit Klarenberg and Max Blumenthal
Leaks expose a secret effort by retired National Endowment for Democracy leader Carl Gershman to consolidate war-hungry neoconservative control over Iran’s opposition, while channeling US government funds into his own pet regime change initiatives.
Leaked documents and emails obtained by The Grayzone reveal a seemingly covert effort by American regime change operatives to impose radical leadership on the remnants of Iran’s protest movement against the mandatory hijab, in order to topple the government of Iran.
The initiative was spearheaded by Carl Gershman, the longtime director of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a US government-funded non-profit which advances regime change operations across the globe. Originally conceived by the Reagan administration’s CIA, the NED has meddled in elections and sponsored coup leaders from Nicaragua to Venezuela to Hong Kong, and beyond.
The leaks reveal how Gershman privately plotted to channel US State Department resources into the construction of an “Iran Freedom Coalition” composed of pro-Western Iranian activists and US neoconservative operatives who clamor for an American military assault on Iran.
While aiming to “mobilize international support” for the Women, Life, Freedom Movement, “and to do what is possible to aid [their] struggle,” the Freedom Coalition represents a clear attempt to impose an exiled leadership over the grassroots Iranian opposition which is directed and sponsored by the most belligerent elements in Washington.
+
“Exclusive: Yemen Uncovers Massive CIA and Mossad Spy Ring Embedded in Pro-Democracy NGOs”
https://www.mintpressnews.com/cia-spy-ring-yemen-promoted-homosexuality-israel-normalization/288407/
by Ahmed Abdulkareem
While Yemen usually conjures images of conflicts with Israel and the Saudi-led coalition, a new dimension to the complex country and its people has emerged: Yemen’s secret war of spies. MintPress News delves into the largest CIA spy cell ever uncovered in Yemen, revealing a major security operation that apprehended its members and exposed American espionage activities, dramatically altering our understanding of Yemen’s complex battlefield.
In June, MintPress revealed how the Ansar Allah-led government of Sanaa had dismantled an espionage cell – Force 400 — allegedly working for the United States and Israel, detailing the cell’s members and their activities. Washington responded by calling for the release of individuals it claimed were employees of the United Nations, diplomatic bodies, and NGOs, labeling them as hostages held by the Houthis, a pejorative term often used by Western officials to describe the political and military movement known as Ansar Allah.
MintPress News correspondent Ahmed AbdulKareem was granted unprecedented access to the alleged spies. Additionally, a trove of top-secret documents was provided to MintPress, corroborating the testimony of many of the detainees given during these interviews. MintPress also reviewed hours of footage showing interrogations conducted by Yemeni security personnel, which confirmed the details of the allegations against the detainees that were provided to MintPress during interviews with high-level security officials from Ansar Allah.
While arrests related to the vast espionage cell began in earnest in 2021, officials in both the United States and Yemen remained tight-lipped about the discovery. However, Ansar Allah officials told MintPress that Washington was aware of the arrests and initiated a series of secret negotiations for the detainees’ release shortly thereafter. Those negotiations ultimately failed, and details began to leak in the Arab press. This led Yemeni officials to publicly disclose the discovery of the espionage ring and eventually revived negotiations between the two parties in Muscat, Oman.
In a groundbreaking investigation, MintPress News uncovers the inner workings of one of the largest spy networks ever exposed in Yemen, shedding light on how American and Israeli intelligence agencies covertly infiltrated Yemeni society. Through clandestine operations, they manipulated local dynamics, exploiting religious divisions and sowing seeds of normalization with Israel. The ultimate aim: gathering intelligence for Saudi airstrikes on military targets.
Exclusive access to top-secret documents, detainee testimonies, and interrogation footage reveals a harrowing narrative of espionage. Spies were recruited through psychological manipulation, sexual blackmail, and torture, highlighting the extent to which U.S. and Israeli operatives bent moral boundaries to secure cooperation.
This investigation offers a disturbing glimpse into the shadow war being waged in Yemen—one fueled by exploitation and coercion. It marks the beginning of an ongoing series that will unveil further layers of this covert operation in future reports.
=======
g.
“Israeli Oil Refinery, Gas Field 'Bombed'; Iraqi Resistance's 'Tit-For-Tat Attack 'Jolts' Netanyahu”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvtJWJfDOfk&si=ytQX_NVOG6TObDNM
by Telegram, Palestine Resists, Nov. 5, 2024
(3:28)
The Islamic Resistance in Iraq bombards three vital Haifa targets with drones. The Iran proxies claimed to have attacked the Haifa Oil Refinery and Tamar Gas Field in early morning attacks. Watch.
+
“Israel Killed Over 50 Children in Jabalia in 48 Hours: UN”
https://scheerpost.com/2024/11/04/israel-killed-over-50-children-in-jabalia-in-48-hours-un/
by Dave DeCamp / Antiwar.com, Nov. 4, 2024
Israeli strikes in Jabalia, northern Gaza, killed over 50 children in just 48 hours, the UN’s child relief agency, UNICEF, said in a statement on Saturday.
“This has already been a deadly weekend of attacks in North Gaza. In the past 48 hours alone, over 50 children have reportedly been killed in Jabalia, where strikes leveled two residential buildings sheltering hundreds of people,” said UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell.
Jabalia has been the focus of an Israeli ethnic cleansing campaign in northern Gaza that began in early October. The campaign has involved a starvation blockade and massive strikes on civilians, and Israeli troops are preventing the approximately 50,000 Palestinians who have been forced out of Jabalia from returning.
Russell said Israeli strikes included an attack on UNICEF staff working on a polio vaccination campaign for children and an attack on a vaccination center. The World Health Organization said at least six people, including four children, were wounded in the Israeli strike on the vaccination center.
“The attacks on Jabalia, the vaccination clinic, and the UNICEF staff member are yet further examples of the grave consequences of the indiscriminate strikes on civilians in the Gaza strip,” Russell said. “Taken alongside the horrific level of child deaths in North Gaza from other attacks, these most recent events combine to write yet another dark chapter in one of the darkest periods of this terrible war.”
Israeli strikes continued to pound northern, central, and southern Gaza on Sunday. Medical sources told Al Jazeera that at least 35 Palestinians were killed, including 16 in the north. An Israeli attack on a residential building in the southern city of Khan Younis killed seven members of the same family, including four children.
Gaza’s Health Ministry said in its death toll update on Sunday that at least 27 Palestinians were killed and 86 were injured in the previous 24-hour period. The latest violence brought the ministry’s death toll since October 2023 to 43,341 and the number of wounded to 102,105.
The Health Ministry’s numbers are considered an undercount since they don’t account for Palestinians missing and presumed dead under the rubble or indirect deaths caused by the Israeli siege. A group of American healthcare workers who volunteered in Gaza have estimated the US-backed Israeli bombing campaign and siege has killed at least 118,908 Palestinians, including over 60,000 who have starved to death.
The genocidal slaughter would not be possible without US military aid, as Israeli officials have acknowledged they couldn’t sustain operations in Gaza for more than a few months without US support. The Israeli news site Calcalist has estimated the US has funded about 70% of Israel’s military operations over the past year.
+
“ADL Offshoot's Hidden Influence in US Schools: Project Shema Exposed”
https://www.mintpressnews.com/adl-offshoot-hidden-influence-us-schools-project-shema/288283/
by Kit Klarenberg
On September 3, Massachusetts’ Northampton High School (N.H.S.) was shut down – dramatically, yet without much fanfare. All 900 pupils were given the day off, with every teacher conversely cooped up inside. Meanwhile, swarms of armed police patrolled the grounds. Their purpose was to deter any potential commotion from concerned parents or students who might attend to voice their discontent. N.H.S. was hosting a highly controversial staff instruction delivered by the “training and support organization” Project Shema.
Days earlier, local outlet The Daily Hampshire Gazette reported on how over 500 community members had signed a petition demanding N.H.S. scrap the “professional development training” delivered by Project Shema, which purportedly focuses on “addressing antisemitism” and instead “plan training on anti-Palestinian and anti-Arab racism, Islamophobia and antisemitism.” The petition was launched “by parents of current students and current high school staff” due to their concerns that “Project Shema conflates antisemitic comments with criticism of Israel and support for Palestine.”
