Bulletin N° 851
9 to 5
(1980 Film)
https://www.putlockers.me/movie/nine-to-five-2416.html
Subject :
Logical Positivism vs. Historical
Materialism
24 June
2019
Grenoble, France
Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,
Historical knowledge is not a parlor game; it is
more like a gyrator, indispensible for navigation. Without historical knowledge
we are most certainly lost, without a clue of where we are heading. Like
navigation itself, historical knowledge requires interpretation and discussion.
In the end, the best results come from informed social interaction. With all
the cards on the table, in full transparency, the results are more likely to be
satisfactory.
In this spirit, we look once again at the book by
R.D. Laing and his colleagues, Interpersonal
Perception, A theory and a method of research, (London, 1966 &
1972) in search of a method for understanding the future prospects of
post-imperial international relations.
Discussing the “spiral of reciprocal perspectives,”
this book presents an optimistic view that ontological misunderstandings can be
overcome, or at least recognized.
There is a peculiar satisfaction in feeling
that one understands another person, and in feeling that one is being
understood.
Patently, however, two people may neither
understand each other completely nor wish to. They may understand each other
while supposing that they do not understand.
Understanding may be greater over some issues than in others. The
relationship may be relatively symmetrical, in that each understands the other
to about the same extent over the same issues, or it may be lopsided, one
person, in Jung’s sense, being the container and the other the contained. The
feeling of being understood entails feeling that the other person’ meta-perspective
is
correct, in other words, that one’s own meta-meta feeling corresponds to
one’s direct perspective. One is now operating between all three levels. The
feeling of being understood or misunderstood may be desired or feared. Its
presence may be comforting or disconcerting. Its presence may mean a sense if
being together, its absence a sense of solitude.
People will vary as to whether or not they
would rather be understood or understand. An important aspect of each person’s self-concept
is the extent to which he feels capable of being understood. An important aspect
of one’s image of the other is the extent to which one feels the other can or
does understand oneself.
Whether or not it is easier to make
guesses between second and first order perspectives, or between third and
second order perspectives, is an interesting question, and one towards which
our method can contribute an answer.
We must remember that some people feel
extremely persecuted because they persist in attributing to the others a
capacity to know what is going on in them fare higher than the others actually
do posses. This may be because they grew up with another who had such an
ability (e.g., identical twin), or who in fact laid claims to such
understanding. In intergroup and international as well as in interpersonal
dyadic systems, the desires to be understood in some respects, the fears of
being known in others, the efforts taken towards being understood, and the
precautions taken against being known, together with the complementary
maneuvers to achieve knowledge of the other, legitimately and illegitimately
(espionage), quite evidently play a large part.
From the point of view of the subject, the starting point is
often between the second and the third order level of perspective. Jill thinks
that Jack thinks that she does not love him, that she neglects him, that she is
destroying him, and so on, although she says she does not think that she is
doing any of these things. In this position, it is open to Jill to do a number
of things. She may constantly complain to Jack that Jack does not realize how
much she is doing for him, and that he is always sorry for himself. He may
protest that he thinks she is doing all sorts of things for him, but she does
not believe him. She may express fears lest he think that she thinks that he is
ungrateful to her for all she is doing, when she wants him to know that she
does not think that he thinks she thinks he thinks that she does not do
enough. Here, the initial situation from Jill’s point of view is: Jill
thinks that Jack thinks that Jill neglects him. One move that the other may
make in order to break such a unilateral spiral is to break into it at one
level of perspective. Thus, Jill thinks Jack does not believe that Jill loves
Jack. Jack’s move may be to say: “But I do believe you do.” This
direct contradiction, in this case intended as reassurance, is usually thought
by psychiatrists, psychoanalysts, marriage counselors, and so on to be
ineffective.
A way to enter such a situation
therapeutically is to get both Jack and Jill to define their criteria for
generosity and to define how their parents defined generosity. One discovers
that Jack’s father treated his mother very differently than Jill’s father
treated her mother. Jack’s father was
too poor to have brought home enough money to make his family feel secure
against the possibility of being evicted or not having enough food. Jack
remembers vividly how his mother complained to his father about his inadequate
income. From this Jack developed the viewpoint that if his father had simply
made enough money his mother would have been eternally grateful. Since he is
now successful financially, he expects Jill to be eternally grateful to him for
providing her with a security that his mother never had. On the other hand,
Jill has come from a wealthy family in which there was never any comparable
issue of financial insecurity. In Jill’s family, consideration, love and
kindness were expressed through the giving of gifts, the remembering of
anniversaries, etc. She had leaner to take it for granted that the man will
provide her with an economically secure home. What she looks for are the little niceties which she feels indicate true
considerateness, kindness and love. For
Jack these niceties are irrelevant; they are minor details, trivia by
comparison to the other things he does for the family. However, if each can
discover his or her own and the other’s value system and thereby see the
conjunctions and discrepancies between them, it becomes possible for each to
explain himself or herself to the other. It is now, for the first time,
feasible for Jack to say: “Well, if it really is that important to you that I
remember your birthday, I’ll do my darndest to try”.
