Bulletin 651
Subject: Saudi Arabia? Israel? ‘What hath god wrought?’
21 May 2015
Grenoble, France
Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,
Below we share with you four ‘essays’ of interest which speak to the ideological troubles that capitalists are experiencing in this period of historic crisis (of their own making) . . . .
Sincerely,
Francis Feeley
Professor of American Studies
University of Grenoble-3
Director of Research
University of Paris-Nanterre
Center for the Advanced Study of American Institutions and Social Movements
The University of California-San Diego
http://dimension.ucsd.edu/CEIMSA-IN-EXILE/
A.
Why Israel Should Not Exist
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/05/19/why-israel-should-not-exist/
by Garry Leech
By suggesting that the state of
Israel should not exist, I am not being anti-Semitic. I am, however, being
anti-Zionist. There is a distinct difference. An anti-Semite is someone who is
prejudiced against Jews. An anti-Zionist, on the other hand, is opposed to that
sector of the Jewish population who see it as their God-given right to
establish a Jewish state in the Holy Land at the expense of the Palestinian
people who have lived there for two thousand years.
The creation of a Jewish state in the middle of the Arab world not only
represents the continuation of European colonialism in Palestine, it has also
consisted of the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians and the establishment of an
apartheid system by a rogue nation that has repeatedly violated international
law. Given this reality, and the fact that Palestine is the Holy Land of three
religions, the only just solution to the Zionist project of the Israeli state
and its Western backers is the establishment of a single country: a democratic
secular state of Palestine in which Jews, Arabs and Christians all have equal
rights.
The Rise of the Zionist Movement
The Zionist movement emerged in Europe in the late 19th century and encouraged
European Jews to escape anti-Semitism by migrating to Palestine, which was
ruled by the Ottoman Turks at the time, with the goal of creating a Jewish
state in the Holy Land. This migration saw the Jewish population in Palestine
increase from 4 percent in 1850 to 11 percent in 1917, the year that the
British government’s Balfour Declaration stated: “His Majesty’s government view
with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people,
and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this
object.”
Following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War One, the countries of
the region were ruled by Britain and France under mandates from the League of
Nations (predecessor of the United Nations). But World War Two brought about
the downfall of the European empires as colonies throughout the world gained
independence. Accordingly, Lebanon (1943) and Syria (1946) gained independence
from France while Jordan (1946) was liberated from British rule. The exception
was Palestine, which had been ruled by Britain since 1922.
By all rights, Palestine, like its neighbors, should have become an independent
nation following World War Two, but the Western-backed Zionist project prevented
this from happening. In accordance with the Balfour Declaration, Britain and
the United States sought to ensure the creation of a Jewish state in Palestine.
Under British rule, the Jewish population in Palestine had increased from 11
percent in 1922 to 32 percent in 1948, with many having arrived following the
end of the war.
In 1947, the newly-established United Nations adopted the Partition Plan for
Palestine without any consultation with the Palestinian people. The plan called
for 56 percent of Palestine to become the Jewish state of Israel with 43
percent of the territory turned into a Palestinian state. Despite a large Arab
majority in Palestine, Israel’s share of the territory was larger in order to
accommodate the anticipated increased migration of European Jews. The remaining
1 percent of Palestine, consisting of the Holy City of Jerusalem, was to be an
international territory administered by the United Nations.
Jewish groups supported the partition plan but Palestinians and the surrounding
Arab states opposed it on the grounds that it violated the principles of
national self-determination in the UN charter under which Palestinians should
have the right to decide their own destiny. The plan was not implemented.
Nevertheless, the Jewish population in Palestine unilaterally announced the
creation of the state of Israel on May 14, 1948.
The New European Colonialism
By the end of 1949, according to Israeli historian Ilan Pappe, Israel had
destroyed more than 400 Palestinian villages, massacred thousands of civilians
and forcibly displaced almost a million Palestinians, who ended up in refugee
camps in neighboring Arab countries. In other words, with the Jewish people
having just endured the horrors of the Holocaust, the Zionists were now carrying
out, according to Pappe, the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people.
This process of ethnic cleansing allowed Israel to expand and encompass 77
percent of Palestinian territory, all but East Jerusalem, the West Bank and
Gaza. Over the next three years, 700,000 Jews immigrated to Israel, mostly from
Europe. This Jewish colonization of Palestine represented a continuation of
European colonialism as the wielding of power over the Palestinian people
shifted from the British government to European Jews in the form of the new
Israeli state.
Following the 1967 war with several Arab states (Syria, Jordan and Egypt),
Israel militarily occupied the remaining 23 percent of Palestine (East
Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza). The UN Security Council responded by
passing Resolution 242 demanding the “Withdrawal of Israel armed forces from
territories occupied in the recent conflict.” The United States has since used
its veto power in the Security Council on 41 occasions to ensure that the
numerous UN resolutions condemning Israel’s illegal occupation have never been
enforced.