They charged that Project Shema closely aligns with the noxious Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a prominent and extremely well-funded Zionist lobby organization. With a sordid history of infiltrating and destabilizing social justice movements, it preaches the perverse gospel that any condemnation of Israel’s genocidal actions against the Palestinian people equates to antisemitism. The petition’s authors allege Project Shema employs similarly disreputable tactics and rhetoric to insulate the Zionist entity’s neverending erasure of Palestine from scrutiny. They further stated:
By using Project Shema as a training resource, N.H.S. will be endorsing a narrative that the colonization, ethnic cleansing, and illegal occupation of Palestinian land and people is legitimate. It will bolster harmful narratives that Palestinians, and Arabs in general, are irrational and inherently antisemitic. N.H.S. will be aligning with those who claim that Israel’s genocide of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza constitutes ‘self defense.’”
For its part, Project Shema contends, “we do not offer education or advocacy on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict” but simply “help upstanders understand Jewish identity and nurture empathy for Jewish traumas and lived experiences.” Publicly, its operatives and supporters repudiate any connection with the ADL or the League’s disingenuous crusade to neutralize anti-Zionist perspectives under the bogus aegis of combating antisemitism. Yet, as we shall see, there are unambiguous grounds to believe these denials to be brazen lies.
Furthermore, there is significant cause for concern that the N.H.S. training day is no one-off but just the beginning of a wider rollout across all U.S. public schools. If that comes to pass, Project Shema will effectively infiltrate countless classrooms across the nation and, in turn, the hearts and minds of millions of unsuspecting American teenagers – one of the Western world’s fastest-growing anti-Zionist constituencies, among them many Jews. Are we witnessing the latest chapter in Israel’s ceaseless overseas censorship crusade erupt?
=======
h.
In the Aftermath of Covid . . . .
“Mistakes Were NOT Made: An Anthem for Justice”
https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/mistakes-were-not-made-an-anthem
by Margaret Anna Alice
+
“Shame on Hospital Systems that Denied Patients This Wonder Drug”
by The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC)
+
“Ivermectin's Mechanism of Action Against SARS-CoV-2 Described”
by Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH
SHAME on the hospital systems that systematically denied patients (and their begging families) this FDA-approved, Nobel prize winning, wonder drug.
+
Through the Looking Glass, with a poem by Margaret Anna Alice,
“When Tyranny Is in Vogue + Honoring Dr. Jackie Stone (1965–2024)”
https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/when-tyranny-is-in-vogue-honoring
with Margaret Anna Alice, Lisa Henry, and SeanBFlanagan
(5:53)
+
“Dr. Francis Boyle Provides Affidavit: COVID 19 mRNA Nanoparticle Injections Are Biological Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Law Professor That Wrote 1989 Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act Provides Affidavit”
by Dr. Joseph Sansone
Dr. Francis Boyle, the Harvard educated law professor that drafted the 1989 Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act, which passed both houses of Congress unanimously, provided an affidavit stating that Covid 19 injections and mRNA nanoparticle injections violate the law he wrote. Dr. Boyle asserted that ‘COVID 19 injections’, ‘COVID 19 nanoparticle injections’, and ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’ are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction and violate Biological Weapons 18 USC § 175; Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat. (2023).
Dr. Boyle provided this affidavit in a Florida case filed by Dr. Joseph Sansone involving an Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus that seeks to compel Governor DeSantis to prohibit the distribution of ‘COVID 19 injections’, ‘COVID 19 nanoparticle injections’, and ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’, in the state of Florida. It also seeks to compel Attorney General Ashley Moody to confiscate the vials.
The original Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus was filed on March 3rd, 2024, in the Florida Supreme Court. It was then transferred to the Circuit Court in Leon County on March 20th, 2024. On April 9th, 2024, the Circuit Court dismissed the case. The case is now in the appellate court. The Appellate Brief was filed on Memorial Day, May 27th, 2024.
The pleadings assert that the distribution of ‘COVID 19 injections’, ‘COVID 19 nanoparticle injections’, and ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’, violate – Biological Weapons 18 USC § 175; Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat. (2023); Federal Crime of Treason 18 USC § 2381; Treason § 876.32 Fla. Stat. (2023); Domestic Terrorism, 18 USC § 2331; Terrorism § 775.30 Fla. Stat. (2023); Murder § 782.04 (1)(a) Fla. Stat. (2023); and Genocide 18 USC §1091; Florida Drugs and Cosmetic Act § 499.005 (2) Fla. Stat. (2023); Fraud § 817.034 Fla Stat. (2023); Accessory After the Fact § 777.03 Fla. Stat. (2023); and Florida Medical Consent Law § 766.103 Fla Stat. (2023).
Dr. Boyle is considered one of the world’s leading legal experts on biological weapons. Dr. Boyle’s affidavit adds a tremendous amount of credibility to the case, which already has a tremendous body of evidence provided in the writ of mandamus. Affidavits stating that the injections are biological and technological weapons, were also provided by med legal advisor and biotech analyst Karen Kingston, who researched the evidence that makes of the Facts of the Case section of the Mandamus, and from Ana Mihalcea, M.D., PhD. Dr. Mihalcea’s research is included in the Mandamus. Dr. Mihalcea is one of the world’s leading researchers into the effects of self replicating nanotechnology in the blood of injected as well as the effects in the blood of the uninjected as a result of shedding.
Dr. Boyle’s affidavit is below:
+
“The Evolution And Validation Of The Metabolic Theory Of Cancer”
by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA
For the past 70 years the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT) guided all research and treatment in cancer. Why are so few aware that it was overturned 15 years ago by the Metabolic Theory of Cancer (MTOC)?
In my last post of this series on cancer, I summarized the history of the scientific discoveries which led to the current consensus theory on the cause of cancer which is called the Somatic Mutation Theory (SMT). I concluded by presenting evidence from the Human Genome Project and The Cancer Genome Atlas Project that emerged in the last 15 years which paradoxically, instead of confirming its validityy, instead contradicted it.
I suggest you read that first post on the SMT before delving into the current post which traces the history and evolution of the competing, and in my and other’s opinion, more scientifically valid theory called the Metabolic Theory of Cancer (MTOC). Please know that this post was highly informed by the amazing books by Travis Christofferson (Tripping Over the Truth or what I will reference below as TOTT), Thomas Seyfried (Cancer As a Metabolic Disease), and Siddhartha Mukherjee (The Emperor of All Maladies). I ask those authors for forgiveness if I mis-referenced or failed to reference statements made below as I wrote much of it from memory and notes.
My other cancer posts are:
If you have not read the previous posts, I will quickly review and summarize the conceptual foundation of the two competing theories so you can better understand this post.
SMT adherents believe that cancer arises solely from direct DNA damage, i.e. carcinogens cause mutations in the DNA contained in the chromosomes in the nucleus. These mutations then drive the cell to adopt “cancerous” properties, of which there are 8:
1. it stimulates its own growth
2. it evades growth suppressing signals
3. it resists cell death (apoptosis)
4. it enables replicative immortality
5. it induces the ability to grow new blood vessels to further tumor growth (angiogenesis)
6. it spreads to distant sites (metastasis)
7. it evades the immune system
8. it has a “reprogramming of energy metabolism”
Meanwhile, MTOC adherents believe that cancer results from injury to the mitochondria (the energy forming unit of the cell which is in the cytoplasm). They focus on the fact that all cancer cells, instead of using oxygen to make energy, rely on glucose for energy, something that occurs only when mitochondria are damaged.
Injured mitochondria then send signals to the nucleus which both disrupt the cell’s DNA monitoring and repair mechanisms as well as turn on genes which cause cancer (oncogenes). The main concept to understand is that MTOC researchers posit that unless there are damaged mitochondria, cancer will not result. SMT adherents largely ignore the role of the mitochondria in causing a cell to become cancerous and instead obsessively focus on the DNA mutations they find.
However, SMT adherents (i.e. all of modern oncology) really have no explanation for, nor do they address in a coherent manner the fact that all cancer cells predominantly utilize glucose for energy instead of oxygen. They think it a curious finding without importance, simply a “consequence” of cancer and not a cause. . . . .
=======
i.
“Weather Attack On Spain? At Least 95 Dead, Many More Missing, In "Unfathomable" Rainfall In Valencia—A YEAR'S Worth Of Rain In Hours”
by Celia Farber
Spain's National Weather Service Called The Rainfall "Extraordinary."
Open to see video coverage of this event.
