Bulletin N° 625







11 September 2014
Grenoble, France


Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,


On this anniversary of 9/11/1973 and 9/11/2001, I found myself re-reading Wilhelm Reich’s important book, The Mass Psychology of Fascism, in an effort to come to terms with the micro/macro emergence of fascism in our world today. For many decades now, social critics have complained of the disconnect between our daily lives and world events. Increasingly we hear about the ‘interconnectedness’ and the ‘systemic’ nature of life on this planet, but such ideas do not seem to translate well into significant behavioral changes. Where is the missing link that would connect the personal and the political, so that the consequences of our habitual behavior would become more accessible to our conscious thoughts? Reich attempted to answer this question during the rising tide of fascism between 1930 and 1933 in Berlin, where the first edition of this book was published in September 1933. The second German-language edition, was published in Denmark in April 1934, and the first English-language edition did not appear until 1946.


Reich’s book, Character Analysis (also, published in 1933), has been widely accepted as a classic contribution to the discipline of psychoanalysis. In it, he went beyond Freud’s psychoanalytic technique of symptom analysis and introduced the concept of character analysis, which for the first time focused on character structure (‘an individual’s stereotypical manner of acting and reacting’) as a key for understanding resistance to the therapeutic process. “Our greatest obligation, wrote Reich in this classic, “is to enable the human animal to accept nature within himself, to stop running away from it and to enjoy what now he dreads so much.” However Reich’s contemporaneous book on the social psychology of fascism was much more controversial. Reich fled Nazi Germany in 1933, after the publication of these two books, but the thesis of Mass Psychology, which was nothing less than a search for the origins of fascist behavior, brought him opprobrium from many quarters, by people who did not wish to look at their shared characteristics with fascists.


By this time, Reich had broken with Freud over several issues; among them was Freud’s acceptance of the notion of Thanatos as a basic universal instinct, on the same level as Eros. The so-called ‘death instinct’ was unacceptable to Reich, who identified destructive behaviors, such as morbidity and sadism, as pathologies acquired from the social context, rather than anything stemming from human instinct. Likewise, Reich could not accept Freud’s idea that culture and all of civilization was the result of sexual repression. Instead, he insisted that sexual repression was necessary only under certain social conditions of production, namely in cases of servitude and labor exploitation, but that new societies could maintain a vibrant cultural life without repression and sublimation. He called this new social order, ‘work-democracy’.


Conducting his psychoanalysis for a while in the working-class neighborhoods of Berlin, Reich had made important discoveries ‘on the ground,’ so to speak, at a time when the Nazi movement was growing. This study brought him into further conflict with Freudian orthodoxies concerning the Reality Principle and the psychic hierarchy of id, ego, super-ego.


     Extensive and painstaking therapeutic work on the human character has led me to the conclusion that, as a rule, we are dealing with three different layers of the biopsychic structure in the evaluation of human reactions. As I demonstrated in my book Character-Analysis, these layers of the character structure are deposits of social development, which function autonomously. On the surface layer of his personality the average man is reserved, polite, compassionate, responsible, conscientious. There would be no social tragedy of the human animal if this surface layer of the personality were in direct contact with the deep natural core. This, unfortunately, is not the case. The surface layer of social cooperation is not in contact with the deep biologic core of one’s selfhood; it is borne by a second, an intermediate character layer, which consists exclusively of cruel, sadistic, lascivious, rapacious, and envious impulses. It represents the Freudian ‘unconscious’ or ‘what is repressed’; to put it in the language of sex-economy, it represents the sum total of all so-called ‘secondary drives.’


     Orgone biophysics made it possible to comprehend the Freudian unconscious, that which is antisocial in man, as a secondary result of the repression of primary biologic urges. If one penetrates through this second layer of perversion, deeper into the biologic substratum of the human animal, one always discovers the third, deepest, layer, which we call the biologic core. In this core, under favorable social conditions, man is an essentially honest, industrious, cooperative, loving, and, if motivated, rationally hating animal. Yet it is not at all possible to bring about a loosening of the character structure of present-day man by penetrating to this deepest and so promising layer without first eliminating the nongenuine, spuriously social surface. Drop the mask of cultivation, and it is not natural sociality that prevails at first, but only the perverse, sadistic character layer.


