Bulletin N° 909



Subject: "The Corporate Agenda" and "The COVID-19 Deaths" : In this panic, who has crunched the numbers?



Grenoble, June 6, 2020



Dear Colleagues and Friends of CEIMSA,


As public suspicion grows over the possibility that the current crises are being carefully manufactured by a corporate elite, with plenty of money to invest in their corporate agenda, we look at some recent dissident voices (in the Marxist and radical traditions) expressing concern with this subject of corporate policy-making for our collective future.


Warning: The 11 items below might cause some discomfort, but we should keep in mind when examining this corporate agenda the famous French maxim :


« L'absent a toujours tort! »





Francis Feeley


Professeur honoraire de l'Université Grenoble-Alpes
Ancien Directeur de Researches
Université de Paris-Nanterre
Director of The Center for the Advanced Study
of American Institutions and Social Movements
The University of California-San Diego





(en français)

« Multinationales et agrobusiness » - par Christian de Montlibert, Professeur émérite à l’Université Marc Bloch (Strasburg).


Published on 4 June 2020


« Dans l’agriculture moderne, de même que dans l’industrie des villes, l’accroissement de productivité et le rendement supérieur du travail s’achètent au prix de la destruction et du tarissement de la force de travail. En outre chaque progrès de l’agriculture capitaliste est un progrès, non seulement dans l’art d’exploiter le travailleur, mais encore dans l’art de dépouiller le sol ; chaque progrès dans l’art d’accroitre sa fertilité pour un temps, un progrès dans la ruine de ses sources durables de fertilité. [1][1]» Karl Marx, Le Capital.                     


  Les pandémies un fait social construit

             L’épidémie du coronavirus n’est pas la seule qui ait endeuillée des populations. Comme toujours, on ne peut comprendre la dynamique de diffusion qui la caractérise qu’en joignant ce que discours politiques et discours médiatiques disjoignent en nous présentant chaque épidémie comme un phénomène isolé. En réalité le corona virus rejoint  le SRAS, la grippe aviaire, la grippe porcine, l’Ebola, le H1N1, le MERS-CoV, etc. La succession des épidémies en séries rapprochées montre bien qu’il s’agit bien là d’un « fait social »  qui, comme tout fait social est le résultat d’une construction sociale! Savoir que le virus entraine plus probablement la mort de personnes déjà fragilisées avec des corps vieillis, usés par le travail, par les conduites à risque (tabac, alcool …) qui permettent d’oublier temporairement les conditions de vie pénibles, par l’obésité de la « malbouffe » et de la sédentarité,  renforce l’idée qu’il s’agit bien d’un fait social. Mais comprendre ce « fait social », demande, d’abord, et, autant qu’il soit possible actuellement, de formuler des hypothèses plausibles, de « rechercher la cause déterminante parmi les faits sociaux antécédents ». Pour ce faire il faut aussi s’écarter définitivement des « monstres » qu’ont créé les médias en répétant à longueur de journée le nombre de morts que le Covid19 engendrait et aller au-delà de la « propagande » propre à légitimer la politique d’un Etat dont tout semble montrer qu’il profite de la pandémie pour augmenter son pouvoir de contrôle[2][2].



“UN Agenda 2030 exposed” – with Rosa Koire.



Published on 30 May 2020.



“Sustainability: Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals in Spain” – by Alejandra Boto-Álvarez 1 and Roberto García-Fernández


(in pdf. format)

Published on 21 March 2020.



“Shocking Evidence That Indicates That Somebody Is Trying To Orchestrate An Internal Uprising Inside The United States” – by The Duran.


Published on 3 June 2020.



“Russian criminologist on the Floyd killing and the truth about Antifa” – by Seraphim Hanisch


Published on 5 June 2020.



“Russia wants no part of Microsoft OR Bill Gates” – by Mike Walsh.


Published on 15 May 2020.



“The Movement Gets BIG – and Its Enemies Reveal Themselves” – by Glen Ford.


Published on 4 June 2020.



“All-cause mortality during COVID-19: No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response” – by G. D. Rancourt.