+
“Valencia Rescue Videos Continued: The Spanish Rescue Services Used NIGHT VISION CAMERAS To Locate Stranded People, Horses and Pets, Used Inflatable Rafts, Boats, and Helicopters”
by Celia Farber
+
“Death Toll In Spain Officially Reported As 158 And Climbing, As Of Yesterday. WHAT WAS IT? The People Got NO Warning. In Some Footage The Streets Are DRY When The "Flood" Rolls In; People Are In Shock”
by Celia Farber
Second Day Of National Mourning, Nov 1.
Another event happened that is something that can’t happen—this time in the Valencia region on Spain.
It was neither a “storm” nor a “hurricane” but a sudden appearance of violent mud, water, mud and debris, pushing down bridges, tearing up streets, and flinging cars, even even huge trucks, into chaotic piles, resembling a boy’s car collection emptied from a bucket onto a pile on the floor.
My daughter in law told me yesterday, confirming what we are hearing, that based on what she heard from people in the Valencia region, people got no warning.
Do you remember how I kept saying the most ominous thing about “Helene” was the lack of warning? That seems to be an essential part of these new “weather” attacks, which are not weather.
“Storms” are tracked. Obsessively, with high tech precision, by professionals all over the world, and certainly Spain is no exception.
So what happened here?
One year’s worth of rain in 6 or 8 hours? I don’t think we should continue to use words like “rain.”
It was water. Violent water, out of nowhere. Mud water.
Right now I am only emphasizing the things that are impossible—I’m not offering “answers,” and of course, I am well aware of weather weaponry and have reported on it, more and more recently.
It seems this time they are not even trying to make it appear like a real “storm.”
What are we looking at here? It’s towns and cities filling up with water as you’d fill a bathtub. Water just descending, like a Hollywood film effect. There is no reference point for this. My daughter in law told me it is known hardly ever to rain in the Valencia region—but I am adamant it’s not rain, so what should we call it?
+
“211 Dead And Dozens Missing: Slow Government Or Military Response To Valencia, But Citizens Arrive By The Thousands, Carrying Shovels and Brooms, To Help In Search, Relief And Cleanup”
by Celia Farber
"This Is A Monumental Humanitarian Disaster"(with photos) . . . .
+
“Spain In Agony and Fury: Corpses All Over, Crowd Attacks Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez' Car With Fists, Throwing Objects and Mud, Cursing Him--He Flees; King and Queen Remain, Comfort People”
by Celia Farber
Lack of Warning, Abandonment, No Government Help, Not Even Clearing Dead Bodies--MANY Countries Tried To Warn Spain, President of Valencia Ignored SEVEN Warnings From Meteorologists About "DANA"
This is what remains of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchéz’ car after he made a very late (six days too late) visit, with the King and Queen, to the epicenter of the DANA disaster, in Paiporta . . . .
+
“More Flooding In Spain, Tornados In Oklahoma & Hurricanes In Texas: EU Man In Turtleneck Explains Why EC Needs MORE Money For Europe To ‘Prepare For Greater Security Challenges And Climate Crises.’”
by Celia Farber
A Sick Insult To Spain Which, Despite EU Membership And A "Global Leader" For PM, Did Not Even Get a Text Warning About Incoming Deadly Rushing Water Until They Were Already Fighting For Their Lives . . . .
=======
j.
“Portents of Chaos”
https://scheerpost.com/2024/11/01/patrick-lawrence-portents-of-chaos/
by Patrick Lawrence / Consortium News
Uh-oh. The New York Times is picking up its familiar theme now that the Nov. 5 elections are but a few days out front: Those mal-intended foreigners are again “sowing discord and chaos in hopes of discrediting American democracy,” it reported in a piece published Tuesday.
The Beelzebubs haunting this political season, when everything would otherwise be orderly and altogether copacetic among Americans, are Russia, China and Iran.
Why can’t this year’s version of the old, reliable “Axis of Evil” leave us alone with our “democratic process,” the one the rest of the world envies and resents? Troublemakers, with all their “sowing.” You could probably call them “garbage” and get away with it.
Uh-oh. We’re already reading of tampered voter-registration forms and forged applications to vote by mail in two districts in Pennsylvania, the populous state where the results in 2020 could not have been blurrier and whose 19 Electoral College votes were decisive in getting Joe Biden into the White House last time around.
But not to worry. In a delightful reprise of one of the truly memorable phrases to come down to us from the 1960s, an election commissioner in one of the districts where officials uncovered the malfeasance tells us, “The system worked.”
I think I understand.
I tell you, whenever I read of people in other countries sowing anything, whether it is doubt or chaos or disinformation, and at this point even pumpkin seeds, it always turns out the same. This word “sowing” has been a favorite in the mainstream press since 2016, when we read daily — and of this we were to have no doubt — the Rrrrrussians were “interfering in our elections.”
Since then, everytime I read of someone sowing something it sows more doubt in my mind — more than I already harbored — that one can take our electoral system, as we have it in the 21st century, the slightest bit seriously.
This is to say nothing of putting one’s name on it behind a little green curtain in a voting booth.
On the one hand you have the Times, which has diminished itself over the past eight years to little more than the Democrats’ house organ, already preparing to suggest that the malign enemies of American democracy corrupted the elections. Believe me, you will hear this if Kamala Harris loses but not if she wins.
On the other hand, you have early but clear cases of attempted vote-rigging and local election officials waving these cases off as nothing at all to fret about. It is interesting to consider why said officials profess so cavalier a view.
I have thought for months that the 2024 elections, discord already in plentiful supply, could easily tip over into a degree of civil chaos beyond anything so far recorded in the American story. Just such a day of reckoning now seems to beckon.
Neither of the main parties appears prepared to lose. At this moment it is hard to locate the limit of what either party will do to avoid losing.
Remnants of Democracy . . . .
+
“Patterns in Presidential Assassinations: Reviewing the Attempts on Donald Trump. A Conversation with Lisa Pease”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/patterns-in-presidential-assassinations-reviewing-the-attempts-on-donald-trump-a-conversation-with-lisa-pease/5868819
by Michael Welch and Lisa Pease
(59:01)
The year 2024 seems to have been a banner year for assassination attempts on the world stage. [1]
In May, there was a hit put on the Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico. The man just shy of his sixtieth birthday was off-side with NATO and most European countries in his advocacy for not selling weapons to Ukraine, allowing the country to cede some of its territory to Russia. Fico also promised to launch investigations into COVID-19 pandemic corruption, COVID-19 vaccine injuries and deaths, and 21,000 excess deaths. [2][3]
Ebrahim Raisi, president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, died in a suspicious helicopter crash that same month. [4]
So the suspicion of some people, this author included, was that Trump, the high profile personality who is accused of being a Manchurian Candidate (Putin’s buddy) and not quite reliable in dealing with standard “COVID protocols,” likely had a deep state bullet with his name on it. [5][6]
There have been not just one but two assassination attempts on the former president in the past two months. Both attempts failed, though one came awfully close to succeeding. [7]
This brings to mind several other assassination attempts of presidents and presidential candidates going back to the 1960s. As with the Kennedy brothers, JFK and RFK, there were some details 6 decades later that have curious qualities not generally explained by the official story. For example, why was the first shooter able to climb up on a roof only 100 yards away without any Secret Service personnel questioning him or stopping Trump from giving a speech? Why did the second gunman have the ability to get in and out of Ukraine and know Trump’s whereabouts on one of Trump’s golf courses in Florida? And how did he fit the typical description (not unlike Lee Harvey Oswald) of “lone gunmen?”
Is there more to this scenario than individuals taking matters into their own hands to deal with the man President Biden refers to as being a “threat to American democracy?” If so, then it might be helpful to get hold of a person who has devoted years investigating the suspected state murders of the past. And at this time, the Global Research News Hour had the great privilege of tracking down the knowledgeable yet polite voice of Lisa Pease.
Lisa Pease has spent many lunch hours, nights and weekends at her local library pouring through the files on microfilm to research the assassination of Robert F Kennedy. On 2018, she has published the critically acclaimed book A Lie Too Big to Fail: The Real History of the Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy. She joind us for the bulk of the hour to share her perspectives on RFK, the inconsistency around the official story, and the problematic aspects of Trump’s two close calls with the Grim Reaper.
Guiding listeners through the conversation this week is the former CJUM (University of Manitoba radio) host and broadcaster David Wright.