     It is this unfortunate structuralization that is responsible for the fact that every natural, social, or libidinous impulse that wants to spring into action from the biologic core has to pass through the layer of secondary perverse drives and is thereby distorted. This distortion transforms the original social nature of the natural impulses and makes it perverse, thus inhibiting every genuine expression of life.  . . .


     Everything that is genuinely revolutionary, every genuine art and science, stems from man’s natural biologic core. Thus far, neither the genuine revolutionary nor the artist nor scientist has won favor with masses of people and acted as their leader, or if he has, he has not been able to hold them in the sphere of vital interest for any length of time.


     The case of fascism, in contrast to liberalism and genuine revolution, is quite different. Its essence embodies neither the surface nor the depth, but by and large the second, intermediate character layer of secondary drives.


     When this book was first written, fascism was generally regarded as a ‘political party,’ which, as other ‘social groups,’ advocated an organized ‘political idea.’ According to this appraisal “the fascist party was instituting fascism by means of force or through ‘political maneuver’.”


     Contrary to this, my medical experiences with men and women of various classes, races, nations, religious beliefs, etc., taught me that ‘fascism’ is only the organized political expression of the structure of the average man’s character, a structure that is confined neither to certain races or nations nor to certain parties, but is general and international. Viewed with respect to man’s character, ‘fascism’ is the basic emotional attitude of the suppressed man of our authoritarian machine civilization and its mechanistic-mystical conception of life.


   It is the mechanistic-mystical character of modern man that produces fascist parties, and not vise versa.  . . .


     My character-analytic experiences have convinced me that there is not a single individual who does not bear the elements of fascist feeling and thinking in his structure. As a political movement fascism differs from other reactionary parties inasmuch as it is born and championed by masses of people.


     I am fully conscious of the enormous responsibility involved in making such an assertion. And in the interest of this lacerated world I should like the toiling masses to be just as clear about their responsibility for fascism.(pp.xi-xiv)



In her Forward to the 1970 English-language edition of The Mass Psychology of Fascism, Mary Boyd Higgins, a Trustee of The Wilhelm Reich Infant Trust Fund, wrote that,


The importance of this work today cannot be underestimated. The human character structure that created organized fascist movements still exists, dominating our present social conflicts. If the chaos and agony of our time are ever to be eliminated, we must turn our attention to the character structure that creates them; we must understand the mass psychology of fascism.(p.x)



The 11 items below will remind CEIMSA readers that most of us have indeed been degraded by contemporary events to the status of a coolie, fearful, obedient and self-deceptive, in a desperate effort to somehow survive the debacle of a failed political economy.


Item A., from Information Clearing House, is an article by Pepe Escobar on the true role of NATO in the world today.


Item B., from Information Clearing House, is a video explaining the origins of ISIS and the Western war economy.


Item C., from Information Clearing House, is an article by Noam Chomsky discussing the high-tech destruction of our world.


Item D., from Jeanne-Henriette Louis, is a message on Ukraine from the Friends House in Moscow, Russia.


Item E., from Information Clearing House, is an article first posted on Electronicintifada offering a ‘guide’ for the growing movement in support of boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel.


Item F., from Mark Crispin Miller, founder of News from the Underground, is a report the growing presence of Fascist forces in Ukraine.


Item G., from Truth Out, is an interview by Laura Flanders, talking with David Harvey and Gar Alperovitz about the failure of capitalism.


Item H., from Democracy Now !, is an interview with public TV and radio broadcaster, Tavis Smiley, on the last year in the life of Martin Luther King, and the legacy he left for the human rights movement.


Item I., from Truth Out, is an article by John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, discussing how Greece and other eurozone countries have become the new victims of ‘economic hit men'.


Item J., from National Security Archives, is a document on the Nixon Administration's debate in early 1969 over the Israeli nuclear program, with Richard Nixon prevailing.