It wasn’t until after the Palestinians were forced to exist under Israel’s
illegal military occupation following the 1967 war that the Palestinian
Liberation Organization (PLO) decided to make armed struggle the centerpiece of
its campaign to achieve a Palestinian state. And it wasn’t until after 20 years
of enduring an oppressive military occupation and the unwillingness of the
international community to enforce UN resolutions that sectors of Palestinian
society became increasingly radicalized and the Islamic group Hamas was formed.
Hamas began using suicide bombing as a tactic in the early 1990s because it
could not combat the vastly superior US-backed Israeli military through conventional
warfare. Beginning in 2001, it also began launching primitive and inaccurate
rockets into Israel from its Gaza strongholds.
Even though Israel withdrew its military from Gaza in 2005, it implemented a
military blockade of the tiny territory the following year through which it
strictly controls all access of people, food, medicines and other materials.
Some analysts claim that Israel’s ongoing blockade of Gaza’s 1.8 million
inhabitants has created the world’s largest prison camp.
Meanwhile, Israel has not only continued its illegal occupation of the West
Bank and East Jerusalem, it has further violated international law by forcibly
displacing Palestinian communities and encouraging Jews to move into the
Occupied Territories. It is now estimated that almost half a million Jews live
in illegal settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem despite UN
resolutions demanding that they be dismantled.
Israel has also constructed a giant wall known as the separation barrier
throughout the West Bank in order to segregate the illegal settlements from
Palestinian communities and to restrict the movement of Palestinians.
Meanwhile, in addition to establishing the illegal settlements, Israel has also
constructed industrial zones in the West Bank in which Palestinian laborers are
forced to endure low wages and poor working conditions.
The flagrant discrepancy in rights afforded to the Jewish settlers in
comparison to Palestinians living in the Occupied Territories constitutes a
system of apartheid. In fact, as John Dugard, a South African human rights
lawyer and former UN Special Rapporteur, has noted, “I have no hesitation in
saying that Israel’s crimes are infinitely worse than those committed by the
apartheid regime of South Africa.”
In 1947, the year before Israel declared itself a sovereign state, Palestinians
lived in 94 percent of Palestine. Today, they inhabit a mere 15 percent with
some five million living in refugee camps in the West Bank and surrounding
countries. The population densities in Palestinian refugee camps are among the
highest of any place on earth. For example, more than 10,000 refugees live in
the one square kilometer al-Amari camp in the West Bank, which amounts to five
times the population density of New York City. As one third-generation refugee
in the al-Amari camp told me, “We have a dream to return to our lands. How long
it will take and what generation it will be, we don’t know.”
The disproportionate number of Palestinians killed in the long-running conflict
is a reality hidden from many in the West. Over the past 15 years, according to
the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem, 8,701 Palestinians have been
killed by Israelis compared to 1,138 Israelis killed by Palestinians. The
disparity in the number of Palestinian children killed is even greater with a
total of 1,772 killed during that period compared to 93 Israeli children.
Given this history, the repeated claim made by the United States and other
Western nations that Israel’s military actions are merely acts of self-defense
contradicts the reality on the ground. Surely it is the violence carried out by
people forced to live under a violent illegal military occupation and blockade
that should be considered an act of self-defense. After all, the French
Resistance to the Nazi occupation of France during World War Two is viewed as a
heroic struggle for national liberation. In stark contrast, Palestinian
resisters are labelled ‘terrorists.’
Despite the best efforts of the United States and other Western governments as
well as the mainstream media to portray Israel as the victim in this conflict,
the numbers make evident who is doing most of the killing and who is doing most
of the dying. The fact that a people forced to live under an illegal foreign
military occupation are portrayed as the aggressors constitutes a stunning
example of Orwellian doublespeak.
Collaborating with the Colonizers
This violent expansion of Israeli control over all of Palestine fulfils the
European Zionist dream initiated in the late 19th century. Sadly, over the past
couple of decades, some Palestinian leaders have been complicit in the Zionist
project. The Oslo peace process during the 1990s saw the PLO recognize the
state of Israel and in return Israel permitted the Palestinians limited self-governance
in parts of the West Bank and Gaza. However, the so-called peace process
postponed addressing the crucial issue of ‘the right of return’ for Palestinian
refugees.