Lisa Pease is the author of ‘A Lie Too Big to Fail: The Real History of the Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy.’ Based on more than two decades of investigative research, Pease’s recently published book has already been hailed as “the magnum opus of RFK assassination research” by the acclaimed author of ‘JFK and the Unspeakable,’ James Douglass. Pease was previously published in a collection of essays titled ‘The Assassinations: Probe Magazine on JFK, MLK, RFK and Malcolm X.’
Global Research News Hour Episode 442 . . . .
=======
k.
“2016 Election Candidate Hillary Clinton: ‘We Created Al Qaeda’. The Protagonists of the ‘Global War on Terrorism’ are the Terrorists”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-we-created-al-qaeda/5337222
by Prof Michel Chossudovsky
The following video features 2016 Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton who candidly acknowledges that America created and funded Al Qaeda as a terrorist organization in the heyday of the Soviet-Afghan war:
““Let’s remember here… the people we are fighting today we funded them twenty years ago
… let’s go recruit these mujahideen.
“And great, let them come from Saudi Arabia and other countries, importing their Wahabi brand of Islam so that we can go beat the Soviet Union.”
In 1979 the plan in Afghanistan was regime change: destroy the secular (pro-Soviet) government which came to power in 1973, and install a proxy U.S. Islamic State, led by the Taliban.
THEN AND NOW
NOW

And today leading up to the 2024 elections, it’s “Déjà Vu: financing the “terrorists” as part of US-NATO’s “Global War on Terrorism”
What Hillary does not mention is that at no time in the course of the last 45 years since the so-called Soviet-Afghan War, the US has not ceased to support and finance Al Qaeda as a means to destabilizing and impoverishing sovereign countries.
It was “a pretty good idea”, says Hillary, and it remains a good idea today.
President Ronald Reagan issued (and signed) the National Security Decision Directive 166 (NSDD 166), which de facto authorized “stepped-up covert military aid to the Mujahideen” as well as CIA support to religious indoctrination.
The promotion of “Radical Islam” was a deliberate CIA initiative (NSDD 166) which in the wake of 9/11 has served as justification to waging a “Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) in the Middle East, Central Asia, Southeast Asia and sub–Saharan Africa.
See:
By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, October 23, 2024
+
“These 10 Companies Run Our ‘Democracy’”

https://scheerpost.com/2024/11/01/these-10-companies-run-our-democracy/
withRobert Scheer
(52:38)
Amidst the hype, excitement and nervousness of the election, the bigger picture of what the United States is and how it operates often gets lost on people. Many think that choosing one or another candidate will significantly alter their future to better represent their values, but in reality there is only one group of people that matter the most: those who Dr. Peter Phillips, professor emeritus at Sonoma State University, calls the “titans of capital.”
In his new book by the same name, Phillips studies the economic trends following the COVID-19 pandemic and how the wealth concentration in the world took a dramatic turn towards the already ultra-wealthy. He joins host Robert Scheer on this episode of Scheer Intelligence to further analyze these trends and how dire inequality is becoming.
The main problem is simple to understand: the ultra-wealthy “doubled their wealth concentration.” That means, according to Phillips, that “the upper one half of 1% of the people got richer and basically, the rest of the world got poorer.”
Phillips names the top 10 capital investment companies, such as BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, Morgan Stanley and others as the main culprits. Over $50 trillion are controlled by 117 people across these 10 companies, according to Phillips.
This immense concentration of wealth inevitably renders any semblance of democracy almost useless, as the main decision makers are those who hold the biggest bag. “Whoever we elect as President is not going to make any difference because they’re managed by capital,” Phillips tells Scheer.
“They’re there to protect global capital. That’s what the American political system is about. That’s what the political systems in the West are about. They see capital as a vital interest of the West, and that’s why we have military bases all over the world to protect capital and to ensure that debts get repaid and that this capital continues to grow and expand.”
+
“Jeffrey D. Sachs: The BRICS Summit Should Mark the End of Neocon Delusions”

by Jeffrey Sachs
The recent BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia should mark the end of the Neocon delusions encapsulated in the subtitle of Zbigniew Brzezinski’s 1997 book, The Global Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives. Since the 1990s, the goal of American foreign policy has been “primacy,” aka global hegemony. The U.S. methods of choice have been wars, regime change operations, and unilateral coercive measures (economic sanctions). Kazan brought together 35 countries with more than half the world population that reject the U.S. bullying and that are not cowed by U.S. claims of hegemony.
In the Kazan Declaration, the countries underscored “the emergence of new centres of power, policy decision-making and economic growth, which can pave the way for a more equitable, just, democratic and balanced multipolar world order.” They emphasized “the need to adapt the current architecture of international relations to better reflect the contemporary realities,” while declaring their “commitment to multilateralism and upholding the international law, including the Purposes and Principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations (UN) as its indispensable cornerstone.” They took particular aim at the sanctions imposed by the U.S. and its allies, holding that “Such measures undermine the UN Charter, the multilateral trading system, the sustainable development and environmental agreements.”
Time has run out on the neocon delusions, and the U.S. wars of choice.
The neocon quest for global hegemony has deep historical roots in America’s belief in its exceptionalism. In 1630, John Winthrop invoked the Gospels in describing the Massachusetts Bay Colony as a “City on the Hill,” declaring grandiosely that “The eyes of all people are upon us.” In the 19th century, America was guided by Manifest Destiny, to conquer North America by displacing or exterminating the native peoples. In the course of World War II, Americans embraced the idea of the “American Century,” that after the war the U.S. would lead the world.
The U.S. delusions of grandeur were supercharged with the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of 1991. With America’s Cold War nemesis gone, the ascendant American neoconservatives conceived of a new world order in which the U.S. was the sole superpower and the policeman of the world. Their foreign policy instruments of choice were wars and regime-change operations to overthrow governments they disliked.
Following 9/11, the neocons planned to overthrow seven governments in the Islamic world, starting with Iraq, and then moving on to Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. According to Wesley Clark, former Supreme Commander of NATO, the neocons expected the U.S. to prevail in these wars in 5 years. Yet now, more than 20 years on, the neocon-instigated wars continue while the U.S. has achieved absolutely none of its hegemonic objectives.
The neocons reasoned back in the 1990s that no country or group of countries would ever dare to stand up to U.S. power. Brzezinski, for example, argued in The Grand Chessboard that Russia would have no choice but to submit to the U.S.-led expansion of NATO and the geopolitical dictates of the U.S. and Europe, since there was no realistic prospect of Russia successfully forming an anti-hegemonic coalition with China, Iran and others. As Brzezinski put it:
“Russia’s only real geostrategic option—the option that could give Russia a realistic international role and also maximize the opportunity of transforming and socially modernizing itself—is Europe. And not just any Europe, but the transatlantic Europe of the enlarging EU and NATO.” (emphasis added, Kindle edition, p. 118)
Brzezinski was decisively wrong, and his misjudgment helped to lead to the disaster of the war in Ukraine. Russia did not simply succumb to the U.S. plan to expand NATO to Ukraine, as Brzezinski assumed it would. Russia said a firm no, and was prepared to wage war to stop the U.S. plans. As a result of the neocon miscalculations vis-à-vis Ukraine, Russia is now prevailing on the battlefield, and hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians are dead.
Nor—and this is the plain message from Kazan—did U.S. sanctions and diplomatic pressures isolate Russian in the least. In response to pervasive U.S. bullying, an anti-hegemonic counterweight has emerged. Simply put, the majority of the world does not want or accept U.S. hegemony, and is prepared to face it down rather than submit to its dictates. Nor does the U.S. anymore possess the economic, financial, or military power to enforce its will, if it ever did.
The countries that assembled in Kazan represent a clear majority of the world’s population. The nine BRICS members (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa as the original five, plus Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates), in addition to the delegations of 27 aspiring members, constitute 57 percent of the world’s population and 47 percent of the world’s output (measured at purchasing-power adjusted prices). The U.S., by contrast, constitutes 4.1 percent of the world population and 15 percent of world output. Add in the U.S. allies, and the population share of the U.S.-led alliance is around 15 percent of the global population.
The BRICS will gain in relative economic weight, technological prowess, and military strength in the years ahead. The combined GDP of the BRICS countries is growing at around 5 percent per annum, while the combined GDP of the U.S. and its allies in Europe and the Asia-Pacific is growing at around 2 percent per annum.