It is now possible for Jill to “appreciate” Jack more as a provider in the
family. If bitterness and revenge (I am going to hurt you for the hurt you have
done to me) have not intensified too much, it may still be relatively simple
for each to satisfy the other’s expectations according to their idiosyncratic
value systems. Such an incredibly simple move can sometimes produce very
powerful effects, particularly, early in a relationship. Once a history has
been developed of pain and misery, the matter becomes correspondently more
complex and difficult to reorient.
There are innumerable such unilateral and
bilateral spirals as well as those of giving-taking, trust-mistrust,
indifference and concern. There are “ascending” “manic” spirals (I’m happy that
you’re happy I’m happy), and “descending” “depressive” ones (I’m sad that
you’re sad, etc.); all are in a sense ‘obsessive”. Such spirals can be attempts
to get out of a fake or untenable position. The danger to the persons
involved is that the next move may be catastrophic. It may be the last
move ever; it may be the end of the relationship, or the end of the world.
Here we are particularly concerned with
how such a unilateral spiral functions in the dyad system. After the twists of
the spiral have been extended to a third, even fourth, level at some point a
relatively steady state of reciprocal mistrust, precarious happiness, common
misery or terror becomes established. It may be that the only hope at the pre-catastrophic
position is to make a move to change the whole axis of orientation, to change
the issue, both in content and direction, and one person has to make the change
initially.(pp.38-42)
At the end of this book - which is divided into an
exposition of the theory followed by a careful elaboration of the Interpersonal
Perception Method (IPM) used for testing this theory - the authors provide a
series of 60 IPM items for the purpose of testing dyadic relationships, each
item containing three sections that reflect “direct”, “meta”, and “meta-meta”
perceptions, each of which, in turn, contains four permutations within a given dyadic
relationship. One example of this method from an examination of interpersonal
perception is item N°47, taken as a quickly administered “pencil-and-paper”
test, to be answered with one of the
following four responses : (++) (+) (- -) (-)
.
47. A.
How true do you think the following are?
1. He is bitter towards
me.
2. I am bitter towards
him.
3. She is bitter towards
herself.
4. I am bitter towards
myself.
B. How would SHE answer the
following?
1. “I am bitter towards
him.”
2. “He is bitter towards
me.”
3. “I am bitter towards myself.”
4. “He is bitter towards
himself.”
C. How would SHE think you would
have answered the following?
1. She is bitter towards
me.
2. I am bitter towards
her.
3. She is bitter towards
herself.
4. I am bitter towards
myself.(p.210)
The authors suggested at the end of their book in
1966 that improved interpersonal perceptions could reduce misunderstandings,
The
future of East and West depends upon East-West finding some way of resolving
their reciprocal mistrust enough for each to throw away their means of
deterrence.(p.173)
While this positivist science might be of some
value for a partial understanding of interpersonal experiences and behavior, it hardly
offers the final word on the subject. Knowledge of the historical, social and material
context is essential for any true comprehension of relationships, domestic or
international.
This is illustrated in Paul L. Williams' history of
“the unholy alliance between the Vatican, the CIA, and the Mafia,” entitled, Operation
Gladio (New York, 2018). Citing Steve Kangas, author of “A Timeline of CIA Atrocities” (1994), Williams
writes:
The
Association for Responsible Dissent estimates that by 1987, six million people
had died as a result of CIA covert operations. Former State Department official
William Blum correctly calls this as “American Holocaust.” The CIA justifies
these actions as part of the its war against
communism. But most coups do not involve a communist threat. Unlucky nations
are targeted for a wide variety of reasons: not only threats to American
business interests abroad, but also liberal or even moderate social reforms,
political instability, the unwillingness of a leader to carry out Washington’s
dictates, and declarations of neutrality in the Cold War. Indeed, nothing has
infuriated CIA Directors quite like a nation’s desire to stay out of the Cold
War.(p.23)
. . .
Poetry
and Paranoia
[Allan]
Dulles was not the only OSS official involved in establishing stay-behind units
[in Europe after WW II]. He was aided by James Jesus Angleton, one of the
strangest spooks to emerge from the shadow world of the US intelligence
community. A tall figure of spectral thinness, with owlish glasses, Angleton
was a rabid anti-Communist, an ardent Anglophile, and a devout Roman Catholic.