The first Palestinian parliamentary elections under the Oslo Accords were held
in 1996 and were won by Fatah, the PLO’s political party, which then headed the
new Palestinian Authority government. The Palestinian Authority began receiving
significant aid from Western governments. In return, the Palestinian Authority
has policed the Palestinian population on Israel’s behalf in the areas of the
Occupied Territories that it governs. In other words, in the same way that
Indian administrators and police oversaw the day-to-day governing of colonial
India on behalf of the British colonizers, the Palestinian Authority has served
the Israeli colonizers of the Occupied Territories in return for Western aid
and a reduced Israeli military presence.
The infusion of foreign aid, especially funding from the United States Agency
for International Development (USAID), is intended to achieve ‘economic peace’
by allowing sectors of the Palestinian population to attain a certain material
comfort without challenging the ongoing Israeli occupation and the continued
expansion of Jewish settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which
violate both the Oslo Accords and international law. In reference to the
long-running, oft-stalled peace talks, former UN Special Rapporteur Dugard
recently stated, “I think the strategy of Israel and also of the United States is
simply to allow talks to go on forever and ever, while Israel annexes more land
and takes over Palestinian territory.”
Meanwhile, the economic model emerging in the West Bank is not sustainable
because it is almost entirely dependent on foreign aid and international NGOs.
Furthermore, the benefits from the economic model are largely restricted to
Ramallah, the seat of the Palestinian Authority government, creating what is
known in the West Bank as the ‘Ramallah bubble.’ As Dr. Hanan Chehata, a professor
of law and former correspondent for the Middle East Monitor, explains,
… while those in Ramallah may currently travel throughout that small city
relatively unimpeded, Palestinians in the rest of the region are subjected to
daily humiliation at Israeli road blocks and military checkpoints; they also
have to endure indiscriminate arrests and unjustified interrogations leading
frequently to torture and sometimes to death. While the residents of Ramallah
can go to work in the day reasonably secure in the knowledge that they will
return home in the evening to a hot meal and well-rested family members, other
Palestinians leave their homes not knowing if their houses will still be
standing when they return or if they will have been demolished by Israeli Caterpillar
bulldozers in order to make room for new Israeli settlements.
In other words, if the Palestinian Authority and its supporters cooperate with
the Israeli colonizers they will receive economic rewards and be spared the
excessive brutality wielded by the Israeli military. But those who insist on
actively resisting the colonizers will bear the full force of Israeli
aggression. Not surprisingly, in the eyes of many Palestinians, the Palestinian
Authority has sold out to the colonizers by colluding with Israel and the
United States to achieve ‘economic peace’ at the expense of national
liberation.
The growing discontent with the Palestinian Authority became evident in the
2006 general elections when Fatah was handily defeated by Hamas. Following the
election, Fatah refused to hand over power in the West Bank and, with the
support of Israel and Western nations, has continued to rule for the past nine
years as an un-elected government—while Hamas has governed Gaza.
The one place that elections have been allowed to take place is in universities
and these are seen as a barometer that reflects the political views of the
broader Palestinian population. In the student council elections at Birzeit
University in Ramallah last month, the Hamas-affiliated Islamic Wafaa’ Bloc
defeated Fatah’s student party, winning a majority of the seats. Nadine
Suleiman, a fourth-year public administration student, explained why she voted
for Hamas: “I detest the corruption of the PA [Palestinian Authority], their
security coordination with Israel which involves arresting and killing
Palestinians who are on Israel’s wanted list while Palestinians get nothing in
return. The PA is only interested in keeping its wealth and privilege.”
The Palestinian Authority’s US-funded security forces quickly responded to the
Birzeit University election results by arresting four students belonging to the
winning party and then interrogating and beating them. In total, 25 students
throughout the West Bank were arrested and scheduled elections in An-Najah
National University and Hebron University were postponed. According to Human
Rights Watch, “It is deeply worrying that students are being held by
Palestinian forces for no apparent reason other than their connection to Hamas
or their opinions.”
So while on the international front the Palestinian Authority has challenged
Israel by gaining membership in the International Criminal Court (ICC), on the
ground in the West Bank it regularly arrests, interrogates, imprisons and
tortures Palestinians who are viewed as sympathetic to Hamas or who
aggressively challenge the Israeli occupation in their quest for liberation. As
a result of its failure to call new elections, its corruption with regard to
handling foreign aid and its collusion with the illegal Israeli occupation,
many Palestinians no longer view the Palestinian Authority government as
legitimate.
In contrast, Hamas is seen by many Palestinians as actively resisting Israel,
and it is this perception—and its relative lack of corruption—that lies at the
root of its popular support. This resistance has also led Israel to launch
three large-scale military assaults against Gaza during the past seven years
(2008, 2012 and 2014). According to the United Nations, the Israeli military’s
seven-week invasion of Gaza last year resulted in the deaths of 2,025
Palestinians, including 1,483 civilians, of whom 521 were children. Meanwhile,
71 Israelis died, of which 66 were soldiers. Additionally, more than half a
million Palestinians were forcibly displaced from their homes by the assault.