=======
l.
“Israel Kills the Journalists. Western Media Kills the Truth of Genocide in Gaza”

by Jonathan Cook
Western publics are being subjected to a campaign of psychological warfare, where genocide is classed as ‘self-defence’ and opposition to it ‘terrorism’
Israel knew that, if it could stop foreign correspondents from reporting directly from Gaza, those journalists would end up covering events in ways far more to its liking.
They would hedge every report of a new Israeli atrocity – if they covered them at all – with a “Hamas claims” or “Gaza family members allege”. Everything would be presented in terms of conflicting narratives rather than witnessed facts. Audiences would feel uncertain, hesitant, detached.
Israel could shroud its slaughter in a fog of confusion and disputation. The natural revulsion evoked by a genocide would be tempered and attenuated.
For a year, the global networks’ most experienced war reporters have stayed put in their hotels in Israel, watching Gaza from afar. Their human-interest stories, always at the heart of war reporting, have focused on the far more limited suffering of Israelis than the vast catastrophe unfolding for Palestinians.
That is why western audiences have been forced to relive a single day of horror for Israel, on 7 October 2023, as intensely as they have a year of daily horrors in Gaza – in what the World Court has judged to be a “plausible” genocide by Israel.
That is why the media have immersed their audiences in the agonies of the families of some 250 Israelis – civilians taken hostage and soldiers taken captive – as much as they have the agonies of 2.3 million Palestinians bombed and starved to death week after week, month after month.
That is why audiences have been subjected to gaslighting narratives that frame Gaza’s destruction as a “humanitarian crisis” rather than the canvas on which Israel is erasing all the known rules of war.
While foreign correspondents sit obediently in their hotel rooms, Palestinian journalists have been picked off one by one – in one of the greatest massacres of journalists in history.
Israel is now repeating that process in Lebanon. On Thursday night, it struck a residence in south Lebanon where three journalists were staying. All were killed.
In an indication of how deliberate and cynical Israel’s actions are, it put its military’s crosshairs on six Al Jazeera reporters this week, smearing them as “terrorists” working for Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
They are reportedly the last surviving Palestinian journalists in northern Gaza, which Israel has sealed off while it carries out the so-called “General’s Plan”.
Israel wants no one reporting its final push to exterminate northern Gaza by starving out the 400,000 Palestinians still there and executing anyone who remains as a “terrorist”.
These six join a long list of professionals defamed by Israel in the interests of advancing its genocide – from doctors and aid workers to UN peacekeepers.
Sympathy for Israel .
Perhaps the nadir of Israel’s domestication of foreign journalists was reached this week in a report by CNN. Back in February whistleblowing staff there revealed that the network’s executives have been actively obscuring Israeli atrocities to portray Israel in a more sympathetic light.
In a story whose framing should have been unthinkable – but sadly was all too predictable – CNN reported on the psychological trauma some Israeli soldiers are suffering from time spent in Gaza, in some cases leading to suicide.
Committing a genocide can be bad for your mental health, it seems. Or as CNN explained, its interviews “provide a window into the psychological burden that the war is casting on Israeli society”.
In its lengthy piece, titled “He got out of Gaza, but Gaza did not get out of him”, the atrocities the soldiers admit committing are little more than the backdrop, as CNN finds yet another angle on Israeli suffering. Israeli soldiers are the real victims – even as they perpetrate a genocide on the Palestinian people.
One bulldozer driver, Guy Zaken, told CNN he could not sleep and had become vegetarian because of the “very, very difficult things” he had seen and had to do in Gaza. . . . .
+
“101 BBC Journalists Say it is Biased Against Palestine”
https://scheerpost.com/2024/11/03/101-bbc-journalists-say-it-is-biased-against-palestine/
by Jewish Voices for Labour
JVL Introduction
The BBC has been accused of bias against Israel but here over 230 people, including 101 BBC journalists have argued that there is a strong bias towards Israel and certainly the Israeli narrative. The letter was sent to the Independent arguing that Broadcaster bias is failing to hold Israel to account.
It is noteworthy that only 72 of the 230 signatories felt able to sign openly and this included none of the BBC journalists. Distrust of mainstream media is growing but there is a real need for unbiased reporting. The BBC has previously claimed that the fact it receives complaints from those in support of Israel as well as those in support of Palestine shows its impartiality. This letter, and many other articles and letters before, show this to be nonsense.
Hundreds of Journalists and Personalities Accuse BBC of Bias in Favor of Israel and Call for a Return to “fairness and impartiality”
More than 230 members of the media industry and personalities, including 101 BBC employees, accuse the British media outlet of providing favourable coverage of Israel and call on the public broadcaster to “recommit to fairness, accuracy and impartiality” in its reporting on the Gaza Strip.
In a letter sent to Tim Davie, signed by more than 230 members of the media industry, including 101 anonymous BBC employees, the corporation is criticized for failing to enforce its own editorial standards by lacking “fair evidence-based journalism in its coverage of Gaza.”
Seen exclusively by The Independent, the letter, which was also signed by Baroness Sayeeda Warsi and actress Juliet Stevenson, calls on the BBC to report “without fear or favour” and “to recommit to the highest editorial standards – with an emphasis on fairness, accuracy and due impartiality.”
The letter also calls on the broadcaster to implement a number of editorial commitments, including “reiterating that Israel does not offer foreign journalists access to Gaza; clarifying when there is insufficient evidence to support Israeli claims; clarifying where Israel is the perpetrator in article titles; including the usual historical context before October 2023; and firmly challenging the Israeli military and government in all interviews.”
The BBC denied these claims, insisting that it “strives to live up to our responsibility to provide the most reliable and impartial news”.
“When we make mistakes or have made changes in the way we report, we are transparent. We are also very clear with our audience about the limitations imposed on our reporting – including the lack of access to Gaza and restricted access to certain parts of Lebanon, as well as our continued efforts to attract reporters to those areas,” a spokesperson said.
Other signatories on the list include historian William Dalrymple, Dr. Catherine Happer, lecturer in sociology and director of media at the University of Glasgow, Rizwana Hamid, director of the Centre for Media Monitoring, and broadcaster John Nicolson.
This is not the first time the BBC has been criticised for bias during the Gaza war. In September, the BBC rejected claims that it had violated its own guidelines more than 1,500 times following a controversial report that claimed some BBC correspondents had excused or downplayed Hamas’ activities. A BBC spokesperson said at the time that it would “carefully consider” the complaint, but denied the allegations of bias.
=======
m.
“Leading Up to the Elections: The War Against the Palestinians Must Go On”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/war-palestinians-go-on/5871612
by Philip Giraldi
(28:56)
Both major political parties connive at Israel’s genocide in Gaza
The sucking up to Israel and its backers by the political class in America never seems go away. Indeed, it if anything increases during the lead up to national elections. In the latest manifestation of Judeophilia, Rudy Giuliani, self-described as “America’s Mayor,” has now informed us that
“They [the Israelis] are our best friends. I worked for Ronald Reagan for eight years and Ronald Reagan said that we have to always be there for Israel always because Israel is always there for us! Hamas is not there for us, the Iranians are not there for us, they want to kill us and the Palestinians are taught to kill us at two years old! They won’t let a Palestinian in Jordan. They won’t let a Palestinian in Egypt. And [Kamala] Harris wants to bring them to you! They may have good people, I don’t care, but I won’t take a risk with people that are taught to kill Americans at two! I’m on the side of Israel! You’re on the side of Israel! Donald Trump is on the side of Israel! And they [the Democrats] are on the side of the terrorists.”
Giuliani said all that and more at a Donald Trump election rally in New York’s Madison Square Garden, where he was breathing fire in a speech [at minute 17:27] that one media outlet described as “unhinged” to rouse the overflow crowd to hate Israel’s enemies, which apparently includes the Democratic Party if they should regain the presidency. I would not want to disagree with a man of Giuliani’s psycho-phantasmagoric stature about facts, but I do not recall when the United States was actually threatened by Israel’s enemies to include Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran or a place we once called Palestine, but then again, I am getting older and my memory might be failing. Nor can I recall anything at all that Israel has done for what was once my country apart from take huge bundles of our tax money equivalent to one quarter of a trillion dollars while also corrupting our politicians and undermining both our rule of law and our Bill of Rights, but, then again, blame it on my memory since I cannot imagine a warm and friendly chap like Benjamin Netanyahu doing anything nasty or naughty. . . . .