Published June 2020


The latest data of all-cause mortality by week does not show a winter-burden mortality that is statistically larger than for past winters. There was no plague. However, a sharp "COVID peak" is present in the data, for several jurisdictions in Europe and the USA. This all-cause-mortality "COVID peak" has unique characteristics: • Its sharpness, with a full-width at half-maximum of only approximately 4 weeks; • Its lateness in the infectious-season cycle, surging after week-11 of 2020, which is unprecedented for any large sharp-peak feature; • The synchronicity of the onset of its surge, across continents, and immediately following the WHO declaration of the pandemic; and • Its USA state-to-state absence or presence for the same viral ecology on the same territory, being correlated with nursing home events and government actions rather than any known viral strain discernment. These "COVID peak" characteristics, and a review of the epidemiological history, and of relevant knowledge about viral respiratory diseases, lead me to postulate that the "COVID peak" results from an accelerated mass homicide of immune-vulnerable individuals, and individuals made more immune-vulnerable, by government and institutional actions, rather than being an epidemiological signature of a novel virus, irrespective of the degree to which the virus is novel from the perspective of viral speciation.



"No Compromise, No Retreat: Defeat the War Against the African/Black People in the U.S. and Abroad" - by Ajamu Baraka.


Published on 3 June 2020.


From: newsfromunderground@googlegroups.com [mailto:newsfromunderground@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Crispin Miller
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2020
Subject: [MCM] India puts the CDC on notice (MUST-READ)

Why is it that US liberals and "progressives," and the media that caters to them, could (evidently) not care less about the toxic medical experiments and lethal biowarfare research carried out in non-white countries?



"India Puts the CDC on Notice" - by James Corbett.
Published on 6 June 2020.

corbettreport (73)
by James Corbett

June 6, 2020
Flying completely under the radar of the various crises that have come to define 2020, an interesting story is playing out in India. This story shines a light on the increasingly globalized nature of medical research and on the dark practice of using poor people in third world nations as guinea pigs in that research.
In early May, the US Centers for Disease Creation and Propaganda (CDC) announced a $3.6 million grant to "further strengthen and support the Indian government's efforts to increase laboratory capacity for SARS-COV-2 testing." But just days later, it was reported that the grant may be delayed because the CDC was placed on a "watch list" by the Indian Ministry of Home Affairs last December.

Wait, what? The Indian government placed the CDC on a "watch list" last year? Why?

Well, according to The Hindustan Times, the Indian government specifically asked the CDC to "stop funding research in India without government approval" after they discovered that the US health agency had helped an under-qualified Indian research facility to study a potential bioweapon. The facility in question—the Manipal Centre for Virus Research—was researching the Nipah virus, a so-called "Risk Group 4" (RG4) pathogen that is "likely to cause serious or lethal human disease for which preventive or therapeutic interventions are not usually available."

Given their extremely dangerous nature, RG4 pathogens can only be handled in special "biological safety level 4" (BSL4) laboratories. BSL4 labs are completely sealed off from the outside, with dedicated supply and exhaust air systems and rigorous procedures for decontaminating all personnel and materials leaving the building. As a result, BSL4 laboratories are very rare, with only a handful of facilities in the world able to meet the stringent security protocols. Like the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

. . . Oh, wait.

Well, anyway, the key point is that the Manipal Centre for Virus Research (MCVR) is a BSL2 facility, not a BSL4 laboratory, and thus was not cleared to be working with Nipah virus at all. So how did the researchers at the MCVR get their hands on the viral samples? And how did they get the funding for their research?
The illegal research was uncovered after the coronavirus panic prompted the Indian government to order a review of biological weapons grade pathogens in the country. That review discovered that the CDC was funding a training program at the MCVR to detect and diagnose Nipah virus, and that the US agency was secretly funding the program in violation of India's Foreign Contribution Regulation Act 2010. The bold, illegal scheme was laid out in an internal government report titled “Unapproved, US-funded Indian Laboratory stored samples of Nipah Virus – a bioterrorism agent.”

The Hindustan Times report includes a startling accusation from one unnamed Indian government official:
"Our apprehension is that the lab was being used to map the Nipah virus, which can be used to develop a vaccine, the intellectual property right of which [sic] will not be with India. Importantly, understanding how the human body reacted to the virus will also produce a more virulent form of virus for biological warfare."
That's right, folks. For some reason, the US CDC was secretly funding a research program into a highly dangerous weapons-grade biological pathogen at an under-qualified research facility in India.

Even more incredibly, this isn't the first time that the CDC has been accused of nefarious biowarfare activity in the country. In 1994, an outbreak of bubonic and pneumonic plague hit south-central and western India, causing 693 cases of the disease and 56 deaths. The loss of life may have been relatively small, but the panic surrounding the event was unprecedented. 300,000 people fled the plague-stricken city of Surat in two days, the largest post-independence migration of Indians in history, and the Indian economy suffered a $600 million hit.