And finally, we invite CEIMSA readers to review their own psychological state within the matrix that constantly reproduces it by looking at the important film :


The Century of the Self

Episode 3:

“There is a Policeman Inside All Our Heads: He Must Be Destroyed”


Adam Curtis, BBC






Francis Feeley

Professor of American Studies

University of Grenoble-3

Director of Research

University of Paris-Nanterre

Center for the Advanced Study of American Institutions and Social Movements

The University of California-San Diego







From Information Clearing House :

Dates: 8 September 2014

Subject : NATO.



First thing we do, let's kill all the myths. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is nothing but the Security Council of the Empire of Chaos



NATO Attacks!
by Pepe Escobar



From Information Clearing House :

Dates: 8 September 2014

Subject : The Western War Economy.




Evidence exposing who put ISIS in power, and how it was done.



The Covert Origins of ISIS?



From Information Clearing House :

Dates: 8 September 2014

Subject : Man-Made “Natural” Catastrophes.


Human civilization, may now be approaching its inglorious end.



ISIS and Our Times
by Noam Chomsky



From Jeanne-Henriette Louis :

Dates: 12 September 2014          

Subject : Mists, lies and candles: News from Friends House Moscow.



Friends of Friends House Moscow


Dear Friend,


Our summer newsletter is now available: you can view or download it here

Contents include:
- Alternatives to Violence in Ukraine
- Christ in Catastrophe and The Generals and Twenty-first Century War
- Supporting families in Dzerzhinsk

Click here to download the newsletter as a 2-page pdf file



Mists, lies and candles


The information war over the conflict in Ukraine has created a miasma of disinformation and mistrust. It is often hard to speak our Quaker truth, but now it is hard to even keep our facts straight. At one point we were so eager to believe in the triumph of The Good, that we were on the point of publicising a video of Ukrainian women appealing for peace to their brothers and sisters in Russia.  Unfortunately it proved to be a piece of propaganda from Ukraine’s military.  And another controversial “peace protest” that recently went viral could well be Kremlin-inspired.


Here is another, more certain, story from Moscow. It appeared on the television channel Dozhd’ and in the online newspaper Novaya Gazeta. This story reminds us that people of faith are called, not to succeed, but to be faithful.


On August 31, seven activists began to light 2,249 candles near Moscow’s Kiev Station. Their action was planned to coincide with one in Kiev itself. The candles commemorated 2,249 people killed in the fighting in eastern Ukraine. One activist sadly noted that the UN’s numbers are already out of date. Police arrived, arrested the activists and extinguished the candles. Other activists arrived too late to be arrested. They decided to light candles in another location, less visible, sheltered from the wind.


One of the participants, Alisa, explained. “I don’t want people in Ukraine to think that we think of them as our enemies… This action is about connecting people. We are all in this nightmare together.” The wind from the river kept blowing out the candles. The activists kept relighting them. “It’s useless,” said another (her name is Anya). “Even funny. But we have to do it. We don’t want to lose what is left of our humanity.”


Soldiers' Mothers speaking out


KSM, the Russian human rights organization "Committee of the Soldiers' Mothers" has great moral authority among Russians. KSM is calling on the Russian government for an accounting of the Russian soldiers recently reported dead, captured or missing in Ukraine.


In response the Kremlin has issued a new list of "Foreign Agents" (a term that carries connotations of spying). It includes the St. Petersburg chapter of the Committee of the Soldiers' Mothers, and Dozhd', the Moscow TV channel that "broke" the story of the funerals of Russian soldiers killed in Ukraine. Read more here: amnesty . org/en/news/russian-ngo-branded-foreign-agent-after-reporting-russian-military-action-ukraine-2014-08-29


Getting Creative


With Mr Putin's popularity running at an all-time high, and most Russians supporting his actions, a brave minority who are prepared to make an anti-war protest have sometimes found creative ways to do so.  On 20 August Muscovites woke to find the huge Soviet star crowning a landmark Stalin-era skyscraper repainted in the blue and yellow colours of the Ukrainian flag.  Four people have been arrested and charged with hooliganism (the same charge used against Pussy Riot, that carries a sentence of up to seven years).  Read more here.


In friendship,

Mary Morris
(Group Manager, Friends of FHM)





From Information Clearing House :

Dates: 8 September 2014

Subject :  How to boycott Israel.