+
How Do We Get Off the Road to Armageddon?”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/get-off-road-armageddon/5870313
by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Two days ago on October 14, I posted my column about a new US Department of Defense Directive, 5240.01, that radically alters the relationship between the US military and American citizens. In the new directive issued one month prior to the election, the US military is authorized to intervene against American citizens and to use deadly force against Americans.
I asked why such a drastic reformulation of long established policy unless the Democrats were setting up a coup in place of a lost election.
The dramatic change in policy requires more examination than my speculative question, but does not seem to be getting any attention.
One would think that those patriots who are convinced that the military will come forward at the last resort and save our freedoms should be alarmed by Department of Defense Directive 5240.01.
Those patriots who see Trump as America’s savior should be alarmed by his response. In a Fox Business interview on October 13, Trump was asked if he anticipated any chaos following the announcement of the election results. Trump said not from his supporters, a surprising statement if the Democrats steal the election. Trump thought that Kamala’s loss could result in disturbances from the woke left-wing, but “it should be very easily handled by, if necessary, the National Guard, or if really necessary, by the military.” So here we have it: Trump has bought into Directive 5240.01.
Having accepted the directive, how can Trump complain if the directive is used against him?
How the Elite Gets Rid of Populists
It is only a few days before the presidential election and Trump seems again to be in the clutches of advisors composed of the ruling elites.
Who are Trump’s advisors? Do they have any sense? Why is Trump aligned with Israel’s genocide of Palestine and attacks on Iran? Is Trump just another warmonger serving the military/security complex and Greater Israel?
Trump directs American hostility toward China, because of the lopsided trade deficit. But it was Wall Street that forced the offshoring of US manufacturing. The trade deficit results when the US corporations bring their offshored production home to America to sell. How can it be that Trump hasn’t a single advisor able to inform him of the real problem?
We have to be grateful for Trump. He realizes that America is in dire straits, and he alone has emerged as anyone willing to do anything about it. But Trump is a real estate developer. He does not know issues and their history. His first term proved him to be a poor judge of people as he appointed to his government the very people he had declared to overthrow, and they overthrew him. Judging by his positions on DOD 5240.01, China, Israel, he has learned nothing and has no better advisors.
In my opinion it is essential that Trump be elected, because it will give America four more years. But the result is unlikely to be renewal of our country. Simply, the can will be kicked down the road.
It is difficult to rouse the American people to the realities that they face. Americans are the most insouciant of all peoples. They exist surrounded by oceans and friendly countries devoid of military potential. Americans have ruled the world because World War II destroyed all rivals. Americans might be beginning an acquaintance with hardship, having lived on credit card and student loan debt, but despite the deceptions their government inflicts on them — 9/11, Muslim Terrorists and weapons of mass destruction, Covid pandemic, Russian invasion of Ukraine, Iranian nukes, Chinese threat, Trump insurrection, Putin’s resurrection of the Soviet Empire, the return of slavery by white supremacists– a large segment of the population still trusts the government that is destroying them.
So, what can be done? . . . .
+
“The Ever Widening War”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/ever-widening-war-paul-roberts/5871525
by Paul C. Roberts
Zero Hedge, normally a reliable site, reports that the US Department of Defense and the NATO Secretary General claim that 10,000 to 12,000 North Korean soldiers have joined Russian forces in Kursk to help drive out the Ukrainian incursion.
The Pentagon spokeswoman, Sabrina Singh, says that if these North Koreans do for Russia what French troops and NATO personnel are doing for Ukraine, the US will remove its ban on NATO firing missiles into Russia from Ukraine.
As Putin has said, this would mean the US/NATO are at war with Russia, which, Putin has implied, means a nuclear response from Russia. Why Putin is OK with drones fired deep into Russia but not missiles is unclear.
What do we make of this report? It strikes me as nonsensical and contrary to Putin’s abhorrence of expanding the conflict. It also strikes me as nonsensical that Russia cannot expel Ukrainians from Kursk without North Korean reinforcements.
There are two possible real explanations. One is that Washington’s military/security complex wants to carry the war further into Russia, confident from Putin’s past non-response that Putin will do nothing about it, and the alleged Korean troops are an excuse. The neoconservatives believe that Putin is nothing but hot air and that they can destabilize his regime by sending in missiles to kill Russians and destroy infrastructure all over Russia. That Putin has been unwilling to use the available force that he has to end a conflict with a third world military with zero military technology of its own after three years suggests to the neoconservatives that Putin is so averse to war that he simply will not fight anything other than a limited military operation.
The other explanation is that Putin is demonstrating to Washington that Russia, also, can bring in foreign resources to the conflict. The French send troops. NATO sends “mercenaries.” Washington provides weapons and people to operate them along with intelligence and targeting information. If this is the explanation, assuming there actually are North Korean troops there, it shows that Putin has a defective understanding of the situation.
President Putin, you are at war. You, Russia, China, and Iran are in the way of American hegemony. American foreign policy has not repudiated the neoconservative doctrine that hegemony is the principal goal of US foreign policy. Therefore your support for peace negotiations is nonsensical. Negotiations make no sense. They show you to be humanitarian but unrealistic.
Russia is in the way of Washington. There can be no peace until Washington redefines its foreign policy goal, or Russia is broken up into its constituent parts. While Putin speaks of peace negotiations with Ukraine, Washington is attempting to open a second front against Russia with a color revolution in Georgia.
Whatever peace deal Putin makes would have no more reality than the Minsk Agreement, Washington’s pledge not to move NATO one inch to the east, or any of the broken 20th century agreements. Washington only respects force, and Russia has not demonstrated force. Neither has China. Neither has Iran. The absence of countervailing power is building toward a major war . . . .
+
“US Sounds the Alarm: Russian Marines Surrounded US Army Officers in KURSK┃RU Captured VOZNESENKA”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJ8wJd6_ffA&si=jksf24UNW3WOefE9
by Brozzikman
(9:14)
The situation of the Ukrainian Army continues to deteriorate rapidly in almost all directions of the front. War correspondents record the advance of Russian troops throughout the Special Military Operation zone. As of November 2, 2024, the Russian Army has achieved the most success in the Pokrovsk, Kurakhovo, and Kursk directions of the front. Almost daily, war correspondents report that the Russian Army has taken control of the next
+
“Scott Ritter WARNS: The Great Battle Is About To BREAK OUT! Iran's Grand Ayatollah SHOCKS The World”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Il4xqVMNT4I&si=coe0o81b0TKCYZGE
with Scott Ritter
(25:26, with transcript)
=======
n.
« Israël contre l’ONU, une si longue histoire »
https://orientxxi.info/magazine/israel-contre-l-onu-une-si-longue-histoire,7697
par Sylvain Cypel
Aussi
impuissante soit-elle, l’Organisation des Nations unies est la cible de
Benyamin Nétanyahou car elle représente le droit international. Ses agences,
ses Casques bleus au Liban sont, verbalement et physiquement, attaqués. Même
Emmanuel Macron, bien timoré face aux massacres dans la bande de Gaza, s’est
fait tancer pour avoir pointé son rôle dans la création d’Israël. Or, ces
attaques systématiques contre l’ONU ne datent pas d’aujourd’hui.
Actualisation : le lundi 28 octobre 2024, la Knesset a
adopté deux lois interdisant les activités de l’UNRWA à Jérusalem-Est et
empêchant les autorités israéliennes de coopérer avec l’organisation ou ses
représentants, ce qui contribuerait à entraver davantage son travail à Gaza et
en Cisjordanie.
+
“UN: Over 11,000 Pregnant People in Lebanon at Risk Due to Israel’s Aggression”
by Sharon Zhang
Thousands of pregnant people are being impacted by Israel’s bombardment and invasion of Lebanon, according to the UN’s sexual and reproductive health agency, with pregnant people facing fewer and fewer options for care and shelter as Israeli forces attack huge swaths of the country’s civilian infrastructure.
An estimated 11,600 pregnant people in Lebanon have been affected by Israel’s escalated violence and campaign of forced displacement, the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) has reported. Roughly 1,300 of those affected are expected to give birth in the next month, according to the agency.
Over 1.4 million people have been displaced by Israel’s assault, Lebanese officials have estimated, including half a million children. The displacement is causing physical, financial and mental stress, with many families being displaced multiple times by Israeli forces.