The One-State Solution
The Palestinian Authority has accepted the two-state solution proposed as part
of the Oslo peace process. The basic idea being that the West Bank and Gaza
would constitute a Palestinian state (only 23 percent of Palestine) with the
remainder being Israel. But the Palestinian Authority’s support for a two-state
solution is at odds with the wishes of the majority of Palestinians. In a poll
conducted last year, 60 percent of Palestinians believed in a one-state
solution while only 27 percent supported the two-state option.
The two-state solution constantly being touted by the United States and other
Western nations, and backed by the Palestinian Authority, is completely out of
touch with the reality in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. According to Tariq
Dana, a professor at Birzeit University in Ramallah, “A two-state solution is
not possible. It is not viable given the reality on the ground.”
The reality that Dana is referring to is the constantly expanding illegal
Jewish settlements that are now home to almost half a million Jews. The
settlements now cover more than 40 percent of the West Bank, dominating the
best agricultural land and access to the region’s principal water supply. As
Daniella Weiss, a Zionist former mayor of a Jewish settlement in the West Bank,
admitted a few years ago, “I think the settlements prevent the establishment of
a Palestinian state in the land of Israel. This is the goal. And this is the
reality.” Clearly, any two-state solution that creates a viable Palestinian
state would require the dismantling of these settlements and removal of the
settlers from what the Zionists consider to be their Holy Land.
Far from dismantling the settlements, Israel’s policies are further entrenching
them. With its building of the separation barrier, the Israeli government is
seeking to annex the settlements into the state of Israel, which would leave
the Palestinians with three small, unconnected chunks of arid and rocky land
that lack access to essential water supplies. Such an outcome would not
constitute a viable Palestinian state.
Many Palestinians support the establishment of a single state of Palestine in
which Arabs and Jews would have equal rights. The Popular Front for the
Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), the second largest member of the PLO after
Fatah and a terrorist group in the eyes of the United States, Canada and the
European Union because it advocates armed struggle, is opposed both to the
Palestinian Authority government and the two-state solution. According to the
PFLP,
The Palestinian liberation movement is not a racial movement with aggressive
intentions against the Jews. It is not directed against the Jews. … The aim of
the Palestinian liberation movement is to establish a democratic national state
in Palestine in which both Arabs and Jews will live as citizens with equal
rights and obligations and which will constitute an integral part of the
progressive democratic Arab national presence living peacefully with all forces
of progress in the world.
Hamas also sees the one-state solution as the only answer, albeit an Islamic
state in which the rights of Jews are protected. But creating an Islamic
Palestine would simply replace one religious state (Israel) with another. Given
that Palestine is the Holy Land of three religions (Islam, Judaism and
Christianity) and the fact that a significant portion of the Palestinian
population supports a secular state, the solution to this seemingly intractable
conflict could be the replacement of a Zionist state with a secular democratic
nation in which all citizens—Jewish, Christian and Muslim—have equal rights and
responsibilities.
Conclusion
The establishment of a Zionist state in the middle of the Arab world for Jewish
migrants from Europe was only possible due to the support of Western
imperialist powers including the United States, Britain and Canada. And
Israel’s existence and ongoing expansion of Jewish settlements in the West Bank
and East Jerusalem constitutes the continuation of European colonialism into
the 21st century at the expense of the Palestinian people who have lived there
for two thousand years.
Given this reality, the Jewish state of Israel should be viewed as both
illegitimate and yet another catastrophic consequence of Western imperialism.
The only just solution to this entrenched conflict is to finally allow
Palestinians to establish the independent state they should have attained
following World War Two and to allow for the return of all refugees. In other
words, a single, secular Palestinian state in which Jews, Christians and
Muslims all share equal rights. Such a one-state solution is not anti-Semitic,
it is sensible.
Garry Leech is an independent journalist and author of numerous books including Capitalism: A Structural Genocide (Zed Books, 2012); Beyond Bogota: Diary of a Drug War Journalist in Colombia (Beacon Press, 2009); and Crude Interventions: The United States Oil and the New World Disorder (Zed Books, 2006). ). He is also a lecturer in the Department of Political Science at Cape Breton University in Canada.
+
B.
Israel's
Descent into Barbarism
The Real News Network
(A video interview, Part I and II)
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41917.htm
by Norman Finkelstein
+
C.
“Propaganda Terms in the Media and What They Mean”
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41912.htm
Chomsky lecture, 1989
+
D.
“Bitter Lake”
A
(flawed) BBC video documentary (?)
exploring Saudi Arabia's relationship with the U.S. and the role this has played in the war in Afghanistan.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41894.htm
by Adam Curtis