Upon further inspection, however, questions began to emerge about whether the outbreak had really been the plague at all. Writing about the questions surrounding the recent coronavirus panic, a jounalist in the Indian publication THE WEEK wrote:
"During the 1994 plague outbreak in Surat and Beed, it was found that the germs had an extra protein ring which could only have been inserted artificially. Indian scientists had raised concerns about a US biowar experiment having gone awry. THE WEEK had carried reports giving details of germ war research being carried on in labs under the Centre for Disease Control in Atlanta and about a newly developed germ detector being tested. The US embassy had denied the allegations."

Yes, perhaps the only surprising thing about this latest Nipah virus scandal is that the Indian government had the gumption to call the CDC out on their illegal activity and even to delay cashing a big juicy check from the agency just to smooth things over.

You see, ever since it was effectively conquered by the British East India Company in the 18th century, India has been used as a giant open-air laboratory for the would-be social engineers of the ruling oligarchy.

The Company began its conquests in the mid-18th century and gradually expanded military, political and economic control over India. At the height of the East India Company’s power, the nation of India had effectively become the plaything of a private corporation. As historian William Dalrymple writes:
"We still talk about the British conquering India, but that phrase disguises a more sinister reality. It was not the British government that seized India at the end of the 18th century, but a dangerously unregulated private company headquartered in one small office, five windows wide, in London, and managed in India by an unstable sociopath – [Robert] Clive."

Fast forward a century or two and India is still the plaything of multinational corporations. The much-touted "Green Revolution" of the 1950s and 1960s, for example—a set of technology transfer initiatives designed to "modernize" agricultural practices in developing countries by selling them American-made machinery running on petrochemicals—not only exacerbated the problems faced by landless peasants in India, but actually slowed the growth of agricultural production in the country. The seed cartels and agricultural giants like Monsanto that colonized the country in the wake of this "Green Revolution" have left their own scar on India in the form of an epidemic of suicides committed by farmers saddled with unpayable debts.

In the current era, however, the privatization of India is done not by the corporations directly, but under the guise of "philanthropy" by nongovernmental organizations and private foundations.

Viewers of Who Is Bill Gates? will already know some of the lowlights of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation's involvement in India. From the national vaccination schedule to the national biometric identification scheme (Aadhaar) to the country's headlong rush towards a mobile digital payment system, there is no aspect of the modern Indian state that does not bear the fingerprints of Gates or one of his minions. In fact, such was the concern over the way that the Gates Foundation was influencing India's vaccination strategy on behalf of Gates' Big Pharma buddies that the Indian government was forced to cut all financial ties between the foundation and the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation—the primary body advising New Delhi on all vaccination-related matters.
But, contrary to the headlines that have been generated in the alt media that the Gates Foundation has been "kicked out" of the country, the relationship between the Indian government and Gates is as close as ever. In fact, so close is the relationship that the Gates Foundation actually operates an "India Office," which "operates as a branch office with permission of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) under Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and is appropriately registered under Indian law."

The reason that India continues to be a rich target for the likes of the Gates Foundation is that it provides an easily accessible testing ground for medical research and its large population provides ready markets for Big Pharma vaccines and other products. As Samiran Nundy, editor emeritus of the National Medical Journal of India, observed regarding a scandal surrounding an HPV vaccine study in the country that committed "gross violations" of consent, "This is an obvious case where Indians were being used as guinea pigs."

The Indian people, and poor people across Asia and Africa, have been used as human guinea pigs by medical researchers, social engineers and agents of empire for centuries. It should come as no surprise that the US CDC has been caught with their hand in the India cookie jar, funding secret bioweapon development research in the country without the government's knowledge or consent. The only question now is whether the Indian government is willing to cash their $3.6 million "coronavirus research" bribe and look the other way, or stick to their guns and kick the CDC out of the country for good.

#news #coronavirus
4 hours ago in #india by corbettreport (73)$19.15
steemcurator06 (42)
 3 hours ago 
This post has been rewarded by the Steem Community Curation Project. #communitycuration06
This account is currently being delegated to and operated by @greenhouseradio .We would love to invite you to come to our community in CANNA CURATE discord and share your post with us on an upcoming GROWING TOGETHER COMMUNITY FORUM. The next meeting is this Sunday the 7th at 11am pst.



"Up Next: The Collapse of the Food Supply Chain" - James Corbett.
Published on 2 May 2020.