This comes at a crucial moment – in the wake of Israel’s latest spasm of horrifying destruction and mass killing in Gaza, and after a period of unprecedented growth in support for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS).


How to boycott Israel: updated guidelines for academics







From Mark Crispin Miller :

Dates: 10 September 2014          

Subject : Racism, Anti-Semitism, & the Rise of World-Wide Fascism.




World newsAzov fighters are Ukraine's greatest weapon and may be its greatest threat

The battalion's far-right volunteers' desire to 'bring the fight to Kiev' is a danger to post-conflict stability


by Shaun Walker in Mariupol



"I have nothing against Russian nationalists, or a great Russia," said Dmitry, as we sped through the dark Mariupol night in a pickup truck, a machine gunner positioned in the back. "But Putin's not even a Russian. Putin's a Jew."


Dmitry – which he said is not his real name – is a native of east Ukraineand a member of the Azov battalion, a volunteer grouping that has been doing much of the frontline fighting in Ukraine's war with pro-Russia separatists. The Azov, one of many volunteer brigades to fight alongside the Ukrainian army in the east of the country, has developed a reputation for fearlessness in battle.


But there is an increasing worry that while the Azov and other volunteer battalions might be Ukraine's most potent and reliable force on the battlefield against the separatists, they also pose the most serious threat to the Ukrainian government, and perhaps even the state, when the conflict in the east is over. The Azov causes particular concern due to the far right, even neo-Nazi, leanings of many of its members.

Dmitry claimed not to be a Nazi, but waxed lyrical about Adolf Hitler as a military leader, and believes the Holocaust never happened. Not everyone in the Azov battalion thinks like Dmitry, but after speaking with dozens of its fighters and embedding on several missions during the past week in and around the strategic port city of Mariupol, the Guardian found many of them to have disturbing political views, and almost all to be intent on "bringing the fight to Kiev" when the war in the east is over.


The battalion's symbol is reminiscent of the Nazi Wolfsangel, though the battalion claims it is in fact meant to be the letters N and I crossed over each other, standing for "national idea". Many of its members have links with neo-Nazi groups, and even those who laughed off the idea that they are neo-Nazis did not give the most convincing denials.


"Of course not, it's all made up, there are just a lot of people who are interested in Nordic mythology," said one fighter when asked if there were neo-Nazis in the battalion. When asked what his own political views were, however, he said "national socialist". As for the swastika tattoos on at least one man seen at the Azov base, "the swastika has nothing to do with the Nazis, it was an ancient sun symbol," he claimed.

The battalion has drawn far-right volunteers from abroad, such as Mikael Skillt, a 37-year-old Swede, trained as a sniper in the Swedish army, who described himself as an "ethnic nationalist" and fights on the front line with the battalion.

Despite the presence of these elements, Russian propaganda that claims Kiev's "fascist junta" wants to cleanse east Ukraine of Russian speakers is overblown. The Azov are a minority among the Ukrainian forces, and even they, however unpleasant their views may be, are not anti-Russian; in fact the lingua franca of the battalion is Russian, and most have Russian as their first language.

Indeed, much of what Azov members say about race and nationalism is strikingly similar to the views of the more radical Russian nationalists fighting with the separatist side. The battalion even has a Russian volunteer, a 30-year-old from St Petersburg who refused to give his name. He said he views many of the Russian rebel commanders positively, especially Igor Strelkov, a former FSB officer who has a passion for military re-enactments and appears to see himself as a tsarist officer. He "wants to resurrect a great Russia, said the volunteer; but Strelkov is "only a pawn in Putin's game," he said, and he hoped that Russia would some time have a "nationalist, violent Maidan" of its own.


On one afternoon earlier this week the Guardian travelled with a group of Azov fighters to hand over several boxes of bullets to Ukrainian border guards. During an artillery attack outside Mariupol in the days before, the border guards had come to the rescue of a group of Azov fighters, and the bullets were their way of saying thank you. "Everything in this war is based on personal links; Kiev does nothing," explained the Azov's Russian volunteer, as we sped towards a checkpoint in a civilian Chevrolet; the boot full with the boxes of bullets and rocket-propelled grenade launchers; one of the windows shot out by gunfire during a recent battle.