He bred orchids, wore a black homburg, and drank bourbon for breakfast. A
graduate of Yale, Angleton possessed a gift for poetry and had established
close friendships with Ezra Pound, E.E. Cummings, and T.S. Eliot. Fluent in
several languages, including German and Italian, he arrived in Rome as the
commander of the Secret Counterintelligence (SCI) unit of the OSS. Few were
more qualified for the position. Unfortunately, Angleton was not only brilliant
but also dangerously paranoid, seeing the world as a “wilderness of mirrors.”
In these mirrors, he saw reflections of spies and counterspies (many of whom he
felt compelled to eliminate) and the unfolding succession of conspiracy upon
conspiracy – all of which required immediate and, at times, murderous
resolution.(p.27)
. . .
On May
15, 1945, When Borghese was arrested and charged with war crimes, Angleton
managed to secure his release into US Army custody. The Black Prince was
dressed in an American uniform and transported from Milan to Rome. Angleton
needed Borghese and the 10,267 fascists who fought under his command to help
establish the stay-behind units that would ward off any Soviet aggression.
. . .
Under
Borghese, the Gladio forces in Italy were divided
into forty main groups: ten specialized in sabotage; six each in espionage,
propaganda, and escape tactics; and twelve in guerrilla activities. A special
training camp for members of the stay-behind units was set up in Sardinia, off
Italy’s western coast. The camp, thanks to the efforts of Gehlen
and Wolff, was soon swarming with new gladiators from Germany, France, and
Austria. By 1946, when the OSS morphed into the Central Intelligence Group (the
precursor of the CIA), hundreds of Gladio units were
in place throughout Western Europe.(pp.28-29)
President Harry S Truman is reputed to have once
remarked: “The only thing new under the sun is the history I didn't know!”
Positivist social critics would do well to heed this warning and adjust their
criticisms of social behavior to historical material realities.
The 16 + items below speak to the historic
debacle of the US Empire and the threat this collapse represents to all of us,
in the absence of historical knowledge, social class consciousness and
political will.
Francis Feeley
---
Professor emeritus of American
Studies
University Grenoble-Alpes
Director of Research
University of Paris-Nanterre
Center for the Advanced Study of
American Institutions and Social Movements
The University of California-San
Diego
a.
May 14,
2018
Yanis Varoufakis on Lost U.S.
Credibility in Middle East, from Iran Deal to Israel Embassy Move
https://www.democracynow.org/2018/5/14/yanis_varoufakis_on_lost_us_credibility
with Yanis Varoufakis
+
The Middle East's cold war, explained
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veMFCFyOwFI
How two feuding countries are tearing apart the
Middle East. The Saudis and Iranians have never
actually declared war on each other. Instead, they fight indirectly by
supporting opposing sides in other countries and inciting conflicts. This is
known as proxy warfare. And it’s had a devastating effect on the region.
Countries, especially poor ones, can’t function if there are larger countries
pulling strings within their borders. And that’s exactly what's happening in
the Middle East. The Saudi-Iranian rivalry has become a fight over influence,
and the whole region is a battlefield.
===========
b.
"Treason!" NYT Story
Reveals US Cyber Ops Against Russian Power Grid Hidden
From Trump
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51773.htm
by Tyler Durden
President Trump has
hurled the dire charge of "Treason" at the New York Times for its
lengthy investigative piece alleging US intelligence has stepped up systematic
cyber attacks on Russia's power grid. “This is a virtual
act of Treason by a once great paper so desperate for a story, any
story, even if bad for our Country…” Trump tweeted Saturday
evening in response to the story which ran hours earlier.
He then hastily added
in a follow-up tweet in all caps, "ALSO, NOT TRUE!" — as if only then
realizing his initial tweet seemed to actually vouch for the story. The
follow-up further excoriated the Times for their reporting with "not even the slightest thought of consequence!"
Whether this means the
president is outraged that a true and verified report
could be detrimental to US credibility and national security, or that fake news
could hurt the US and invite unnecessary cyber retaliation is still not fully
evident, but Trump's impulsive Saturday evening tweets appear to back the
former.
.....ALSO,
NOT TRUE! Anything goes with our Corrupt News Media today. They will do, or
say, whatever it takes, with not even the slightest thought of consequence!
These are true cowards and without doubt, THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June
16, 2019
And the Times was quick to respond to the "treason" charge as
follows:
Accusing
the press of treason is dangerous.
We described the article to the government before publication. As our story
notes, President Trump’s own national security officials said there were no
concerns. https://t.co/MU020hxwdc pic.twitter.com/4CIfcqKoEl
—
NYTimes Communications (@NYTimesPR)
June 16, 2019
The NYT report outlines an alleged ongoing US operation to infiltrate and implant malware in Russia’s power grid as preparation for any potential major cyber
warfare operation in the future, and further as "a warning" to the
Kremlin. However, the story is light on details and heavy on the usual
anonymous "current and former officials".