Dangers for pregnant people are exacerbated by the Israeli military’s destruction of a quarter of Lebanon’s infrastructure, estimates say, including its attacks on 53 health facilities and 27 ambulances amid the current escalation.
UNFPA shared the story of Soumaia, who was forced to flee south Lebanon when Israel began its heavy bombardments in September. Soumaia was five months pregnant when she, her husband and their eight children began heading toward Syria — “a journey that took four days with little food, only to find the borders closed,” the agency wrote.
When they were finally granted entry, Soumaia experienced a stillbirth and was rushed to the hospital, where doctors treated her. “I woke up in the middle of the night with sharp pain and cramps. When I went to the bathroom, I realized that something was wrong. I was in my fifth month of pregnancy, and my baby was gone,” she told the UNFPA.
“Losing my baby in the midst of all this chaos felt like the final blow,” Soumaia said.
Those still in Lebanon are facing fewer and fewer options for health care, including reproductive care. Lebanon’s health care system has been “pushed to the brink” by Israel’s aggression, with at least 100 primary health care centers and at least five hospitals being forced to close.
Just on Thursday, Lebanon’s Health Ministry reported that Israeli forces killed six paramedics and wounded four in attacks spanning just a few hours in southern Lebanon, with four being killed after Israel struck a gathering point for civil defense. In total, Israeli forces have killed 178 paramedics in Lebanon and wounded 179.
In all, Lebanese health officials report that 2,800 people have been killed in Lebanon since October 2023.
The death toll includes a staggering number of children. Officials have reported that 166 children have been killed in the past year in Lebanon.
The death toll of Israel’s massacres is increasing, according to UNICEF; this month alone, Israel has killed at least one child in Lebanon and injured 10 more each day.
“Thousands more children who have survived the many months of constant bombings physically unscathed, are now acutely distressed by the violence and chaos around them,” the group’s executive director, Catherine Russell, said in a statement on Thursday.
+
« Israeli Military’s Crushed Morale
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGVnqFK7jm0&si=VSzXBZAG5JlBAclT
with Shir Hever
(29 53)
+
“What Compels Israelis to Die For Zionism”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1CbOk9WXJM&si=VSz5rVkBRJuCPNkd
with ASA Winstanley
(25:31)
=======
o.
“Russell Brand EXPOSES Bill Gates!”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOPuTMTzZO8
with Jimmy Dore
(17:18)
Russell Brand recently ran a segment discussing Bill Gates' allegedly philanthropic efforts in Africa -- efforts that may actually harm the native communities but will undoubtedly enrich Bill Gates and his many-tentacled empire.
+
“Something HUGE Is About To Happen And Bill Gates Is In Real Trouble”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi_O3BDgv4Y
with Russel Brand
(8:20)
+
“Bourbons take the biscuit”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTONhgEvGII&si=C4lxZDG3nFRrfJpW
with George Galloway
(17:52)
=======
p.
“Israel's secret weapon supplies exposed | How Starmer helps bomb Gaza”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YvTQ3hri2M&si=BDKzTyU2KF6_zMiK
(13:31, with transcript)
F-35 fighter jet parts have been secretly transported to Israel from a British air force base in Norfolk, writes John McEvoy. At least seven arms shipments have been sent from RAF Marham to Israel’s F-35 airbase at Nevatim since the Gaza bombing began. Two of the deliveries took place this summer shortly after Keir Starmer became UK prime minister. The information is contained within cargo documents reviewed by The Ditch and Declassified. The documents show that the UK government has not only been approving F-35 export licences to Israel, but actively facilitating their transportation through British military sites. F-35 supplies have become particularly controversial after it emerged that Israel used one of the planes to bomb a designated safe zone in Gaza, Al-Mawasi, killing 90 people. Campaign Against Arms Trade’s Sam Perlo-Freeman told Declassified: “The F-35 plays a major part in Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza and brutal bombardment and invasion of Lebanon”. He added that “the UK is not only licensing the supply of spare parts, but actively using UK military assets to facilitate their delivery. This makes UK ministers and potentially even military personnel complicit in war crimes”. The International Criminal Court is currently considering arrest warrants for Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and defence minister Yoav Gallant. Human Rights Watch has warned that countries supplying Israel with arms could be complicit.
+
“Israel's secret trips to British cyber warfare base exposed | IDF leak latest”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrTAa9HkAxc
(3:18, with transcript)
Read more: https://www.declassifieduk.org/uk-psy...
Britain secretly advised the Israeli military on psychological warfare techniques, Declassified has found. Leaked documents reveal how the British army’s 77th brigade discussed strategy and tactics with the Israel Defence Forces (IDF). The 77th brigade uses psychological operations and social media to help fight wars “in the information age”. It specialises in “non-lethal forms of psychological warfare” such as cyber-attacks, propaganda activities, and counter-insurgency operations online. Israel’s own information operations have involved using fabricated videos and fake social media accounts to defend the bombing of Gaza. Two exchanges with the IDF took place at the 77th brigade’s barracks in Hermitage, Berkshire, between 2018-19. Leaked documents about the encounters originate from a hack of the IDF by a group called “Anonymous for Justice”. The dataset was subsequently published by Distributed Denial of Secrets. Although some of the documents reference “secret” matters, there is strong public interest in reporting on their contents. Israel is being investigated by international courts for genocide and war crimes in Gaza, while the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) refuses to answer freedom of information requests or parliamentary questions about its military assistance to Israel. Professor Paul Rogers, an honorary fellow of the Joint Services Command and Staff College, commented: “This is a highly significant revelation that shows the extent of high level links between Israeli and British counter-insurgency and psychological warfare operators – and, as ever, the need for greater transparency from the military right across the board”. An MoD spokesperson said: “We regularly conduct non-operational defence engagements at staff level with partners across the globe. All engagement focuses on best practices and is in compliance with International Humanitarian Law”. The department refused to clarify whether psychological warfare collaboration with Israel was ongoing.
=======
q.
“Would you like to know what BRICS just declared?”

https://off-guardian.org/2024/11/02/would-you-like-to-know-what-brics-just-declared/
by Riley Waggaman
BRICS just wrapped up its 16th summit in Kazan. Probably you heard about this momentous event from meticulously researched independent media articles discussing how BRICS just delivered a DOUBLE DEATHBLOW to the globalists.
This is very good news. Let us celebrate together by reading the BRICS’ Kazan Declaration, published on October 23. (English or Russian, compliments of the Kremlin’s official website.)
Please, I beg you—read this Declaration and share it with all your friends. The Kazan Declaration is not just a massive victory for BRICS, it is a victory for all decent freedom-loving people on Earth.
Here are a few highlights from this historic document:
BRICS supports “global governance” and “the central role of the United Nations in the international system”
[W]e reaffirm our commitment to multilateralism and upholding the international law, including the Purposes and Principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations (UN) as its indispensable cornerstone, and the central role of the UN in the international system, in which sovereign states cooperate to maintain international peace and security, advance sustainable development, ensure the promotion and protection of democracy, human rights and fundamental freedoms for all as well as cooperation based on solidarity, mutual respect, justice and equality. We further emphasize the urgent need to achieve equitable and inclusive geographical representation in the staff composition of the Secretariat of the United Nations and other international organizations in a timely manner.”
“We reiterate our commitment to improving global governance by promoting a more agile, effective, efficient, responsive, representative, legitimate, democratic and accountable international and multilateral system.”
BRICS supports the leading role of the IMF in global finance
“We reaffirm our commitment to maintaining a strong and effective Global Financial Safety Net with a quota-based and adequately resourced IMF at its center.”
BRICS supports the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
“We stress the universal and inclusive nature of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its Sustainable Development Goals, and that implementation should take into account different national circumstances, capacities and levels of development, whilst respecting national policies and priorities and in conformity with national legislation.”
BRICS supports public-private partnerships to help nations achieve their Sustainable Development Goals
“We recognise that the use of blended finance is an effective way to mobilize private capital to finance infrastructure projects. We note the important role of multilateral development banks and development finance institutions, in particular national development banks, in institutionally scaling up the use of blended finance and other instruments, and thereby contributing to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals in accordance with country-specific needs and priorities. To this end, we commend the work of the BRICS Public-Private Partnership and 17 Infrastructure Task Force and endorse its Technical Report on Infrastructure Projects Blended Finance.”