"This is how it works. You go to some hot spot, they see you're really brave, you exchange phone numbers, and next time you can call in a favour. If you need an artillery strike you can call a general and it will take three hours and you'll be dead. Or you can call the captain or major commanding the artillery battalion and they will help you out straight away. We are Azov and they know that if they ever needed it, we would be there for them."

For the commanders and the generals in Kiev, who many in Azov and other volunteer battalions see as responsible for the awful losses the Ukrainian army has suffered in recent weeks, especially in the ill-fated retreat from Ilovaysk, there was only contempt. "Generals like those in charge of Ilovaysk should be imprisoned for treason," said Skillt. "Heads are going to roll for sure, I think there will be a battle for power."


The Ukrainian armed forces are "an army of lions led by a sheep", said Dmitry, and there is only so long that dynamic can continue. With so many armed, battle-hardened and angry young men coming back from the front, there is a danger that the rolling of heads could be more than a metaphor. Dmitry said he believes that Ukraine needs "a strong dictator to come to power who could shed plenty of blood but unite the nation in the process".

Many in the Azov battalion with whom the Guardian spoke shared this view, which is a long way from the drive for European ideals and democracy that drove the protests in Kiev at the beginning. The Russian volunteer fighting with the Azov said he believes Ukraine needs "a junta that will restrict civil rights for a while but help bring order and unite the country". This disciplinarian streak was visible in the battalion. Drinking is strictly forbidden. "One time there was a guy who got drunk, but the commander beat him in his face and legs until he could not move; then he was kicked out," recalled one fighter proudly.

Other volunteer battalions have also come under the spotlight. This week,Amnesty International called on the Ukrainian government to investigate rights abuses and possible executions by the Aidar, another battalion.


"The failure to stop abuses and possible war crimes by volunteer battalions risks significantly aggravating tensions in the east of the country and undermining the proclaimed intentions of the new Ukrainian authorities to strengthen and uphold the rule of law more broadly," said Salil Shetty, Amnesty International secretary general, in Kiev.

Fighters from the battalion told the Guardian last month they expected a "new revolution" in Ukraine that would bring a more decisive military leader to power, in sentiments similar to those of many Azov fighters.

Despite the desire of many in the Azov to bring violence to Kiev when the war in the east is over, the battalion receives funding and assistance from the governor of Donetsk region, the oligarch Serhiy Taruta. An aide to Taruta, Alex Kovzhun, said the political views of individual members of Azov were not an issue, and denied that the battalion's symbol had Nazi undertones.


"The views of some of them is their own affair as long as they do not break the law," said Kovzhun in written answers to questions. "And the symbol is not Nazi. Trust me – some of my family died in concentration camps, so I have a well-developed nose for Nazi shit."

As well as their frontline duties, the Azov battalion also functions as "a kind of police unit", said a platoon commander who goes by the nom de guerre Kirt. A medieval history buff who takes part in Viking battle reenactments and once ran a tour firm in Thailand, Kirt returned to east Ukraine to join the Azov. He took the Guardian on an overnight patrol through the outskirts of Mariupol and the villages around the front line.

Part separatist hunters, part city cops with no rules to restrain them, they travelled in a convoy of three vehicles, all heavily armed. As midnight approached we set off across the bumpy tarmac roads to the outskirts of Mariupol, and soon came across a parked car by the side of the road that the men found suspicious.

Fighters dashed from the front two cars and rushed at the vehicle pointing their guns at it. A startled man got out of the passenger seat, then a sheepish looking woman in a cocktail dress and holding a half-smoked cigarette emerged, smoothing her hair. The Azov fighters apologised, but only after demanding documents and thoroughly searching the car.

As we edged closer to the front line, Kirt and the others scanned the skyline with binoculars, on the lookout for snipers and separatists. Later, fighters sprinted towards a suspicious jeep parked on the beach while the sea was scanned for hostile support vessels, but it turned out that again the men had stumbled upon people just trying to have a good time: a group of women drinking sparkling wine out of plastic cups on the beachfront.

The Azov have been partially brought into the military and officially function as a special police unit. There are discussions that Azov and other battalions could be integrated into the army or special forces when the conflict is over.