According to the Times, “officials described the
previously unreported deployment of American computer code inside Russia’s grid
and other targets.” The officials described that “it has gotten far, far more aggressive over the past year,” and
that they are “doing things at a scale that we never contemplated a few years
ago.” Though US operations hadn't reached the level of specific attacks, the
malware constitutes what's described as a “persistent presence” within
Russia’s infrastructure.
The report casts the
latest ramped up cyber efforts targeting Russia as part of a broader campaign
to clandestinely probe the country’s electrical grid going back to 2012 — efforts which grew following alleged Russian
hacking and election meddling connected with the 2016 election.
Crucially, as CNN
describes of the NYT report,
"Two administration officials told the Times they believed President Donald
Trump had not been briefed in any detail about the US computer code being
implanted inside the Russian grid."
And further, the story
is outright suggesting the White House's own intelligence briefers are actually
withholding vital national security information from the president . . .
+
NYT pushes Power Grid Cyberwar
between US & Russia, as Trump & Putin prepare for G20
with
Alex Christoforou and Alexander Mercouris
+
The Danger of Leaving a President Out of the Loop
https://consortiumnews.com/2019/06/16/the-danger-of-leaving-a-president-out-of-the-loop/
by Caitlin Johnstone
Donald Trump was kept in the dark about
a possible U.S. nuclear response to a Russian cyber-weapon attack. The U.S. has
now ramped up offensive cyber-warfare against Russia’s power grid, putting
Trump in a deep bind.
The New York Times has published an anonymously sourced report titled “U.S. Escalates
Online Attacks on Russia’s Power Grid” about the
“placement of potentially crippling malware inside the Russian system at a
depth and with an aggressiveness that had never been tried before” which could
potentially “plunge Russia into darkness or cripple its military,” with one
anonymous official reporting that “We are doing things at a scale that we never
contemplated a few years ago.”
Obviously this is yet another serious escalation in
the continually
mounting series of steps that have been taken into a new
cold war between the planet’s two nuclear superpowers. Had a report been leaked
to Russian media from anonymous Kremlin officials that Moscow was escalating
its cyber-aggressions against America’s energy grid,
this would doubtless be labeled an act of war by the political/media class of
the US and its allies with demands for immediate retaliation.
To put this in perspective, The New York Times reported last year
that the Pentagon was pushing for the U.S. Nuclear Posture Review to include
the strategy of retaliating against serious Russian cyberattacks
on American power grids with nuclear weapons.
===========
c.
Corporate News Pushes Iran War For
Trump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgQzb4ErYWQ&feature=youtu.be
with Jimmy Dore
+
Watch: US releases video it says shows Iran
removing unexploded mine from ship
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51767.htm
by ICH and Agencies
President
Trump blamed Iran for the attacks, but confusion
has taken hold over the events after separate reports on what happened appeared
to contradict each other. Asked how he planned to address Tehran and prevent
any further incidents, Trump told Fox News: "We're going to see."
China, the European Union and others have called for
restraint from all sides. Germany said the U.S. video was not enough to
apportion blame for Thursday's attack.
"These accusations are alarming," Iranian Foreign
Ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi
said, adding that blaming Iran for Thursday's attacks was
"convenient" for U.S. officials.
+
Proof U.S. Is Provoking Iran Into
WAR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOudBT4S4y0
&
Corporate News Pushes Iran War For
Trump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgQzb4ErYWQ
with Jimmy Dore
+
“US Further Isolate Itself Over
Iran”
with Larry Wilkerson
+
“‘Ridiculous,
dangerous': Iran denies US claims over Gulf tankers”
+
Trump Pulls Back from Iran Attack as Bolton & Pompeo Continue
to Push for War
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/6/21/trump_cancels_iran_strikes_after_drone
with MOHAMMAD MARANDI
===========
d.
Trump’s Trade Threats are really Cold War 2.0
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51769.htm
by Michael Hudson
President
Trump has threatened China’s President Xi that if they don’t meet and talk at
the upcoming G20 meetings in Japan, June 29-30, the United States will not
soften its tariff war and economic sanctions against Chinese exports and
technology.
Some meeting between Chinese and U.S. leaders will
indeed take place, but it cannot be anything like a real negotiation. Such
meetings normally are planned in advance, by specialized officials working
together to prepare an agreement to be announced by their heads of state. No
such preparation has taken place, or can take place. Mr. Trump doesn’t delegate
authority.