BRICS supports the reduction and removal of greenhouse gases to combat climate change
“We reiterate that the objectives, principles and provisions of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), its Kyoto Protocol and its Paris Agreement, including its principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (CBDR-RC) in the light of different national circumstances, must be honoured. We condemn unilateral measures introduced under the pretext of climate and environmental concerns and reiterate our commitment to enhancing coordination on these issues. We will strengthen cooperation on a whole range of solutions and technologies that contribute to the reduction and removal of Greenhouse Gases (GHGs). We also note the role of carbon sinks in absorbing GHGs and mitigating climate change, whilst also highlighting the importance of adaptation and stressing the need for the adequate provision of the means of implementation, namely financial resources, technology transfer and capacity building.”
“We underscore the critical need for active climate adaptation projects, moving beyond research and forecasting to the implementation of practical solutions, advancing renewable energy, sustainable financing, low-emission technologies, and sustainable development investments, while highlighting the importance of collective action and international cooperation to address the adverse impacts of climate change and ensure inclusive, equitable climate initiatives.”
BRICS supports the creation of carbon markets . . . .
+
“A Silent and Warm Revolution in the Arctic Ocean: ‘As the Ice Melts, the Hegemonic Sea Power Also Melts’
ttps://www.globalresearch.ca/silent-warm-revolution-arctic-ocean/5871834
by Ret Admiral Cem Gürdeniz
The melting of ice in the Arctic Ocean continues to affect not only maritime transportation but also global geopolitics. As the ice melts, Anglo-Saxon maritime dominance also melts. In this context, a new development that will be a milestone for world maritime trade took place on September 25, 2024, on the Northern Sea Route (NSR) controlled by Russia in the Arctic Ocean.
A First on the North Arctic Route
The Panama-flagged, non-Ice Class, 294-meter-long PANAMAX-class container ship named ‘’Flying Fish 1’’ carrying 5,000 containers (TEU) arrived in Shanghai, China, on September 25, 2024, less than three weeks after its departure from Saint Petersburg, Russia. During this 8,000-mile voyage, the ship maintained an average speed of 16 knots and, most importantly, did not need the Russian icebreaker. The two most critical developments for this journey, which goes from the Baltic to the North Sea and passes through the Barents, Kara, Laptev, East Siberian, Chukchi and Bering Seas, are undoubtedly Russia’s announcement that the NSR will be open to ice-class ships all year round at the end of 2022, and starting in 2023, non-ice-class ships will be given permission to pass between July 1 and November 15. The Flying Fish 1 ship received this permission on May 20, 2024.
+
“BRICS Invite? Saudi Arabia Just Hit the Reject Button!”
https://www.youtube.com/live/aiylfg97WQk
Saudi Arabia has sent shockwaves around the world by declining an invitation to join the BRICS economic bloc. What are the implications of this move and what does it mean for the global economy? In this video, I delve into the reasons behind Saudi Arabia's surprising decision and explore the potential consequences for the Middle East and the world at large. From energy politics to regional power dynamics, I examine the complexities of this surprising move and what it could mean for the future of global economic & geopolitical order.
=======
r.
News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller
“Nate Silver sees Trump leading Harris by 8 points, accusing other pollsters of inventing a "close race" (which is the easiest to steal)”
Thus "our free press" has always helped the CIA subvert democracy—here as in so many other places. (So if you think it's just the "other party" doing it, you've been played.
Nate Silver is a very able pollster; but his work is considerably flawed by his stone-blindness to election theft, which no big-time pundit is allowed to see, or mention. Thus the parenthesis that ends my title isn’t Silver’s observation, but mine, and that of all Americans who’ve closely watched “our” presidential contests in this century. As we saw with Bush/Cheney’s “victories” in 2000 and 2004, when “our free press” defines a race as “close”—that is, closer than it really is—the charge of fraud seems rather wild, especially to those who like the outcome, and/or those who just don’t want to think that American elections can be stolen, since It Can’t Happen Here, etc. Such happy campers tend to snort and roll their eyes at any and all evidence of theft, dismissing students of that evidence as (of course) “conspiracy theorists.”
This tendency has hardened over the last decade or so, as the government-and-media has gone from simply jeering those who doubt or question the official numbers, to slandering them as dangerous subversives—“election deniers,” comparable, morally and intellectually, to “Holocaust deniers.” Since Trump’s ascension in 2016 (an election that he really lost, unlike the one he really did win four years later), and especially since “January 6,” it’s actually become a sort of federal offense to call for a close look at the forensic evidence of fraud. As far as “liberals” are concerned, anyone who doubts the outcome trumpeted by “our free press” is a fascist—when, in fact, such “liberals” are themselves the fascists here (no scare quotes needed).
Blind though he may be to the statistical significance of fraud, Nate Silver is otherwise a scrupulous observer of the voting masses; and so it is appropriate—and urgent—that we take note of his assessment of the current race, as reported Sunday in Epoch Times:
+
“It's The Day Before The 2024 US Election: Voter Fraud Is Done On An Industrial Scale In Plain View, But It's Possible A Landslide For Trump Will Force A "Win" In Which Case The Burning Of American”
by Celia Farber
Cities Can Begin Anew, And Possibly "Civil War," False Flags—Who Knows? All We Know Is It's Going To Be Totally Dysfunctional
+
“Pilot Death: 30 Year Old Qantas Pilot Died Suddenly”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/pilot-death-30-year-old-qantas-pilot-died-suddenly/5871761
by Dr. William Makis
On Sunday 13/10/24 we lost a dear friend, brother and son.
Harry was a light in many peoples lives.
With his trademark mullet and silver sunglasses, Harry was known for his love for travel, his mates, family and his job.
The gravity of the loss of our mate will be felt throughout the community and beyond. The loss of Harry was very sudden and unexpected and his family are now trying to navigate through this process while dealing with their grief.
We are hoping to raise funds so we can give Harry the appropriate send off he deserves, all money raised will be given directly to Paul Tkalcevic, Harrys best friend, who will pass on these funds to the Allchin Family to aid them in this process.
=======
s.
“Israeli Air Force Pilot's Horrifying End: Denied Military Honours After Death, Family Blasts IDF”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_mAvzDaMM0
by Times Of India
(3:55)
Family of Israeli Air Force pilot Maj. (res.) Asaf Dagan, a combat navigator with emotional problems who died by suicide after years of bombing experience, asked the Defense Ministry and Israel Defense Forces to hold a military funeral for him and recognize him as a fallen soldier, on the grounds that he had post-traumatic stress disorder that was caused by his military service. Watch.
+
“Larry Johnson: Iran's new Strategy to teach Israel a Harsh lesson”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3f2lCIOOso&si=B4cQmX6P4-pGa8Mu
by BismiTV
(11:09)
In this exclusive video, we take a deep dive into Johnson's impressive career, his candid perspectives on U.S. intelligence operations, and his outspoken views on terrorism, international security, and military interventions. Johnson’s expertise offers a unique understanding of the complexities surrounding modern global threats. 🎯 **WHAT YOU'LL LEARN**:
· The early life and career of Larry Johnson in U.S. intelligence
· His key contributions as a CIA analyst and counterterrorism expert
· An exploration of his critical views on U.S. foreign policy and military actions
· Insights from Johnson’s public appearances, interviews, and writings
· Exclusive interview footage (if applicable)
Best known for his candid critiques and deep understanding of intelligence operations, Larry Johnson provides invaluable insights into the challenges of global security. This video offers a comprehensive look at his career and ongoing influence in the field of international relations and intelligence.
+
“Scott Ritter: Israel and Ukraine are Crumbling, and Even Trump is Powerless to Stop It”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvZXTlRCN5U
by Dialogue Works
(30:11)
===========
t.
Global Research Archives
https://www.globalresearch.ca/
+
CovertAction Magazine Archives
https://covertactionmagazine.com/
+
Unlimited Hangout Archives
+
The Corbett Report Archives
|
+ The Electronic Intifada ARCHIVES. https://electronicintifada.net/
+ Al Jazeera Archives |
+
Middle East Eye ARCHIVES
https://www.middleeasteye.net/home
+
Palestine Chronicle ARCHIVES
https://www.palestinechronicle.com/
+
MintPress News ARCHIVES
https://www.mintpressnews.com/
+
The Grayzone ARCHIVES
+
ANTIWAR ARCHIVES
+
Children’s Health Defense ARCHIVES
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/