Some of them, however, are hoping Ukraine will look very different in the not-so-distant future. And while they may be a tiny minority when it comes to Ukraine as a whole, they have a lot of weapons.

President Petro Poroshenko will be killed in a matter of months, Dmitry said, and a dictator will come to power.

"What are the police going to do? They could not do anything against the peaceful protesters on Maidan; they are hardly going to withstand armed fighting units."




From Truth Out :

Dates: 11 September 2014          

Subject : On “Cooperation” and “Capitalism”.




David Harvey and Gar Alperovitz dig into the failure of capitalism, the hope presented by worker co-ops, and what activists fighting for a just economy must do to get there.



David Harvey and Gar Alperovitz on Cooperation and Capitalism


Video Interview

by Laura Flanders, GRITtv





From Democracy Now !  :

Dates: 11 September 2014         

Subject : What would Dr. Martin Luther King do?




What would Dr. Martin Luther King do? As debate continues over U.S. plans to launch airstrikes in Syria, we look at the final year of King’s life when he became a fierce critic of U.S. foreign policy and the Vietnam War, calling his government "the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today." We speak to public TV and radio broadcaster Tavis Smiley, author of the new book, "Death of a King: The Real Story of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s Final Year."



What Would Dr. King Do? As U.S. Moves to Bomb Syria, Tavis Smiley on MLK’s Antiwar Legacy


Interview with public TV and radio broadcaster, Tavis Smiley





From Truth Out :

Dates: 11 September 2014          

Subject : An Economic Hit Man Speaks Out !




John Perkins, author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, discusses how Greece and other eurozone countries have become the new victims of "economic hit men."



An Economic Hit Man Speaks Out: John Perkins on How Greece Has Fallen Victim to

"Economic Hit Men"



by Michael Nevradakis






From National Security Archives :

Dates: 11 September 2014          

Subject : Israel Crosses the Threshold II: The Nixon Administration Debates the Emergence of the Israeli Nuclear Program.



Israel Crosses the Threshold II: The Nixon Administration Debates the Emergence of the Israeli Nuclear Program

DOD's Paul Warnke Warned in Early 1969 that Israeli Nuclear Program is "the Single Most Dangerous Phenomenon in an Area Dangerous Enough Without Nuclear Weapons"

President Nixon Overrode Near Consensus of Senior U.S. Officials on Threat Posed by Israeli Nuclear Program in 1969

NSSM 40 and Related Records Released in Full for First Time

National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 485

Posted - September 12, 2014

Edited by William Burr and Avner Cohen

For more information contact:
William Burr - 202/994-7000 or nsarchiv@gwu.edu

Washington, DC, September 12, 2014 -- During the spring and summer of 1969, officials at the Pentagon, the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the National Security Council staff debated and discussed the problem of the emergence of a nuclear Israel. Believing that Israel was moving very close to a nuclear weapons capability or even possession of actual weapons, the Nixon administration debated whether to apply pressure to restrain the Israelis or even delay delivery of advanced Phantom jets whose sale had already been approved.

Recently declassified documents produced in response to a mandatory declassification review request by the National Security Archive, and published today by the Archive in cooperation with the Nuclear Proliferation International History Project, show that top officials at the Pentagon were especially supportive of applying pressure on Israel. On 14 July 1969, Deputy Secretary of Defense (and Hewlett-Packard co-founder) David Packard signed a truly arresting memorandum to Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird, arguing that failure to exert such pressure "would involve us in a conspiracy with Israel which would leave matters dangerous to our security in their hands."

In the end, Laird and Packard and others favoring pressure lost the debate. While National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger supported some of their ideas, he also believed that, at the minimum, it would be sufficient for U.S. interests if Israel kept their nuclear activities secret. As he put on his draft memo to President Nixon on or around July 19, "public knowledge is almost as dangerous as possession itself." Indeed, Nixon opposed pressure and was willing to tolerate Israeli nuclear weapons as long as they stayed secret.

Check out today's posting at the National Security Archive's Nuclear Vault -


Find us on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/NSArchive

Unredacted, the Archive blog - http://nsarchive.wordpress.com/