He opens negotiations with a threat. That costs
nothing, and you never know (or at least, he never knows) whether he can get
a freebee. His threat is that the U.S. can hurt its adversary unless that
country agrees to abide by America’s wish-list. But in this case the list is
so unrealistic that the media are embarrassed to talk about it. The US is
making impossible demands for economic surrender – that
no country could accept. What appears on the surface to be only a trade war
is really a full-fledged Cold War 2.0. |
America’s wish list:
other countries’ neoliberal subservience.
At stake is whether China will agree to do what
Russia did in the 1990s: put a Yeltsin-like puppet of neoliberal planners in
place to shift control of its economy from its government to the U.S. financial
sector and its planners. So the fight really is over what kind of planning
China and the rest of the world should have: by governments to raise
prosperity, or by the financial sector to extract revenue and impose austerity.
U.S. diplomacy aims to make
other countries dependent on its agricultural exports, its oil (or
oil in countries that U.S. majors and allies control), information and military
technology. This trade dependency
will enable U.S. strategists to impose sanctions that would deprive economies
of basic food, energy, communications and replacement parts if they resist U.S.
demands.
The objective is to gain financial control of
global resources and make trade “partners” pay interest, licensing fees and
high prices for products in which the United States enjoys monopoly pricing
“rights” for intellectual property. A trade war thus aims to make other
countries dependent on U.S.-controlled food, oil, banking and finance, or
high-technology goods whose disruption will cause austerity and suffering until
the trade “partner” surrenders.
China’s willingness to
give Trump a “win”.
Threats are cheap, but Mr. Trump can’t really
follow through without turning farmers, Wall Street and the stock market, Walmart and much of the IT sector against him at election
time if his tariffs on China increase the cost of living and doing business. His
diplomatic threat is really that the US will cut its own economic throat,
imposing sanctions on its own importers and investors if China does not
acquiesce.
It is easy to see what China’s answer will be. It
will stand aside and let
the US self-destruct. Its negotiators are quite happy to “offer”
whatever China has planned to do anyway, and let Trump brag that this is a
“concession” he has won.
China has a great sweetener that I think President
Xi Jinping should offer: It can nominate Donald Trump
for the Nobel Peace Prize. We know that he wants what his predecessor Barack
Obama got. And doesn’t he deserve it more? After all, he is helping to bring
Eurasia together, driving China and Russia into an alliance with neighboring
counties, reaching out to Europe.
Trump may be too narcissistic to realize the irony
here. Catalyzing Asian and European trade independence, financial independence,
food independence and IT independence from the threat of U.S. sanctions will
leave the U.S. isolated in the emerging multilateralism.
America’s wish for a
neoliberal Chinese Yeltsin (and another Russian Yeltsin for that matter).
A good diplomat does not make demands to which the
only answer can be “No.” There is no way that China will dismantle its mixed
economy and turn it over to U.S. and other global investors. It is no secret
that the United States achieved world industrial supremacy in the late 19th and
early 20th century by heavy public-sector subsidy of education, roads,
communication and other basic infrastructure. Today’s privatized, financialized and “Thatcherized”
economies are high-cost and inefficient.
Yet U.S. officials persist in their dream of
promoting some neoliberal Chinese leader or “free market” party to wreak the
damage that Yeltsin and his American advisors wrought on Russia. The U.S. idea
of a “win-win” agreement is one in which China will be “permitted” to grow as
long as it agrees to become a U.S. financial and trade satellite, not an
independent competitor.
Trump’s trade tantrum is that other countries are
simply following the same economic strategy that once made America great, but
which neoliberals have destroyed here and in much of Europe. U.S. negotiators
are unwilling to acknowledge that the United States has lost its competitive
industrial advantage and become a high-cost rentier
economy. Its GDP is “empty,” consisting mainly of the Finance, Insurance and
Real Estate (FIRE) rents, profits and capital gains while the nation’s
infrastructure decays and its labor is reduced to a prat-time
“gig” economy. Under these conditions the effect of trade threats can only be
to speed up the drive by other countries to become economically self-reliant.
+
The Coming War On China
(China Documentary) | History Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ot-acn1whrc
by John Pilger
The Coming War on China, from award winning
journalist John Pilger, reveals what the news doesn’t
– that the world’s greatest military power, the United States, and the world’s
second economic power, China, both nuclear-armed, may well be on the road to
war. Nuclear war is not only imaginable, but planned. The greatest build-up of
NATO military forces since the Second World War is under way on the western
borders of Russia. On the other side of the world, the rise of China is viewed
in Washington as a threat to American dominance. To counter this, President
Obama announced a ‘pivot to Asia’, which meant that almost two-thirds of all US
naval forces would be transferred to Asia and the Pacific, their weapons aimed
at China. A policy which has been taken up by his successor Donald Trump, who
during his election campaign said “We can’t continue to allow China to rape our
country and that’s what they’re doing”. Filmed on five possible front-lines
across Asia and the Pacific over two years, the story is told in chapters that
connect a secret and ‘forgotten’ past to the rapacious actions of great power
today and to a resistance, of which little is known in the West.
+
In China Again
https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/06/19/in-china-again/
===========
e.
London: Julian Assange Defence Committee
lobbies Jeremy Corbyn’s
Constituency Labour Party
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/06/21/jadc-j21.html
+
This Assange Supporter
Excoriating The Press Is The Best Thing You’ll Watch
All Day
Julian Assange’s latest
US extradition hearing was a brief affair which saw the WikiLeaks
founder’s next
hearing scheduled for sometime after the end of February, nearly at the
end of his 50-week sentence for a bail conditions violation. According to Reuters Assange was lucid and spirited enough to argue with the
prosecution a bit, telling the American lawyer via videolink,
“I didn’t break any password whatsoever.”
So that’s somewhat encouraging. A short time
earlier, on the other side of the Westminster Magistrates courthouse wall, a
far more animated scene had just been live-streamed to the world.
During a lively pro-Assange
demonstration outside, independent reporter and political commentator Gordon
Dimmack took the bullhorn, pointed it at the
press crew which had gathered awaiting news from the courthouse, and delivered a scathing rebuke
to them which is about the most delightful and cathartic thing that an Assange supporter can possibly watch.
+
UN Rapporteur on Torture
Says Assange Could Die in Prison
https://www.blackagendareport.com/un-rapporteur-torture-says-assange-could-die-prison
+
"New details of 'blackmail' attempt
against Julian Assange
emerge"
+
Dr. Gabor Maté- Julian Assange is Guilty of TELLING THE TRUTH!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQV-BpETwBc
On this episode of Going Underground, we speak to
Dr. Gabor Maté who discusses the second anniversary
of the Grenfell tower tragedy, the impact of austerity on the UK, drugs and
addiction and why they are becoming so prevalent in today’s society, the role
of Tory Leadership favourite Boris Johnson in
creating the environment in which drugs and addiction are booming, as well as
the ongoing persecution of Julian Assange. Next we
speak to John Shipton, Julian Assange’s
father after he visited his son Julian Assange in Belmarsh Prison. Finally, we speak to former Minister of
the Interior of IcelandÖgmundur Jónasson
on how he kicked out a team of FBI investigators from Iceland who were trying
to frame Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange.
+
Julian Assange Indictment
“Criminalizes the News Gathering Process,” Says Pentagon Papers Lawyer
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/6/18/pentagon_papers_lawyer_julian_assange_case
with James Goodale
+
Watch "LIVE: Imperialism on Trial - Free
Julian Assange"
with George Galloway
+
Assange lawyer reveals Pentagon behind pursuit of WikiLeaks publisher
https://www.rt.com/news/462359-assange-lawyer-pentagon-wikileaks/
+
Extradition Process a 'Very Long Uphill Road' for Assange
https://therealnews.com/stories/john-pilger-extradition-process-a-very-long-uphill-road-for-assange
with John Pilger
+
Assange will never see fair trial amid ‘industrial-grade
demonization campaign’
https://www.rt.com/news/461919-assange-fair-trial-demonization-blumenthal/
by Max Blumenthal
===========
f.
From: "World BEYOND War" <info@worldbeyondwar.org>
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019
Subject: WBW News & Action: Upcoming Free Webinar
|
Click here to go to an online
version with language translation.
+
New European air
force will ‘duplicate NATO’
with George Galloway
+
The end of western driven globalization
+
Russia, China warn US over sending 1,000 new troops
to the Gulf
+
Trump says he would ‘certainly’ go to war with Iran
‘over nuclear weapons’, but not right now
https://www.rt.com/news/462149-trump-iran-nuclear-weapons/
===========
g.
How the Democratic Party Strangled Black Politics
https://www.blackagendareport.com/how-democratic-party-strangled-black-politics-1
+
Did a Coverup of Who
Caused Flint Michigan’s Contaminated Water Continue During Its Investigation?
+
“16 Shots”: Chicago Police Killing of Laquan McDonald Exposed a System Built on Lies
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/6/17/16_shots_rick_rowley_showtime_documentary
===========
h.
Tear gas in Toulouse as Yellow Vests
protests continue for 31st straight weekend
https://www.rt.com/news/461974-yellow-vests-toulouse-paris/
===========
i.
DOJ Bloodhounds on the Scent of John Brennan
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51765.htm
by Ray McGovern
With Justice Department investigators’ noses to the ground, it should be
just a matter of time before they identify Brennan as fabricator-in-chief of
the Russiagate story.
The New York Times Thursday
morning has bad news for one of its favorite anonymous sources, former CIA
Director John Brennan.
The Times reports that the Justice Department plans
to interview senior CIA officers to focus on the allegation that Russian
President Vladimir Putin ordered Russian intelligence to intervene in the 2016
election to help Donald J. Trump. DOJ investigators will be looking for
evidence to support that remarkable claim that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s
final report failed to establish.
Despite the collusion conspiracy
theory having been put to rest, many Americans, including members of Congress,
right and left, continue to accept the evidence-impoverished,
media-cum-“former-intelligence-officer” meme that the Kremlin interfered
massively in the 2016 presidential election.
One cannot escape the analogy with
the fraudulent evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. As in 2002 and
2003, when the mania for the invasion of Iraq mounted, Establishment media have
simply regurgitated what intelligence sources like Brennan told them about
Russia-gate.
No one batted an eye when Brennan told a House committee
in May 2017, “I don’t do evidence.”
Leak Not Hack.
As we Veteran Intelligence
Professionals for Sanity have warned numerous times over the past two plus
years, there is no reliable forensic evidence to support the story that Russia
hacked into the DNC. Moreover, in a piece I wrote in May, “Orwellian Cloud Hovers Over
Russia-gate,” I again noted that accumulating forensic evidence from metadata
clearly points to an inside DNC job — a leak, not a hack, by Russia or anyone
else.
So Brennan and his partners, FBI
Director James Comey and National Intelligence
Director James Clapper were making stuff up and feeding thin but explosive
gruel to the hungry stenographers that pass today for Russiagate
obsessed journalists.
Is the Jig Up?
With Justice Department
investigators’ noses to the ground, it should be just a matter of time before
they identify Brennan conclusively as fabricator-in-chief of the Russiagate story. Evidence, real evidence in this case,
abounds, since the Brennan-Comey-Clapper gang of
three were sure Hillary Clinton would become president. Consequently, they did
not perform due diligence to hide their tracks.
===========
j.
Brutally Simple Illustration Shows Climate Change's
True Scale Everywhere on Earth
by Peter Dockrill
+
Interactive
Warming Stripes for GLOBE from 1850-2018
+
Climate change ‘switchboard’ visualization shows every
country on the planet turning red-hot
===========
k.
Why Israel wants Iran destroyed
https://electronicintifada.net/content/why-israel-wants-iran-destroyed/2
+
Drones, F-35s feature in Israel’s largest military
drill in years
as Iran tensions rise
https://www.rt.com/news/462256-israel-military-drill-tensions-iran/
+
Palestine: The Arab 'deal of the century'
https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/palestine-arab-deal-century-190618094825714.html
+
A Jerusalem hospital where Palestinian babies die
alone | Israel |
+
'Joints will be separated': Grim new details of Khashoggi murder
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/06/separated-grim-details-khashoggi-murder-190619165104493.html
===========
l.
RT NEWSLETTER (June 22, 2019)
https://subscribe.rt.com/preview/GyQUed
===========
m.
Big Tech’s War for Your Wallet: Facebook
Sparks Outrage After Announcing Plans for Digital
Currency
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/6/19/big_techs_war_for_your_wallet
with David Dayen
+
Century of Enslavement: The History of the Federal
Reserve
https://www.corbettreport.com/federalreserve/
by James Corbett
===========
n.
As U.S. and Iran Face Off, Europe Is Stuck in the
Middle
by Steven Erlanger
BRUSSELS — As tensions
between Washington and Tehran escalate, European leaders find themselves in an
uncomfortable place they have feared ever since President Trump pulled out of
the Iran nuclear deal 13 months ago and restored punishing sanctions against
Tehran.
While the Europeans want to preserve the deal —
which they see as important for their own security and for the stability of the
Middle East — they are basically powerless in the face of American military and
financial clout.
Iran is calling on Europe to solve its economic
problems brought on by the sanctions or face a collapse of the nuclear deal as
Iran begins to exceed limits on uranium enrichment. But Washington wants the
Europeans to join in pressing Iran to enter humiliating new negotiations to
shut down Tehran’s nuclear program entirely, limit its
missile programs and restrict its regional ambitions.
+
White House Pushes 'Trump Pulled Back' Story - He
Likely Never Approved To Strike Iran
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/51806.htm
+
VIPS Memo to the President: Is Pompeo’s
Agenda the Same As Yours?
===========
o.
From: "CODEPINK" <info@codepink.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019
Subject: Psst: have you heard our plan for the
Pentagon?
|
Dear francis, We can’t seem to
stop talking about defense spending. Maybe that’s because folks everywhere are starting to demand a
decrease of the obscene percentage of our federal discretionary budget
going to the Pentagon. We’re thrilled to join forces with our partners
in the peace movement and shout this message out from the rooftops: We demand
an end to funding endless wars! In the U.S. we’ve already spent a
mind-boggling $5.9 trillion on our Middle East wars since 2001. Congress was
squabbling this week over whether to give the Pentagon the full $750 billion
President Trump is demanding or a paltry $16 billion less as the Democratic
party is pushing for. Amidst the two-party consensus that provides endless funding for war,
the People’s Moral Budget is a guiding light
in an ocean of war hawks. We fully support this amazing project. Here’s how you can help: How can the
Pentagon ask us every year to support endless wars, arms sales to Saudi
Arabia we know will be used on innocent Yemenis, and constant threats of new
wars of aggression against Venezuela, Iran, and other places? All this death
and destruction simply to enrich the CEOs of weapons companies and to
keep the Pentagon in business while almost half of us in the U.S. live in
poverty, affordable housing is nowhere to be found, and the Pentagon is one
of the top contributors to climate change is unacceptable . Recent research
shows we can save $250 billion of the $350 billion we want to reduce annually
by cutting the Pentagon’s funding for endless wars, closing 60% of our 800
foreign bases, dismantling nuclear weapons and cutting unnecessary weapons.
Will you send a message now to
the 2020 candidates demanding action? Towards Peace,
|
===========
p.
From: Mark Crispin Miller
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2019
Subject: [MCM] Guaido team accused of
embezzling humanitarian aid funds
NYTimes missed this story, somehow....
MCM
Guaido Staffers Accused of Embezzling Venezuela Humanitarian
Aid Funds
https://venezuelanalysis.com/news/14545
by Ricardo Vaz
Guaido envoys reportedly spent tens of thousands of dollars on upscale
restaurants, hotels, and nightclubs.
Guaido
addressing military deserters in Cucuta, Colombia. (@jguaido)
Caracas,
June 17, 2019 (venezuelanalysis.com) – Allegations of
corruption have surfaced implicating envoys of Venezuela’s self-proclaimed
“interim president,” Juan Guaido.
A
report published in Miami-based Panampost claims
that Rossana Barrera and Kevin Rojas, members Guaido’s Popular Will party, misappropriated funds
earmarked for so-called “humanitarian aid” in Colombia. Barrera and Rojas were
tapped by the opposition leader to supervise operations in the Colombian border
town of Cucuta, which included tending to the soldiers who deserted from the
Venezuelan armed forces. Barrera is the sister-in-law of Popular Will lawmaker
Sergio Vergara, who is considered one of Guaido’s closest confidants.
The
Venezuelan opposition attempted to force
US-supplied aid across the closed Venezuelan-Colombian border on February 23,
while also calling on the armed forces to turn against the Maduro
government. The day saw violent skirmishes and the desertion of a few dozen
soldiers, while one of the humanitarian aid trucks caught fire on Simon Bolivar
bridge. The New York Times would later reveal that the fire was caused by a
Molotov cocktail-wielding opposition activist.
Venezuelan
military personnel who heeded Guaido’s call to rebel
made headlines in recent weeks after being evicted from the hotels where they
were staying over unpaid bills. The Panampost article
states that the hotels had unpaid bills worth up to US $20 thousand.
The
report goes on to detail an elaborate embezzlement scheme whereby Barrera and
Rojas allegedly solicited funds for all Colombian hotels lodging military
deserters and their families, despite Bogota and the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR)
paying for all but two. Both Guaido officials have
also been accused of inflating by more than half the number of soldiers in
their care, spending tens of thousands of dollars of the allocated funds on
private dining, shopping and hotels. A number of supposed copies of receipts
submitted by Barrera are included in the article.
From: Mark Crispin Miller
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2019
Subject: [MCM] What to do about 5G? (1) Learn all about it, and (2) fight hard to STOP it. (MUST-READ)
From Douglas Yates:
Excellent sources and accounts of people and orgs resisting 5G technology.
In the absence of answers that justify its risks, consider: If the US govt’s financial stability requires wiping future liabilities from the books, is 5G a solution that reduces the number of SSI recipients by an order of magnitude?
The Corbett Report -5G is a surveillance dragnet
Transcript of video and sources:Mine comments for useful nuggets.
Details of telecomms ‘war gaming’ political resistance:
Global awareness campaign:
One guy on Facebook - amazing library of info and outreach: https://www.facebook.com/notes/bruce-cain/a-template-for-activists-to-demand-an-end-to-5g-and-smart-meters-in-their-commun/3133538826672084/
As it relates to technocracy, and its tendency toward fascism, more than 50 years ago, Aldous Huxley offered a prescient one-liner:
"People will come to love their oppression, to adore the technologies that undo their capacities to think.”
The trail is steeper than Seward’s Mt. Marathon. It will test all of us.
dy